Pointless motorway overhead messages

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by the cheesecake man »

New variation on M1 today :confused:

DRIVE TO EU
NEW DOCS
1 NOV

I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
User avatar
ManomayLR
Assistant Site Manager
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:47
Location: London, UK

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ManomayLR »

the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 12:56 New variation on M1 today :confused:

DRIVE TO EU
NEW DOCS
1 NOV

I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
That message isn't even understandable by us Brits, let alone foreign drivers with limited knowledge of English.
What the hell does "drive to EU" mean?
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by the cheesecake man »

EpicChef wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 13:21
the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 12:56 New variation on M1 today :confused:

DRIVE TO EU
NEW DOCS
1 NOV

I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
That message isn't even understandable by us Brits, let alone foreign drivers with limited knowledge of English.
What the hell does "drive to EU" mean?
Quite. Maybe it was an order designed to reduce immigration figures!

Perhaps that's why today it had been expanded to

DRIVING TO EU
NEW DOCUMENTS
1 NOV - CHECK
User avatar
ManomayLR
Assistant Site Manager
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:47
Location: London, UK

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ManomayLR »

the cheesecake man wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 13:28
EpicChef wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 13:21
the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 12:56 New variation on M1 today :confused:

DRIVE TO EU
NEW DOCS
1 NOV

I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
That message isn't even understandable by us Brits, let alone foreign drivers with limited knowledge of English.
What the hell does "drive to EU" mean?
Quite. Maybe it was an order designed to reduce immigration figures!

Perhaps that's why today it had been expanded to

DRIVING TO EU
NEW DOCUMENTS
1 NOV - CHECK
Maybe "freight" was changed to "driving" because they need to also encourage tourists/other drivers that they may need different travel documents to continue their journey.
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
BeenEverywhere
Member
Posts: 597
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 23:08

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by BeenEverywhere »

On the A1m just south of Peterborough yesterday "A1 SOUTH CLOSED".

I went round my options... I could change my days around and go to Northampton instead, or I could drop down the old north Road, come out at Huntingdon and drop down the 141, but then I'm likely to end up in the diversion anyway.

So I decided to plough on and see what happens.

By the time I got to black cat, I decided that the A1 south wasn't actually closed. :roll:
Been everywhere... can't remember any of it

Was fun though :laugh:
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by the cheesecake man »

EpicChef wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 14:19
the cheesecake man wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 13:28
EpicChef wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2019 13:21
That message isn't even understandable by us Brits, let alone foreign drivers with limited knowledge of English.
What the hell does "drive to EU" mean?
Quite. Maybe it was an order designed to reduce immigration figures!

Perhaps that's why today it had been expanded to

DRIVING TO EU
NEW DOCUMENTS
1 NOV - CHECK
Maybe "freight" was changed to "driving" because they need to also encourage tourists/other drivers that they may need different travel documents to continue their journey.
That sounds far too sensible. I'm looking forward to seeing what it's saying this afternoon!
User avatar
punyXpress
Member
Posts: 1177
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 21:27
Location: Riding, North

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by punyXpress »

EU GOODS DRIVER
NEW RULES -
TAX LORRY 1 NOV
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16962
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by Chris5156 »

the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 12:56I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
At the risk of defending the indefensible, I don't think Highways England get to decide whether these messages are on their signs; they've been instructed to do it, and that instruction presumably stands until Government policy actually changes and the DfT instructs them otherwise.
User avatar
Johnathan404
Member
Posts: 11478
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 16:54

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by Johnathan404 »

And that campaign is still running, no matter whether you or I think it's necessary.

Though it's also true that there can be a delay taking these redundant campaigns down. I recall in about 2015 there was a planned nationwide rail strike, and messages were put on the VMS shortly before it was called off. That was unfortunate, but the messages remained up for another 24 hours, for what I can only assume were administrative reasons.
I have websites about: motorway services | Fareham
User avatar
ManomayLR
Assistant Site Manager
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:47
Location: London, UK

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ManomayLR »

the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Oct 23, 2019 12:56 New variation on M1 today :confused:

DRIVE TO EU
NEW DOCS
1 NOV

I'm tempted to ask if HE have seen the news recently but it's probably best if I don't.
M25 yesterday - incomprehensible signs still up! They should take the old “freight to EU” message which was correctly phrased and just change “freight” to “traffic”

So it would look like this on a 3 line MS3:
TRAFFIC TO EU
PAPERS MAY CHANGE
1 NOV PLEASE CHECK

And this on a 4 line MS4:
EU TRAFFIC
PAPERS MAY
CHANGE 1 NOV
PLEASE CHECK
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by the cheesecake man »

Johnathan404 wrote: Sat Oct 26, 2019 10:14 And that campaign is still running, no matter whether you or I think it's necessary.
We could add to the 17 signatories on this petition!
:lol: :coat:
User avatar
Big L
Deputy Site Manager
Posts: 7568
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 20:36
Location: B5012

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by Big L »

Northbound M6 between J1 and J2 this afternoon. "M1 delays between J20-something and 20-something-else".

Fair enough, turn up the M69 and you end up in that.

