Someone please remind children's organisations like the cadet forces of this... Until the year I left one of the key commander's intents of the Corps was "total safety 2020"... Spot the problem... It just results in absolutely nothing being done as nothing is totally safe.FosseWay wrote:
We can do our best to mitigate stupidity but completely redesigning or forbidding the activity doesn't generally fall into the area of reasonable mitigations for stupidity.
The future of smart motorways
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: The future of smart motorways
Re: The future of smart motorways
Shouldn't that be encapsulated in the Safety Plan, etc.?Bomag wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 11:54 They have rigidly applied the principle of GALE in GD04/GG104 without any real understanding on managing risk to high risk subsets of groups. The 'public' generally don't understand it and those that do don't agree this Spartan approach to risk management is acceptable.
Re: The future of smart motorways
Seem to be new TV ads down in Hampshire tonight, basically about using refuges on smart motorways. “Go left” to the tune of “Go West”... Is anyone else suddenly seeing them?
Paul
Paul
Re: The future of smart motorways
The largest civil engineering and roads construction contractor, Balfour Beatty, has likewise their "Zero Harm" tagline. You must have seen them around. Some members here possibly work for them. It doesn't stop them getting on with jobs, sensibly - among other things, they do maintenance work, at height, on 440 kva electricity transmission networks, on live railways - and on live motorways.DB617 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 09, 2021 13:46 Someone please remind children's organisations like the cadet forces of this... Until the year I left one of the key commander's intents of the Corps was "total safety 2020"... Spot the problem... It just results in absolutely nothing being done as nothing is totally safe.
https://www.balfourbeatty.com/health-an ... den-rules/
-
- Member
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 21:45
- Location: Kidderminster
Re: The future of smart motorways
Yes, seen them on Sky Channels today, also heard them on the radio, seems as though this is going to be a major ad campaign.
Re: The future of smart motorways
The media ad salesmen have clearly been banging on the DfT's door. If there's going to be any additional spending on Smart Motorways, they want as big a share of it as they can.Worcestershire Wolf wrote: ↑Wed Mar 10, 2021 21:07 Yes, seen them on Sky Channels today, also heard them on the radio, seems as though this is going to be a major ad campaign.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1359
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
- Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge
Re: The future of smart motorways
I am briefly breaking my moratorium on this topic. Yes, I saw the advert, with someone dressed as an insect pointing left alongside one pointing right! What was the point? I mean this question seriously.
Dropping off again.
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Re: The future of smart motorways
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/go-l ... y-campaignmikehindsonevans wrote: ↑Wed Mar 10, 2021 21:39I am briefly breaking my moratorium on this topic. Yes, I saw the advert, with someone dressed as an insect pointing left alongside one pointing right! What was the point? I mean this question seriously.
Dropping off again.
"today Highways England is setting out what drivers should do if they encounter problems with their vehicle – go left. The campaign is being supported by partners across the recovery industry and independent road safety campaigner Meera Naran.
Set to the tune of the Pet Shop Boys’ hit version of the ‘Go West’ song, the advert delivers a clear, single-minded message – go left. Testing with focus groups found that the distinctive characters, music and humour made the important message very memorable and people will remember what to do in the event of an emergency."
Owen
- Conekicker
- Member
- Posts: 3769
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
- Location: South Yorks
Re: The future of smart motorways
Well that should nicely quash the corporate manslaughter chatter then.
Riiiiight.
Riiiiight.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
Re: The future of smart motorways
Indeed. The advertising campaign they should be running is one that tells people that if they do have to stop in a live lane, there is a good chance that the lane won't be closed for 20+ minutes.
That just might make people realise that they need to be out and over the barrier to as soon as the vehicle stops.
Of course delivering that important message without appearing incompetent isn't possible so splurge the budget on the current nonsense instead.
That just might make people realise that they need to be out and over the barrier to as soon as the vehicle stops.
Of course delivering that important message without appearing incompetent isn't possible so splurge the budget on the current nonsense instead.
Re: The future of smart motorways
What about the following:-
An explanation from HE that Smart Motorways do the following:-
- reduce congestion
- increase capacity
- decrease safety
To the tune of "2 out of 3 ain't bad by Meatloaf"?
An explanation from HE that Smart Motorways do the following:-
- reduce congestion
- increase capacity
- decrease safety
To the tune of "2 out of 3 ain't bad by Meatloaf"?
- traffic-light-man
- Member
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: The future of smart motorways
I appreciate that not being in the stationary vehicle is the ideal scenario (not that any of it is ideal, of course), but I can see why the HE aren't advising people to try and cross the live carriageway between their vehicle and the verges...Bendo wrote: ↑Wed Mar 10, 2021 22:42 Indeed. The advertising campaign they should be running is one that tells people that if they do have to stop in a live lane, there is a good chance that the lane won't be closed for 20+ minutes.
That just might make people realise that they need to be out and over the barrier to as soon as the vehicle stops.
Of course delivering that important message without appearing incompetent isn't possible so splurge the budget on the current nonsense instead.
