Upgrading the A66 and A69
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
I've just looked at Highways England WebTris system for the Average Daily Flow for the both the A66 and A69 for 2019.
A66 west of Bowes is
9,370 E/B (28.5% HGV's)
9,346 W/B (27.8% HGV's)
A69 east of Haltwhistle
6,703 W/B (13.7% HGV's)
6,720 E/B (14.1% HGV's)
The A66 flows are 50% greater for total flow and carry 100% more HGV's than the A69, so you can see why money is being spent on the A66.
An ADT of only 13,423 as is the case on the A69 can easily accommodate S 2+1 which this section is provided with. It is very unlikely that a full dual carriageway between Hexham and Brampton is going to get a very good cost benefit analysis.
On a separate point, while going W/B on the A69 at Brampton the M6 North is signed via the A689 to J44 and the M6 South via the A66 to J43.
However on the M6 southbound, there is no reference to Newcastle (A69) on the southbound approach to J44.
I am aware the A689 is not trunked but you would think they would be consistent.
A66 west of Bowes is
9,370 E/B (28.5% HGV's)
9,346 W/B (27.8% HGV's)
A69 east of Haltwhistle
6,703 W/B (13.7% HGV's)
6,720 E/B (14.1% HGV's)
The A66 flows are 50% greater for total flow and carry 100% more HGV's than the A69, so you can see why money is being spent on the A66.
An ADT of only 13,423 as is the case on the A69 can easily accommodate S 2+1 which this section is provided with. It is very unlikely that a full dual carriageway between Hexham and Brampton is going to get a very good cost benefit analysis.
On a separate point, while going W/B on the A69 at Brampton the M6 North is signed via the A689 to J44 and the M6 South via the A66 to J43.
However on the M6 southbound, there is no reference to Newcastle (A69) on the southbound approach to J44.
I am aware the A689 is not trunked but you would think they would be consistent.
Last edited by A303Chris on Tue Apr 13, 2021 14:09, edited 1 time in total.
The M25 - The road to nowhere
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
I am convinced the A66 would carry more traffic if the road was better. With the M62 chocka its an obvious short cut from the east to the M6, A75 and Western Scotland. I agree that the A689 should be signed to Newcastle when south bound on the M6A303Chris wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 14:06 I've just looked at Highways England WebTris system for the Average Daily Flow for the both the A66 and A69 for 2019.
A66 west of Bowes is
9,370 E/B (28.5% HGV's)
9,346 W/B (27.8% HGV's)
A69 east of Haltwhistle
6,703 W/B (13.7% HGV's)
6,720 E/B (14.1% HGV's)
The A66 flows are 50% greater for total flow and carry 100% more HGV's than the A69, so you can see why money is being spent on the A66.
An ADT of only 13,423 as is the case on the A69 can easily accommodate S 2+1 which this section is provided with. It is very unlikely that a full dual carriageway between Hexham and Brampton is going to get a very good cost benefit analysis.
On a separate point, while going W/B on the A69 at Brampton the M6 North is signed via the A689 to J44 and the M6 South via the A66 to J44.
However on the M6 southbound, there is no reference to Newcastle (A69) on the southbound approach to J44.
I am aware the A689 is not trunked but you would think they would be consistent.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
There is the hopeless A69 from Brampton to jct 43 of the M6, which is largely as it was 50 years ago. While traffic heading from the North East to Scotland will mostly use the A689, the A69 remains an important route for those heading into Carlisle city centre from the east. Warwick Bridge urgently needs a by pass.
- Mark Hewitt
- Member
- Posts: 31443
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
- Location: Chester-le-Street
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Agreed. It's quite insane that there remains significant sections of S2 on the A66 trans pennine route. The 2006 designation of it being a route of local importance was entirely wrong.KeithW wrote:I am convinced the A66 would carry more traffic if the road was better. With the M62 chocka its an obvious short cut from the east to the M6, A75 and Western Scotland. I agree that the A689 should be signed to Newcastle when south bound on the M6A303Chris wrote: ↑Mon Apr 12, 2021 14:06 I've just looked at Highways England WebTris system for the Average Daily Flow for the both the A66 and A69 for 2019.
A66 west of Bowes is
9,370 E/B (28.5% HGV's)
9,346 W/B (27.8% HGV's)
A69 east of Haltwhistle
6,703 W/B (13.7% HGV's)
6,720 E/B (14.1% HGV's)
The A66 flows are 50% greater for total flow and carry 100% more HGV's than the A69, so you can see why money is being spent on the A66.
An ADT of only 13,423 as is the case on the A69 can easily accommodate S 2+1 which this section is provided with. It is very unlikely that a full dual carriageway between Hexham and Brampton is going to get a very good cost benefit analysis.
