Pass Either Side
Moderator: Site Management Team
Pass Either Side
For years, I've seen the following sign being used inappropriately:
As I understand it, the sign means that you can pass either side to reach the same destination. However, it has often been used where you would end up at a different destination depending on which side you chose; most notably at roadworks on major roads, where the sign would be positioned at a temporary gore for an off-slip. I have also seen the sign installed permanently at a T-junction, where according to the road markings, left-turning traffic really should pass on the left, and right-turning traffic should pass on the right.
Lately, however, I've seen a new temporary sign at some roadworks, which consists of a "keep left" sign mounted side-by-side with a "keep right" sign, on the same backing plate. I wonder if these have been manufactured in response to the problem of the "pass either side" being misused so often.
Having thought about the new sign, however, I'm starting to wonder if it's any better. How can you follow positive instructions to pass the obstacle on its left-hand side and its right-hand side? Would it be better just to re-define the meaning of "pass either side" so that it's not supposed to convey anything about the destination(s) you may or may not reach?
This is another case where drivers manage just fine, and most probably won't notice that anything's amiss. But as ever on SABRE, Pedants-R-Us, and I was just wondering what everyone else thought.
As I understand it, the sign means that you can pass either side to reach the same destination. However, it has often been used where you would end up at a different destination depending on which side you chose; most notably at roadworks on major roads, where the sign would be positioned at a temporary gore for an off-slip. I have also seen the sign installed permanently at a T-junction, where according to the road markings, left-turning traffic really should pass on the left, and right-turning traffic should pass on the right.
Lately, however, I've seen a new temporary sign at some roadworks, which consists of a "keep left" sign mounted side-by-side with a "keep right" sign, on the same backing plate. I wonder if these have been manufactured in response to the problem of the "pass either side" being misused so often.
Having thought about the new sign, however, I'm starting to wonder if it's any better. How can you follow positive instructions to pass the obstacle on its left-hand side and its right-hand side? Would it be better just to re-define the meaning of "pass either side" so that it's not supposed to convey anything about the destination(s) you may or may not reach?
This is another case where drivers manage just fine, and most probably won't notice that anything's amiss. But as ever on SABRE, Pedants-R-Us, and I was just wondering what everyone else thought.
John
- Mark Hewitt
- Member
- Posts: 31443
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
- Location: Chester-le-Street
According to the Highway code, "Vehicles may pass either side to reach same destination".Mark Hewitt wrote:I've never thought it meant pass either side to reach the same destination, just simply that it is safe to pass either side of the obstacle
John
- Johnathan404
- Member
- Posts: 11478
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 16:54
I always thought it meant pass either side to reach same destination, and I'm sure I've read that in the Highway Code. That's why it's used most at toll booths, but I too have seen it used in the wrong places.
EDIT: Too slow!
EDIT: Too slow!
I have websites about: motorway services | Fareham
- SubaruImprezaWRX
- Member
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:37
- Location: London
True!SubaruImprezaWRX wrote:Whatever the sign is, it needs to be 'urgent' enough to prevent folk from driving head-on into the obstacle!
If I were in charge of deciding what sign to put up, though, I wouldn't have a clue what to use. I think they need to get rid of the official "same destination" requirement for the "pass either side" sign, as it would be a lot more useful without that restriction.
John
There is an island like this on Ladywell Walk (just outside the Arcadian) in Birmingham. It always had "pass both sides" sign on the bollard; however, I passed it last week and the bollard just has a blank white circle on it now. I think that when the Bull Ring was being rebuilt Ladywell Walk became either a two-way road, or became one-way in the opposite direction, or something! I assume the bollard was change then and never changed back.SubaruImprezaWRX wrote:I really do hate one-way systems with pass-either-side islands down them (like Tottenham Court Road, London). Feels so unnatural driving down the right hand side.
tbh, that's the only place I recall them being used properly: big, one-way avenues in Central London.SubaruImprezaWRX wrote:I really do hate one-way systems with pass-either-side islands down them (like Tottenham Court Road, London). Feels so unnatural driving down the right hand side.
