Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
That was a useful update, thankyou. Nice to see things are staying on track, not left on the back burner.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Only thing about that though is that the Lib Dems aren't known as keen road builders.Herned wrote:There's quite a few Tory/Lib Dem marginal seats in the South West, I would imagine a potential election would make the scheme more likely to go ahead, the approach seems to be to throw money at any problem
Still, glad to know it is still rumbling on.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
New images released by HE showing what the tunnel could like are viewable via this link.
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/a303-stonehenge-about/
Meanwhile it was missed off the so called Government review, really a election broadcast and the view of HE remains that if the project is to be completed as planned by 2026, the funding needs to be confirmed by the end of the year.
I can't see it happening I'm afraid, too contentious with too little tangible reward.
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/a303-stonehenge-about/
Meanwhile it was missed off the so called Government review, really a election broadcast and the view of HE remains that if the project is to be completed as planned by 2026, the funding needs to be confirmed by the end of the year.
I can't see it happening I'm afraid, too contentious with too little tangible reward.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
It really is only about funding. Before it was because funds had to come from central government.
In the end, I would rather the Government caved and accepted PFI for this one. It really has to be built.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Geotechnical Surveying work to start. Due to complete early next year
https://www.spirefm.co.uk/news/local-ne ... -amesbury/
https://www.spirefm.co.uk/news/local-ne ... -amesbury/
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Something is happening? That's better than nothing happening.tompatt wrote:Geotechnical Surveying work to start. Due to complete early next year
https://www.spirefm.co.uk/news/local-ne ... -amesbury/
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
The examination of the scheme has now closed. PINS have three months to make their recommendation, but it's a rubber stamping exercise nowadays.
The funding issue is pretty academic imo. In truth the govt were always paying for it so the change there is a superficial one.
The funding issue is pretty academic imo. In truth the govt were always paying for it so the change there is a superficial one.
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
No UK tier 1 contractors have bid for the contract. Highways England are standing firm on their fixed price approach, and have three bids from continental joint ventures.
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 7-12-2019/
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 7-12-2019/
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5719
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Funnily enough for those with a long memory, this approach is almost exactly the same one that led to cost increases in the ECI period and the project being dubbed uneconomic and withdrawn the last time. It was similarly competitively priced with risk transfer before the design was carried out.jackal wrote: ↑Tue Dec 17, 2019 19:41 No UK tier 1 contractors have bid for the contract. Highways England are standing firm on their fixed price approach, and have three bids from continental joint ventures.
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 7-12-2019/
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
And they're planning on using the same model for LTC...
HS2 has already backtracked on risk transfer, all the big boys got stung in Scotland recently with FRB and AWPR, over two years ago some of the top players were making noises about shunning the HE in favour of HS2....it may be good for the HE getting new contractors in but if they're not experienced in UK highways there's a risk it could backfire
HS2 has already backtracked on risk transfer, all the big boys got stung in Scotland recently with FRB and AWPR, over two years ago some of the top players were making noises about shunning the HE in favour of HS2....it may be good for the HE getting new contractors in but if they're not experienced in UK highways there's a risk it could backfire
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5719
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Absolutely, with Hinkley C ongoing, HS2, Heathrow and Sizewell C all in the near future plus a steady RDP flow, not many Tier 1's need to chase the HE complex schemes, so HE will get the team they deserve with the conditions they have chosen.darkcape wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 00:07 And they're planning on using the same model for LTC...
HS2 has already backtracked on risk transfer, all the big boys got stung in Scotland recently with FRB and AWPR, over two years ago some of the top players were making noises about shunning the HE in favour of HS2....it may be good for the HE getting new contractors in but if they're not experienced in UK highways there's a risk it could backfire
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
At least it ensures another 15 years of me complaining about shoddy design quality on the 'ancillary' items buried in Series 1200, not like this stuff matters is it given that it's only what everyone using the road relies on...RichardA35 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 07:53Absolutely, with Hinkley C ongoing, HS2, Heathrow and Sizewell C all in the near future plus a steady RDP flow, not many Tier 1's need to chase the HE complex schemes, so HE will get the team they deserve with the conditions they have chosen.darkcape wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 00:07 And they're planning on using the same model for LTC...
