A1 Northumberland Dualling
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
I know there are alternatives from Newcastle to Edinburgh, but the A1 is the only logical route from Newcastle to Berwick and is very popular with tourists in summer. I think at the very least dualling between the Morpeth and Alnwick by passes is imperative as the road is busy. and prone to massive tailbacks in summer. Then the rest of the road in England, including the Berwick by pass, should be dualled.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
So let's hope this does get done as the A1 is poor north of Morpeth and a mixture of S2 and D2 is unacceptable for such a busy road, rather like the A66, whose upgrade is due to start this year. Obviously these S2 sections of the A1 are a reminder of what the road was like in the rest of the country 60 years ago, but this nostalgia means nothing when you can't get past a tractor doing 10 mph.KeithW wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 14:13 Your wish has been granted - see
https://highwaysengland.citizenspace.co ... to-felton/
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/no ... 4-22108999
https://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ... uk-2900147
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
According to the highwaysengland website, A66 construction starts in 2024/5 : https://highwaysengland.citizenspace.co ... s-pennine/Glenn A wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 18:35So let's hope this does get done as the A1 is poor north of Morpeth and a mixture of S2 and D2 is unacceptable for such a busy road, rather like the A66, whose upgrade is due to start this year.KeithW wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 14:13 Your wish has been granted - see
https://highwaysengland.citizenspace.co ... to-felton/
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/no ... 4-22108999
https://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk ... uk-2900147
Owen
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
The latest reports I saw stated that archaeological and environmental surveys were starting ahead of road construction.owen b wrote: ↑Sun Jan 09, 2022 18:44 According to the highwaysengland website, A66 construction starts in 2024/5 : https://highwaysengland.citizenspace.co ... s-pennine/
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/digg ... nine-route
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
As others have suggested the upgrade of the A1 in Scotland has always been a political pawn peddled by conservative MPs in the area.
The fact of the matter is that there’s nowhere near the demand to warrant the enormous expenditure. I’ve worked on this road in recent years and beyond the improved expressway to the north, you have sections in the south that are uncharacteristically quiet for a trunk road. Areas where you could virtually lie untroubled in the middle of the carriageway for a couple of minutes without seeing a single vehicle. It’s not the case either that neighbouring routes are currently experiencing congestion or poor journey times. The A68 functions well and I believe is an equally scenic route that many people prefer to take as it’s more direct and crucially it cuts out junctions on the A720 that you’d face if heading north (or to Edinburgh) via the A1.
There are other areas of the trunk road network in the south east that would benefit massively from improvements. The forth bridges are poorly connected to the likes of the A720, a route itself which has horrendous journey times because it’s in dire need of reconfiguration at several junctions. You also have legitimate calls for bypasses of towns like Selkirk which accommodates the A7. It’s town centre is sorely incapable of handling the constant flow of HGVs that opt for that route when entering Scotland.
Talk of improving the A1 is frustrating because it’s just about politics. It’s arguably already over-engineered and there are so many others parts of the network that of far greater priority to improve.
The fact of the matter is that there’s nowhere near the demand to warrant the enormous expenditure. I’ve worked on this road in recent years and beyond the improved expressway to the north, you have sections in the south that are uncharacteristically quiet for a trunk road. Areas where you could virtually lie untroubled in the middle of the carriageway for a couple of minutes without seeing a single vehicle. It’s not the case either that neighbouring routes are currently experiencing congestion or poor journey times. The A68 functions well and I believe is an equally scenic route that many people prefer to take as it’s more direct and crucially it cuts out junctions on the A720 that you’d face if heading north (or to Edinburgh) via the A1.
There are other areas of the trunk road network in the south east that would benefit massively from improvements. The forth bridges are poorly connected to the likes of the A720, a route itself which has horrendous journey times because it’s in dire need of reconfiguration at several junctions. You also have legitimate calls for bypasses of towns like Selkirk which accommodates the A7. It’s town centre is sorely incapable of handling the constant flow of HGVs that opt for that route when entering Scotland.
Talk of improving the A1 is frustrating because it’s just about politics. It’s arguably already over-engineered and there are so many others parts of the network that of far greater priority to improve.
- Mark Hewitt
- Member
- Posts: 31443
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
- Location: Chester-le-Street
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
While I would agree with that sentiment I think it only really applies North of Alnwick. Morpeth to Felton is the only bit that really needs to be addressed and it is in progress.Hudson80 wrote:As others have suggested the upgrade of the A1 in Scotland has always been a political pawn peddled by conservative MPs in the area.