On a separate point, while going W/B on the A69 at Brampton the M6 North is signed via the A689 to J44 and the M6 South via the A66 to J44.
However on the M6 southbound, there is no reference to Newcastle (A69) on the southbound approach to J44.
I am aware the A689 is not trunked but you would think they would be consistent.
- A72
- Member
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 17:21
- Location: Newtown St Boswells, Scottish Borders
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Unless the entire length of these sections has one lane coned-off, or the second HGV in line decides to have an elephant race with the lead truck.
The 7-Zone Challenge
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
I'm fairly sure that either of those things would cripple the capacity of dual carriageway too.
Make poetry history.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
- Mark Hewitt
- Member
- Posts: 31443
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
- Location: Chester-le-Street
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
I've crossed the A66 before where the entire central D2 section was coned down to one lane with a 40mph speed limit. Now that was frustrating.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Big L wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 08:26I'm fairly sure that either of those things would cripple the capacity of dual carriageway too.
Yes but less so in the case of Elephant Racing unless the dual carriageway is also seriously overloaded it typically reduces speed to around 50 mph or so. Remove a lane and the capacity is at least halved.
In the case of the A1 from Buckden to Blyth the single largest improvement by far was getting rid of the roundabouts. On a bank holiday or summer weekend the queues could be several miles long. The same thing is true of the A66 at both Scotch Corner and Penrith. Some improvements were made by tinkering with lane layouts but really both should be free flow.
After the upgrade has been completed the Penrith end should flow much more smoothly with the underpass of the Kemplay Bank Roundabout. At Scotch Corner Highways England have undertaken a study to improve the situation but no detailed plans have been made but my suspicion is that little will be done except some minor tinkering and perhaps an express lane or 2. The reality is that between the hotel, caravan park, car dealership, services and go help us a planned shopping centre its hard to see what can be done without a major rebuild except perhaps to provide a free flow from the A66 eastbound to the A1(M) northbound.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
One should not forget that there is a busy section of the A66 where it multiplexes with the A595 in west Cumbria that was put forward by Cumbria County Council in 2009 as a case for dualling. This fell through due to a lack of interest in Westminster, but is a busy stretch of road with a nasty junction for Brigham and Broughton Moor.
- A72
- Member
- Posts: 787
- Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 17:21
- Location: Newtown St Boswells, Scottish Borders
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Only if the dual carriageway is as short as the A69's S2+1 sections. These sections are uphill, so an elephant race is almost guaranteed to take-up the entire lengthBig L wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 08:26I'm fairly sure that either of those things would cripple the capacity of dual carriageway too.
The 7-Zone Challenge
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
A roads: 71/71
B roads: 181/181
Total: 252/252
Completed: 04/11/20.
- Mark Hewitt
- Member
- Posts: 31443
- Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
- Location: Chester-le-Street
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
There are very few parts of the A66 that don't justify dualling.Glenn A wrote:One should not forget that there is a busy section of the A66 where it multiplexes with the A595 in west Cumbria that was put forward by Cumbria County Council in 2009 as a case for dualling. This fell through due to a lack of interest in Westminster, but is a busy stretch of road with a nasty junction for Brigham and Broughton Moor.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Having to build another Marron bridge would cost a fair bit though!Glenn A wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 12:58 One should not forget that there is a busy section of the A66 where it multiplexes with the A595 in west Cumbria that was put forward by Cumbria County Council in 2009 as a case for dualling. This fell through due to a lack of interest in Westminster, but is a busy stretch of road with a nasty junction for Brigham and Broughton Moor.
I saw a proposed roundabout at that junction, any news on that?
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
"Early work underway on £1bn trans-Pennine road upgrade" - ground investigations and the like.
“This work is vitally important as we head towards a final public consultation on the options and submitting our application to the Planning Inspectorate which, subject to the outcome, will allow us to start construction in 2024.”
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 2-04-2021/
“This work is vitally important as we head towards a final public consultation on the options and submitting our application to the Planning Inspectorate which, subject to the outcome, will allow us to start construction in 2024.”
https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest ... 2-04-2021/
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Probably based on this item on the HE website:
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/our-work/ ... under-way/
What does the guy say his name is at the beginning of the video? Sounds like Andy Junction!
Edit: no, you can turn captions on, it's Andy Johnson.
https://highwaysengland.co.uk/our-work/ ... under-way/
What does the guy say his name is at the beginning of the video? Sounds like Andy Junction!
