Photo of the Month

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 915 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 46  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 02:32 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
I have a mental list of them all- I'd say maybe 20% of all the PW signs around London since around 2005 I found online or in reality were not replaced so rather than actually having something perfectly adequate to go on they now have nothing.

This was not just the odd little road with an arrow on a bend but some pretty major A road junctions like Willesden Lane and East Finchley High Road, the sort of crossroads that van drivers and people from the other side of London are guaranteed to get confused just as I would in Norwood or Forest Hill as it can be like a maze to the unfamiliar. I don't know if there's a procedure to request a replacement, much like the RAC provided signs where clearly needed, although from my personal interest I do know the routes and only missed the signs themselves, especially where they went before I got a photo. If anyone really wants it I can list the whole lot if anyone wanted to try and do something about it, but probably would fall on deaf ears at the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 09:45 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 11:01
Posts: 2881
Location: Herts
Agreed - London is appallingly signed, generally, in terms of direction to where anything is... (unless you look at the little signs for bikes) - though does this worry anyone anymore as the majority of people are lemmings to their sat navs

I've spent some time in Manchester over this last month, and signage is definitely better there, with small suburbs and housing areas being signed at even relatively minor junctions...

_________________
words go here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:43 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Posts: 10226
Location: South London
c2R wrote:
Agreed - London is appallingly signed, generally, in terms of direction to where anything is... (unless you look at the little signs for bikes) - though does this worry anyone anymore as the majority of people are lemmings to their sat navs

It varies massively from one borough to the next - Bromley is really rather good, with clear signs at the junctions of all classified roads, though it has an odd predeliction for signposting "All other destinations" on the A21 relief road around Bromley town centre.

Southwark - as discussed in another thread - are appalling, as are Brent. Lambeth put up some very good and serviceable signs, but not many of them and never with route numbers.

The TfL red route network is exceptionally well signposted.

_________________
Chris
Bellhop and sweeper-upper, CBRD.co.uk
chris5156.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:41 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 16:46
Posts: 3071
Location: A21 Bromley, Kent
Chris5156 wrote:
It varies massively from one borough to the next - Bromley is really rather good, with clear signs at the junctions of all classified roads, though it has an odd predeliction for signposting "All other destinations" on the A21 relief road around Bromley town centre.


Yes - such as this for example.

_________________
6 years...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 16:46 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 23:31
Posts: 178
Location: Northumberland
Not sure whether this one has been seen before - on the B8000 at Otter Ferry, Argyll, noted on New Year's Eve 2011.

Image

Image

_________________
You call that low?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 19:10 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
Thank goodness for the MoD, thanks to Streetview this turned up on Deepcut barracks land and besides someone squashing the triangle is in very good nick.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 22:38 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 23:14
Posts: 1160
Location: South Yorkshire
I came across this pre WB sign recently in Pontefract.

_________________
Cheers! Image

Gaz Wilson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 03:35 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
That is a real gem. The yellow signs become rarer and rarer the more places they mention as it means they'd be on more important roads. There was a perfect condition set of yellow arrows till a few years ago right on the Upper Street junction in Islington, but were apparently removed when it was no longer possible to turn right as one directed, some years before I discovered them plus the poster couldn't remember where they were and took me months to pin them down.

The Scottish triangle looks vaguely familiar as I have seen a fingerpost with a triangle on top, it just may have been a different one. It's a strange idea though as it's not warning people of anything, although it does draw attention to the sign which always helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 23:10 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 13:36
Posts: 524
Location: Hampshire/Surrey Border
What was above this A31 sign?

http://g.co/maps/4zw5d


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Fri Jan 13, 2012 23:22 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:55
Posts: 1835
Location: Derby
Hasn't it just slid down the post?

Acceptable cos it must have been there a good 50 years.

