Photo of the Month

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 08:44 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 13:54
Posts: 11852
Location: Chester-le-Street
They should take the BBC Basic approach of numbering junctions in multiples of 10, that way there's always enough space to fit one inbetween!

_________________
Visit Motorsport Forums


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:05 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 15:51
Posts: 92
Location: Shoreham-by-Sea
wrinkly wrote:
Motorway junction numbers were invented about 1965-6 (anyone know the exact date?) but several shorter motorways and An(M) motorways were originally left out.


I'm convinced that I had an AA Handbook which showed Ax(M) Motorways with letters as junction "numbers". Unfortunately that was back in the mid-seventies and I can't prove it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:27 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 13:17
Posts: 3841
Location: Leeds
For a few years in the late 60s, some maps and atlases showed a set of junction numbers on the "original M62" Stretford-Eccles bypass which didn't appear on any signs. They were shown as increasing northwards, with the present M60 J7 as 1 and the present J13 as 6. (At that time, the present junctions 8 and 12 didn't exist, and there was a half-diamond junction with the B5213).

At that time the plan to rename most of the original M62 as M63 was in existence, but it wasn't implemented until 1971 when the M602 Eccles bypass opened. Only then did the M63 get junction numbers shown on signs, and they increased southwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 13:30
Posts: 4335
Location: Birmingham, England
A3-Andrew wrote:
wrinkly wrote:
Motorway junction numbers were invented about 1965-6 (anyone know the exact date?) but several shorter motorways and An(M) motorways were originally left out.


I'm convinced that I had an AA Handbook which showed Ax(M) Motorways with letters as junction "numbers". Unfortunately that was back in the mid-seventies and I can't prove it.

They did, but those were the AA's own invention and never appeared on signs.

_________________
Moseley Rugby - http://www.moseleyrugby.co.uk
...... EDF Trophy winners 2009; "Onwards and Upwards" ......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:49 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 13:56
Posts: 2206
Location: Letchworth, Herts, England
Maybe this was to index the diagrams, IIRC AA handbooks had details of limited access and none standard junctions.

_________________
Johnny Mo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:03 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 13:17
Posts: 3841
Location: Leeds
Also, before official junction numbers were introduced, the AA handbook didn't have special motorway maps, but the AA produced separate special maps which incorporated strip maps of motorways, with junctions numbered for cross reference to junction diagrams.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:43 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 21:39
Posts: 12548
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
wrinkly wrote:
At that time the plan to rename most of the original M62 as M63 was in existence, but it wasn't implemented until 1971 when the M602 Eccles bypass opened. Only then did the M63 get junction numbers shown on signs, and they increased southwards.


I really need to get home to leaf through the relevant documentation, but I'm sure I've got the exact date somewhere when the decision was taken. Certainly there are references to "M62 Sale Eastern and Northendon Bypass" in there, as well as the aborted M64 numbering for the Eccles Bypass.

_________________
Steven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:45 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 18:55
Posts: 1817
Location: Just East of York
A3-Andrew wrote:
wrinkly wrote:
Motorway junction numbers were invented about 1965-6 (anyone know the exact date?) but several shorter motorways and An(M) motorways were originally left out.


I'm convinced that I had an AA Handbook which showed Ax(M) Motorways with letters as junction "numbers". Unfortunately that was back in the mid-seventies and I can't prove it.


I have abunch of AA Atlases from the 1980's with motorway strip maps in them... And on motorways where the junction's aren't numbered, they've put letters...

This was in 1981-1987, for definate!

_________________
And it's a 2, 4, 6, 8 motorway!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 12:58 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 13:17
Posts: 3841
Location: Leeds
Steven wrote:
wrinkly wrote:
At that time the plan to rename most of the original M62 as M63 was in existence, but it wasn't implemented until 1971 when the M602 Eccles bypass opened. Only then did the M63 get junction numbers shown on signs, and they increased southwards.


I really need to get home to leaf through the relevant documentation, but I'm sure I've got the exact date somewhere when the decision was taken. Certainly there are references to "M62 Sale Eastern and Northendon Bypass" in there, as well as the aborted M64 numbering for the Eccles Bypass.


I have a number of cuttings from that period, mostly from the Manchester Evening News. They're rather inaccessible at present, but some day I'll look through them again. I'm pretty sure the M63 decision was mentioned in one or more of them several years before it was implemented. But before that, the M62 was planned to reach at least to Cheadle. Stockport would perhaps have been M56.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 19:17 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 16:20
Posts: 908
Location: Around the A500
Mark Hewitt wrote:
They should take the BBC Basic approach of numbering junctions in multiples of 10, that way there's always enough space to fit one inbetween!


Yeah - but given that I always used to type in RENUMBER before saving a program, that could get pretty expensive if the same system was used on the roads!

_________________
'Today Stoke on Trent, tomorrow the world' - Britt Eckland 1999


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 19:56 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 18:12
Posts: 301
Location: Darlington
I remember I had an AA map with "lettered" junction ons the A1(M) in the 80s when I was a kid! On the Barton - Washington section, what is now J56 was "A" and it went up to J65 being "K" and as at the time, the A1 went through the Tyne Tunnel (it was before the Western by-pass) the junctions on what is now the A194(M) were L, M and N.