Edit: no, you can turn captions on, it's Andy Johnson.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
The roundabout is still in the planning stage, but I would have liked the dualling to have gone ahead as this is a busy stretch of S2, probably the busiest west of Keswick.MFB wrote: ↑Tue Apr 20, 2021 13:06Having to build another Marron bridge would cost a fair bit though!Glenn A wrote: ↑Sun Apr 18, 2021 12:58 One should not forget that there is a busy section of the A66 where it multiplexes with the A595 in west Cumbria that was put forward by Cumbria County Council in 2009 as a case for dualling. This fell through due to a lack of interest in Westminster, but is a busy stretch of road with a nasty junction for Brigham and Broughton Moor.
I saw a proposed roundabout at that junction, any news on that?
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
At last a voice of reason! THIS is what's needed (Warwick Bridge bypass). Not A689 which is no use for going to Carlisle or M6 Southbound nor the slight but costly improvements at Hexham and Corbridge roundaboutsGlenn A wrote: ↑Sat Apr 17, 2021 18:50 There is the hopeless A69 from Brampton to jct 43 of the M6, which is largely as it was 50 years ago. While traffic heading from the North East to Scotland will mostly use the A689, the A69 remains an important route for those heading into Carlisle city centre from the east. Warwick Bridge urgently needs a by pass.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
Thankyou, there has been talk on here of re routing the A69 along the A689 to Greymoorhill( jct 44), but this would do nothing to improve the current A69, which is a poor road and busy. Warwick Bridge needs a by pass that locals have been demanding for decades.tibsy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 22:27At last a voice of reason! THIS is what's needed (Warwick Bridge bypass). Not A689 which is no use for going to Carlisle or M6 Southbound nor the slight but costly improvements at Hexham and Corbridge roundaboutsGlenn A wrote: ↑Sat Apr 17, 2021 18:50 There is the hopeless A69 from Brampton to jct 43 of the M6, which is largely as it was 50 years ago. While traffic heading from the North East to Scotland will mostly use the A689, the A69 remains an important route for those heading into Carlisle city centre from the east. Warwick Bridge urgently needs a by pass.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
I never understood why they don't just build new South facing slips on the B6264 and direct Carlisle traffic from the A69 via the A689 and B6264 and M6 traffic to join there. The route is a much better quality route and quicker into Carlisle regardless to a Warwick Bridge Bypass and is pretty much WS2 direct into the centre which can't be said about the A69 which can be a right slog along Warwick Road if you hit it at the wrong time.Glenn A wrote: ↑Sat May 01, 2021 19:25Thankyou, there has been talk on here of re routing the A69 along the A689 to Greymoorhill( jct 44), but this would do nothing to improve the current A69, which is a poor road and busy. Warwick Bridge needs a by pass that locals have been demanding for decades.tibsy wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 22:27At last a voice of reason! THIS is what's needed (Warwick Bridge bypass). Not A689 which is no use for going to Carlisle or M6 Southbound nor the slight but costly improvements at Hexham and Corbridge roundaboutsGlenn A wrote: ↑Sat Apr 17, 2021 18:50 There is the hopeless A69 from Brampton to jct 43 of the M6, which is largely as it was 50 years ago. While traffic heading from the North East to Scotland will mostly use the A689, the A69 remains an important route for those heading into Carlisle city centre from the east. Warwick Bridge urgently needs a by pass.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
The B6264 is a residential road. Warwick Rd is as well of course but the threshold for a new scheme is much higher than the threshold for maintaining the status quo.jabbaboy wrote: ↑Mon May 03, 2021 15:12 I never understood why they don't just build new South facing slips on the B6264 and direct Carlisle traffic from the A69 via the A689 and B6264 and M6 traffic to join there. The route is a much better quality route and quicker into Carlisle regardless to a Warwick Bridge Bypass and is pretty much WS2 direct into the centre which can't be said about the A69 which can be a right slog along Warwick Road if you hit it at the wrong time.
Re: Upgrading the A66 and A69
The B6264 used to continue as far as Brampton until the A689 replaced it with a by pass of Crosby on Eden. Also the section from the roundabout to jct 44 was once unclassified, although there was a sign with M6 in brackets.jackal wrote: ↑Mon May 03, 2021 17:58The B6264 is a residential road. Warwick Rd is as well of course but the threshold for a new scheme is much higher than the threshold for maintaining the status quo.jabbaboy wrote: ↑Mon May 03, 2021 15:12 I never understood why they don't just build new South facing slips on the B6264 and direct Carlisle traffic from the A69 via the A689 and B6264 and M6 traffic to join there. The route is a much better quality route and quicker into Carlisle regardless to a Warwick Bridge Bypass and is pretty much WS2 direct into the centre which can't be said about the A69 which can be a right slog along Warwick Road if you hit it at the wrong time.