Forth Replacement Crossing

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
Duncan macknight
Committee Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:59
Location: Inverness

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Duncan macknight »

As a small side thought here... Would it be possible to “accidentally” cross the forth road bridge. I wouldn’t think there’s a massive penalty or fine to do so, probably the worst that would happen is a telling off from a policeman. Thoughts...
User avatar
Berk
Member
Posts: 9779
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 02:36
Location: somewhere in zone 1

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Berk »

[*]
Last edited by Berk on Sat Dec 30, 2017 18:22, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by wrinkly »

Duncan macknight wrote:
wrinkly wrote:The third section of M90 to be built was called Arlary to Arngask.
Was it? I’m pretty sure that the third section of the M90 was the Kinross bypass which went from Gairneybridge (a terminus at Lochran, more accurately) up to Arlary. After that the next section was Arlary to Arngask although the road did terminate a bit further on than Arngask. Bridge of Earn to Craigend may have opened before this mind you..
Sorry, I ment the fourth section was Arlary to Arngask. I was miscounting from my own list.
djw1981
Member
Posts: 1803
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 00:07
Location: Falkirk

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by djw1981 »

Duncan macknight wrote:As a small side thought here... Would it be possible to “accidentally” cross the forth road bridge. I wouldn’t think there’s a massive penalty or fine to do so, probably the worst that would happen is a telling off from a policeman. Thoughts...
IIRc it now runs under bus lane type conditions, so they would probably be looking at fine plus 3pts?
User avatar
Berk
Member
Posts: 9779
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 02:36
Location: somewhere in zone 1

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Berk »

djw1981 wrote:
Duncan macknight wrote:As a small side thought here... Would it be possible to “accidentally” cross the forth road bridge. I wouldn’t think there’s a massive penalty or fine to do so, probably the worst that would happen is a telling off from a policeman. Thoughts...
IIRc it now runs under bus lane type conditions, so they would probably be looking at fine plus 3pts?
I thought there were cameras, so they’d just fine people who wanted to do their own thing?? In any case, you can’t really join the bridge northbound, apart from slip roads.
djw1981
Member
Posts: 1803
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 00:07
Location: Falkirk

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by djw1981 »

There are the standard traffic cameras, though whether they have ANPR appropriate for enforcing vehicle restrictions I have no idea!

Indeed, northbound access is via slip roads at the old Echline junction, thus it is a fairly deliberate act to join the bridge, and not something which one could easily claim as an accident or disorientated.
User avatar
novaecosse
Member
Posts: 4722
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 23:35
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by novaecosse »

djw1981 wrote:
Duncan macknight wrote:As a small side thought here... Would it be possible to “accidentally” cross the forth road bridge. I wouldn’t think there’s a massive penalty or fine to do so, probably the worst that would happen is a telling off from a policeman. Thoughts...
IIRc it now runs under bus lane type conditions, so they would probably be looking at fine plus 3pts?
It depends who’s tasked with doing the enforcement.
If it’s Police Scotland, then yes, it would be a fine + points.
But Council enforced Bus Lanes only attract a fine... which is often discounted if paid promptly.
User avatar
Berk
Member
Posts: 9779
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 02:36
Location: somewhere in zone 1

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Berk »

Meanwhile I’m still struggling to understand why the M90 couldn’t have been built to go straight to the Queensferry Crossing (there is sufficient land outwith the Dundas Mains estate), and why the M90 at J1 isn’t full access, so you can go eastbound (rather than take the A8/A902). :?

Even a cheapo onslip from the B800 would do (until they can fix it properly).
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35928
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Bryn666 »

The decision to follow the railway was to reduce the amount of "converting our countryside to concrete!" sulking. The result is a horribly convoluted motorway route though.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Berk
Member
Posts: 9779
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 02:36
Location: somewhere in zone 1

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Berk »

It’s lead to an absurd choice of route though... :confused:
User avatar
Glen
Social Media Admin
Posts: 5429
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 02:16
Location: Inbhir Pheofharain
Contact:

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Glen »

The M9 Spur extension was a local road project and built to connect to the existing bridge, long before the FRC was being planned. It had to connect to the A90 allowing for the existing junction, so it couldn't have taken a much straighter route without needing a complete redesign of the Echline Junction.
If it hadn't already been built then the motorway link between the M9 and FRC could have been to the west of Dundas Castle, but that wasn't going to happen when there was a new motorway just to the east of that route.
User avatar
Truvelo
Member
Posts: 17501
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 21:10
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Truvelo »

Had the A720 north of Gogar been built the whole thing would have been a continuation of the Edinburgh Bypass. There would have been no TOTSOing at all between the A720 and FRC.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
Duncan macknight
Committee Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:59
Location: Inverness

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Duncan macknight »

Truvelo wrote:Had the A720 north of Gogar been built the whole thing would have been a continuation of the Edinburgh Bypass. There would have been no TOTSOing at all between the A720 and FRC.
Was that ever in plans? Or did a 1980s road planner say “the A902 is there so the A720 can stop at the A8”. I think that the original M9 spur messed things up from the start but it’s not a BAD extension, just the ruddy sharp bend at the top that’s the annoying bit in the whole M90 approach route.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9018
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by wrinkly »

I have a dim and vague idea that at some time in the distant past an undertaking was made that the A720 would not be extended north of the A8.

