Botched Roadsigns

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Beardy5632
Member
Posts: 1436
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 16:45
Location: Forest of Dean

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Beardy5632 »

Johnathan404 wrote: The second one is harder to explain.
Was the person who put it up colourblind?
British & Irish cities driven in - 48/75
England - 36/52, Scotland - 7/7, Wales - 5/6, NI - 0/5, RoI - 0/5
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15777
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Chris Bertram »

Beardy5632 wrote:
Johnathan404 wrote: The second one is harder to explain.
Was the person who put it up colourblind?
The advantage of triangular signs over diamonds is that there's an obvious right way up. There will be a flat base and a pointy top - Give Way signs apart - and if you get the wrong point at the top, it will look stupid.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35936
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Bryn666 »

That didn't stop the sign in Salford where the traffic signal is the correct way up on an upside down triangle. Who on earth managed that? If it had a sticker on the back of course I'd know, and I would never buy signs from them.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
trencheel303
Account deactivated at user request
Posts: 257
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 20:24
Location: England

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by trencheel303 »

User avatar
DavidNW9
Member
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 18:16
Location: London NW9
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by DavidNW9 »

Seriously not?
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35936
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Bryn666 »

trencheel303 wrote:https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Win ... !1e1?hl=en

when you see it...
Shortage of oxygen to the brain on them thar hills.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
crb11
Member
Posts: 1630
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 21:35
Location: Cambridge

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by crb11 »

At present on the M11 southbound on the approach to junction 10 (A505) there's a yellow-backed sign pointing to Stump Cross (exit) and A11 (continue on motorway). Unclear what it's doing there, but an expensive detour if you want the A11 from here, and I don't think many people know what Stump Cross is/was any more. (It's labelled as Stumps Cross on another yellow sign at the A505/A1301 junction.)
[real name Colin]
B1040
Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 15:51
Location: fenland

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by B1040 »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-engla ... 7a1393bd0e

Image

Shame the author of the article didn't look very hard for a real A248
User avatar
crowntown100
Member
Posts: 740
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 21:13
Location: Helston, Cornwall

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by crowntown100 »

I hope you have your glasses on for this beauty! I don't know who thought that the "REDUCE SPEED NOW" sign on the right would be an appropriate sized sign for a WS2 road, especially as it's warning people who are, most likely, driving quite fast...
Harry
Lewis1997
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 22:53

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Lewis1997 »

This road sign appears twice in Haverhill. Firstly, the road is the A143, which is correct going right. However, it is the A1307 and not the A1017 to Cambridge, which is incorrect going right. As for going left, well, it couldn't be any worse! Whilst the route is still the A143, it leads to the A1017, which then goes on to Braintree. Therefore, the sign should say 'Braintree (A1017)'. The A1071 actually begins at the other side of Sudbury on the A134, with the A134 being some 12 miles away from this location at Long Melford. Therefore, the sign should actually say 'Sudbury/Long Melford (A1092)'.
New sign.png
(4.81 KiB) Not downloaded yet
Attachments
Road sign.png
Lewis1997
Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 22:53

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Lewis1997 »

Another one I noticed, and coincidently on holiday in the area, is within the last (or first as some would say) mile of the A30. The last junction with the B3315, there are no issues with the A30 signs, although the B3315 signs do still include the (A3077) which became a defunct after the A30 Penzance bypass, so this is incorrect. We then move along the A30 about some 150/200 yds to a turning to Trevescan. The A30 signs are certainly confusing; the road between Land's End and Penzance is a non-primary A-road, yet the signs are in green and yellow writing, and don't follow suit with the typical white on brown for Land's End signs and black on white for Penzance signs. So there you go, the first and last botched roadsign in the country! :wink:
Attachments
A30 road signs.png
kc1
Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 17:01
Location: Alba

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by kc1 »

Is this a botch? https://goo.gl/maps/tp51VG3tNP62. Technically, it is the non-primary A77 leading to the primary A77, but it looks very odd. :?
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16982
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Chris5156 »

kc1 wrote:Is this a botch? https://goo.gl/maps/tp51VG3tNP62. Technically, it is the non-primary A77 leading to the primary A77, but it looks very odd. :?
Yes, that's a mess. "A77" only needs to appear once. Both "(A75)" and "A77" should be on green patches as the road becomes primary further on, but everything else should stay black and white because it is not primary at this point.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35936
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Bryn666 »

As Chris says. It's a little known secret of TSM Chapter 7 that you can do that.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15777
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Chris Bertram »

Bryn666 wrote:As Chris says. It's a little known secret of TSM Chapter 7 that you can do that.
So, how about this one? I'm sure A44 should be in brackets, so that's a botch, but actually, isn't A424 primary from Stow to Troopers Lodge anyway? OS think it is.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
c2R
SABRE Wiki admin
Posts: 11190
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 11:01

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by c2R »

Even though this is a wrong like-for-like replacement of the old sign (rewind street view), I like how simple the sign is without a bracketed patched A10 and pointless indication of the B road number:

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.89467 ... 56!6m1!1e1
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
User avatar
Viator
Member
Posts: 1768
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 19:06
Location: Llan-giwg

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Viator »

Not so much a botched roadsign as a botched vegetation management scheme: https://goo.gl/maps/XrqarU7ra1S2.

The image dates from 2011 (though the history shows that the sign was just as obscured for at least two and a half years before that). My question is: who is responsible when things get to such a state: the highway authority or the landowner?
User avatar
Burns
Member
Posts: 3793
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 21:37
Location: Dundee
Contact:

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Burns »

Anyone up for a trip to the Tay Bridge via Craigellachie?
User avatar
exiled
Committee Member
Posts: 24866
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 17:36
Location: South Lanarkshire

Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by exiled »

Not a bodge but is it me but this looks very French?
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
Glen
Social Media Admin
Posts: 5432
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 02:16
Location: Inbhir Pheofharain
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: Botched Roadsigns

Post by Glen »

exiled wrote:Not a bodge but is it me but this looks very French?
It's a bit pointless using Jerol columns behind a barrier, though.
Post Reply