Is it safe & necessary to turn right through hatchings?

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
tipsynurse
Banned
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37

Is it safe & necessary to turn right through hatchings?

Post by tipsynurse »

Long time lurker, sorry to drive straight in with a question!

The council have recently painted some new 1042.1 markings on a blind bend on part of my commute home, where you need to turn right to stay on National Cycle Route 5.

Google Maps link

The problem of course being that if you wait in the area seemingly for "right turns" oncoming vehicles use the hatchings to cut the corner and time after time end up swerving away from you at the last minute. They probably aren't in the wrong either, I don't think either direction has "priority" over centre hatchings unless indicated.

My understanding of TD42/95 is that although not expressly discouraged, they recommend solid lines, ribbed markings, coloured tarmac and/or a traffic island in situations where overtaking needs to be discouraged, which is very similar to this. Bearing in mind the circumstances (narrow hatchings, cycle route, blind corner) I would imagine a traffic island would be most sensible.

The council don't agree, they say 1042.1 in this circumstance is absolutely fine.

Opinions welcome... ironically it was much better before with normal markings. The problem is if you wait to the left of the hatchings not only does it cheese off following drivers but also you can't see well around the corner.

TN
Last edited by tipsynurse on Mon Feb 19, 2018 13:42, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mark Hewitt
Member
Posts: 31443
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2004 12:54
Location: Chester-le-Street

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Mark Hewitt »

It does seem that hatching is often used in situations where 'no overtaking' is the message they want to convey, even if legally it has no such meaning.
avtur
Member
Posts: 4902
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 16:51
Location: Haywards Heath

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by avtur »

I wouldn't have thought that overtaking was the primary risk here.

Looks more like an attempt to separate opposing traffic where it is likely that some traffic will cut the corner putting on coming right turners at risk. There doesn't appear to enough width in the road to create a full width turning right lane.

My understanding is that the broken line around the edge of the hatched area should not be driven over as a matter of course i.e. to cut the corner. It should be treated as solid line (or physical or physical kerb) unless there is good reason to drive over it.
User avatar
nowster
Treasurer
Posts: 14839
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 16:06
Location: Manchester

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by nowster »

As far as I am aware (and I'm prepared to be shot down on this) a broken hatching in the centre of the road would have the same legal status as a simple centre line.
tipsynurse
Banned
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by tipsynurse »

Thank you avtur.

The issue I have is that it should be obvious on 1042.1s around a tight corner people will cut it. Combine that with right turning cyclists and you are setting up head on conflicts.

I used the "overtaking" examples because I don't think there is advice on drivers trying to move closer to a racing line through corners!

Nowster its more that as a council traffic engineer surely they could see the potential conflict this could create. Even if not I offered to meet them but they declined.

I even had someone swerve onto the wrong side of the road one night. I know budgets are tight but they have made the layout much worse!
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35880
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Bryn666 »

Looks like the kind of bend where a small refuge would eliminate corner cutting.

Lining is often used as a quick way to fix a problem but some practitioners out there unwittingly create new ones in doing that.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9726
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by WHBM »

Doesn't seem enough carriageway width to install a traffic island. The war memorial opposite already impinges on the desirable distance from the carriageway.

There's also just been a traffic calming width restriction a couple of hundred yards back for the approaching traffic, with a Give Way To Oncoming Vehicles. Are they really taking a "racing line" just beyond there ?
Isleworth1961
Member
Posts: 771
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 14:15
Location: South Gloucestershire

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Isleworth1961 »

Bryn666 wrote:Looks like the kind of bend where a small refuge would eliminate corner cutting.

Lining is often used as a quick way to fix a problem but some practitioners out there unwittingly create new ones in doing that.
In a village near me, stone setts have been used instead of hatching, making the centre of the road bumpy so drivers are much less likely to 'cut the corner'. Having said that, there's not a junction on a bend like that, or even a bend that tight. Obviously this is a more expensive solution than a bit of white paint.
Bomag
Member
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 23:26

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Bomag »

tipsynurse wrote:Long time lurker, sorry to drive straight in with a question!

The council have recently painted some new 1042.1 markings on a blind bend on part of my commute home, where you need to turn right to stay on National Cycle Route 5.

TN
That is not marking 1042 it is supposed to be 1040 but as they have not bothered to remove the old centre line its not any prescribed marking. Given the nature of the road I would suggest a layout from TSM Chapter 5 would be more appropriate than TD42.
tipsynurse
Banned
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by tipsynurse »

Thank you all for your suggestions. I have emailed them suggesting that these two layouts would be better, will see what comes back. Obviously the second one is a traffic island or raised, white painted area.

Image

Image
User avatar
Bfivethousand
Member
Posts: 1387
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 22:16
Location: Derbyshire

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Bfivethousand »

From experience of a previous scheme, simply offsetting the centre line - perhaps almost as far as the 'outside' of the two parallel lines of the hatching as installed - may have the benefit of creating that little bit of extra right turning space whilst reducing the risk of traffic cutting the corner in the opposite direction. The hatching is considered a safe zone by an element of drivers and can indeed create a new problem in trying to solve the original one.

Saying that, yes, a cheap bolt-on centre island is preferable if it can be comfortably accommodated and if the council coffers can stretch to that.
16 Sodium atoms walk into a bar
followed immediately by Batman
User avatar
Jam35
Member
Posts: 4129
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 14:43
Location: Rural Glamorgan

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by Jam35 »

Looks like a mini-roundabout would solve this one.
tipsynurse
Banned
Posts: 407
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37

Re: Question about 1042.1 on blind bend

Post by tipsynurse »

A bit of an update on this, the council have repainted the markings so there are solid 1042.1 throughout. I.e. no gap for the right turn.
I have discussed the situation with my manager, there is an outstanding order for the hatching to be refurbished at which time the hatching through the junction will be made continous, vehicles (including cyclists) should not enter the area unless it is necessary and they can see that it is safe to do so.
Is it safe and necessary to enter the hatchings to turn right on a blind bend? I have not seen similar hatchings on a right turn before.

I don't know whether, as a driver or cyclist, you should be waiting in the hatchings or in lane when turning right?
Post Reply