HS2 has already backtracked on risk transfer, all the big boys got stung in Scotland recently with FRB and AWPR, over two years ago some of the top players were making noises about shunning the HE in favour of HS2....it may be good for the HE getting new contractors in but if they're not experienced in UK highways there's a risk it could backfire
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5719
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
HE also seem unaware of the cost and inefficiency of Eurocode foundations compared to the old BS and meanwhile the public get lost due to poor wayfinding design and speed inappropriate roundabout geometry.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 13:19At least it ensures another 15 years of me complaining about shoddy design quality on the 'ancillary' items buried in Series 1200, not like this stuff matters is it given that it's only what everyone using the road relies on...RichardA35 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 07:53Absolutely, with Hinkley C ongoing, HS2, Heathrow and Sizewell C all in the near future plus a steady RDP flow, not many Tier 1's need to chase the HE complex schemes, so HE will get the team they deserve with the conditions they have chosen.darkcape wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 00:07 And they're planning on using the same model for LTC...
HS2 has already backtracked on risk transfer, all the big boys got stung in Scotland recently with FRB and AWPR, over two years ago some of the top players were making noises about shunning the HE in favour of HS2....it may be good for the HE getting new contractors in but if they're not experienced in UK highways there's a risk it could backfire
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
That explains the nuclear bunker designs we see everywhere then. I'd love to see how much money this wastes on smart motorway schemes where you'd have thought lightweight lattix type gantries (protected by barriers as they're not passively safe once heavy signal equipment is installed) as used in Norway would provide much better savings and also reduce the visual clutter...RichardA35 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 14:08HE also seem unaware of the cost and inefficiency of Eurocode foundations compared to the old BS and meanwhile the public get lost due to poor wayfinding design and speed inappropriate roundabout geometry.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2019 13:19At least it ensures another 15 years of me complaining about shoddy design quality on the 'ancillary' items buried in Series 1200, not like this stuff matters is it given that it's only what everyone using the road relies on...RichardA35 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 07:53 Absolutely, with Hinkley C ongoing, HS2, Heathrow and Sizewell C all in the near future plus a steady RDP flow, not many Tier 1's need to chase the HE complex schemes, so HE will get the team they deserve with the conditions they have chosen.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
This sounds like a similar scenario to the GW electrification, where the gantries have been of a far more solid design than earlier ones on schemes like the ECML. Why the overdesign, H&S paranoia?
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
The Tier 1's have been delivering obscenely expensive road schemes by international standards. I for one welcome our new European overlords.
- thatapanydude
- Member
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 21:35
- Location: Bedfordshire
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
It is to stop the trains and weather pulling the wires down more often! On the ECML this is a common enough occurrence which needs to be mitigated - hence the same installation on the MML electrification.
A1/A1(M) >>> M1
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
Getting back to the theme of this thread............
When will this project ever be "oven ready", to use a phrase !! A decades long saga still not ended; yet the countries of Europe just seem to get on and build things without all the chest beating and knashing of teeth !
When will this project ever be "oven ready", to use a phrase !! A decades long saga still not ended; yet the countries of Europe just seem to get on and build things without all the chest beating and knashing of teeth !
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
It should be hitting the Minister’s in-tray by the new year. They’ll have had the report for 3 months by then.
Final decision must be made by the end of March/beginning of April.
Final decision must be made by the end of March/beginning of April.
- Norfolktolancashire
- Member
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 22:34
- Location: Cornwall
Re: Stonehenge - The bored tunnel option
I think it will be given the final go ahead. There is no other option really apart from leaving the route as it is and that will just not help the wider area.
There will, however, be massive protests, if not just from Extinction Rebellion.