A9 dualling
Moderator: Site Management Team
- A72
- Member
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 17:21
- Location: Newtown St Boswells, Scottish Borders
Re: A9 dualling
Two short schemes in seven years. Why do we allow ourselves to be so slow and crap at building things in this country?!
The 7-Zone Challenge
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
Re: A9 dualling
We've designed and approved the go ahead for the Tomatin to Moy dualling. The only thing left to do is pick the contractor.
Sweet, that only takes a week or two, right?
Nah, the better part of a year and that's if we start the process today, which we won't.
Sweet, that only takes a week or two, right?
Nah, the better part of a year and that's if we start the process today, which we won't.
Re: A9 dualling
I thought the current procurement policy was to hand the contracts to your mates.
Worked great for Trojan in Dundee, until the rules caught up and various people connected lives in HMP Perth for a bit.
Worked great for Trojan in Dundee, until the rules caught up and various people connected lives in HMP Perth for a bit.
Re: A9 dualling
https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/ne ... under-way/ Enabling Works underway for Tomatin to Moy Section
Motorways travelled 2019 - M90 - M9 - M80 - M8 -M77 - M73 -A74(M) -M6-M42-M40 -A404(M) - M4 - M5 -M50 -M56 much better so far than last year
Re: A9 dualling
A quick reference to the eco-fanatic ruling-classes on either side of the border should answer this.
"I see the face of a child. He lives in a great city. He is black. Or he is white. He is Mexican, Italian, Polish. None of that matters. What matters, he's an American child"
- Richard Nixon
- Richard Nixon
-
- Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 23:14
Re: A9 dualling
Hi
It has got nothing to do with “ allowing ourselves to be slow” the A9 upgrade has always been a political exercise by the Nats in doing the minimum possible. For example why do we do one section at a time with a year long plus pause inbetween, when we could be doing two or even three sections at once. The current environmental tw@DLE is more about providing convenient cover.
Be thankful something is actually being done, the badly needed A96 upgrade has gone from residing in the very long grass to being kicked down a very deep hole.
It has got nothing to do with “ allowing ourselves to be slow” the A9 upgrade has always been a political exercise by the Nats in doing the minimum possible. For example why do we do one section at a time with a year long plus pause inbetween, when we could be doing two or even three sections at once. The current environmental tw@DLE is more about providing convenient cover.
Be thankful something is actually being done, the badly needed A96 upgrade has gone from residing in the very long grass to being kicked down a very deep hole.
- A72
- Member
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 17:21
- Location: Newtown St Boswells, Scottish Borders
Re: A9 dualling
Quite. I reckon we'll lucky to anything happen with that, before the end of the decade. If only Patrick Harvie would fall down the same hole.Mikehannah wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 20:38Be thankful something is actually being done, the badly needed A96 upgrade has gone from residing in the very long grass to being kicked down a very deep hole.
The 7-Zone Challenge
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15777
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: A9 dualling
Any chance of the Scottish Greens getting a kicking at the next set of elections for propping up the SNP government and obstructing infrastructure plans at the same time?A72 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 13:46Quite. I reckon we'll lucky to anything happen with that, before the end of the decade. If only Patrick Harvie would fall down the same hole.Mikehannah wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 20:38Be thankful something is actually being done, the badly needed A96 upgrade has gone from residing in the very long grass to being kicked down a very deep hole.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: A9 dualling
The most recent opinion polls showed the Scottish Greens at a record high.Chris Bertram wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 14:54Any chance of the Scottish Greens getting a kicking at the next set of elections for propping up the SNP government and obstructing infrastructure plans at the same time?A72 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 13:46Quite. I reckon we'll lucky to anything happen with that, before the end of the decade. If only Patrick Harvie would fall down the same hole.Mikehannah wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 20:38Be thankful something is actually being done, the badly needed A96 upgrade has gone from residing in the very long grass to being kicked down a very deep hole.
In reality I doubt they're having much impact on Scottish roads policy. The A9/A96 dualling commitment was made during the SNP's first term where they formed a minority government. They had won the last election by the skin of their teeth and desperately needed to broaden the geographic extent of their appeal with bold populist policies - the Queensferry Crossing and bridge tolls abolition was part of this as well. Of course, this worked probably better than they expected and won them an unprecedented majority in the subsequent election. Now, 15 years deep into the grim realities of government, they've long since realised that there's lots and lots of other quite important things they need to spend money on and have therefore been limiting capital spend on the A9 for ages. It's nothing to do with environmentalism: rail and active travel have been the victims of "aspiration fatigue" over the years as well.
