Photo of the Month

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Deliberately reducing visibility
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 09:23 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 17:52
Posts: 44
Location: Derby
As part of the work going on at the A38/A50 junction near the Toyota works south of Derby :

http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/10421.aspx

tall wooden barriers are being erected on the righthand side of the slip roads onto the roundabout.

I assume that these are to prevent drivers approaching the roundabout from seeing traffic on the roundabout until they are at the end of the slip road and force them to slow down.

Is this a new idea or has it been used elsewhere ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 09:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 10:11
Posts: 2712
Location: West Midlands
It's not a new idea, no. Not that I can quite remember when I've seen it, but I know of one on the A1 around Nottingham (is it at Five Lanes End?).

Having said that, I'm suprised this is progressing. Whilst it's a very "fast" roundabout, the visibility looks no better or no worse than any other that-scale junction.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 09:28 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 10:11
Posts: 2712
Location: West Midlands
Oh, and welcome to SABRE!!!! :)


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 09:31 
Online
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 00:19
Posts: 15081
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
It's also been done on the A303 Countess Roundabout near Amesbury in Wiltshire.

Deliberately restricting visibility seems to me to be a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.

_________________
Peter

"The normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable individual should be considered legal." (Arizona Department of Transportation)


Safe Speed forum


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 09:54 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 17:08
Posts: 2764
Location: Stafford, mostly
PeterA5145 wrote:
Deliberately restricting visibility seems to me to be a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.


I quite agree. It's probably down to some road safety bod on the council wanting to slow traffic down.

Some roundabouts in Dundee have tall flowery 'fences' seperating the lanes, so you have to approach the roundabout at <10mph.

The junction between the B5031 and B5030 outside of Rocester is now a roundabout, although not shown on the map. Grass banks have been constructed so if travelling along the 5031 and turning right onto the 5030, then vision is seriously reduced until you're at the junction. It's a pain in the neck. Truck drivers would have no problems though.

_________________
You're never late, with a Scania V8


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:38 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2002 22:35
Posts: 7817
Location: WGC, Herts
rsorionboy wrote:
PeterA5145 wrote:
Deliberately restricting visibility seems to me to be a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.


I quite agree. It's probably down to some road safety bod on the council wanting to slow traffic down.

Some roundabouts in Dundee have tall flowery 'fences' seperating the lanes, so you have to approach the roundabout at <10mph.

The junction between the B5031 and B5030 outside of Rocester is now a roundabout, although not shown on the map. Grass banks have been constructed so if travelling along the 5031 and turning right onto the 5030, then vision is seriously reduced until you're at the junction. It's a pain in the neck. Truck drivers would have no problems though.


10 years ago, the Colney Heath longabout on the A414 was upgraded, which included improving visibility. As a result, vehicle speeds increased, but so did the accident rate. Various signs and marker posts were added to reduce the visibility again, with a corresponding reduction in accidents. Personally, I think this was a sensible thing to do.

Simon

_________________
Swansea City FC - League 1 Champions 2008

Please visit Rural Roads and The Old Map Site


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:39 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 13:01
Posts: 785
Location: Reading
It has also been done on at the A33 / A339 roundabout on the Basingstoke ring road by installing several 6 foot close boarded fences. In My opionion very dangerous and does not seem to enhance road safety


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:43 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 10:48
Posts: 969
Location: Perth
The Auchenkilns roundabout on the A80 (RIP!) used to have netted screens on approach to reduce traffic speed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:57 
Offline
Member

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 13:51
Posts: 67
Location: Wiltshire
A303Chris wrote:
It has also been done on at the A33 / A339 roundabout on the Basingstoke ring road by installing several 6 foot close boarded fences.


Obviously a technique favoured by HCC - the approach to M3 J5 on the A287 from the east is the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 17:56 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 11:27
Posts: 3786
Location: Keeping clear of idiots
PeterA5145 wrote:
It's also been done on the A303 Countess Roundabout near Amesbury in Wiltshire.

Deliberately restricting visibility seems to me to be a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.


And before the fencing was erected, they rationalised signing, they applied yellow bar markings across the c/way on the approach, they applied anti-skid surfacing, they then put yellow backing around the signs, and still the accidents occurred. Putting up the fencing forces the d/heads to approach at a safer speed

_________________
Mr Brown, 1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=JCwW_1rswyo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 18:12 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 20:01
Posts: 5486
Location: Southampton
These fences can also be seen on the A3(M) at junction 3.

_________________
This signature has no human rights implications, and has been deemed satisfactory under Health and Safety legislation. Furthermore, it has an excellent carbon footprint of 2 grams per post, although measures are being taken through our Forward Plan to reduce this figure by 80% by 2050.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 18:33 
Offline
Assistant Site Manager
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 23:09
Posts: 4284
Location: Bromsgrove, Worcs
Oddly, at M5 J5, fences have been errected just before the Southbound slip road merges into the Motorway, stopping you from seeing what is on the Motorway untill you get there!

