Fortunately, being based upon chalk, there is no risk that a deeper cutting/tunnel alignment would be more prone to flooding (regularly or intermittent).Jim606 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 16, 2021 10:00I agree that the scheme is 'likely' to go-ahead, in fact some preparation work is about to start such as the power and byway diversions. The campaigners always argued 'no tunnel' or a 'much longer tunnel'. It makes me wonder if they have the ability to extract some more concessions if the High Court ruling goes against the DfT? As mentioned earlier in this thread a longer tunnel isn't possible without a lot of extra money and some ventilation shafts. However, as I have always thought the scheme still isn't good enough. Personally, I would ask for two extra green bridges, one along the line of what would become the old A360 near Longbarrow roundabout and another by the eastern portal. Here I would lower the road level down by 10-15m and sink into much more into the landscape hiding it from view.The PM in his levelling up speech made reference again to the A303 so despite all the issues - he knows like many others that its a scheme which needs to go ahead.
Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Moderator: Site Management Team
-
- Member
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
- Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Another classic example of if HE just designed a proper scheme in the first place they'd have saved millions in legal battles...Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:48 Back we go.... (again)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-w ... e-58024139
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Makes me really annoyed that these eco warriors can stop a much needed road scheme. They want to protect the stones, but are happy for 35,000 vehicles a day to scream past, severely affecting the environment of the surrounding area when they could be under the ground.Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:48 Back we go.... (again)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-w ... e-58024139
This may be controversial but I do sometimes question the neutrality of the judges in these decisions.
The M25 - The road to nowhere
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
I mostly agree, but as Bryn says, if they did it properly in the first place this wouldn't happen. Just do the job properly, design it properly, approve it properly. If this keeps happening I'll start to wonder if it's deliberate - fire a scheme away as approved - "look at us building infrastructure" etc - knowing it'll never happen.A303Chris wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:59Makes me really annoyed that these eco warriors can stop a much needed road scheme. They want to protect the stones, but are happy for 35,000 vehicles a day to scream past, severely affecting the environment of the surrounding area when they could be under the ground.Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:48 Back we go.... (again)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-w ... e-58024139
This may be controversial but I do sometimes question the neutrality of the judges in these decisions.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
I dare say it's the consultancy money-go-round, things being built means they're not being endlessly developed in CAD and that's a lot of people not needed in a design office...Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 17:03I mostly agree, but as Bryn says, if they did it properly in the first place this wouldn't happen. Just do the job properly, design it properly, approve it properly. If this keeps happening I'll start to wonder if it's deliberate - fire a scheme away as approved - "look at us building infrastructure" etc - knowing it'll never happen.A303Chris wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:59Makes me really annoyed that these eco warriors can stop a much needed road scheme. They want to protect the stones, but are happy for 35,000 vehicles a day to scream past, severely affecting the environment of the surrounding area when they could be under the ground.Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:48 Back we go.... (again)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-w ... e-58024139
This may be controversial but I do sometimes question the neutrality of the judges in these decisions.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Interesting comment about "failure to consider other options", as required by law. They have long been hell bent on the tunnel option despite opposition and alternatives that may or may not be more cost effective/cheaper. Looks like you may now have to happen. Pity it couldn't have been done years ago, saving many years and a load of money!
Goodness knows when it will be now before something is done, if ever. Meanwhile A303 traffic and the site itself will continue to suffer, not to mention the impact on other improvement schemes along the road that are dependent on Stonehenge being sorted out!
Love to know what planet those that say we must reduce road use and traffic rather than building more roads are living on? People and goods need to move around and roads are still the best way of doing that.
Goodness knows when it will be now before something is done, if ever. Meanwhile A303 traffic and the site itself will continue to suffer, not to mention the impact on other improvement schemes along the road that are dependent on Stonehenge being sorted out!
Love to know what planet those that say we must reduce road use and traffic rather than building more roads are living on? People and goods need to move around and roads are still the best way of doing that.
My latest Road Photos https://flic.kr/s/aHsktQHcMB
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
I notice these eco-warriors are totally silent on the thousands of building sites building hundreds of thousands of houses everywhere one looks.