Incidentally I see that current Landranger mapping shows (as a "place of interest", with blue shaded background to the text) a "Country Esate" (sic) at Cammo, west of the A902. Whilst some OS maps have disputable spellings of some placenames, I don't remember seeing a typo in an ordinary word on an OS map before.
A9NWIL
Member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 02:36

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by A9NWIL »

How about this the A720 gets extended to meet the A90, the A90 gets an LAR from that point to the B924 (The LAR could actually take the number B924), then the bit of A90 from the A720 extension to the other bit of M90 becomes part of the M90 as a spur.
Formerly known as 'lortjw'
FtoE
Member
Posts: 156
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 09:43

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by FtoE »

rileyrob wrote:The Construction Timleine on CBRD: http://www.cbrd.co.uk/motorway/m90 suggests otherwise, unless construction sections were opened a bit at a time.

I've also compiled the dates on the wiki here: Scottish_Motorway_Opening_Dates
That’s pretty comprehensive!
(The only one I can’t see is the M9 from junction 9 (I think) to Junction 7 which connected the two sections of the M9 and where it multiplexes with the M876. Opened about 1980 I believe?)

From the SABRE Wiki: Scottish Motorway Opening Dates :

his data has been collated from Roads.org.uk (formerly CBRD) Motorway Database pages, and then expanded. Asterisks (*) indicate a temporary terminus near the current junction numbered.

| class4 |- !Motorway !Month !Year !Section !Notes |- |M90 |9 |1964 |J1C - J2* |Forth Road Bridge Northern Approach Roads |- |A823(M) |9 |1964 |Entire motorway | |- |M8 |11 |1964 |J4A* - J5* |Harthill Bypass

... Read More
Duncan macknight
Committee Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:59
Location: Inverness

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Duncan macknight »

FtoE wrote:
rileyrob wrote:The Construction Timleine on CBRD: http://www.cbrd.co.uk/motorway/m90 suggests otherwise, unless construction sections were opened a bit at a time.

I've also compiled the dates on the wiki here: Scottish_Motorway_Opening_Dates
That’s pretty comprehensive!
(The only one I can’t see is the M9 from junction 9 (I think) to Junction 7 which connected the two sections of the M9 and where it multiplexes with the M876. Opened about 1980 I believe?)
Yes it opened in 1980 and ran from junction 9 to just south of junction 7. There was a temporary terminus in the form of a roundabout (https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/maps/) The M876 was also extended from J2 to junction 3 and was opened at the same time.

From the SABRE Wiki: Scottish Motorway Opening Dates :

his data has been collated from Roads.org.uk (formerly CBRD) Motorway Database pages, and then expanded. Asterisks (*) indicate a temporary terminus near the current junction numbered.

| class4 |- !Motorway !Month !Year !Section !Notes |- |M90 |9 |1964 |J1C - J2* |Forth Road Bridge Northern Approach Roads |- |A823(M) |9 |1964 |Entire motorway | |- |M8 |11 |1964 |J4A* - J5* |Harthill Bypass

... Read More
djw1981
Member
Posts: 1803
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 00:07
Location: Falkirk

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by djw1981 »

wrinkly wrote:I have a dim and vague idea that at some time in the distant past an undertaking was made that the A720 would not be extended north of the A8.

Incidentally I see that current Landranger mapping shows (as a "place of interest", with blue shaded background to the text) a "Country Esate" (sic) at Cammo, west of the A902. Whilst some OS maps have disputable spellings of some placenames, I don't remember seeing a typo in an ordinary word on an OS map before.
I have heard mention of some deliberate typos to help OS spot when people use their mapping without attribution or payment etc.
User avatar
Halmyre
Member
Posts: 1997
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 07:47
Location: Fifeshire

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by Halmyre »

djw1981 wrote:
wrinkly wrote:I have a dim and vague idea that at some time in the distant past an undertaking was made that the A720 would not be extended north of the A8.

Incidentally I see that current Landranger mapping shows (as a "place of interest", with blue shaded background to the text) a "Country Esate" (sic) at Cammo, west of the A902. Whilst some OS maps have disputable spellings of some placenames, I don't remember seeing a typo in an ordinary word on an OS map before.
I have heard mention of some deliberate typos to help OS spot when people use their mapping without attribution or payment etc.
They're usually non-existent locations rather than typos. I would have thought a bit more subtle than that, though.
mikehindsonevans
Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge

Re: Forth Replacement Crossing

Post by mikehindsonevans »

We crossed the new Forth Road Bridge for the first time on New Year's day. It is good to see that the roadworks are finally behind us, but I have to say that the signposting (we came along the A720 from the A1 at Haddington) left a bit to be desired. You know that you want to cross the "Forth Bridge" - but why does that destination randomly disappear from certain roadsigns and overhead gantries just where you need reassurance?

Leaving aside the minor gripe (plus our satnav grew concerned that we were travelling over open water!) this new bridge is a fine piece of construction. returning to Glasgow over the Kincardine Bridge reminded us of how road bridges in Scotland have improved over the past 80 years.

Mike
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Post Reply