Forth Replacement Crossing
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I think you could argue that the signage on the ground suggests that the M876 and M9 run along together, with lane one in each direction being the M876 and lanes 2 and 3 the M9. Therefore, the M876 either has a Junction 8 and 7 between 2 and 3 or two un-numbered junctions.
Rob.
My mission is to travel every road and visit every town, village and hamlet in the British Isles.
I don't like thinking about how badly I am doing.
My mission is to travel every road and visit every town, village and hamlet in the British Isles.
I don't like thinking about how badly I am doing.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I would agree with the idea that lane 1 of that section is the M876 and lanes 2 and 3 are the M9, thats how I have read it when I have driven that section.rileyrob wrote:I think you could argue that the signage on the ground suggests that the M876 and M9 run along together, with lane one in each direction being the M876 and lanes 2 and 3 the M9. Therefore, the M876 either has a Junction 8 and 7 between 2 and 3 or two un-numbered junctions.
Formerly known as 'lortjw'
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Can it be made by an SI?? It’s much quicker to introduce changes by secondary legislation than an (all new) RTA (Amendment) Act.Big L wrote:It's promised for 2018.Phil wrote:There was - but I don't think its made much headway so far, mainly because HM Government have rather a lot of other more pressing demands on legislative time at the moment.Ronnie wrote:Wasn't there a plan floated last year to lift the restriction on learners on motorways? Its a ridiculous, outdated and arbitrary ban anyway.
-
- Member
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 13:53
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I think most of the talk has come from the local LibDem councillors and has very little chance of coming to fruition.GrahameCase wrote:Re south queensferry, theres talk of opening up the bus slip from Echline onto the A90 to all vehicles as the poor darlings aren’t travelling to the new junction south of the bridge to go into edinburgh
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Now on Google Street View but northbound only and not south of 1a
Ian (M5 Driver)
Ian (M5 Driver)
Last edited by IAN on Sun Apr 22, 2018 20:55, edited 1 time in total.
AKA M5 Driver
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Crossed in the Motorhome on Sunday night with a stiff breeze coming downstream; pretty impressed with the wind shielding, didn't need to counter steer at all even after making landfall on the Fife side as the shielding protects you until you're round the curve and sheltered.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I've occasionally felt a twitch as I pass the base of a tower, I suppose it's not inconceivable that there might be a bit of eddying there.Nwallace wrote:Crossed in the Motorhome on Sunday night with a stiff breeze coming downstream; pretty impressed with the wind shielding, didn't need to counter steer at all even after making landfall on the Fife side as the shielding protects you until you're round the curve and sheltered.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I didn't notice anything untoward but I was on the upstream carriageway with a westerly blowing out to sea.
This in a vehicle which if you're not prepared will be blown significantly off course whenever anything passes it in either direction. Always a pain when someone who's been hiding in your blind spot finally decides to overtake when you're not looking in the mirrors.
This in a vehicle which if you're not prepared will be blown significantly off course whenever anything passes it in either direction. Always a pain when someone who's been hiding in your blind spot finally decides to overtake when you're not looking in the mirrors.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
A selection of Statutory Instruments published relating to the approach roads and the old crossing for your enjoyment
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/119 - The A90/A9000 Trunk Road (Forth Road Bridge) (Prohibitions on Use and Stopping) Order 2018
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/120 - The A90 Trunk Road (Forth Road Bridge and Queensferry Crossing Approach Roads) (Prohibitions on Use and Stopping and Bus Lane) Order 2018
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/121 - The A90/A9000 Trunk Roads (Forth Road Bridge, and Queensferry Crossing and Forth Road Bridge Approach Roads) (Speed Limits) Order 2018
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/119 - The A90/A9000 Trunk Road (Forth Road Bridge) (Prohibitions on Use and Stopping) Order 2018
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/120 - The A90 Trunk Road (Forth Road Bridge and Queensferry Crossing Approach Roads) (Prohibitions on Use and Stopping and Bus Lane) Order 2018
* http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2018/121 - The A90/A9000 Trunk Roads (Forth Road Bridge, and Queensferry Crossing and Forth Road Bridge Approach Roads) (Speed Limits) Order 2018
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Speaking of the old bridge, apparently around 100 vehicles a day are illegally using the old bridge. I'd have thought it would have camera enforcement or something along those lines.
Owen Rudge
http://www.owenrudge.net/
http://www.owenrudge.net/
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
How about a crackdown on Lib-Dem MSPs who don't know the difference between "flaunt" and "flout"?