Re: A9 dualling
As part of the deal with the Green Party the active travel budget is set to increase from £100 million to £300 million per annum. Patrick Harvie was saying the other day that Scotland will soon be spending more per head on active travel than the Netherlands.
Decarbonising the railways is a top priority for the Scottish Government. There’s £200 million per annum set aside for that.
£500 million has been committed to bus priority infrastructure over the next 5 years.
The A83 Access to Argyll and Bute project is a top priority and will probably cost over £100 million.
All these demands on the transport capital budget don’t leave much money for the A9.
Decarbonising the railways is a top priority for the Scottish Government. There’s £200 million per annum set aside for that.
£500 million has been committed to bus priority infrastructure over the next 5 years.
The A83 Access to Argyll and Bute project is a top priority and will probably cost over £100 million.
All these demands on the transport capital budget don’t leave much money for the A9.
Re: A9 dualling
Yes - and as you note, only the active travel spend is a direct result of the deal with the Greens and something the SNP are likely to have partly done anyway.clc wrote: ↑Mon Mar 28, 2022 21:40 As part of the deal with the Green Party the active travel budget is set to increase from £100 million to £300 million per annum. Patrick Harvie was saying the other day that Scotland will soon be spending more per head on active travel than the Netherlands.
Decarbonising the railways is a top priority for the Scottish Government. There’s £200 million per annum set aside for that.
£500 million has been committed to bus priority infrastructure over the next 5 years.
The A83 Access to Argyll and Bute project is a top priority and will probably cost over £100 million.
All these demands on the transport capital budget don’t leave much money for the A9.
Re: A9 dualling
And after the Greens give some money to Russia to help them destroy chemical weapons there won't be a lot left for anything . Its in the Green Manifesto!
Motorways travelled 2019 - M90 - M9 - M80 - M8 -M77 - M73 -A74(M) -M6-M42-M40 -A404(M) - M4 - M5 -M50 -M56 much better so far than last year
-
- Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 23:14
Re: A9 dualling
If the Russian can invade a sovereign neighbour, they can destroy their own chemical weapons, preferably not over Ukraine soil.
Re: A9 dualling
Seems odd to complain that the SNP are not doing enough for the A9 upgrades, when it's their pet project and they're the only political party interested in doing it. Without them it wouldn't be happening at all.Mikehannah wrote: ↑Sun Mar 27, 2022 20:38It has got nothing to do with “ allowing ourselves to be slow” the A9 upgrade has always been a political exercise by the Nats in doing the minimum possible. For example why do we do one section at a time with a year long plus pause inbetween, when we could be doing two or even three sections at once. The current environmental tw@DLE is more about providing convenient cover.
Chris
Roads.org.uk
Roads.org.uk
Re: A9 dualling
Are you sure it's in the Scottish Green Party manifesto? In any case I don't think it forms part of the not-coalition agreement...
Re: A9 dualling
PD412 We will provide financial support for the urgent decommissioning of chemical weapons in the former Soviet Union.
Motorways travelled 2019 - M90 - M9 - M80 - M8 -M77 - M73 -A74(M) -M6-M42-M40 -A404(M) - M4 - M5 -M50 -M56 much better so far than last year
Re: A9 dualling
That seems to be a quote from policy documents (not manifesto) of the Green Party of England and Wales (not Scotland) and seems to refer to decommissioning across former Soviet states (not just Russia). It also aligns with longstanding UK government policy.B9127 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 01, 2022 10:04
PD412 We will provide financial support for the urgent decommissioning of chemical weapons in the former Soviet Union.
There are plenty of arguments to be had about Scottish transport policy but they are not helped by citing incorrect, unrelated and apparently uncontroversial facts about the wrong party.
Re: A9 dualling
I don’t want to delve into politics too much (it never ends well), but there are some recent posts from people who don’t understand the differences between English politics and Scottish politics, so I’ve tried to write some fair and balanced notes.
The Scottish Green Party is nothing to do with the English and Welsh Green Party. They’re completely separate - one doesn’t answer to the other - and they actually don’t get on very well. The Scottish Greens don’t have anything about paying other countries to dispose of weapons in their manifesto.
