Photo of the Month

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 21:32 
Offline
New Member

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 19:25
Posts: 7
It suddenly occurred to me that very little of the UK Roman roads have been dualled. Sure, there are some exceptions but the greater proportion remain single carriageway and were never much upgraded.

It can't be because of the expense of urban demoliton, because (again generalising) they go through far less urban area than the later "British" main roads.

Has anyone got a persuasive (and serious) explanation?

Nigel O


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 21:40 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 16:22
Posts: 4138
Location: Luton
The vast majority of our pre-motor age roads have not been dualled, Roman roads are no exception. I'm not sure why it's surprising that most Roman roads haven't been dualled.

Even of roads which have been dualled, most of the dualling has been offline.

Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if a higher percentage of Roman roads have been dualled than non-Roman roads. Much of the A2, A12, A5, A1, A66, A14 (Cambridge-Huntingdon), A46 have been dualled - to my knowledge these follow the basic routes of old Roman roads.

_________________
Owen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 21:46 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 00:15
Posts: 6582
Location: kingston-upon-thames
Significant chunks of Ermine Street and Dere Street have been dualled as parts of the A1, and of the Fosse Way as part of the A46


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 22:54 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 18:19
Posts: 2551
Location: Yorkshire
Afterbrunel wrote:
It suddenly occurred to me that very little of the UK Roman roads have been dualled. Sure, there are some exceptions but the greater proportion remain single carriageway and were never much upgraded.

It can't be because of the expense of urban demoliton, because (again generalising) they go through far less urban area than the later "British" main roads.

Has anyone got a persuasive (and serious) explanation?

Apart from the places where Roman Roads have been dualled, which others have given you, the main reason that more haven't been is because they wouldn't be useful. They often run through towns and villages, which are no good for dual-carriageways – the A12 shows what happens when you try to mix a dualled RR with bypasses: sudden curves. In other cases, they run through areas that are relatively sparsely populated and have no need of a high speed, high capacity route. In hilly areas, RRs often don't have good vertical alignment, going over hills rather than round them.

Which Roman Roads do you think should have been dualled?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 22:57 
Offline
Assistant Site Manager
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 01:19
Posts: 18988
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
The A38 heading north-east from Lichfield along Ryknild Street is a good example of on-line dualling of a Roman road.

_________________
"Just as the private car is the embodiment of the concept of freedom, in metal and rubber, so the speed bump represents in tarmac the essence of regulation, nannying and political interference." (Tom Utley)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 17:59 
Offline
New Member

Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 19:25
Posts: 7
Stevie D wrote:
Which Roman Roads do you think should have been dualled?


How about the A5?

Several respondents have pointed out bits of Roman raods that have been dualled; I don't quite see how that carries my question forward.

Some respondents have said "Why should they be dualled?" or words to that effect. Well, lots and lots of other roads that started out as single carriageways have been dualled, haven't they.

Roman roads go in straight lines, or go over hills? Don't quite see why that is an objection.

Roman roads go through lots of towns? I think I disagree; of course they linked Roman townships, but a lot of those have not become large in the last millennium. Yes, I know some of them have; but hugely more of the medieval English roads go through (or earlier went through) what have become large tons.

But thanks everyone for your interest.

Nigel O


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 18:08 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 20:40
Posts: 7424
Location: Ashford, Kent
Afterbrunel wrote:
Some respondents have said "Why should they be dualled?" or words to that effect. Well, lots and lots of other roads that started out as single carriageways have been dualled, haven't they.

Looking around the local area, I see the A28 is single carriageway in either direction, the A20 has a small amount of dualling to Maidstone but not much, the A251 is single carriageway all the way to Faversham, and the A259 is infamous for being not just single carriageway, but full of 90 degree turns and level crossings. It doesn't get any better when you go over into East Sussex, which is particularly bereft of any dualled roads east of Lewes. So I don't agree that lots of mediaeval and later roads have been dualled online.

(PS: Shouldn't this thread be on the main roads board?)

_________________
--
SABRE Maps - all the best maps in one place....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 18:15 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 21:39
Posts: 12551
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Afterbrunel wrote:
Stevie D wrote:
Which Roman Roads do you think should have been dualled?


How about the A5?


Large sections of the A5 have been. Of the single-carriageway sections, most have been replaced by off-line motorway improvements, such as the M1, M6 and M54.

The A5 through the Midlands isn't exactly a prime candidate for major dualling anyway - it bypasses Birmingham, Wolverhampton and Coventry entirely - hence Telford's Holyhead Road being off the line of Watling Street even back in the 19th century. As for the section west of Shrewsbury, well, that's not part of the Roman Road anyway - that ended in Wroxeter, between Shrewsbury and Telford.

_________________
Steven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 18:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 16:22
Posts: 4138
Location: Luton
Afterbrunel wrote:
Some respondents have said "Why should they be dualled?" or words to that effect. Well, lots and lots of other roads that started out as single carriageways have been dualled, haven't they.

Yes, but the vast majority of non-Roman roads have not been dualled, so I don't accept the implication of your question that Roman roads are relatively unlikely to be dualled compared to other roads.

