Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Moderator: Site Management Team
-
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
- Location: Belfast N Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
So if you were stood at a pedestrian crossing for several minutes and the road was clear in both directions, you would refuse to cross even if unaccompanied by your son?
That’s not rational.
That’s not rational.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
I can see where he's coming from - it's a bit irritating to have to stop for a crossing that no-one's crossing, but there's not much point hanging around if the traffic clears enough to cross safely before the lights change. I'll wait if there are children around (assuming that their parents might get an earful of "but that man crossed, why should we wait?!") but not otherwise.
- FosseWay
- Assistant Site Manager
- Posts: 19705
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 22:26
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
It's irritating to have to stop at all, let's face it. We do it through a combination of legal compulsion and a desire to be done by as others do unto us, not because it is actively helpful to us at that point. If it happens a lot at a certain crossing, it may indicate that there is something amiss with the timings there. But either way, it's not the pedestrian's fault. It's not "selfish" to press the button because there is clearly traffic approaching, but then find that the red man persists after the immediate traffic has cleared and go then. (Though I take your point about setting an example to children.) As I said earlier, the net result to the motorist is zero - if the button is pressed the red light will show at a certain point for traffic, regardless of whether the pedestrian waits for the green man or not.Helvellyn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 16:14I can see where he's coming from - it's a bit irritating to have to stop for a crossing that no-one's crossing, but there's not much point hanging around if the traffic clears enough to cross safely before the lights change. I'll wait if there are children around (assuming that their parents might get an earful of "but that man crossed, why should we wait?!") but not otherwise.
A lot of blood pressure pills could go unused by road users of all types if they stopped finding fault with other people when the (perceived) fault has no impact on them whatsoever. So what if that driver is doing 31 mph with no-one at risk of being hit. So what if that cyclist is cycling on a deserted pavement or runs a red on a deserted road. These may be issues for the police, but neither you, I nor Lenzar are the police.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Most crossings could reliably be zebras or even uncontrolled with a refuge and move more pedestrians without "unduly" delaying vehicles.
The problem with that is under the Equalities Act we must consider those who may not be confident crossing the road without reassurance from audible or tactile aids.
The real fix would to be replace all green lights on signal crossings with a flashing amber and having them go straight to red if you push the button.
The problem with that is under the Equalities Act we must consider those who may not be confident crossing the road without reassurance from audible or tactile aids.
The real fix would to be replace all green lights on signal crossings with a flashing amber and having them go straight to red if you push the button.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15772
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Not sure that I buy that. Flashing amber means "proceed with caution", steady amber means "stop unless it's dangerous to do so". Changing from flashing amber to steady amber, then red would work. It's what the French do with traffic signals in certain locations, such as outside fire and ambulance stations. The flashing amber replaces the green light in these cases.
I noted when in Canada earlier this year that signals guarding pedestrian crossings, as opposed to full intersections, show flashing green rather than steady green when not activated. Any mileage in that?
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Yes I hadn't meant literally to red - a normal sequence change would work.
Flashing green could work given that pelicans still exist for now. They aren't allowed as new installs since TSRGD 2016 so all new signal crossings are puffin.
Flashing green could work given that pelicans still exist for now. They aren't allowed as new installs since TSRGD 2016 so all new signal crossings are puffin.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Do many actually do this?
I agree that it is not really right for someone to press the button when they know they are going to cross just after the one car that is just approaching the crossing with nothing else being in sight. However, I don't think this is a common thing for people to actually do.
I believe it is far more common to see that the road is quite busy and press the button only to find that the road is clear once the cars you could originally see have passed. In this situation I see nothing wrong in crossing even if it means that cars may end up stopping for no-one as they will have to stop whether you wait or not and why should you have to wait. This situation occurs to me quite often on my walk from the station to work where a nearby roundabout makes it impossible to tell if there is a big gap in the traffic behind the cars near the crossing. It is actually quite common here for others to be at the crossing by the time the traffic is stopped.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
I've sometimes seen kids walk pass and press the button even when they're not crossing.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
In your situation it may make every sense to stop. But where most roads have good sight lines and are completely clear, pedestrians should have more controlled phases and be prepared to wait for them - or walk to the nearest bridge or underpass.trickstat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 18:42Do many actually do this?
I agree that it is not really right for someone to press the button when they know they are going to cross just after the one car that is just approaching the crossing with nothing else being in sight. However, I don't think this is a common thing for people to actually do.
I believe it is far more common to see that the road is quite busy and press the button only to find that the road is clear once the cars you could originally see have passed. In this situation I see nothing wrong in crossing even if it means that cars may end up stopping for no-one as they will have to stop whether you wait or not and why should you have to wait. This situation occurs to me quite often on my walk from the station to work where a nearby roundabout makes it impossible to tell if there is a big gap in the traffic behind the cars near the crossing. It is actually quite common here for others to be at the crossing by the time the traffic is stopped.