But who has turned off the M1 onto the M6 intending to do that? And who got on at J1 to do it, rather than just continue up to Lutterworth and straight onto the M1?
Make poetry history.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
User avatar
ManomayLR
Assistant Site Manager
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:47
Location: London, UK

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ManomayLR »

At least there’s no more “DRIVE TO EU”
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by the cheesecake man »

EpicChef wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 21:12 At least there’s no more “DRIVE TO EU”
Until January :stir: :coat:
DB617
Member
Posts: 1292
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 00:51
Location: Bristol

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by DB617 »

New MS4 of shame at the Brynglas Tunnels:

POLLUTED AIR
KILLS
SLOW DOWN

:x Thanks for the safety critical message I can read instead of looking at the road.
ais523
Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 19:52
Location: Birmingham

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ais523 »

DB617 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 15:03 New MS4 of shame at the Brynglas Tunnels:

POLLUTED AIR
KILLS
SLOW DOWN

:x Thanks for the safety critical message I can read instead of looking at the road.
That message may well be safety critical. The reason that avoiding accidents has safety importance is that it reduces the number of injuries and deaths. Avoiding deaths due to air pollution is just as important when it comes to reducing injuries and deaths; crashes aren't the only way to kill someone. So if overspeeding is causing deaths as a consequence of pollution, a sign warning people against it may well save lives, at least if people obey it.
User avatar
KeithW
Member
Posts: 19269
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 13:25
Location: Marton-In-Cleveland North Yorks

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by KeithW »

ais523 wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 17:02
DB617 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 15:03 New MS4 of shame at the Brynglas Tunnels:

POLLUTED AIR
KILLS
SLOW DOWN

:x Thanks for the safety critical message I can read instead of looking at the road.
That message may well be safety critical. The reason that avoiding accidents has safety importance is that it reduces the number of injuries and deaths. Avoiding deaths due to air pollution is just as important when it comes to reducing injuries and deaths; crashes aren't the only way to kill someone. So if overspeeding is causing deaths as a consequence of pollution, a sign warning people against it may well save lives, at least if people obey it.
While long term exposure to NOx and particulate air pollution can cause problems for local residents I seriously doubt its going to influence drivers and in any event the real deterrent is the presence of variable limit speed cameras. Those who drive at excessive speed are already risking their own lives as well as other road users so are hardly likely to worry about some anonymous person in Newport. The worst case scenario for residents is stationary traffic particularly in calm sunny weather when smog can quickly form under an inversion layer.
DB617
Member
Posts: 1292
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 00:51
Location: Bristol

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by DB617 »

KeithW wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 17:23
ais523 wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 17:02
DB617 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 15:03 New MS4 of shame at the Brynglas Tunnels:

POLLUTED AIR
KILLS
SLOW DOWN

:x Thanks for the safety critical message I can read instead of looking at the road.
That message may well be safety critical. The reason that avoiding accidents has safety importance is that it reduces the number of injuries and deaths. Avoiding deaths due to air pollution is just as important when it comes to reducing injuries and deaths; crashes aren't the only way to kill someone. So if overspeeding is causing deaths as a consequence of pollution, a sign warning people against it may well save lives, at least if people obey it.
While long term exposure to NOx and particulate air pollution can cause problems for local residents I seriously doubt its going to influence drivers and in any event the real deterrent is the presence of variable limit speed cameras. Those who drive at excessive speed are already risking their own lives as well as other road users so are hardly likely to worry about some anonymous person in Newport. The worst case scenario for residents is stationary traffic particularly in calm sunny weather when smog can quickly form under an inversion layer.
Yes, I should have added that the section is under variable speed limit which is permanently set to maximum 50mph for pollution enforcement.

SPEED LIMIT
SET FOR
AIR QUALITY

...May have at least given drivers some understanding, without the need to preach. However as the speed limit is already compulsory, the feeling of needing to justify or preach the reasons for speed limits to drivers would seem to give the impression that if you don't care about pollution, feel free to drive faster. I still firmly believe the Welsh M4 needs HADECS type cameras on every gantry to get even 50% obedience, and I don't think telling everyone the speed limit is for pollution, not road traffic safety reasons, is going to help matters. The trunk agency knows this because of the staggered installation of the widely maligned miles-long SPECS section around Swansea which is permanently reduced to 50 for safety and air quality. Nobody obeyed the 50 limit in the un-enforced section across the Briton Ferry Bridge, which was installed later than the original section at Baglan.

Sadly the SWTRA policy on VMS messages has always been quite amazingly patronising and it's unlikely to change.
User avatar
ManomayLR
Assistant Site Manager
Posts: 3376
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 11:47
Location: London, UK

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by ManomayLR »

England need to use their VMS more.
Messages should be tailored to the motorway and they should be able to use lowercase letters on all messages, not just the pre programmed ones. Also where a junction is a motorway to motorway or motorway to major A road interchange they should use the names of those instead of junction numbers.

Eg

instead of “M25 J23 EXIT CLOSED” say “M25 J23 exit closed”

Instead of “LANE CLOSED FOR INCIDENT ACCESS” say “Lane closed for incident access”

Instead of “DO NOT USE CLOSED LANES” say “Do not use closed lanes”

Instead of “M25 J25-27 LONG DELAYS”
say “M25 A10-M11 long delays
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
Fenlander
Member
Posts: 7806
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 21:54
Location: south Lincolnshire

Re: Pointless motorway overhead messages

Post by Fenlander »

ais523 wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2019 17:02
DB617 wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2019 15:03 New MS4 of shame at the Brynglas Tunnels:

POLLUTED AIR
KILLS
SLOW DOWN

:x Thanks for the safety critical message I can read instead of looking at the road.
That message may well be safety critical. The reason that avoiding accidents has safety importance is that it reduces the number of injuries and deaths. Avoiding deaths due to air pollution is just as important when it comes to reducing injuries and deaths; crashes aren't the only way to kill someone. So if overspeeding is causing deaths as a consequence of pollution, a sign warning people against it may well save lives, at least if people obey it.
How's this for coincidence, as I was reading this post a message just flashed up on the notifications on my phone to say a Boeing 747 has just taken off from Cardiff heading to St Athan, a distance of 4 miles as the crow flies (not being a crow of course it took off heading south east, did a 180 short of Flat Holm Island and came in to land heading south west at St Athan. It got as high as 3,375ft!). That must be a hideous pollutants/mile set of figures.
Post Reply