While you're on, here's some more routes which have been dualled which are more or less old Roman routes :
A30/M3
A417/A419
A120
A69 (section immediately west of Newcastle)
A74(M)

So there's actually quite a high proportion of old Roman routes which have been significantly improved.

_________________
Owen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 21:33 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 00:15
Posts: 6582
Location: kingston-upon-thames
Medieval roads and turnpikes tend to link towns together - either that is their raison d'etre or they were built that way to connect staging points (horse changeovers) for the mail coaches. Only with the arrival of thye motor car did the concept of a bypass make any sense.

But the Roman Roads often bypass all but the most major Roman settlements - compare Ermine Street north and south of Lincoln with the older "cliff roads" (B1398 and A607) which link the spring-line villages along the escarpment. Thus most Roman roads are not useful arteries but where they are, they can be used for considerable distances with only minor deviations, and an on-line dualling is often possible. Look at the A1, A12, A38, A46, A419.

Two interesting examples where Roman roads have been upgraded from unclassified to A road (albeit single carriageway) in recent years are the A15 between Kirton Lindsey and the M180, and the entire A1500.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 22:00 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:21
Posts: 116
Surely part of the explanation is that the socio-political geography of Great Britain has changed almost beyond recognition over the 2000 years since the Romans were here. In others words, what was a key and important route back then may not necessarily be so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 07:26 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 18:26
Posts: 2182
Location: South Notts
t1(M) wrote:
Medieval roads and turnpikes tend to link towns together - either that is their raison d'etre or they were built that way to connect staging points (horse changeovers) for the mail coaches. Only with the arrival of thye motor car did the concept of a bypass make any sense.


That can be a blessing as long as they aren't too far away - I dread to think what the A46 would be like if it went through Nottingham then onto Hull for instance!

As for hills being bad things - can you imagine the elephant racing which would ensue at about 30 mph on the uphill sections? Modern roads tend to avoid hills as they are the HGV's nemesis. The A46 was bad enough (pre-dualling) with a constant 40 mph nose to tail slog (no chance of overtaking as the other lane was the same) all the way from Bingham to Newark-on-Trent with that speed being scrubbed off on the up hill sections (and this is in the relatively flat countryside of the East Midlands).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 09:57 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2007 15:57
Posts: 1170
Location: Derby
The reason surely is very simple. With the obvious and massive exception of Londinium, the towns that were important in Roman times are no longer the ones most important today. Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds, Nottingham, Sheffield, Bristol- these all grew up around the industrial revolution and so were not served by Roman roads.


Rykneld Street from Letocetum (Lichfield/Wall) to Derventio (Derby)is probably the most important dualled Roman road today, because it links Birmingham not only with Derby but also the Sheffield/Leeds/Bradford area. Until fairly recently it also served as the 'missing link' between the M5 and the M1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:00 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 13:54
Posts: 11995
Location: Chester-le-Street
Comstock wrote:
Newcastle - these all grew up around the industrial revolution and so were not served by Roman roads.



I beg to differ! Segedunum was a major Roman fort at the end of the wall, and was a major intersection of the North - South and routes West. There was even a Roman bridge across the tyne.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of ... _upon_Tyne

_________________
Visit Motorsport Forums


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:08 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2002 00:15
Posts: 6582
Location: kingston-upon-thames
Comstock wrote:
The reason surely is very simple. With the obvious and massive exception of Londinium, the towns that were important in Roman times are no longer the ones most important today. Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Leeds, Nottingham, Sheffield, Bristol- these all grew up around the industrial revolution and so were not served by Roman roads.


.

Manchester (the clue is in the name) was also significant in Roman times. Much of the A64 and A664 are the Roman road from manchester to York, and there are plans to dual part of the Roman Road between Chester and Manchester - the infamous A556 (M6/M56) link.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:08 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Posts: 17599
Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Yes, there's a Roman Road from Manchester to Ribchester as well. Where it runs through Blackburn with Darwen it has the imaginative name of Roman Road.

_________________
Bryn Buck
Traffic Technician and General Grumpy Young Man
The Road Giveth, and the Road Taketh Away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:12 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 13:17
Posts: 3911
Location: Leeds
Bristol and Nottingham were among the most important towns in the country long before the industrial revolution, though admittedly long after Roman times as far as I know.

Newcastle too is one of those places like New College Oxford and the New Forest that are about a thousand years old.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 13:00 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 16:00
Posts: 335
isn't Bath Road (A4) in London a roman road???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 13:23 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 13:54
Posts: 11995
Location: Chester-le-Street
wrinkly wrote:
Newcastle too is one of those places like New College Oxford and the New Forest that are about a thousand years old.


Indeed, but it's only been called Newcastle for less than half the time it has been a major settlement.

_________________
Visit Motorsport Forums


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Roman Roads rarely dualled
PostPosted: Tue Aug 07, 2012 13:38 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 13:30
Posts: 4408
Location: Birmingham, England
wrinkly wrote:
New College Oxford ... about a thousand years old.
The Warden and Scholars of St Mary's College of Winchester in Oxford, commonly called New College in Oxford, was founded in 1379, so not quite a thousand years old. It was new at the time, of course ...

_________________
Moseley Rugby - http://www.moseleyrugby.co.uk
...... EDF Trophy winners 2009; "Onwards and Upwards" ......


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group