Regards,
Paul
Paul
- sotonsteve
- Member
- Posts: 6079
- Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 21:01
There is one of these signs on the A335 iin Eastleigh, heading northbound approaching the roundabout where the two A335 sections seperate. You should pass to the left to turn left or go straight on, or pass to the right to go to Lidl or to Fair Oak.
I thought these signs were pass either side to reach the same destination, but they obviously have another use for letting people pass either side of a traffic island.
I thought these signs were pass either side to reach the same destination, but they obviously have another use for letting people pass either side of a traffic island.
You're right, it does mean pass either side to reach the same destination and I also agree that it's be better without that requirement as the diagram on the sign makes no hint that that's what should happen. To me, it merely shows a traffic island which you can pass either side.jcpren wrote:If I were in charge of deciding what sign to put up, though, I wouldn't have a clue what to use. I think they need to get rid of the official "same destination" requirement for the "pass either side" sign, as it would be a lot more useful without that restriction.
There's something counter-intuitive about the downward arrows, as most signs pertaining to direction have arrows going up or across. Better may be a pair of upward arrows close together at the bottom, widening to pass something blob shaped (possibly with "Pass either side" in it), then coming close again to show that both lead to the same place.
But whatever the sign, someone's going to put it in the wrong place (or the wrong way up) somewhere.
But whatever the sign, someone's going to put it in the wrong place (or the wrong way up) somewhere.
Smacks of US design:Ian198 wrote:There's something counter-intuitive about the downward arrows, as most signs pertaining to direction have arrows going up or across. Better may be a pair of upward arrows close together at the bottom, widening to pass something blob shaped (possibly with "Pass either side" in it), then coming close again to show that both lead to the same place.
Regards,
Paul
Paul
- SubaruImprezaWRX
- Member
- Posts: 2799
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:37
- Location: London
- michael769
- Member
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 20:36
- Location: Polbeth, West Lothian
- Contact:
In situations where "pass either side" is needed without "same direction", the correct options are, depending on the layout.jcpren wrote: True!
If I were in charge of deciding what sign to put up, though, I wouldn't have a clue what to use. I think they need to get rid of the official "same destination" requirement for the "pass either side" sign, as it would be a lot more useful without that restriction.
A standard illuminated bollard with no sign at the top,
A black and white marker post
The black and white checkerboard sign.
A suitably located direction sign
Blue circular signs are meantto give instructions to drivers (eg. you must go this side). If drivers are free to go either side there is no requirement for any mandatory signs, just some way to warn drivers of the obstruction.
IMHO this sign is a bit of anomaly as it really means "you can" rather than "you must", it's not really a mandatory sign. It would make more sense for it to be rectangular.
Still if we did not have these oddities we'd have a lot less to talk about!
Re: Pass Either Side
You can also use the "bee stripes" on the ends of crash barriers that meet at an apex where vehicles can take a slip road etc.
I've wondered about the wording of the YOU MUST and YOU MAY with these signs too. "You must keep left or right but it doesn't matter which".
I've wondered about the wording of the YOU MUST and YOU MAY with these signs too. "You must keep left or right but it doesn't matter which".
Re:
And, indeed, that is how it appears in the Worboys Report. One of the changes that were made when the new 1964 TSRGD was published, contrary to the committee's recommendations, was for "pass either side" to become circular.michael769 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2006 13:30IMHO this sign is a bit of anomaly as it really means "you can" rather than "you must", it's not really a mandatory sign. It would make more sense for it to be rectangular.
Chris
Roads.org.uk
Roads.org.uk
Re: Re:
It was almost certainly changed to a circle because new traffic bollards were all designed to use a moulded circle, really in most cases the simple plain face bollard serves the exact same purpose so I'm not even sure why it's still a sign to be honest.Chris5156 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 22:06And, indeed, that is how it appears in the Worboys Report. One of the changes that were made when the new 1964 TSRGD was published, contrary to the committee's recommendations, was for "pass either side" to become circular.michael769 wrote: ↑Sat Jul 29, 2006 13:30IMHO this sign is a bit of anomaly as it really means "you can" rather than "you must", it's not really a mandatory sign. It would make more sense for it to be rectangular.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck