Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Moderator: Site Management Team
-
- Banned
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37
Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I remember well when VSL went into the M25 it seemed to work really well - the technology really did seem futuristic and probably was pushing the envelope of what could be done back in 1995.
However, as time has gone on it seems to get more and more unreliable especially with phantom limits in the middle of the night and faulty signage (although the MS2s and 3s seem to be ageing well).
I would imagine this is a result of hardware like sensors dropping out or becoming unreliable, plus a lot of the technology will probably be obsolete now and tied together with unwieldy uncommented software no-one wants to touch.
Was there ever a design life envisaged for smart motorways when they were first installed? I know because this is the UK the system will be forced to hobble on until it actually blows up, but it is a shame what was once a visionary piece of engineering isn't having a happy old age.
However, as time has gone on it seems to get more and more unreliable especially with phantom limits in the middle of the night and faulty signage (although the MS2s and 3s seem to be ageing well).
I would imagine this is a result of hardware like sensors dropping out or becoming unreliable, plus a lot of the technology will probably be obsolete now and tied together with unwieldy uncommented software no-one wants to touch.
Was there ever a design life envisaged for smart motorways when they were first installed? I know because this is the UK the system will be forced to hobble on until it actually blows up, but it is a shame what was once a visionary piece of engineering isn't having a happy old age.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
All equipment, whether mechanical or electronic has a design life, a MTBF and an ability to fail as it gets older.
If the kit that's in now was put in in 1995 then I'm not surprised it's shonky now.
If the kit that's in now was put in in 1995 then I'm not surprised it's shonky now.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
To also be honest I've had a few weird phantom limits on the M1 section south of Sheffield, and this is brand new kit, so age isn't always the issue
Sometimes the kit picks up non-existent problems or is too slow to adapt to the traffic flow when it has cleared
Sometimes the kit picks up non-existent problems or is too slow to adapt to the traffic flow when it has cleared
-
- Banned
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
This is a case where it seems to have got noticeably worse/more erratic as time goes by, albeit it is very difficult to objectively assess as one road user.James wrote:To also be honest I've had a few weird phantom limits on the M1 section south of Sheffield, and this is brand new kit, so age isn't always the issue
Sometimes the kit picks up non-existent problems or is too slow to adapt to the traffic flow when it has cleared
I wonder whether the newer software may be more risk averse than the original system - obviously somewhat needed for ALR anyway.
- M4 Cardiff
- Member
- Posts: 2401
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 15:12
- Location: Leamington Spa
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
One would assume that there is a human override, if due to failure it starts showing abnormal limits, either 40 in clear / no traffic or NSL in a large queue. However, little touch of cynic here, but could there be the wee tiniest possibility that erroneously low limits are left on a little longer than they should be for 'fundraising' purposes?
Driving thrombosis caused this accident......a clot behind the wheel.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
New Smart Motorways are being designed so that equipment can be replaced more easily- this is a major issue with the M42 pilot which is why subsequent schemes sought to reduce the amount of technology on the carriageway.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
-
- Banned
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I wouldn't imagine the Treasury or police give a cut to anyone working in a HE control room.M4 Cardiff wrote:One would assume that there is a human override, if due to failure it starts showing abnormal limits, either 40 in clear / no traffic or NSL in a large queue. However, little touch of cynic here, but could there be the wee tiniest possibility that erroneously low limits are left on a little longer than they should be for 'fundraising' purposes?
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Presumably the speed limits are calculated from data gathered by loops. It doesn't take much for a loop to fail, which can cause all kinds of wackiness.
Is there scope for using ANPR to calculate journey speeds and therefore set limits - cameras would presumably be easier to maintain and require fewer lane closures for slot cutting, etc?
Is there scope for using ANPR to calculate journey speeds and therefore set limits - cameras would presumably be easier to maintain and require fewer lane closures for slot cutting, etc?
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- Johnathan404
- Member
- Posts: 11478
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 16:54
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Surely the technology is already within the speed cameras?Bryn666 wrote:Is there scope for using ANPR to calculate journey speeds and therefore set limits - cameras would presumably be easier to maintain and require fewer lane closures for slot cutting, etc?
I have websites about: motorway services | Fareham
- Conekicker
- Member
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
- Location: South Yorks
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
And most definitely not as a cost cutting measure. No. Perish the thought. Yes. Indeed. No. Yes.darkcape wrote:New Smart Motorways are being designed so that equipment can be replaced more easily- this is a major issue with the M42 pilot which is why subsequent schemes sought to reduce the amount of technology on the carriageway.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
- hoagy_ytfc
- Member
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 00:10
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I'd have thought it is explicitly to cut maintenance costs, yes. Are you suggesting this is a bad thing?!Conekicker wrote:And most definitely not as a cost cutting measure. No. Perish the thought. Yes. Indeed. No. Yes.darkcape wrote:New Smart Motorways are being designed so that equipment can be replaced more easily- this is a major issue with the M42 pilot which is why subsequent schemes sought to reduce the amount of technology on the carriageway.
- Conekicker
- Member
- Posts: 3754
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
- Location: South Yorks
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I'm suggesting the reduction in level of provision was a measure driven purely by the initial installation cost. Any reduced future maintenance burden was a "happy" side effect.hoagy_ytfc wrote:I'd have thought it is explicitly to cut maintenance costs, yes. Are you suggesting this is a bad thing?!Conekicker wrote:And most definitely not as a cost cutting measure. No. Perish the thought. Yes. Indeed. No. Yes.darkcape wrote:New Smart Motorways are being designed so that equipment can be replaced more easily- this is a major issue with the M42 pilot which is why subsequent schemes sought to reduce the amount of technology on the carriageway.