The fact of the matter is that there’s nowhere near the demand to warrant the enormous expenditure. I’ve worked on this road in recent years and beyond the improved expressway to the north, you have sections in the south that are uncharacteristically quiet for a trunk road. Areas where you could virtually lie untroubled in the middle of the carriageway for a couple of minutes without seeing a single vehicle. It’s not the case either that neighbouring routes are currently experiencing congestion or poor journey times. The A68 functions well and I believe is an equally scenic route that many people prefer to take as it’s more direct and crucially it cuts out junctions on the A720 that you’d face if heading north (or to Edinburgh) via the A1.
There are other areas of the trunk road network in the south east that would benefit massively from improvements. The forth bridges are poorly connected to the likes of the A720, a route itself which has horrendous journey times because it’s in dire need of reconfiguration at several junctions. You also have legitimate calls for bypasses of towns like Selkirk which accommodates the A7. It’s town centre is sorely incapable of handling the constant flow of HGVs that opt for that route when entering Scotland.
Talk of improving the A1 is frustrating because it’s just about politics. It’s arguably already over-engineered and there are so many others parts of the network that of far greater priority to improve.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
There are sections north of Alnwick where full dualling is hard to justify on traffic levels but the flat junctions are decidedly iffy. Warenford, Belford, Haggerston Castle and Beal come to mind. When there is an incident along there or even routine road works the lack of viable alternative routes can cause chaos. A break down or even a flat tyre on an HGV can cause huge tailbacks that make recovery a real problem if the recovery service is in Morpeth, Alnwick or Berwick.Mark Hewitt wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 08:17
While I would agree with that sentiment I think it only really applies North of Alnwick. Morpeth to Felton is the only bit that really needs to be addressed and it is in progress.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Totally agreed with your comments on the Scottish side of the border, it's always constantly quiet. As someone said the only bits that really need done are upto Alnwick and ideally more passing places between Brownieside and Berwick. It's a long stretch (22 mile I believe) without any overtaking opportunities especially inHudson80 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 08:09 As others have suggested the upgrade of the A1 in Scotland has always been a political pawn peddled by conservative MPs in the area.
The fact of the matter is that there’s nowhere near the demand to warrant the enormous expenditure. I’ve worked on this road in recent years and beyond the improved expressway to the north, you have sections in the south that are uncharacteristically quiet for a trunk road. Areas where you could virtually lie untroubled in the middle of the carriageway for a couple of minutes without seeing a single vehicle. It’s not the case either that neighbouring routes are currently experiencing congestion or poor journey times. The A68 functions well and I believe is an equally scenic route that many people prefer to take as it’s more direct and crucially it cuts out junctions on the A720 that you’d face if heading north (or to Edinburgh) via the A1.
There are other areas of the trunk road network in the south east that would benefit massively from improvements. The forth bridges are poorly connected to the likes of the A720, a route itself which has horrendous journey times because it’s in dire need of reconfiguration at several junctions. You also have legitimate calls for bypasses of towns like Selkirk which accommodates the A7. It’s town centre is sorely incapable of handling the constant flow of HGVs that opt for that route when entering Scotland.
Talk of improving the A1 is frustrating because it’s just about politics. It’s arguably already over-engineered and there are so many others parts of the network that of far greater priority to improve.
Summer with people travelling to North Northumberland.
Being from the North East, I'd much rather see the A69 upgraded over the A1 in Scotland, it's more useful and is just dangerous in parts Low Row, the lack of a bypass of Warwick Bridge and the bendy section around Denton Mill with junctions on corners in particular.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
The current dualling scheme (Morpeth to Ellingham) has two 'parts', as NH call them:
Part A: Morpeth to Felton - 18k AADT
Part B: Alnwick to Ellingham - 12k AADT
Part A is absolutely reasonable, part B is a bit more dubious, but still not bad value considering that, at £20m per mile, the overall scheme is far cheaper than comparable ones: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=43131&p=1217320
I think I prefer part B dualling to A69 dualling. The A69 has similar volumes on the SC sections, but is likely to cost far more per mile. The A66, which is somewhat comparable, is projected around £43m per mile. Admittedly I haven't dug into the safety data, though I don't think it's great on either the A1 or A69.
So I can't really fault the prioritisation in terms of progressing one dualling scheme rather than another. But one could argue that the Part B money could have been better spent at Seaton Burn and Moor Farm.