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15777
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
I don't think that confusion is restricted to MSPs of any political colour.RichardB wrote:How about a crackdown on Lib-Dem MSPs who don't know the difference between "flaunt" and "flout"?
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
- novaecosse
- Member
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 23:35
- Location: Dundee, Scotland
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Rising Bollards would be betterorudge wrote:Speaking of the old bridge, apparently around 100 vehicles a day are illegally using the old bridge. I'd have thought it would have camera enforcement or something along those lines.
Better still, install a barrier... they could charge £5 to cross the bridge and issue a souvenir ticket.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Im sure its been suggested before in this thread, months ago, that having a scheme whereby certain registered vehicles can join if they are living within a certain distance of the bridge.orudge wrote:Speaking of the old bridge, apparently around 100 vehicles a day are illegally using the old bridge. I'd have thought it would have camera enforcement or something along those lines.
I guess they could charge an annual fee of say £20 per year so that north and south Queensferry residents could use the bridge, perhaps up to say 10km away from the old bridge each side.
The old bridge could easily be marked as 1 lane bus lane and 1 lane local private traffic.
The bridge could be enforced by ANPR, meaning those that arent included on the list of allowed numberplates would get a fine. All buses would be registered by default of course and taxis could register, for a larger fee than residents, if within 50km of the bridge, seeing as they are a form of public transport.
Formerly known as 'lortjw'
- ScottB5411
- Member
- Posts: 4153
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 20:04
- Location: St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Excellent idealotrjw wrote:Im sure its been suggested before in this thread, months ago, that having a scheme whereby certain registered vehicles can join if they are living within a certain distance of the bridge.orudge wrote:Speaking of the old bridge, apparently around 100 vehicles a day are illegally using the old bridge. I'd have thought it would have camera enforcement or something along those lines.
I guess they could charge an annual fee of say £20 per year so that north and south Queensferry residents could use the bridge, perhaps up to say 10km away from the old bridge each side.
The old bridge could easily be marked as 1 lane bus lane and 1 lane local private traffic.
The bridge could be enforced by ANPR, meaning those that arent included on the list of allowed numberplates would get a fine. All buses would be registered by default of course and taxis could register, for a larger fee than residents, if within 50km of the bridge, seeing as they are a form of public transport.
How about some more beans Mr. Taggart?
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
With a discount for single-occupancy vehicles as they're putting less stress on the bridge.lotrjw wrote:Im sure its been suggested before in this thread, months ago, that having a scheme whereby certain registered vehicles can join if they are living within a certain distance of the bridge.orudge wrote:Speaking of the old bridge, apparently around 100 vehicles a day are illegally using the old bridge. I'd have thought it would have camera enforcement or something along those lines.
I guess they could charge an annual fee of say £20 per year so that north and south Queensferry residents could use the bridge, perhaps up to say 10km away from the old bridge each side.
The old bridge could easily be marked as 1 lane bus lane and 1 lane local private traffic.
The bridge could be enforced by ANPR, meaning those that arent included on the list of allowed numberplates would get a fine. All buses would be registered by default of course and taxis could register, for a larger fee than residents, if within 50km of the bridge, seeing as they are a form of public transport.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Wouldn't expect the taxi companies to be happy with that seeing as they can currently use the bridge for free.lotrjw wrote:... and taxis could register, for a larger fee than residents, if within 50km of the bridge, seeing as they are a form of public transport.
Education makes the wise slightly wiser, but it makes the fool vastly more dangerous. N. Taleb
We tend to demand impossible standards of proof from our opponents but accept any old rubbish to support our beliefs.
The human paradox that is common sense
The Backfire Effect
We tend to demand impossible standards of proof from our opponents but accept any old rubbish to support our beliefs.
The human paradox that is common sense
The Backfire Effect
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
Oh OK didnt realise I guess that comes as part of their licence?cb a1 wrote:Wouldn't expect the taxi companies to be happy with that seeing as they can currently use the bridge for free.lotrjw wrote:... and taxis could register, for a larger fee than residents, if within 50km of the bridge, seeing as they are a form of public transport.
Formerly known as 'lortjw'
- novaecosse
- Member
- Posts: 4722
- Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 23:35
- Location: Dundee, Scotland
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
So, after a bit of digging, it appears we are going to be deviating from current practice, in that the Ramp Metering signals will not have the yellow Backing Boards that are prescribed in England.
Re: Forth Replacement Crossing
The bridge looks like its regressing every time I go over. I'm guessing that the snagging works will be ongoing for some time?