This is in contrast to the “Scottish” Labour, Lib Dem and Conservatives, which aren’t actual parties at all and are just the UK parties operating under a different brand name. So the Scottish party can’t go against the UK party because they call the shots.
It’s also worth noting that the Scottish Parliament uses proportional representation rather than First Past The Post. This reduces the seats the winning party gets and gives more seats to the parties in second and third place. Minority governments and coalitions are the norm - there’s only ever been one Parliament that was a majority and it was incredibly narrow. A hung Parliament in Scotland doesn’t mean the same as in Westminster. It doesn’t mean a party is losing support or is on thin ice. Despite the fact the SNP have a minority right now, they have a lot of support. You can see this from the constituency results, which they win by a landslide. The Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem seats come from the regional bank, which are given to parties in second and third place.
Hope that’s fair and balanced, and also helpful.
The Scottish Green Party is nothing to do with the English and Welsh Green Party. They’re completely separate - one doesn’t answer to the other - and they actually don’t get on very well. The Scottish Greens don’t have anything about paying other countries to dispose of weapons in their manifesto.
This is in contrast to the “Scottish” Labour, Lib Dem and Conservatives, which aren’t actual parties at all and are just the UK parties operating under a different brand name. So the Scottish party can’t go against the UK party because they call the shots.
It’s also worth noting that the Scottish Parliament uses proportional representation rather than First Past The Post. This reduces the seats the winning party gets and gives more seats to the parties in second and third place. Minority governments and coalitions are the norm - there’s only ever been one Parliament that was a majority and it was incredibly narrow. A hung Parliament in Scotland doesn’t mean the same as in Westminster. It doesn’t mean a party is losing support or is on thin ice. Despite the fact the SNP have a minority right now, they have a lot of support. You can see this from the constituency results, which they win by a landslide. The Labour, Conservative and Lib Dem seats come from the regional bank, which are given to parties in second and third place.
Hope that’s fair and balanced, and also helpful.
Re: A9 dualling
The biggest problem with any A9 megaplan still remains there is simply not the traffic to make it stack up.
The safety argument falls flat too when the average speed checks and raising of the HGV limit to 50 have done wonders to reduce the number of kamikaze car drivers along the single bits too.
For comparison, similar corridors in France that are carrying similar traffic volumes are tolled autoroutes and built to lower standards than busier routes - the A28 for example opened with narrow lanes and D1 sections over structures.
I would rather a targeted programme of dualling the worst bits and improve enforcement on better bits where dualling isn't necessary. The real danger sites are the flat junctions and these need resolving be they single carriageway GSJs like at Newtonmore or just actual roundabouts.
The safety argument falls flat too when the average speed checks and raising of the HGV limit to 50 have done wonders to reduce the number of kamikaze car drivers along the single bits too.
For comparison, similar corridors in France that are carrying similar traffic volumes are tolled autoroutes and built to lower standards than busier routes - the A28 for example opened with narrow lanes and D1 sections over structures.
I would rather a targeted programme of dualling the worst bits and improve enforcement on better bits where dualling isn't necessary. The real danger sites are the flat junctions and these need resolving be they single carriageway GSJs like at Newtonmore or just actual roundabouts.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: A9 dualling
As someone who uses the A9 quite frequently at holiday times I fully agree. Perth to Inverness is a much calmer experience now with the cameras and raised HGV speed limit, and delays are minor. Even in an ideal world of lots of available public money, an unpolluting vehicle fleet and minimal environmental impacts of road building, I think completing the dualling of Perth to Pitlochry, adding GSJs to replace the worst of the flat junctions, and building some sections of alternating S2+1 in the middle of the longer sections between dualled stretches should be sufficient.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 03, 2022 15:34 The biggest problem with any A9 megaplan still remains there is simply not the traffic to make it stack up.
The safety argument falls flat too when the average speed checks and raising of the HGV limit to 50 have done wonders to reduce the number of kamikaze car drivers along the single bits too.
I would rather a targeted programme of dualling the worst bits and improve enforcement on better bits where dualling isn't necessary. The real danger sites are the flat junctions and these need resolving be they single carriageway GSJs like at Newtonmore or just actual roundabouts.
Owen