Most Optimist Future Proofing

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Achmelvic
Member
Posts: 1553
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 21:50
Location: Castleford, Yorkshire

Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Achmelvic »

I was recently driving on the A59 and noticed the Whalley bypass was built with an extra wide over bridge for Elker Lane suitable for a D2 upgrade at a later date similar to many other new roads of that era.

Whilst I doubt we'll see a D2 upgrade of this section of the A59 in the near future it got me wondering what people reckon are the most optimist examples of unused future proofing on the UK network?

I'm thinking of locations which have similar extra wide bridges for a future D2, flared entrances to roundabouts for flyovers etc but are in locations which are very unlikely to ever get used, and may even have been a bit over optimistic at the time of building but were still done anyway.

Obviously the days of future proofing are long gone with current major projects almost designed to prevent future upgrades without huge rebuilding but that's another discussion which I think we've had plenty of time around here :wink:
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35936
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Bryn666 »

Achmelvic wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 16:59 I was recently driving on the A59 and noticed the Whalley bypass was built with an extra wide over bridge for Elker Lane suitable for a D2 upgrade at a later date similar to many other new roads of that era.

Whilst I doubt we'll see a D2 upgrade of this section of the A59 in the near future it got me wondering what people reckon are the most optimist examples of unused future proofing on the UK network?

I'm thinking of locations which have similar extra wide bridges for a future D2, flared entrances to roundabouts for flyovers etc but are in locations which are very unlikely to ever get used, and may even have been a bit over optimistic at the time of building but were still done anyway.

Obviously the days of future proofing are long gone with current major projects almost designed to prevent future upgrades without huge rebuilding but that's another discussion which I think we've had plenty of time around here :wink:
The A59 was of course intended to be the original express road to Yorkshire; the Whalley/Clitheroe Bypasses opened in 1970 with provision for future dualling on this basis. The M65 rendered it redundant and further A59 improvements went down the proverbial.

The dual bit between the two A671s is not original, this was completed in around 1998 or so. The middle roundabout for the service area and housing developments was done at the same time. I think this was part of a detrunking deal.

All in all, the decision to not dual the A59 has been a poor one as there have been numerous fatals at the at-grade junctions. You'll also have noticed all the two-way traffic repeaters as a result of bad overtakes ending in disaster.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Brownfools
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 14:32

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Brownfools »

Can I nominate the southern end of the M11 in East London, with it's slips and overbridge for the, never to be built, M12.
ais523
Member
Posts: 1139
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 19:52
Location: Birmingham

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by ais523 »

Building the A1(M) south of Peterborough as D4M was pretty optimistic. At least that section is unlikely to require widening for a while, if ever.
User avatar
nowster
Treasurer
Posts: 14858
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 16:06
Location: Manchester

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by nowster »

The Clifton viaduct on the M60 over the River Irwell is wide enough for five lanes each way, because of the unbuilt M601.

http://pathetic.org.uk/unbuilt/m601/
Herned
Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 09:15

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Herned »

The Hoddesdon junction on the A10, future proofed for ringway 4
User avatar
vlad
Member
Posts: 2589
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 16:20
Location: Near the northern end of the A34

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by vlad »

There are the earthworks leading from the A801 to an unbuilt bridge over the River Avon.

Or how about a bridge without a road - the Garry Bridge, not served by the B895 on Lewis.
"If you expect nothing from somebody you are never disappointed." - Sylvia Plath
User avatar
Truvelo
Member
Posts: 17501
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 21:10
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Truvelo »

Another example similar to the A59 is the A688 at Spennymoor which has a short section of D2 between two roundabouts which was meant to be GSJ'd.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
B9127
Member
Posts: 697
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 20:45
Location: Angus Scotland

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by B9127 »

How about the B921 IN Glenrothes -all set for grade separated junctions that will never be built including another at its junction with the A92
Motorways travelled 2019 - M90 - M9 - M80 - M8 -M77 - M73 -A74(M) -M6-M42-M40 -A404(M) - M4 - M5 -M50 -M56 much better so far than last year
Duncan macknight
Committee Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 10:59
Location: Inverness

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Duncan macknight »

The A8 between Newhouse and Newbridge was rebuilt with the intention of being a dual carriageway.

Notice the very wide bridge at the Almond Viaduct near the Newbridge end so they could decide what arch the second carriageway could go through. Lots of Livingston too with very wide verges.
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by the cheesecake man »

A617 Rainworth bypass. Highly engineered D2 with wide enough central reservation and margins for D3 and probably for D3M. Huge roundabout at western end with flared carriageways clearly intended for a big ass flyover. But this short marvel just bypasses the one village. At the eastern end it is followed by twisty unimproved S2 passing through every village all the way to Southwell and at the western end it crashes straight into urban Mansfield.
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15777
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Chris Bertram »

Droitwich by-pass, A38/A442 junction. A38 is dualled either side of this roundabout, and is futureproofed for continuation over the junction, using the eventual sliproads to meet the roundabout. Unlikely ever to happen.

There are loads of bits of A4040, the former Outer Ring Road around Birmingham where the formation is wide enough for D2, but the second carriageway has either never been built, or is in use as a service road only. A few sections did get dualled early on, but since the Birmingham Motorway Box was completed, it is unlikely that any more will be done.