(Incidentally that looks a lovely bit of old dual carriageway :) )

_________________
"Urban Motorways do not, as many people seem to think, possess some magical property."
-The Buchanan Report


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 14:40 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Posts: 10226
Location: South London
A325Ham wrote:
What was above this A31 sign?

http://g.co/maps/4zw5d

Nothing - that's a type of direction sign and wouldn't have had a finial.

_________________
Chris
Bellhop and sweeper-upper, CBRD.co.uk
chris5156.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 20:18 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 13:36
Posts: 524
Location: Hampshire/Surrey Border
swarkestonecauseway wrote:

(Incidentally that looks a lovely bit of old dual carriageway :) )


Yeah most of the Farnham bypass is like that, apart from recent changes from the A287 bridge to Hickley's corner, it hasnt altered much.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 18:37 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
I drove past that sign a few months ago and didn't even notice it. It is pretty small to be fair but I must have been looking the other way as don't normally miss them. I'm surprised it didn't have a yellow border though, I missed the one in Shepherd's Bush by months maximum and the only other one I know with one is in Wales.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 21:46 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
One I just found on Streetview in deepest Surrey (Abinger Common). I found it afterwards on Geograph but as it wasn't tagged pre-Worboys it only surfaced when I uploaded to the same square as they do. It seems the council may have lifted the prohibition (how many tractors have 15 seats I wonder?) as they've painted the regulations out in white. The only missing vehicles were charabancs, I haven't found one of those yet.
Another interesting feature is the rare use of lower case, as it's the only way to fit the extra wording in. The signs were simplified in 1953 to reduce the number of lines, and this may be an earlier example which is dated as 1920s in Geograph, as they began like this before they were simplified. I also suspect a solid red circle would have been on top as there is a bracket there.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 18:04 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 16:06
Posts: 6797
Location: Manchester
Sad to say, this http://g.co/maps/2h6na has now gone in the last few weeks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 19:05 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
Another lucky find today in deepest Surrey

Image

The council clearly realised that while replacing the old red triangle steep hill sign above the lower instructions still applied. Thank goodness for that. I've no idea when they swapped them but the red one looks very new to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 02:41 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
Very odd, this pair are in Roydon, and although the format is standard PW that font is well dodgy. It's thicker than MOT, the 4 and G are different although the 1 is the same but thicker. Anyone hazard a guess how that happened? It can't be Worboys as only a slight variation of font and not Transport, but never seen non-standard fonts after 1953 when they became the familiar type.

Image

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 20:25 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
The mystery appears to be solved, it seems BR had the option to make level crossing signs, and although the other overhead cable one I have is on national font this uses Gill Sans bold, which was BR standard issue till 1965 so I've been told. I've yet to see another one but sounds logical to me. If anyone's got other examples then you can add them here. The format has overhead cable on separate lines usually but that's the only alteration. So we have a new entry to the game, British Rail issued signs. I hope I come across some more now I know the form.

I think this uses the same one http://www.flickr.com/photos/co-ophistory/3972664582/
http://www.semgonline.com/location/pics/kh_lang-sign.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:20 
Offline
Member

Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 23:32
Posts: 275
Location: Sydney, Australia
Attached is a pre-Worboys sign plan I found in a Main Roads Department Western Australia file at our records office, here in Perth. The drawing is dated 2/8/1950.

I find it quite interesting that 'through' and 'local' AD signs were used that far back. Certainly a lot different to here where the road authorities were very sign-phobic until the 1970s.

More than happy to have it used on the Wiki if it is of interest. PM me for the details if a specific reference is desired/required.


Attachments:
IMG_6597.JPG
IMG_6597.JPG [ 1.32 MiB | Viewed 491 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pre-Worboys preservation campaign
PostPosted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 02:48 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 19:16
Posts: 712
Location: London NW9
I've got plenty of these already including a studded cast version, but these are the first I've found almost like new. Considering they are at least around 50 years old I can't imagine how they survived in such good condition as you can't repaint reflective or stuck on signs.

Image

Image

When I drove up I thought they must have just added them and then realised they'd just been like that from day one. It must be the Surrey climate.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 915 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 ... 46  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group