M181
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: M181
Another smash on the roundabout this morning, and a serious one this time.
A Scania tractor unit was in a collision with a black saloon car, just at the northbound exit from the end of the M181. The fire brigade were cutting the car driver out when I went past at about 8.40am.
2 ambulances, 3 fire engines, at least 3 police cars and a HATO in attendance. I assume not likely to be a FATAC as they had not closed the road.
A Scania tractor unit was in a collision with a black saloon car, just at the northbound exit from the end of the M181. The fire brigade were cutting the car driver out when I went past at about 8.40am.
2 ambulances, 3 fire engines, at least 3 police cars and a HATO in attendance. I assume not likely to be a FATAC as they had not closed the road.
- JackieRoads
- Member
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 14:49
Re: M181
Sorry if this isn't related though.
I just noticed a stretch of motorway that's a mile is somehow numbered the A30(M) on OpenStreetMap near Launceston.
What's the term of an Sabristi you say?
I just noticed a stretch of motorway that's a mile is somehow numbered the A30(M) on OpenStreetMap near Launceston.
Ah thanks.jervi wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 21:24From what I can see on Google Maps, the Northern Half is named A1077 and the southern half has lost all name/number entirely. However both sections and the roundabout are still showing as motorways.JackieRoads wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 21:06 I just somehow noticed a change...
As the northern end is now the A1077(M), Google Maps doesn't show it as a motorway, but Openstreetmap does.
Looks as if the A1077 has taken over the M181 including the new roundabout.
But on Open Street Map - the M181 and A1077(M) are shown as motorways.
Is this "A1077 not shown as a motorway so is the M181 which is taken over by A1077" an error on Google Maps?
You can see that Google are showing both still as motorways as their appear when you zoom out far enough the same as other motorways.
But yeah Google is wrong like always. OSM is always going to be more correct since there are a handful of Sabristi contributing to it.
What's the term of an Sabristi you say?
Fantasy Strip Map Creator- feel free to send me some requests!
As a wise roadie said, don't make any mistakes in building roads.
As a wise roadie said, don't make any mistakes in building roads.
Re: M181
JackieRoads wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 16:21 Sorry if this isn't related though.
I just noticed a stretch of motorway that's a mile is somehow numbered the A30(M) on OpenStreetMap near Launceston.
Ah thanks.jervi wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 21:24 From what I can see on Google Maps, the Northern Half is named A1077 and the southern half has lost all name/number entirely. However both sections and the roundabout are still showing as motorways.
You can see that Google are showing both still as motorways as their appear when you zoom out far enough the same as other motorways.
But yeah Google is wrong like always. OSM is always going to be more correct since there are a handful of Sabristi contributing to it.
What's the term of an Sabristi you say?
That A30(M) was a fantasy change someone did a few weeks ago, it got reverted in just over a day but some of the tiles have not been re-rendered since so it may still show it as A30(M) at certain zoom levels.
Sabristi is the given to someone on the SABRE forums I believe. With Sabristo being the term for a male member and Sabrista being the term for a female member. I presume that Sabristi is gender neutral / collective.
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/society/sabristi.shtml
- JackieRoads
- Member
- Posts: 489
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2020 14:49
Re: M181
Ah ok, thanks Jervi!jervi wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 16:31JackieRoads wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 16:21 Sorry if this isn't related though.
I just noticed a stretch of motorway that's a mile is somehow numbered the A30(M) on OpenStreetMap near Launceston.
Ah thanks.jervi wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 21:24 From what I can see on Google Maps, the Northern Half is named A1077 and the southern half has lost all name/number entirely. However both sections and the roundabout are still showing as motorways.
You can see that Google are showing both still as motorways as their appear when you zoom out far enough the same as other motorways.
But yeah Google is wrong like always. OSM is always going to be more correct since there are a handful of Sabristi contributing to it.
What's the term of an Sabristi you say?
That A30(M) was a fantasy change someone did a few weeks ago, it got reverted in just over a day but some of the tiles have not been re-rendered since so it may still show it as A30(M) at certain zoom levels.