Part A: Morpeth to Felton - 18k AADT
Part B: Alnwick to Ellingham - 12k AADT
Part A is absolutely reasonable, part B is a bit more dubious, but still not bad value considering that, at £20m per mile, the overall scheme is far cheaper than comparable ones: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=43131&p=1217320
I think I prefer part B dualling to A69 dualling. The A69 has similar volumes on the SC sections, but is likely to cost far more per mile. The A66, which is somewhat comparable, is projected around £43m per mile. Admittedly I haven't dug into the safety data, though I don't think it's great on either the A1 or A69.
So I can't really fault the prioritisation in terms of progressing one dualling scheme rather than another. But one could argue that the Part B money could have been better spent at Seaton Burn and Moor Farm.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
As I suggested a while back, “Alnwick to Ellingham” really is an exaggerated name for the northern part.
I think it should have been consulted and announced as Denwick to Brownieside, (or even just to North Charlton), with the main emphasis being on the important safety benefits of removing the flat crossing at Charlton Mires.
Reduced to bare bones the scheme is only a single junction grade separation with connections to D2 roads either side, 5 miles total.
I think it should have been consulted and announced as Denwick to Brownieside, (or even just to North Charlton), with the main emphasis being on the important safety benefits of removing the flat crossing at Charlton Mires.
Reduced to bare bones the scheme is only a single junction grade separation with connections to D2 roads either side, 5 miles total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1721
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 17:48
- Location: Leeds
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Part B is crazy with those low traffic volumes! If I’m travelling from Leeds to Edinburgh I would always take the A68 route, the A1 is miles longer and not logical at all, if I’m heading any further North to say Aberdeen it’s actually easier to take the A1(M)/A66 route then up via Glasgow, with an improved A66 coming soon that will likely take more people that way meaning less on the A1!jackal wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 12:13 The current dualling scheme (Morpeth to Ellingham) has two 'parts', as NH call them:
Part A: Morpeth to Felton - 18k AADT
Part B: Alnwick to Ellingham - 12k AADT
Part A is absolutely reasonable, part B is a bit more dubious, but still not bad value considering that, at £20m per mile, the overall scheme is far cheaper than comparable ones: viewtopic.php?f=1&t=43131&p=1217320
I think I prefer part B dualling to A69 dualling. The A69 has similar volumes on the SC sections, but is likely to cost far more per mile. The A66, which is somewhat comparable, is projected around £43m per mile. Admittedly I haven't dug into the safety data, though I don't think it's great on either the A1 or A69.
So I can't really fault the prioritisation in terms of progressing one dualling scheme rather than another. But one could argue that the Part B money could have been better spent at Seaton Burn and Moor Farm.
How can we justify wasting this money on the A1 when we have roads like the A64 that’s not only suffering daily congestion York to Malton but has also had some terrible fatalities, the numbers are appalling! Absolute joke wasting money on the A1!
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Part B is less than 5 miles of new dualling, and fills a gap between two existing stretches. So not very big compared with the A9, say! (Which has similar traffic volumes.) But I agree with you about the A64.NICK 647063 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 21:30
Part B is crazy with those low traffic volumes! If I’m travelling from Leeds to Edinburgh I would always take the A68 route, the A1 is miles longer and not logical at all, if I’m heading any further North to say Aberdeen it’s actually easier to take the A1(M)/A66 route then up via Glasgow, with an improved A66 coming soon that will likely take more people that way meaning less on the A1!
How can we justify wasting this money on the A1 when we have roads like the A64 that’s not only suffering daily congestion York to Malton but has also had some terrible fatalities, the numbers are appalling! Absolute joke wasting money on the A1!
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Resilience on the network, there are plenty of examples where the temporary closure of a major route means chaos on any alternative.NICK 647063 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 21:30
How can we justify wasting this money on the A1 when we have roads like the A64 that’s not only suffering daily congestion York to Malton but has also had some terrible fatalities, the numbers are appalling! Absolute joke wasting money on the A1!
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Indeed, given the overall scheme is very cheap, and part B only has 1 of the 4 GSJs, it must be extremely cheap (£15m per mile?) for a grade-separated GSJ, and does deliver significant safety benefits by removing dangerous at-grade junctions and single to dual transitions.wrinkly wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 21:52Part B is less than 5 miles of new dualling, and fills a gap between two existing stretches. So not very big compared with the A9, say! (Which has similar traffic volumes.) But I agree with you about the A64.NICK 647063 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 04, 2022 21:30
Part B is crazy with those low traffic volumes! If I’m travelling from Leeds to Edinburgh I would always take the A68 route, the A1 is miles longer and not logical at all, if I’m heading any further North to say Aberdeen it’s actually easier to take the A1(M)/A66 route then up via Glasgow, with an improved A66 coming soon that will likely take more people that way meaning less on the A1!