Only disabled people should have an unequivocal right to use at-grade crossings. Not people with bags, buggies, strollers etc.
And phases are too generously timed. They now nearly always have a red waiting phase after the red man appears.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
No doubt this does happen. A little like a more hi-tech derivative of 'knock-down ginger'.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
I take it you don't do much walking...?Berk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 19:28In your situation it may make every sense to stop. But where most roads have good sight lines and are completely clear, pedestrians should have more controlled phases and be prepared to wait for them - or walk to the nearest bridge or underpass.trickstat wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 18:42Do many actually do this?
I agree that it is not really right for someone to press the button when they know they are going to cross just after the one car that is just approaching the crossing with nothing else being in sight. However, I don't think this is a common thing for people to actually do.
I believe it is far more common to see that the road is quite busy and press the button only to find that the road is clear once the cars you could originally see have passed. In this situation I see nothing wrong in crossing even if it means that cars may end up stopping for no-one as they will have to stop whether you wait or not and why should you have to wait. This situation occurs to me quite often on my walk from the station to work where a nearby roundabout makes it impossible to tell if there is a big gap in the traffic behind the cars near the crossing. It is actually quite common here for others to be at the crossing by the time the traffic is stopped.
Only disabled people should have an unequivocal right to use at-grade crossings. Not people with bags, buggies, strollers etc.
And phases are too generously timed. They now nearly always have a red waiting phase after the red man appears.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
I did plenty - miles and miles and miles and miles and miles of it.
Until I got a car.
So yes, I do remember what it’s like to be a pedestrian, very clearly in fact. But it cuts both ways too. Provide a crossing every 200 yards (as you often find in city streets), and the buses struggle to clear the red lights, along with the other traffic.
Encouraging the use of puffin crossings is as likely to lead to crossing misuse as it is to assist people.
My own observations are that peds struggle to cross the road safely even when it’s their shout. I went to Stamford yesterday, waiting on a red in Water Street to turn left.
The number of peds who were clearly misjudging the speed of passing vehicles was ridiculous - you had people peering into the distance, stepping gingerly on to the road before they’d established it was safe to cross, etc. And this was on a green man.
My belief is that many people struggle to gauge the speed and safe distance between vehicles. And it seems to be getting worse.
Until I got a car.
So yes, I do remember what it’s like to be a pedestrian, very clearly in fact. But it cuts both ways too. Provide a crossing every 200 yards (as you often find in city streets), and the buses struggle to clear the red lights, along with the other traffic.
Encouraging the use of puffin crossings is as likely to lead to crossing misuse as it is to assist people.
My own observations are that peds struggle to cross the road safely even when it’s their shout. I went to Stamford yesterday, waiting on a red in Water Street to turn left.
The number of peds who were clearly misjudging the speed of passing vehicles was ridiculous - you had people peering into the distance, stepping gingerly on to the road before they’d established it was safe to cross, etc. And this was on a green man.
My belief is that many people struggle to gauge the speed and safe distance between vehicles. And it seems to be getting worse.
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5716
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Indeed and to assist those who struggle you make a good argument for giving more of the available junction capacity over to pedestrians as their standard is apparently getting lower in a similar way to the extension of intergreen times to cater for poor driving practice.Berk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 20:38
My own observations are that peds struggle to cross the road safely even when it’s their shout. I went to Stamford yesterday, waiting on a red in Water Street to turn left.
The number of peds who were clearly misjudging the speed of passing vehicles was ridiculous - you had people peering into the distance, stepping gingerly on to the road before they’d established it was safe to cross, etc. And this was on a green man.
My belief is that many people struggle to gauge the speed and safe distance between vehicles. And it seems to be getting worse.
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
I would say that we all are to some degree pedestrians unless we are either:
a) housebound.
b) someone who is always able to park or be dropped off right outside their destination e.g. The Queen.
- FosseWay
- Assistant Site Manager
- Posts: 19705
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2006 22:26
- Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Er, say what?Berk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 19:28 In your situation it may make every sense to stop. But where most roads have good sight lines and are completely clear, pedestrians should have more controlled phases and be prepared to wait for them - or walk to the nearest bridge or underpass.
Only disabled people should have an unequivocal right to use at-grade crossings. Not people with bags, buggies, strollers etc.
For a start, by virtue of being a human being, everyone has an unequivocal right to walk on the public highway (yes, yes, I know about Special Roads, not relevant here). No-one has the same unequivocal right to drive anything there - the right to do so is conditional upon gaining and retaining a licence, which among other things means obeying basic traffic rules like red lights.