Sabristi is the given to someone on the SABRE forums I believe. With Sabristo being the term for a male member and Sabrista being the term for a female member. I presume that Sabristi is gender neutral / collective.
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/society/sabristi.shtml
Fantasy Strip Map Creator- feel free to send me some requests!
As a wise roadie said, don't make any mistakes in building roads.
As a wise roadie said, don't make any mistakes in building roads.
Re: M181
So another change to now report......
The new 50 limit signs on the A1077(M) have all been painted over with grey paint and temporary - advisory - rectangular yellow 50mph signs have been put up.
I have no idea why. Perhaps they can't get the appropriate legal order in place? But how difficult can it be to change a speed limit?
The new 50 limit signs on the A1077(M) have all been painted over with grey paint and temporary - advisory - rectangular yellow 50mph signs have been put up.
I have no idea why. Perhaps they can't get the appropriate legal order in place? But how difficult can it be to change a speed limit?
Re: M181
I'd guess separate legislation is needed while the road is a special road....XC70 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 18, 2021 21:03 So another change to now report......
The new 50 limit signs on the A1077(M) have all been painted over with grey paint and temporary - advisory - rectangular yellow 50mph signs have been put up.
I have no idea why. Perhaps they can't get the appropriate legal order in place? But how difficult can it be to change a speed limit?
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Re: M181
Technically it wouldn't have ever been anything but 70 - the speed limit signs weren't legal.
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
-
- Member
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 13:14
- Location: Gone
Re: M181
Looking again at the picture:
I've noticed a number of changes to older roundabouts and with new builds, where the geometry make it quite a challenge to stay in lane - especially when towing a trailer (or if an HGV) - resulting in side-swipes... lazy drivers cutting the apex add to the problem.
At the M3/J4 southern roundabout, using the middle lane here and especially here is particularly fraught... contending with apex-cutters is bad enough, but the 90 degree bend is, err, interesting!
Re: M181
Not for some time - the roundabouts are being built for the sole reason of providing access to a massive new housing development.
The decision when to actually start work on said housing development (and thus the connecting roads to the roundabouts) will lie with developers, whose accountants don't like their company starting doing things till they judge the profits to be made are at their maximum.
Depending on how the economy goes the roundabouts could remain isolated for quite a while....
Re: M181
But that's ridiculous. If that's the case, it really would've been better if they'd just waited for the development work to start before building that roundabout. The roundabout would've still opened first anyway in that scenarioPhil wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 14:01Not for some time - the roundabouts are being built for the sole reason of providing access to a massive new housing development.
The decision when to actually start work on said housing development (and thus the connecting roads to the roundabouts) will lie with developers, whose accountants don't like their company starting doing things till they judge the profits to be made are at their maximum.
Depending on how the economy goes the roundabouts could remain isolated for quite a while....
Re: M181
Thats not how UK planning works these days!SBRoxMan wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 14:28But that's ridiculous. If that's the case, it really would've been better if they'd just waited for the development work to start before building that roundabout. The roundabout would've still opened first anyway in that scenarioPhil wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 14:01Not for some time - the roundabouts are being built for the sole reason of providing access to a massive new housing development.
The decision when to actually start work on said housing development (and thus the connecting roads to the roundabouts) will lie with developers, whose accountants don't like their company starting doing things till they judge the profits to be made are at their maximum.
Depending on how the economy goes the roundabouts could remain isolated for quite a while....
The thing to remember is that the politicians in Westminster have skewed the entire system to suit the developer business mates at the expense of everyone else.
If the state agrees to do its bit by such and such a date -but doesn't then the accountants and lawyers will be only too happy to take action.
Developers on the other hand have all sorts of tactics they can deploy (usually claiming financial poverty) to more or less pick and chose the timing of when anything is done (to ensure that the development ties in with when they can make the most money).
Also in this case I imagine that the new roundabouts will be needed to deliver building materials etc rather than clogging up local roads - if the roundabouts are not there then they can't start developing!