A174 - from the western end of the Kirkleatham by-pass to the roundabout junction with A1085 for Marske - the formation is wide enough for D2 and the carriageway is clearly to one side of this with the roundabouts off-centre from the road. Will probably never be done. Also on A174 at the eastern end of the Parkway, a clear intent to provide a flyover over the roundabout, with an earth bank and flared carriageways - but in which direction? Both A1053 and A174 east of the roundabout meet the roundabout with no flare. The balance of probabilities suggests A174 -> A174, but that would leave traffic heading for Teesport having to use the roundabout. A mystery, though KeithW probably knows the full story ...
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
owen b
Member
Posts: 9901
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 15:22
Location: Luton

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by owen b »

Chris Bertram wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 20:57 Also on A174 at the eastern end of the Parkway, a clear intent to provide a flyover over the roundabout, with an earth bank and flared carriageways - but in which direction? Both A1053 and A174 east of the roundabout meet the roundabout with no flare. The balance of probabilities suggests A174 -> A174, but that would leave traffic heading for Teesport having to use the roundabout. A mystery, though KeithW probably knows the full story ...
I think we got the answer to that one here : viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15739&p=269295&hili ... by#p269295
Owen
BOH
Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2016 14:19

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by BOH »

There are two D2 width bridges (one an overbridge, one an underpass) on the M3 between junctions 4A and 5 near Fleet that seem to have been built with future proofing in mind. Also one on the M4 between the 2 Swindon exits near Wroughton that is D2 width.

The A31 Alton bypass was built with capacity to be a D2M or D3 as it has a very wide central reserve, a GSJ in the middle and widely diverging slips at the roundabouts at each end for a flyover or underpass GSJ
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9736
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by WHBM »

M8 through Glasgow has multiple futureproofed-junctions that never worked out.

West Stret ski jump https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8520792 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Garscube Road stubs (both carriageways) https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8698598 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Maryhill Motorway exit stub and eastbound bridge https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8701658 ... a=!3m1!1e3

East Flank ramps, ended up going into a minor street https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8652863 ... a=!3m1!1e3
naylorsj
New Member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2017 22:10

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by naylorsj »

Junction 2 of the M53 takes some beating with it’s GSJ, slip roads flying all over and coming to an abrupt end at a small roundabout (having come to an abrupt end at village of Upton for years). I’d still love to know what was actually planned - whether a barrage across to North Wales or just a very quick way of getting to West Kirby beach...
Al__S
Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:56

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Al__S »

The A907 on the Clackmannan bypass was clearly built to be D2, with a couple of bridges done- although not where it passes under the railway- and an awkward angle to meet the roundabout at the A977
User avatar
c2R
SABRE Wiki admin
Posts: 11190
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 11:01

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by c2R »

I'd vote for the A4147 under the A414 (former A414 under the M10)

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.7421949 ... 312!8i6656
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
User avatar
KeithW
Member
Posts: 19287
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 13:25
Location: Marton-In-Cleveland North Yorks

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by KeithW »

owen b wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 21:16
Chris Bertram wrote: Wed May 08, 2019 20:57 Also on A174 at the eastern end of the Parkway, a clear intent to provide a flyover over the roundabout, with an earth bank and flared carriageways - but in which direction? Both A1053 and A174 east of the roundabout meet the roundabout with no flare. The balance of probabilities suggests A174 -> A174, but that would leave traffic heading for Teesport having to use the roundabout. A mystery, though KeithW probably knows the full story ...
I think we got the answer to that one here : viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15739&p=269295&hili ... by#p269295
I think that is correct. I believe the original intent was to take the flyover across to the A174 with a slip to the roundabout for the A1053 to Teesport. In the early 1970's used to drive back from ICI Wilton on the old A174 through Eston. The A1053 wax built in the late 60s and the A174 east had been widened from the original country lane but was still S2. The Parkway had NOT been built at this time but the cutting it runs through had been excavated and the roundabout built in anticipation. At the time ICI Wilton was a very large employer with around 12,000 people on site and it generated a lot more road transport than there is now. The new Redcar Steelworks had just been built and the Basic Oxygen British Steel plant at Lackenby was going strong while Shell had a refinery at Teessport and Nissan had a major car import centre. But with that the A1053 did not carry as much traffic as the A174. It still doesnt, AADT on the Trunk A1053 is 15k while that of the A174 east of the roundabout is closer to 40k.

When I last worked at Wilton in the late 1970's as a contractor all this had changed, a number of the major units such as the spinning plant and the titanium works had already been closed and both the nylon and terylene plants were downsizing. All of the ICI technical apprentices in the 1968 intake (future designers and engineers) had either been made redundant or resigned by 1975, I was in fact one of the few who actually quit as I could not see a long term future there. My father who had been at ICI Wilton since it opened was offered and took early retirement in 1978. All the guys in the office thought I was mad giving up a 'job for life'. Within 5 years 90% of them had been laid off and finding a job in the late 70's and early 80's was not easy.

The A66 extension through Middlesbrough had not been built when the Parkway opened which meant the old routes through Middlesbrough and the A1085 Trunk Road were overloaded. I suspect it was the plan to build the A66 along with the downturn at Wilton and the closure of the Shell Refinery and Smiths Dock shipyard that resulted in the flyover being quietly dropped.
Marzo
Member
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2019 10:49
Location: B5132

Re: Most Optimist Future Proofing

Post by Marzo »

M5 Junction 21 (Weston-super-Mare) comes to mind of course. Designed to include the South Bristol Spur (see PM), which still seems as unlikely as ever 54 years on.
Post Reply