Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Moderator: Site Management Team
Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
At the moment the wonderful folks at NMWTRA are surface dressing the trunk roads around here, however for some reason the stretches being done seem to be much longer than usual.
On the A494 for example, there are about three stretches around two miles each between Bontnewydd and Llanuwchllyn (which is only around nine miles of road) and there are also long sections on the A5.
Is there any reason (better than usual weather, late start to the surface dressing season) that these sections are so long, or are they usually around this length?
On the A494 for example, there are about three stretches around two miles each between Bontnewydd and Llanuwchllyn (which is only around nine miles of road) and there are also long sections on the A5.
Is there any reason (better than usual weather, late start to the surface dressing season) that these sections are so long, or are they usually around this length?
Built for comfort, not speed.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Sorry ... a bit of a rant ...
Please give us a chance, I've no idea what NMWTRA is, I don't know if that just makes me plain ignorant, maybe it does.
I thought the convention was that when using acronyms the first time you use them you write out the full name and then move to the acronym on further use. I don't know if the location is really important to the value of your post but if you think it is then please give us a chance at identifying what on earth NMWTRA actually means ...
rant off ....
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
North And Mid Wales Trunk Roads Agency.avtur wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 21:51Sorry ... a bit of a rant ...
Please give us a chance, I've no idea what NMWTRA is, I don't know if that just makes me plain ignorant, maybe it does.
I thought the convention was that when using acronyms the first time you use them you write out the full name and then move to the acronym on further use. I don't know if the location is really important to the value of your post but if you think it is then please give us a chance at identifying what on earth NMWTRA actually means ...
rant off ....
Built for comfort, not speed.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
North and Mid Wales Trunk Road Agentavtur wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 21:51Sorry ... a bit of a rant ...
Please give us a chance, I've no idea what NMWTRA is, I don't know if that just makes me plain ignorant, maybe it does.
I thought the convention was that when using acronyms the first time you use them you write out the full name and then move to the acronym on further use. I don't know if the location is really important to the value of your post but if you think it is then please give us a chance at identifying what on earth NMWTRA actually means ...
rant off ....
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
From the SABRE Wiki: North and Mid Wales Trunk Road Agent :
The North and Mid Wales Trunk Road Agent / Asiant Cefnffyrdd Gogledd a Chanolbarth Cymru is an agency of the Welsh Government, responsible for the management and improvement of trunk roads in Ceredigion, Conwy, Denbighshire, Flintshire, Gwynedd, the Isle of Anglesey, Powys, and Wrexham. It took over from the North Wales Trunk Road Agency
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
No idea re the technical aspects, but a few years ago Devon CC used surface dressing on the A361 west of Tiverton for at least 5 miles in one continuous set of works. The 20mph speed limit for the next few weeks was somewhat torturous
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
I have never seen surface-dressed roads in Germany, or at least nothing that seems like we lay down. Their roads are also like billiard tables compared to our obstacle courses.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
I have, however, driven on roads in Germany that are more patching tar than actual surface.... As much as I hate surface dressing with a passion (especially when used inappropriately on high speed primary rural routes), there are disadvantages to alternative approaches as well.
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
-
- Member
- Posts: 1721
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 17:48
- Location: Leeds
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Well I’m Just pleased that in England we don’t surface dress trunk roads!
As for distance all works are planned months in advance so the length of the sections won’t be down to the weather or anything like that, maybe that more money is available to do longer sections, I know in North Yorkshire they often do long sections, I remember one road getting done that was 10 miles long.....as far as I’m aware there is no maximum distance as they can do it over a number of days.
As for distance all works are planned months in advance so the length of the sections won’t be down to the weather or anything like that, maybe that more money is available to do longer sections, I know in North Yorkshire they often do long sections, I remember one road getting done that was 10 miles long.....as far as I’m aware there is no maximum distance as they can do it over a number of days.
- Conekicker
- Member
- Posts: 3763
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
- Location: South Yorks
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
The M62 to the east of Ferrybridge was surface dressed about 25 years ago.NICK 647063 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 22:51 Well I’m Just pleased that in England we don’t surface dress trunk roads!
As for distance all works are planned months in advance so the length of the sections won’t be down to the weather or anything like that, maybe that more money is available to do longer sections, I know in North Yorkshire they often do long sections, I remember one road getting done that was 10 miles long.....as far as I’m aware there is no maximum distance as they can do it over a number of days.
Very surprisingly cough it didn't last all that long.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Going a bit off topic, what other types of surfacing is there? Surely it is all just just the same, bloop some tar and stones down then roll over it and call it a day?
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
It's about method as well as materials - surface dressing is putting tar down and chucking a load of stones at it, and then sweeping up the excess that hasn't stuck.
You could instead patch and not surface dress, as they do in Germany. You could also scrape off the surafce layer and put some hot rolled ashpelt down. Or you could use different surfaces in the first place, like concrete*
* not that I'm recommending that...
