Botched Traffic Signals

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by L.J.D »

traffic-light-man wrote: Wed Jun 14, 2023 20:42 Presumably there was a perceived need due to the width of the road, then the carriageway was narrowed... Despite the fact I like them, I think I'd have taken the opportunity to get rid of the mast arm liability there, too!
It just seems like a huge waste of cash though to get rid of it after such a short amount of time. How much are mast arms anyway?

Leeds has been doing that rather alot lately with signal installations. This double site had a full refurbishment in 2018 then in 2021 it was all ripped up again and refurbished once again. There's a few other sites where they've done the same thing.
wallmeerkat
Member
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 16:49
Location: County Down

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by wallmeerkat »

ikcdab wrote: Wed Jun 14, 2023 22:39 I was coming out of Exeter on the A379 and wanted to turn right at the Newcourt junction to go into IKEA. I moved into the correct outside RH turning lane and sat at the red light. It's the lane to the right of the island in the attached link.
Frustratingly I watched five cycles of the lights and I never got a green....
Eventually I had no choice but to go anyway when I could see it was clear.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/Mdv4wAyeCtejkcLd8

I see that on the google maps the light is red too.....
Has anyone ever seen this light green?
GSV shows a green right turn https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7077722 ... ?entry=ttu presumably possible. Maybe a fault with the sensor?
OliverH
Member
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2021 10:52
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by OliverH »

L.J.D wrote: Wed Jun 14, 2023 16:15 Whilst not a botch as such this mast arm was installed in 2015 but if you skip to 2018 you can see it was removed. Seems such a waste of money and time to go to all that effort for it to only last 3 years!
yep seen that example too before. some other ones near by replaced some Mellor's / Peek's on old posts and in 2018 chad the mast arms removed.
User avatar
ReissOmari
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 21:51
Location: Birmingham

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by ReissOmari »

Whilst the signal itself isn't botched, the placement of this signal has always confused me, considering it has a right turn filter arrow, why is it place behind where the first car turning right would see it?

If you go back to 2008 on GSV you can actually see it was correctly placed before, but then was moved for some reason.

The other approach also seems a bit botched as there is a right turn filter arrow into a crematorium, which in itself seems a bit strange, however, whenever I've seen it on, its to allow cars into the Alex Stadium access road just prior to this junction, but this contradicts the part time traffic signals just before! There is a loop for the Crematorium but if thats the case, once again shouldn't the arrow be on the secondary signal?

I've lived in this area for 25 years and I think I've only ever seen the part time traffic lights on once, they were't even in use when the Commonwealth Games were on last year.
ReissOmari..
User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by traffic-light-man »

Is it a normal indicative arrow, i.e. does it routinely get called by a detector?

Without knowing that site at all, it had crossed my mind that perhaps it isn't routinely in use, but when the part time signals are on, it runs a special staging arrangement where the two dual carriageway approaches run in separate stages and so the arrows are brought into use.

Around these parts, closely associated secondaries with indicative arrows are fairly normal on sites with a late start in one direction and an early cut off (or phase delay) in the opposite direction, but I know that's not particularly likely to be the case in the West Mods!
Simon
jnty
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by jnty »

ReissOmari wrote: Mon Oct 02, 2023 16:19 Whilst the signal itself isn't botched, the placement of this signal has always confused me, considering it has a right turn filter arrow, why is it place behind where the first car turning right would see it?

If you go back to 2008 on GSV you can actually see it was correctly placed before, but then was moved for some reason.
Right turning traffic at the point where it's beyond the island should continue if safe to do so regardless of the state of signals as it has already passed the stop line and entered the junction. If it erroneously stops when the right turn light goes red it will block traffic emerging from the side road and block the pedestrian crossing. Presumably the signals were moved to prevent this.
User avatar
Dougman
Member
Posts: 978
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:15
Location: Dundee

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by Dougman »

The signals here need a right filter arrow as the oncoming traffic is held at red when this direction gets a green. Takes a good few seconds each time for people to realise the oncoming cars aren't moving.
lose: (v): to suffer the deprivation of - to lose one's job; to lose one's life.

loose: (a): free or released from fastening or attachment - a loose end.
jnty
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by jnty »

Dougman wrote: Wed Oct 04, 2023 08:23 The signals here need a right filter arrow as the oncoming traffic is held at red when this direction gets a green. Takes a good few seconds each time for people to realise the oncoming cars aren't moving.
Same here despite recent works to replace the signals. It's irritating and there's always a bit of jeopardy as you remember (along with the real possibility that it could have changed since last time.)

This junction down the hill is the same although at least there's some skew across the junctions to give you a clue.

Lest you think it's consistent along the whole route, however, you're expected to know to give way to oncoming traffic when turning right here from a road you might not even have spotted before you emerge.
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by L.J.D »

Posted this nicely intact Mellor installation on a Mellor thread a while ago. Sadly it appears to have been replaced now but with this mess. Oops :oops:
User avatar
ReissOmari
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 21:51
Location: Birmingham

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by ReissOmari »

Botched green module replacement, this whole signal looks battered to be honest, different hoods and a missing hood too.
ReissOmari..
User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by traffic-light-man »

ReissOmari wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2023 22:50 Botched green module replacement, this whole signal looks battered to be honest, different hoods and a missing hood too.
This one has been the same for quite some time and it doesn't seem to do it much harm... There must be a method to it! :lol:
Simon
User avatar
ReissOmari
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 21:51
Location: Birmingham

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by ReissOmari »

traffic-light-man wrote: Tue Oct 31, 2023 08:04
ReissOmari wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2023 22:50 Botched green module replacement, this whole signal looks battered to be honest, different hoods and a missing hood too.
This one has been the same for quite some time and it doesn't seem to do it much harm... There must be a method to it! :lol:
There must be some method! :laugh:

This junction in Dudley has had quite a few green ball LED modules replaced with non-LED ones, at this point it surely would be best to renew the whole junction? I'm not sure of the manufacture of these signals, but they didn't last long in Birmingham, and the ones in the Black Country tend to be on their last legs if not replaced already.