People would be trying to cross from, for instance, lane three to the nearside verge. At least if they have 'gone left' as far as they can, they're in a better position to get out the vehicle should they decide to do so.
Simon
Re: The future of smart motorways
Last night on the A46 I passed a broken-down car in lane 1, being fended off by a local police patrol car. An AA van was also in attendance so the broken down vehicle had been there for some time. Looking forwards to the media screaming for SVD, hard shoulders & street lighting on the A46 too.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: The future of smart motorways
A road that never had a hard shoulder is a different issue. Taking away an existing safety refuge is a whole other thing. Quoting stats comparing DUMB against standard motorways doesn't alter the fact that it is made less safe by removing the refuge, which ought to be a criminal offence. Also, the stats are meaningless without the cause of each individual accident being recorded. In the case of DUMB it must be rear end shunts in almost every case, where the vehicle hasn't actually crashed.
The cynicism of those in Gov who tried to come up with a form of words that spelt SMART is despicable. Same with NICE where health is concerned.
The cynicism of those in Gov who tried to come up with a form of words that spelt SMART is despicable. Same with NICE where health is concerned.
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
Re: The future of smart motorways
You’re happy to accept stats that make you think smart motorways are dangerous, but willingly discard stats that show anything else as meaningless?
Make poetry history.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
Re: The future of smart motorways
OK - if SMART is an acronym, what does it even stand for?SteveA30 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 13, 2021 10:59 A road that never had a hard shoulder is a different issue. Taking away an existing safety refuge is a whole other thing. Quoting stats comparing DUMB against standard motorways doesn't alter the fact that it is made less safe by removing the refuge, which ought to be a criminal offence. Also, the stats are meaningless without the cause of each individual accident being recorded. In the case of DUMB it must be rear end shunts in almost every case, where the vehicle hasn't actually crashed.
The cynicism of those in Gov who tried to come up with a form of words that spelt SMART is despicable. Same with NICE where health is concerned.
This.
Though roads may not put a smile on everyone's face, there is one road that always will: the road to home.
Re: The future of smart motorways
It doesn't stand for anything, it's literally just the word "smart". It was chosen to mirror the use of that word in the names of internet-enabled domestic technology like smart phones, smart speakers, etc etc.
Chris
Roads.org.uk
Roads.org.uk
Re: The future of smart motorways
The media hysteria has removed any potential for sensible discussion on the topic.
I don't like smart motorways as a concept, I think the much larger loss from removing hard shoulders will be felt in future maintenance when lanes and entire carriageways must be closed because you can't shunt traffic over onto that hard shoulder past your site. Future roadworks will cause much more delays and economic impact; to the point I expect corners will be cut to avoid adverse publicity because that's how HE operates.
I'd like to know if those arguing that "hard shoulders are safe because I say they are" are presumably the same sorts that think driving at 90 is safe because they're self appointed experts who actually understand very little about motorway design but have through sheer good luck never had a crash as a result of their arrogance.
If I had any kind of manageable vehicle fault I would be getting off the motorway straight away and ditching on a grass verge on the nearest all purpose road where traffic speeds are lower and people don't have this ridiculous belief that they are super safe so drive with a bit more consideration.
I don't like smart motorways as a concept, I think the much larger loss from removing hard shoulders will be felt in future maintenance when lanes and entire carriageways must be closed because you can't shunt traffic over onto that hard shoulder past your site. Future roadworks will cause much more delays and economic impact; to the point I expect corners will be cut to avoid adverse publicity because that's how HE operates.
I'd like to know if those arguing that "hard shoulders are safe because I say they are" are presumably the same sorts that think driving at 90 is safe because they're self appointed experts who actually understand very little about motorway design but have through sheer good luck never had a crash as a result of their arrogance.
If I had any kind of manageable vehicle fault I would be getting off the motorway straight away and ditching on a grass verge on the nearest all purpose road where traffic speeds are lower and people don't have this ridiculous belief that they are super safe so drive with a bit more consideration.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: The future of smart motorways
The only way to find out if Smart is safer or not is by knowing the exact cause of each incident on both Smart and normal motorways but, AFAIK, that factor isn't recorded. That is the only way of settling the discussion really. Otherwise, it is just opinions. I would also like to know how many accidents on all roads have been caused by distraction from phones and other gadgets but, I guess that info is also not available.
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
Re: The future of smart motorways
Collision causation factors (and the narrative describing the collision) are collected as part of the STATS19 record of the crash details, see Annex 4 of the first linked document. They are caveated insofar as they are recorded at the roadside in the aftermath of the crash and not necessarily by a trained traffic officer, but still they are what we have. Distraction from 'phones is one of the causation factors recorded.SteveA30 wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 10:18 The only way to find out if Smart is safer or not is by knowing the exact cause of each incident on both Smart and normal motorways but, AFAIK, that factor isn't recorded. That is the only way of settling the discussion really. Otherwise, it is just opinions. I would also like to know how many accidents on all roads have been caused by distraction from phones and other gadgets but, I guess that info is also not available.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 0-2011.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistic ... ry-factors