Photo of the Month

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 19:18 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 17:21
Posts: 59
Location: Richmond / London
Does anybody know when the M25 widening between the M40 and the M1 is going to start? Thanks for the info :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 19:29 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 20:10
Posts: 217
Location: Sheffield
http://www.cbrd.co.uk/futures/scheme.php?id=167


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 19:29 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
Posts: 5520
Location: Southampton
In April of this year, if all goes to plan. Extends round to the A1(M).

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 20:06 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 17:21
Posts: 59
Location: Richmond / London
Great thank you for the info! How long will it take roughly until it is complete?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 20:09 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
Posts: 5520
Location: Southampton
A whopping 3 years!

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 21:06 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 23:28
Posts: 4694
When you consider just how much is being done, 3 years is actually rather quick!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 21:36 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
Posts: 5520
Location: Southampton
Jeni wrote:
When you consider just how much is being done, 3 years is actually rather quick!


Is it really. The M27 works at J3-4 have taken about a year, and even so, there were prolonged periods of time where the works just seemed to stand still and not progress.

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 21:40 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Posts: 17497
Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Do you expect roadworkers to be tethered to their JCBs and whipped to ensure they all work 18 hour shifts, Steve?

There are often reasons for things not happening. Like weather. Or the fact it's Christmas/New Year/other time when workers can be expected to have a life outside of work.

_________________
Bryn Buck
Traffic Technician and General Grumpy Young Man
The Road Giveth, and the Road Taketh Away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 21:47 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 23:28
Posts: 4694
sotonsteve wrote:
Is it really. The M27 works at J3-4 have taken about a year, and even so, there were prolonged periods of time where the works just seemed to stand still and not progress.


Yeah and? No comparison. The M27 works are about <--this long-->. The M25 works are considerably longer. Much more work involved. Would you prefer it if they did it in 3 or 4 sections? each taking about 2 years each? Didn't think so.

Not everything can be compared to Southampton!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 22:16 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
Posts: 5520
Location: Southampton
I heard that when they built the original section of the M1 they were knocking out a mile every 8 days. Roadworks generally take an eternity nowadays, for various reasons.

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 22:23 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Posts: 17497
Location: Blackburn, Lancashire
Quote:
I heard that when they built the original section of the M1 they were knocking out a mile every 8 days. Roadworks generally take an eternity nowadays, for various reasons.


Rather easy to do when traffic management isn't required. Also, they had thousands upon thousands of Irish navvies building it...

_________________
Bryn Buck
Traffic Technician and General Grumpy Young Man
The Road Giveth, and the Road Taketh Away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 28, 2009 22:24 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 23:28
Posts: 4694
Building a new motorway is also very different, no existing traffic to worry about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 00:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 18, 2003 21:37
Posts: 1919
Location: London
The M25 J16-23 widening is to be done in three sections, each lasting about 18 months (J16-19, 19-21, 21-23) which will overlap with each other so that the total job lasts from April 2009 - April 2012.

This is because it's less frustrating for motorists to have a shorter length of roadworks at any one time, and it's also cheaper to employ a lower number of workers for 3 years, than a higher number of workers for 1 year.

However, the credit crunch means that the funding from the banks still hasn't been agreed, so it looks likely that the start date could slip unless the government decides to part-fund the project up-front.

_________________
Open Road -- putting road building back on the agenda


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 08:40 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Posts: 2326
Location: Dorset
CJ wrote:
....However, the credit crunch means that the funding from the banks still hasn't been agreed, so it looks likely that the start date could slip unless the government decides to part-fund the project up-front.
If the start date slips more than a couple of months bear in mind that the works are meant to be finished before the Olympics so that the M25 is roadwork free for the duration of the games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:35 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 19:01
Posts: 3224
Location: London
The works have started. The contractors have started mobilising in compounds alongside, and last week I noticed heavy vegetation clearance starting south of J17 Maple Cross.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:30 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
Posts: 5520
Location: Southampton
The street lighting replacement at A2/M2 Brenley Corner is programmed to take 12 weeks. That's strange, the county council's contractors down my way are able to relight a road within the space of a week. Furthermore, when they relit the last of the SOX around M27 J7 in early 2001 the works only took a couple of weeks. How can you justify such a job taking 3 months? I'm sure some of you will, because I'm so obviously wrong.

It'll be another Guildford Bypass relighting. Works began on the 4th August, and were expected to be completed by mid November. That's over 3 months, and was a seriously long timescale for such a job. However, the contractors missed the mid November deadline, so a end of November deadline was created, but they missed that, so they created a December deadline, but they missed that, so they created a new deadline for the end of January, but they'll miss that, and now a new dealine of 6th February has been suggested. How can you f*** replacing lighting columns this much? They're only replacing lighting columns over a mile long stretch of road, how the hell can it end up taking half a year? Because the people in charge aren't managing the project very well. Very sloppy. Southern Electric Contracting can completely replace a column within an hour or two in Hampshire, as in, 10am an old column will be standing in place, all connected up, and by 12pm a new column will have magically appeared and have been connected up, with the old column disappeared without a trace. Literally is "blink and you miss it", whereas the Highways Agency is more like "fall into a long coma, wake up and everything is the same".

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Last edited by sotonsteve on Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:56, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:42 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 15:12
Posts: 947
Location: Leamington Spa
What was the final plan for the Metropolitan line / Former Great Central rail viaduct just north of J16? - demo and rebuild or fit the road through somehow?

_________________
Driving thrombosis caused this accident......a clot behind the wheel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:52 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 15:36
Posts: 1772
Location: North Buckinghamshire
M4 Cardiff wrote:
What was the final plan for the Metropolitan line / Former Great Central rail viaduct just north of J16? - demo and rebuild or fit the road through somehow?


I don't see how they could demolish the bridge, certainly without making some very large payments to Chiltern Railways for cutting off their only route from High Wycombe into London. I know they could reroute everything back through PR and upto Aylesbury but that was a nightmare when Tesco opened their new store on the line at Gerrards Cross.

_________________
A fine is a tax for the naughty, tax is a fine for the good!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:59 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Posts: 2326
Location: Dorset
tim_bucks wrote:
M4 Cardiff wrote:
What was the final plan for the Metropolitan line / Former Great Central rail viaduct just north of J16? - demo and rebuild or fit the road through somehow?
I don't see how they could demolish the bridge, certainly without making some very large payments to Chiltern Railways for cutting off their only route from High Wycombe into London. I know they could reroute everything back through PR and upto Aylesbury but that was a nightmare when Tesco opened their new store on the line at Gerrards Cross.
The bridge remains with the M25 having narrow lanes as we discussed here previously.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: M25 widening
PostPosted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 14:10 
Offline
Member

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 21:30
Posts: 1214
Location: Gloucestershire
CJ wrote:
The M25 J16-23 widening is to be done in three sections, each lasting about 18 months (J16-19, 19-21, 21-23) which will overlap with each other so that the total job lasts from April 2009 - April 2012.

This is because it's less frustrating for motorists to have a shorter length of roadworks at any one time, and it's also cheaper to employ a lower number of workers for 3 years, than a higher number of workers for 1 year.


I wonder how long the work would take if the HA had to pay compensation to drivers because of the disruption. This is what happens on the railways, which was implemented to ensure work was done as effeciently as possible, but just means that everything costs a lot more !!

Jim.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 201 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 11  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group