-
- Member
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 07:32
Re: M181
Planning permission has now been granted this month for the new southern roundabout on the M181 creating a junction with B1450 Burringham Road.. the planning document and S106 are on the North Lincs Council website at https://apps.northlincs.gov.uk/application/pa-2015-0627 . The developer are creating the junction alongside the construction of the first 2500 houses and various other local improvements to Burringham Road to support the developments.
Re: M181
Micro The Maniac wrote: ↑Mon Jul 19, 2021 08:59Looking again at the picture:I've noticed a number of changes to older roundabouts and with new builds, where the geometry make it quite a challenge to stay in lane - especially when towing a trailer (or if an HGV) - resulting in side-swipes... lazy drivers cutting the apex add to the problem.
At the M3/J4 southern roundabout, using the middle lane here and especially here is particularly fraught... contending with apex-cutters is bad enough, but the 90 degree bend is, err, interesting!
There’s a good presentation here on the subject.
http://www.teachamerica.com/Roundabouts ... itchie.pdf
and here in the later pages:
https://www.virginiadot.org/business/re ... design.pdf
We seem too willing in the uk to ignore the problem and continue to design shockingly poor roundabouts.
M19
Re: M181
The biggest problem being that we predicate the design on maximising theoretical capacity, well beyond (a) what is needed for the road, and (2) what is achievable in practice, leading to completely unnecessary and counterproductive multi-lane roundabouts. And so you get gems like this one on the A169 near Malton, built just a few years ago, which has a left-turn lane that is barely long enough for a couple of cars: https://goo.gl/maps/Zj9jvjvXqb6ywAzS7, and which in practice just serves to provide more width for people going on to straight-line it.
We need to scrap this approach, and for small roundabouts make it absolutely clear that there is a single-lane entry and a single-lane circulation, and if this imposes an occasional penalty of a couple of seconds on some drivers that is significantly less penalty than that caused by the inevitable accidents that we get with a badly designed roundabout.
Re: M181
That would require the writers of the DMRB to actually think beyond PCUs and spreadsheets, so very unlikely. They deal entirely in theoretical situations where everyone is a robot that does exactly what their required inputs demand.Stevie D wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 13:24The biggest problem being that we predicate the design on maximising theoretical capacity, well beyond (a) what is needed for the road, and (2) what is achievable in practice, leading to completely unnecessary and counterproductive multi-lane roundabouts. And so you get gems like this one on the A169 near Malton, built just a few years ago, which has a left-turn lane that is barely long enough for a couple of cars: https://goo.gl/maps/Zj9jvjvXqb6ywAzS7, and which in practice just serves to provide more width for people going on to straight-line it.
We need to scrap this approach, and for small roundabouts make it absolutely clear that there is a single-lane entry and a single-lane circulation, and if this imposes an occasional penalty of a couple of seconds on some drivers that is significantly less penalty than that caused by the inevitable accidents that we get with a badly designed roundabout.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: M181
That's exactly the one I was going to post, particularly in relation to how the entry lanes conspire to force you to enter the roundabout at the wrong angle.Stevie D wrote: ↑Wed Aug 18, 2021 13:24And so you get gems like this one on the A169 near Malton, built just a few years ago, which has a left-turn lane that is barely long enough for a couple of cars: https://goo.gl/maps/Zj9jvjvXqb6ywAzS7, and which in practice just serves to provide more width for people going on to straight-line it.
Re: M181
Here's some legal tidying relating to the scheme: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/202 ... ction/made
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
-
- Member
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2002 21:16
- Location: Walsall Wood, WALSALL, West Midlands
Re: M181
So would I be correct in saying that the southern roundabout intended for the B1450 Burringham Lane (as built) would terminate the motorway regulations and Brumby Common Lane roundabout be simply part of the A1077 itself?
If that's the case, then N.H. ought to resign Junction 3 on the M180 as simply "A1077 (A18)".
Chris Williams
If that's the case, then N.H. ought to resign Junction 3 on the M180 as simply "A1077 (A18)".
Chris Williams