Even, just for the sake of argument, if it's OK to impose the restrictions you suggest, how do you propose to deal with the majority of situations where there is no over- or underpass at all, usable or not?
Have you ever tried to hump 40 kg of baggage up stairs? Or a pushchair with a child in it, where a significant part of the problem is making doubly sure you don't lose your grip? Dropping a suitcase down a flight of stairs may cause mild inconvenience and slight loss. Dropping a child...
Here I think you may have a point, though it becomes insignificant in comparison to the ridiculous suggestion before it. Several posters above have said that newer crossing types do detect (the absence of) pedestrians and react accordingly, but I have to say I haven't particularly noticed them doing that. If it's possible to detect pedestrians, then it shouldn't be necessary to have a "lowest common denominator" timing on the ped phase - the crossing time for a jogger can be shorter than that for an elderly person with a zimmer frame. If it isn't possible (or if you're dealing with an older crossing) then it's fair enough to expect people to wait a few seconds more. They wouldn't have to if drivers could be reliably expected to be patient when there *is* someone with mobility problems on the crossing, but unfortunately there is a sizeable enough minority that misbehaves in such situations.And phases are too generously timed. They now nearly always have a red waiting phase after the red man appears.
I do agree, though, that there is sometimes too much inactive time where neither movement gets green.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
-
- Member
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
- Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Hang on "Berk" - I remember a guy in London who took a long time to prove that a Pelican crossing was timed TOO SHORT to cross the road - this was after his wife's inquest. I cannot find the reference, but here's one from the Torygraph:Berk wrote: ↑Mon Nov 12, 2018 19:28In your situation it may make every sense to stop. But where most roads have good sight lines and are completely clear, pedestrians should have more controlled phases and be prepared to wait for them - or walk to the nearest bridge or underpass.
Only disabled people should have an unequivocal right to use at-grade crossings. Not people with bags, buggies, strollers etc.
And phases are too generously timed. They now nearly always have a red waiting phase after the red man appears.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/ro ... -road.html
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
- Location: Belfast N Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
The all red phase at a Puffin is the time traffic is held until the crossing is clear. The green man phase - the invitation to start crossing - at a puffin is generally shorter than at a pelican, I think 5 seconds is typical rather than 7?
As far as I can tell, the intention is that if you stay within the bounds of the crossing (ie not going corner to corner at a crossroads) then you have the assurance that once you are on the crossing, you have as long as you need.
The converse of that is that a puffin should be more responsive when someone crosses quickly. If someone crosses as the lights turn amber, you get the minimum intergreen of 13 seconds (2 amber, 2 waiting, 5 green man, 2 clearance, 2 red and amber) which is the same as a pelican (2 amber, 2 waiting, 7 green man, 2 red plus flashing green man, then whatever it is of flashing amber/flashing green man).
Maybe I just look at it from the other point of view. Decades observing why we need pedestrian crossings (essentially because of managing the risk created by bad drivers).
As far as I can tell, the intention is that if you stay within the bounds of the crossing (ie not going corner to corner at a crossroads) then you have the assurance that once you are on the crossing, you have as long as you need.
The converse of that is that a puffin should be more responsive when someone crosses quickly. If someone crosses as the lights turn amber, you get the minimum intergreen of 13 seconds (2 amber, 2 waiting, 5 green man, 2 clearance, 2 red and amber) which is the same as a pelican (2 amber, 2 waiting, 7 green man, 2 red plus flashing green man, then whatever it is of flashing amber/flashing green man).
Maybe I just look at it from the other point of view. Decades observing why we need pedestrian crossings (essentially because of managing the risk created by bad drivers).
- Norfolktolancashire
- Member
- Posts: 1185
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 22:34
- Location: Cornwall
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Much to my shock I managed to get stuck in the queues at these roadworks this Saturday evening coming from the Manchester Christmas markets (another subject,but a shock of too many people in what was a glorified shed shack area!).
Yes I was disgusted with myself as I avoid congestion hotspots like the plague, however I ended up forty minutes of not moving at all. It was only due to cars eventually in the 2nd lane turning right onto a minor road that there was an escape.
On top of this the trains were not running due to strike action.
I'll stick with Cornwall next time, a little bit quieter!
Yes I was disgusted with myself as I avoid congestion hotspots like the plague, however I ended up forty minutes of not moving at all. It was only due to cars eventually in the 2nd lane turning right onto a minor road that there was an escape.
On top of this the trains were not running due to strike action.
I'll stick with Cornwall next time, a little bit quieter!
- FleetlinePhil
- Member
- Posts: 2098
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 11:26
- Location: Calder Valley
Re: Gridlock in Greater Manchester
Presumably none of you got stuck in this on Tuesday?
Apparently Dawnus has now gone into administration.
Apparently Dawnus has now gone into administration.