How can we justify wasting this money on the A1 when we have roads like the A64 that’s not only suffering daily congestion York to Malton but has also had some terrible fatalities, the numbers are appalling! Absolute joke wasting money on the A1!
I agree it might have been better to put the money towards the A64, but it's still a very worthwhile improvement, and won't be outdated in a few years like stacking space and hamburger schemes, which it is actually more comparable to in terms of cost.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
Replacing that short succession of intersections at Charlton with one GSJ would probably be helpful locally too, and improve safety. Feels like low-hanging fruit.jackal wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 12:54 Indeed, given the overall scheme is very cheap, and part B only has 1 of the 4 GSJs, it must be extremely cheap (£15m per mile?) for a grade-separated GSJ, and does deliver significant safety benefits by removing dangerous at-grade junctions and single to dual transitions.
Happy to take the broader point that this section shouldn’t be prioritised. That’s politics, a rational sequencing is just not something that one can expect. Has been like that for ages, and is not specifically English/British too.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
I’m pretty sure the road safety aspects of what is effectively a staggered crossroads at Charlton Mires is a major point. I expect during the peak summer holiday period the risks are completely different to what might be suggested by the AADT figures?brombeer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 06, 2022 18:37Replacing that short succession of intersections at Charlton with one GSJ would probably be helpful locally too, and improve safety. Feels like low-hanging fruit.jackal wrote: ↑Sat Feb 05, 2022 12:54 Indeed, given the overall scheme is very cheap, and part B only has 1 of the 4 GSJs, it must be extremely cheap (£15m per mile?) for a grade-separated GSJ, and does deliver significant safety benefits by removing dangerous at-grade junctions and single to dual transitions.
Happy to take the broader point that this section shouldn’t be prioritised. That’s politics, a rational sequencing is just not something that one can expect. Has been like that for ages, and is not specifically English/British too.
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
The decision to widening the A1 between Morpeth and Ellingham has now been put back to December 2022 by the SoS.
Call me cynic but there are rumours of an election next year, lets delay a good news story to as close as possible to an election.
Call me cynic but there are rumours of an election next year, lets delay a good news story to as close as possible to an election.
The M25 - The road to nowhere
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
The A66 has higher traffic flow than the A1 north of Alnwick and carries a lot of HGV's. It also has some very poor junctions that produce more than its share of serious accidents. Trying to get across the A66 here is positively hair raising.jackal wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 12:13
I think I prefer part B dualling to A69 dualling. The A69 has similar volumes on the SC sections, but is likely to cost far more per mile. The A66, which is somewhat comparable, is projected around £43m per mile. Admittedly I haven't dug into the safety data, though I don't think it's great on either the A1 or A69.
So I can't really fault the prioritisation in terms of progressing one dualling scheme rather than another. But one could argue that the Part B money could have been better spent at Seaton Burn and Moor Farm.
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@54.47645 ... 384!8i8192
- Conekicker
- Member
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
- Location: South Yorks
Re: A1 Northumberland Dualling
The A75 could benefit greatly from more 2+1 sections.Hudson80 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 03, 2022 08:09 As others have suggested the upgrade of the A1 in Scotland has always been a political pawn peddled by conservative MPs in the area.
The fact of the matter is that there’s nowhere near the demand to warrant the enormous expenditure. I’ve worked on this road in recent years and beyond the improved expressway to the north, you have sections in the south that are uncharacteristically quiet for a trunk road. Areas where you could virtually lie untroubled in the middle of the carriageway for a couple of minutes without seeing a single vehicle. It’s not the case either that neighbouring routes are currently experiencing congestion or poor journey times. The A68 functions well and I believe is an equally scenic route that many people prefer to take as it’s more direct and crucially it cuts out junctions on the A720 that you’d face if heading north (or to Edinburgh) via the A1.
There are other areas of the trunk road network in the south east that would benefit massively from improvements. The forth bridges are poorly connected to the likes of the A720, a route itself which has horrendous journey times because it’s in dire need of reconfiguration at several junctions. You also have legitimate calls for bypasses of towns like Selkirk which accommodates the A7. It’s town centre is sorely incapable of handling the constant flow of HGVs that opt for that route when entering Scotland.
Talk of improving the A1 is frustrating because it’s just about politics. It’s arguably already over-engineered and there are so many others parts of the network that of far greater priority to improve.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.