And I can confirm the year that that section got its junction numbers was 1993. I remember the first one I saw was 56 heading away from Darlington on a school trip! I think (but not as certain as the other section) the Doncaster by-pass section got its junction numbers the same year as well, but I've no idea when j1 - 10 got numbered.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 20:46 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 18:19
Posts: 2484
Location: Yorkshire
Steven wrote:
It's also worth thinking about the fact that the likes of M4 J4A and M23 J9A would still need suffixes...

(a) You're assuming they need junction numbers at all,
(b) It might be more sensible to have a suffix specifically meaning a junction on a spur from the main junction.

I'm not saying we should go with the plan, but I don't think that's a good argument against it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 20:59 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 18:19
Posts: 2484
Location: Yorkshire
vlad wrote:
Yeah - but given that I always used to type in RENUMBER before saving a program, that could get pretty expensive if the same system was used on the roads!

Wow, that takes me back...!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 21:25 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 21:39
Posts: 12548
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Steven wrote:
wrinkly wrote:
At that time the plan to rename most of the original M62 as M63 was in existence, but it wasn't implemented until 1971 when the M602 Eccles bypass opened. Only then did the M63 get junction numbers shown on signs, and they increased southwards.


I really need to get home to leaf through the relevant documentation, but I'm sure I've got the exact date somewhere when the decision was taken. Certainly there are references to "M62 Sale Eastern and Northendon Bypass" in there, as well as the aborted M64 numbering for the Eccles Bypass.


Very early 1968 seems to be the right date. There are certainly memos from November 1967 suggesting that Liverpool - Hull should be M62 (or alternatively that Preston - Hull be M61...), but I can't find the confirmation document.

The change for M64 -> M602 dates from late 1969.

_________________
Steven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 21:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 21:39
Posts: 12548
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Steven wrote:
Steven wrote:
wrinkly wrote:
At that time the plan to rename most of the original M62 as M63 was in existence, but it wasn't implemented until 1971 when the M602 Eccles bypass opened. Only then did the M63 get junction numbers shown on signs, and they increased southwards.


I really need to get home to leaf through the relevant documentation, but I'm sure I've got the exact date somewhere when the decision was taken. Certainly there are references to "M62 Sale Eastern and Northendon Bypass" in there, as well as the aborted M64 numbering for the Eccles Bypass.


Very early 1968 seems to be the right date. There are certainly memos from November 1967 suggesting that Liverpool - Hull should be M62 (or alternatively that Preston - Hull be M61...), but I can't find the confirmation document. The documentation also implies very strongly that M63 was in use internally in February 1970; though that doesn't mean that it was actually signed that way.

The change for M64 -> M602 dates from late 1969.

_________________
Steven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 18:20 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 18:06
Posts: 362
Location: Sheffield/Whitby/Tarland
Here's an idea: when they've finished upgrading the A1 to motorway standard between Dishforth and Scotch Corner there'll be a motorway all the way from London to Newcastle. Why not rename the A1(M) from Leeds to Newcastle the M1? :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 21:41 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 21:14
Posts: 7033
Location: Thornaby-on-Tees
Distance based numbering seems to work elsewhere, but raises issues of where the datum point is. Having been to Spain again recently driving along renumbered motorways the junction numbers on the AP-7 towards Cartagena made no sense either.....

_________________
"I don't make the rules, ma'am, I just make them up and write them down"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 22:39 
Offline
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 18:05
Posts: 2221
Location: Cambridgeshire
In general, I'm against renumbering but given that the end of UK motorway building is in sight, I wonder whether it might be worth having a comprehensive once-and-for-all big renumbering exercise in a few years' time to remove all the anomolies and oddities, safe in the knowledge that the new numbers would probably stand for all time?

Any subsequent new junctions - likely to be few in number - could just get a letter suffix.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 14:29 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 13:54
Posts: 11852
Location: Chester-le-Street
jgharston wrote:
Here's an idea: when they've finished upgrading the A1 to motorway standard between Dishforth and Scotch Corner there'll be a motorway all the way from London to Newcastle. Why not rename the A1(M) from Leeds to Newcastle the M1? :)


Welcome to SABRE! As you can imagine this idea has been suggested before, more than once! Especially as the M1 takes the mainline at Hook Moor (the M1/A1(M) split north of Leeds). It's a bit strange that the M1 suddenly turns into the A1(M).

But there's no sign of that happening. Besides what happens to the A1, disappears? Not the A1, no that can't happen!

_________________
Visit Motorsport Forums


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why does the A1(M) start at junction 1?
PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 14:30 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 13:54
Posts: 11852
Location: Chester-le-Street
roadtester wrote:
In general, I'm against renumbering but given that the end of UK motorway building is in sight, I wonder whether it might be worth having a comprehensive once-and-for-all big renumbering exercise in a few years' time to remove all the anomolies and oddities, safe in the knowledge that the new numbers would probably stand for all time?

Any subsequent new junctions - likely to be few in number - could just get a letter suffix.


I don't know about that. Most of the junction numbers are fine a mass renumbering would be a bit of an expensive waste IMO.

_________________
Visit Motorsport Forums


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group