Whether the level of provision reduction was too much, too little or just right, is another matter.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 407
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 13:37
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Speed cameras capture speed immediately after the gantry, you need speeds and vehicle spacings approaching the gantry to know whether to raise the limit.Johnathan404 wrote:Surely the technology is already within the speed cameras?Bryn666 wrote:Is there scope for using ANPR to calculate journey speeds and therefore set limits - cameras would presumably be easier to maintain and require fewer lane closures for slot cutting, etc?
Aside from that the speed cameras seem to be placed one every dozen or so gantries, I would imagine you need more frequent readings for VSL.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
If it is at the expense of safety, then yes.hoagy_ytfc wrote:I'd have thought it is explicitly to cut maintenance costs, yes. Are you suggesting this is a bad thing?!Conekicker wrote:And most definitely not as a cost cutting measure. No. Perish the thought. Yes. Indeed. No. Yes.darkcape wrote:New Smart Motorways are being designed so that equipment can be replaced more easily- this is a major issue with the M42 pilot which is why subsequent schemes sought to reduce the amount of technology on the carriageway.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- Johnathan404
- Member
- Posts: 11478
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 16:54
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Why not simply have the camera provide feedback to a gantry further ahead? It would be reporting to a central computer system anyway.tipsynurse wrote:Speed cameras capture speed immediately after the gantry, you need speeds and vehicle spacings approaching the gantry to know whether to raise the limit.
I have websites about: motorway services | Fareham
- hoagy_ytfc
- Member
- Posts: 632
- Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 00:10
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Well that's moved the goalposts onto a different pitch.Bryn666 wrote:If it is at the expense of safety, then yes.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
No, as I understand it the reduction of technology was driven by two things - the human control room operator (Comprising two sub-issues, the cost of staffing a control room, and that the operating procedures of dynamic hard shoulder schemes weren't ideal), and that the maintenance cost of all the tech was sky-high. Sure, then there's a saving on initial installation - but that is part of the scheme's budget, whereas not all of the ongoing maintenance is covered.Conekicker wrote:I'm suggesting the reduction in level of provision was a measure driven purely by the initial installation cost. Any reduced future maintenance burden was a "happy" side effect.hoagy_ytfc wrote:I'd have thought it is explicitly to cut maintenance costs, yes. Are you suggesting this is a bad thing?!Conekicker wrote:And most definitely not as a cost cutting measure. No. Perish the thought. Yes. Indeed. No. Yes.
Whether the level of provision reduction was too much, too little or just right, is another matter.
If you averaged out all of the maintenance required on the M42, they would have a lane closure on each carriageway every night of the year, including weekends, such is the maintenance requirement. The cost of that is insane.
Switching to ALR removed the issues with opening/closing the hard shoulder, and made it less confusing for drivers - if you have ALR then operationally it is no different to a D3/4 A-road, which have far lower standards of technology - you can justify the reduction in technology and save yourself the maintenance cost.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
- ellandback
- Member
- Posts: 1366
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2005 08:48
- Location: Elland, West Yorkshire
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I've seen plenty of oddities on the M62 j25 to 27 stretch. One blank signal and the others all showing reduced speed limits is pretty common, but I've also seen the opposite. I've also seen a speed limit number without the red circle.
This morning we had a new one though. One set of signals on the HSR section was showing X 60 X 60.
The red Xs were not being wig-wagged, they were just the plain 'non emergency' 'lane closed' signals. I was in lane 1 of the 'proper' road so it didn't particularly concern me, but I noticed that the effect of this was that the red X over the HS was being respected, whereas the red X over lane 2 was being ignored.
What do you reckon - are we attributing this to technical failure? Surely it can't have been intentional to close lane 2 without using wig-wags.
There was no obvious reason for lane 2 to have been closed, for the avoidance of doubt.
This morning we had a new one though. One set of signals on the HSR section was showing X 60 X 60.
The red Xs were not being wig-wagged, they were just the plain 'non emergency' 'lane closed' signals. I was in lane 1 of the 'proper' road so it didn't particularly concern me, but I noticed that the effect of this was that the red X over the HS was being respected, whereas the red X over lane 2 was being ignored.
What do you reckon - are we attributing this to technical failure? Surely it can't have been intentional to close lane 2 without using wig-wags.
There was no obvious reason for lane 2 to have been closed, for the avoidance of doubt.
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
Absolutely not, no.M4 Cardiff wrote:One would assume that there is a human override, if due to failure it starts showing abnormal limits, either 40 in clear / no traffic or NSL in a large queue. However, little touch of cynic here, but could there be the wee tiniest possibility that erroneously low limits are left on a little longer than they should be for 'fundraising' purposes?
I think defining failure is not as easy as you'd think. You could perhaps look at a camera and think, "Ooh, that's running ok now, I'll remove the speeds" but CCTV covers a very small section of network and it's not always obvious as to the trigger.
Yes, if equipment said FAIL, FAIL, FAIL then there's something need fixing, but as a safety-critical failure it would be prioritised.
Opinion is purely my own and all those other exceptions and excuses.
-
- SABRE Developer
- Posts: 11057
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
- Location: Belfast N Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Does VSL technology reach "end of life"?
I think that all other things being equal, it's driven by MIDAS plus manually reviewing CCTV - so if CCTV operator notices an issue that MIDAS hasn't, they can manually intervene, set a speed limit at a particular gantry, and watch the system then impose the stepping down limits at gantries behind it.
I think lane closures happen in a similar way - operator imposes a closure of a lane at a particular gantry, and the system imposes all necessary related speed limits.
I think lane closures happen in a similar way - operator imposes a closure of a lane at a particular gantry, and the system imposes all necessary related speed limits.