-
- Member
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2002 19:54
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
This seems to be more about whether due process was followed and the balance of the decision taken by the SOS. I still think a lot of the opposition would have been addressed if the western portal had been moved out of the heritage site to the other side of the A360.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
The alternatives that the judge said the SST should have considered are lengthening the bore (at an extra £500m) or adding a cut and cover section (at an extra £250m). More tunnel, not less. Though, to be clear, the judge is not recommending these alternatives - it is just a legal requirement that some alternatives are considered by the SST.Richardf wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 17:58 Interesting comment about "failure to consider other options", as required by law. They have long been hell bent on the tunnel option despite opposition and alternatives that may or may not be more cost effective/cheaper. Looks like you may now have to happen.
It doesn't matter how the scheme is designed or how long the tunnel is, the same legal requirement on the SST to fully consider heritage assets and alternatives would have been in place, and the DCO would still have been quashed if that was not done (assuming a case was brought).Fluid Dynamics wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 18:10 I still think a lot of the opposition would have been addressed if the western portal had been moved out of the heritage site to the other side of the A360.
It looks like it should be a simple matter for SST to redetermine the DCO, this time showing he's fully taken the heritage assets and alternatives into account in his decision letter.
The judgment is here: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/save ... transport/
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Grant Shapps has not declared an intention to appeal the ruling...jackal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 18:25The alternatives that the judge said the SST should have considered are lengthening the bore (at an extra £500m) or adding a cut and cover section (at an extra £250m). More tunnel, not less. Though, to be clear, the judge is not recommending these alternatives - it is just a legal requirement that some alternatives are considered by the SST.Richardf wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 17:58 Interesting comment about "failure to consider other options", as required by law. They have long been hell bent on the tunnel option despite opposition and alternatives that may or may not be more cost effective/cheaper. Looks like you may now have to happen.It doesn't matter how the scheme is designed or how long the tunnel is, the same legal requirement on the SST to fully consider heritage assets and alternatives would have been in place, and the DCO would still have been quashed if that was not done (assuming a case was brought).Fluid Dynamics wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 18:10 I still think a lot of the opposition would have been addressed if the western portal had been moved out of the heritage site to the other side of the A360.
It looks like it should be a simple matter for SST to redetermine the DCO, this time showing he's fully taken the heritage assets and alternatives into account in his decision letter.
The judgment is here: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/save ... transport/
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
He doesn't need to appeal. From the judge's summary: 'The redetermination of the application is now a matter for the SST'.
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5711
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
The judges apply the law without fear or favour dependent on what arguments are put before them. The ire should be reserved for the government and DfT managers who managed to get this far spending public money with a fundamental flaw in their process.A303Chris wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:59Makes me really annoyed that these eco warriors can stop a much needed road scheme. They want to protect the stones, but are happy for 35,000 vehicles a day to scream past, severely affecting the environment of the surrounding area when they could be under the ground.Hdeng16 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 16:48 Back we go.... (again)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-w ... e-58024139
This may be controversial but I do sometimes question the neutrality of the judges in these decisions.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
And from what I gather, he has no intention to do that. Rather suggests the scheme will go into the bin.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Its the Summer Holidays when politicians and lots of their minions in Whitehall are not around. From what the Judge has said there is a significant amount of work needed before the application can be resubmitted anyway.
Basically nothing of significance will happen until the Party conference season in September - when ministers will want to impress. Given the pro-car stance of the ruling party and Boris's love of flashy projects, I wouldn't write it off happening just yet.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Sure, if that's what he/the govt want to do. I'm just describing the legal situation.
I will add, though, that if he were going ahead he certainly wouldn't say so immediately as that might suggest he had violated the requirement to fully consider heritage, alternatives, etc. I guess this is what's going on with the similar case of the A38 Derby Junctions - a respectful period of 'consideration' before redetermination.
Last edited by jackal on Fri Jul 30, 2021 20:29, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
I think it’s less pro car and more pro consultancy and construction industry gravy train. Explains the huge expense of schemes for projects many of which are far from what they should be in design.Phil wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 19:48Its the Summer Holidays when politicians and lots of their minions in Whitehall are not around. From what the Judge has said there is a significant amount of work needed before the application can be resubmitted anyway.
Basically nothing of significance will happen until the Party conference season in September - when ministers will want to impress. Given the pro-car stance of the ruling party and Boris's love of flashy projects, I wouldn't write it off happening just yet.
SMT edit to fix quoting.
M19