While I can see the logic on roundabouts, but errecting them approaching a merge is dangerous? You can't see what's coming and so cant adjust your speed accordingly

_________________
If we don't vote, will they all go away?

Girl in Progress: updated! [ 18-Aug:It's been a while! ] | [ 28-Apr: Video: Welcome to me! ] | [ 14-Apr: A little bit of confidence? ]
Twitter


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 18:41 
Online
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 00:19
Posts: 15081
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
highwaymana31 wrote:
Putting up the fencing forces the d/heads to approach at a safer speed

So would blindfolding them :P

Surely you know in your professional capacity that improving sightlines generally tends to reduce collisions at junctions. You wouldn't deliberately engineer a road with lots of blind turnings just to make people take more care, would you?

It is nonsense to asset that slower automatically means safer.

_________________
Peter

"The normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable individual should be considered legal." (Arizona Department of Transportation)


Safe Speed forum


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 18:41 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 16:01
Posts: 4173
Location: Lytham St Annes
its been used on a few roundabouts in mk, where there was an accident problem because although the visibility to the road on the rght was good, anything approaching from the opposite direction turning right was obscured. Reducing the visibility slowed approaching traffic down and resulted in an instant reduction in the accident rates.

Where used appropriately, reducing the visibility is a very good idea.

_________________
Education is that which remains after you have forgotten everything else you have been taught...

boing_uk: causing distress and upset with facts and blunt opinion since 2003


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 19:23 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 20:59
Posts: 358
Location: Newtownards
I've seen this in several places and it is certainly effective if a little annoying at times. I'd use the example of a motorway offslip where long queues develop because of it.

On an amusing aside, I informed my dad one day that there were plans to improve an accident blackspot by reducing the sight lines at the junctions. He clearly misheard me, when he wondered out loud; 'How would reducing the white lines make any difference?'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 19:24 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2003 11:27
Posts: 3786
Location: Keeping clear of idiots
PeterA5145 wrote:
highwaymana31 wrote:
Putting up the fencing forces the d/heads to approach at a safer speed

So would blindfolding them :P

Surely you know in your professional capacity that improving sightlines generally tends to reduce collisions at junctions. You wouldn't deliberately engineer a road with lots of blind turnings just to make people take more care, would you?

It is nonsense to asset that slower automatically means safer.


The problem with the A303 Countess r/bout is there was plenty of forward/sideways visibility to the r/bout, this led to many RTI's due to people literally hitting the r/bout at an inappropriate speed. As I pointed out, the fencing was the last safety measure to try and reduce the RTI's at this particular location. I wouldn't propose it for many locations, but in this location, it has made a big difference.

At no point did I suggest that "slower automatically means safer", I said it was appropriate at this location.

To quote Chris "Where used appropriately, reducing the visibility is a very good idea." A303 Countess r/bout is one example of this

_________________
Mr Brown, 1984 was a warning, not an instruction manual

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=JCwW_1rswyo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 21:25 
Offline
Site Manager
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 13:16
Posts: 5037
Location: Sheffield
PeterA5145 wrote:
Deliberately restricting visibility seems to me to be a misguided and potentially dangerous policy.


I've used this technique on several roundabouts, it actually does work and reduces the amount of overshoot accidents... However, it's only really appropriate to do this sort of thing where there is actaully overshoot accidents !!!!!

_________________
Regards, Haydn

:: Visit My roads in Sheffield web or My personal web or have a read of my Blog
:: View my photostream on Flickr
:: Or read about a great SABRE adventure in 2010 - An adventure of the Highland Roads built by General Wade and Thomas Telford


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 23:22 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:53
Posts: 85
Location: London
PeterA5145 wrote:
It's also been done on the A303 Countess Roundabout near Amesbury in Wiltshire.


Was the Countess Roundabout meant to be a GSJ? There is space for a flyover/underpass at the roundabout where the carriageways split.

_________________
beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 08:23 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 12:47
Posts: 720
Location: St. Asaph, A55
Jenehfa wrote:
Oddly, at M5 J5, fences have been errected just before the Southbound slip road merges into the Motorway, stopping you from seeing what is on the Motorway untill you get there!

While I can see the logic on roundabouts, but errecting them approaching a merge is dangerous? You can't see what's coming and so cant adjust your speed accordingly


it may work as it will make people have to drive fast in a hope they can just filter in.... like your suppost to, i allways try and join as fast as my car will go so i don't have to make anyone pull out


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 08:34 
Offline
Member

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 06:30
Posts: 2322
The sketch below is an illustration of a relatively common event I witness on the Dundee Kingsway.

Image

Car A is waiting to turn right and see Car B is turning left. Lorries D and E are stationary and Car A can't see Car C approaching at speed. The Kingsway itself (running right to left in the picture) has a 50mph speed limit. Whilst there is a deflection for the approach to the roundabout, it can easily be negotiated at 30mph.

Car C has good visibility to the right and can see that nothing is coming.

Cars A and C both pull out on the roundabout. Car A starting from 0mph, Car C from 30mph. Car C has to brake very heavily to avoid hitting Car A.

One possible solution here would be to reduce the visibility on the approach for Car C so they slow down.

_________________
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter. Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JohnnyMo and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group