Different signals from the same junction below.

1
2
3
4
5
ReissOmari..
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35937
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by Bryn666 »

ReissOmari wrote: Tue Oct 31, 2023 16:19
traffic-light-man wrote: Tue Oct 31, 2023 08:04
ReissOmari wrote: Mon Oct 30, 2023 22:50 Botched green module replacement, this whole signal looks battered to be honest, different hoods and a missing hood too.
This one has been the same for quite some time and it doesn't seem to do it much harm... There must be a method to it! :lol:
There must be some method! :laugh:

This junction in Dudley has had quite a few green ball LED modules replaced with non-LED ones, at this point it surely would be best to renew the whole junction? I'm not sure of the manufacture of these signals, but they didn't last long in Birmingham, and the ones in the Black Country tend to be on their last legs if not replaced already.

Different signals from the same junction below.

1
2
3
4
5
There's plans for that area AIUI.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by traffic-light-man »

ReissOmari wrote: Tue Oct 31, 2023 16:19This junction in Dudley has had quite a few green ball LED modules replaced with non-LED ones, at this point it surely would be best to renew the whole junction? I'm not sure of the manufacture of these signals, but they didn't last long in Birmingham, and the ones in the Black Country tend to be on their last legs if not replaced already.
Those are Microsense LSH signal heads and probably at least 20 years old by now. The LED aspects in them are obsolete by many years now, so it's no surprise to see them swapped for halogen aspects. I've seen similar with the early era of Siemens and Peek LED lanterns, too.

This era of LED typically had 240v to the signal head and used some electronics to trick the controller into thinking it was monitoring a halogen aspect. As a result, it's fairly straightforward to swap one of these out for a regular halogen aspect when they fail without causing any issues for the controller, as spares for the halogen are more readily available.

Having said that, I know in West Yorkshire, they've retrofitted some of their failing LSH aspects with Swarco LED aspects to keep them going, which is a nice touch.
Simon
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by L.J.D »

traffic-light-man wrote: Fri Nov 03, 2023 19:51 Having said that, I know in West Yorkshire, they've retrofitted some of their failing LSH aspects with Swarco LED aspects to keep them going, which is a nice touch.
Yes this puffin crossing was changed over pretty soon after it was switched on but other way around it was Halogen not LED. I'd say a year after it was put in! Another one here also had the same treatment around the same time. Why they weren't just switched on as LED is a mystery. I also find it really odd that these didn't get switched over as well.

Also this head has had alot of aspect changes when the LSH has failed in them. The overhead signals were changed completely. They should of been kept for spares. But that whole junction looks scruffy and needs renewing to be honest. They did one half but the second half of the junction is still hanging on years later.
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by L.J.D »

This bus lane couldn't be opened because the signals were installed wrong meaning the bus exemption signs on signals were sticking out too far. They sorted it though they are now mounted all in line and have also been changed to the blue bus and cyclist plates. It's good it was picked up for once otherwise the signal on the island would of been getting bashed all over.
wallmeerkat
Member
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 16:49
Location: County Down

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by wallmeerkat »

L.J.D wrote: Mon Nov 13, 2023 10:50 This bus lane couldn't be opened because the signals were installed wrong meaning the bus exemption signs on signals were sticking out too far. They sorted it though they are now mounted all in line and have also been changed to the blue bus and cyclist plates. It's good it was picked up for once otherwise the signal on the island would of been getting bashed all over.
Yes good it was picked up before opening, but why did they change them at all from the previous - https://www.google.com/maps/@53.6921014 ... ?entry=ttu

I would say it's something that looks good on some designer's drawing, but in real world just doesn't work.
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by L.J.D »

wallmeerkat wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:06 Yes good it was picked up before opening, but why did they change them at all from the previous
I did wonder this myself given how they are now the exact same as the previous set. That set in general has had many changes from blue plates to white then to blue again and it's happened again! As soon as I saw the box sign installed sticking out I thought bad idea. Luckily it's sorted.

Also at this location I noticed how they used Telent 4G heads throughout the junctions. But the mast arm are Elite TLED heads. That's like an admission that they know the boards on the 4G heads are unfit for purpose and prone to falling off. Assuming that's the reason they've chose different heads for the mast arms.
User avatar
Nathan_A_RF
Member
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:53
Location: East Sussex/Southampton
Contact:

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by Nathan_A_RF »

wallmeerkat wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:06 Yes good it was picked up before opening, but why did they change them at all from the previous - https://www.google.com/maps/@53.6921014 ... ?entry=ttu
Because those signs are not allowed in signal heads. They are unnecessary anyway.
User avatar
ReissOmari
Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 21:51
Location: Birmingham

Re: Botched Traffic Signals

Post by ReissOmari »

L.J.D wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 12:36
wallmeerkat wrote: Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:06 Yes good it was picked up before opening, but why did they change them at all from the previous
I did wonder this myself given how they are now the exact same as the previous set. That set in general has had many changes from blue plates to white then to blue again and it's happened again! As soon as I saw the box sign installed sticking out I thought bad idea. Luckily it's sorted.

Also at this location I noticed how they used Telent 4G heads throughout the junctions. But the mast arm are Elite TLED heads. That's like an admission that they know the boards on the 4G heads are unfit for purpose and prone to falling off. Assuming that's the reason they've chose different heads for the mast arms.
Telent 4G's are so ugly. Much prefer the sleekness of Elite's (apart from the ones where the boards slowly turn green!!)
ReissOmari..
Post Reply