You could instead patch and not surface dress, as they do in Germany. You could also scrape off the surafce layer and put some hot rolled ashpelt down. Or you could use different surfaces in the first place, like concrete*
* not that I'm recommending that...
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
-
- Member
- Posts: 1721
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 17:48
- Location: Leeds
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Yes they used to but thankfully now Highways England don’t permit surface dressing.The M62 to the east of Ferrybridge was surface dressed about 25 years ago.
Very surprisingly cough it didn't last all that long.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
on a connected note, is the 20mph limit that is applied through these sections actually mandatory or advisory? i don't think i've ever seen a vehicle actually stick to this. i always assumed it's an arse-cover to remove liability if some does actually skid on this loose surface.
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15771
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
If it's on a plate below the "Loose chippings" triangle sign, saying "Maximum Speed 20 mph", then I believe it's advisory. If it's a number in a red ring, then yes it is mandatory. I saw this applied on A435 south of M42 J3 when that was surface dressed. As the normal speed limit for that road is NSL (70 for a dualled road), it meant that the speed limit was reduced by a whole 50 mph! And no, it wasn't being widely observed.hat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 07:58 on a connected note, is the 20mph limit that is applied through these sections actually mandatory or advisory? i don't think i've ever seen a vehicle actually stick to this. i always assumed it's an arse-cover to remove liability if some does actually skid on this loose surface.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
I've seen mandatory roadworks speed limits and lane closures where it has been applied to nsl rural dual carriageways, but the max speed 20 signs are advisory only.
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Usually it's advisory but can catch you out in an insurance claim.hat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 07:58 on a connected note, is the 20mph limit that is applied through these sections actually mandatory or advisory? i don't think i've ever seen a vehicle actually stick to this. i always assumed it's an arse-cover to remove liability if some does actually skid on this loose surface.
About 25 years ago when at Berkshire CC we surfaced dressed a road and a BMW driver sent in a claim saying he was doing 60mph three days after the road was surfaced with loose chippings and stones have cracked the windscreen , paint etc. It was thrown out on the grounds that as the signs were advising that the safe speed was 20 mph, as he was driving above that, he took a risk and therefore was to blame.
The M25 - The road to nowhere
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
East Riding have taken to using some advisory signs and some mandatory signs interspersed within the same section of road. These were left in place up to 3 weeks after the last loose stone had gone and 2 weeks after the lines had been repainted. Not all of the permanent signs had been covered up. No end of restriction signs were in place. I don't for one second believe it was legally enforceable, and TBH I doubt they even had the legal gubbins in place for the mandatory limit. But they have always treated drivers with contempt and ignored DfT guidance and regulations, so why change now?hat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 07:58 on a connected note, is the 20mph limit that is applied through these sections actually mandatory or advisory? i don't think i've ever seen a vehicle actually stick to this. i always assumed it's an arse-cover to remove liability if some does actually skid on this loose surface.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
Done well (i.e. including repairing the whole road structure where required) it's a perfectly reasonable method of repair on suitable roads. There was a lot of it going on around me a couple of years ago, for the most part you wouldn't know it was done that way (well people here probably would but not your average man on the street), but it was accompanied by quite a bit of digging right down and rebuilding in places rather than just chucking some tar and stones down on what was already there so I suspect it'll last well enough.c2R wrote: ↑Tue Jul 09, 2019 22:16 I have, however, driven on roads in Germany that are more patching tar than actual surface.... As much as I hate surface dressing with a passion (especially when used inappropriately on high speed primary rural routes), there are disadvantages to alternative approaches as well.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
These sections are all NSL, so no permanent signs to cover up. What we got was random temporary 40mph signs placed many days in advance (so mostly ignored) and the "Cyflymder Uchaf 10mya / Max Speed 10mph" signs when work started. Most were not sticking to the 10mph limit, and most were sticking to 40. The actual "running" lane areas were pretty good, but the thick strips of gravel were enough to make the back end of one's car step out if so encouraged...Stevie D wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:24East Riding have taken to using some advisory signs and some mandatory signs interspersed within the same section of road. These were left in place up to 3 weeks after the last loose stone had gone and 2 weeks after the lines had been repainted. Not all of the permanent signs had been covered up. No end of restriction signs were in place. I don't for one second believe it was legally enforceable, and TBH I doubt they even had the legal gubbins in place for the mandatory limit. But they have always treated drivers with contempt and ignored DfT guidance and regulations, so why change now?hat wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2019 07:58 on a connected note, is the 20mph limit that is applied through these sections actually mandatory or advisory? i don't think i've ever seen a vehicle actually stick to this. i always assumed it's an arse-cover to remove liability if some does actually skid on this loose surface.
Built for comfort, not speed.
Re: Surface dressing: is there a maximum distance?
I've driven quite a few sections over the years where the advisory 20 signs are still up on an NSL S2 road but there are little or no loose chippings still left on the surface. In these situations many people tend to drive at 40 or just over.