Road closure diversion through a lay-by

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
Hdeng16
Member
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 20:47

Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Hdeng16 »

Thought this was weird - the A4226 north of Barry and west of Cardiff is being upgraded fairly substantially - mostly offline but on one section seemingly online.

One section not far of the southern roundabout, work seems to be taking place on a bridge over the River Waycock.

The road is ‘closed’ (not signed as such) but access and through- traffic is maintained via single lane running through a lay-by - controlled by temporary lights. The lay-by is almost certainly an old old version of the road too.

Is this a one off? The lay-by isn’t really in that good condition either so I thought it was odd. Any other examples?

Dropped pin
Near Waycock Rd, Barry CF62 3AA
https://goo.gl/maps/x3sXWamtfvAWAbKL9
User avatar
Stevie D
Member
Posts: 8000
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 17:19
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Stevie D »

This was done on the A59 between York and the A1(M) a year or two back. I don't think it was a contraflow through the layby though, I think westbound was through the layby and eastbound remained on the main carriageway (using one lane or the other).
User avatar
Conekicker
Member
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
Location: South Yorks

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Conekicker »

Unusual but not unacceptable, the layby is clearly the old alignment so with sufficient signing and coning at each end to highlight the turns, crack on. I'd expect the layby to be inspected, patched if needed and swept before running through it though. If running through the layby reduces the length of time the site works are present, then surely that's a good thing.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
Hdeng16
Member
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 20:47

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Hdeng16 »

Conekicker wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 22:19 Unusual but not unacceptable, the layby is clearly the old alignment so with sufficient signing and coning at each end to highlight the turns, crack on. I'd expect the layby to be inspected, patched if needed and swept before running through it though. If running through the layby reduces the length of time the site works are present, then surely that's a good thing.
Certainly! And as a road geek - I loved it. It was rough more than anything else - no pot holes but clearly a very old surface.

It may well that only been temporary over the weekend - although it does look like perhaps it’s bypassing the southern tie-in with the existing road.

Wish I’d got a video now!
DB617
Member
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 00:51
Location: Bristol

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by DB617 »

Local here - A4226 is my commute to work. The road upgrade is essentially a bypass of the old widened lane, with the southern section being straightened online, the middle being rebuilt offline with a new cutting and DMRB NSL standards, the northern section receiving a total surface replacement and the online parts having a shared path added to give a cycle link to the A48. They've also *finally* altered the A48 junction to include a separate left-turn filter to the A4226 from the A48 Westbound, something that was unbelievably left out when the junction was signalised, apparently designed by an apprentice or incompetent buffoon ~15 years ago.

The layby was indeed part of the original B4266 Five Mile Lane before it was upgraded to all-purpose with a new bridge over the River Waycock. There's also a stub at the northern end near the junction with the A48, where the lane squeezed through some farmhouses. You can see the remains of the white line and cats' eyes down the middle of the layby. Each side of the old lane must have been <1.5m wide, so one wonders what the purpose of the white line was other than to cause accidents. Said layby was also a prime spot for night-time rendezvous until they deliberately shaved off every bit of overgrowth between the old old road and the old road.
Hdeng16
Member
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2016 20:47

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Hdeng16 »

DB617 wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 22:58 Local here - A4226 is my commute to work. The road upgrade is essentially a bypass of the old widened lane, with the southern section being straightened online, the middle being rebuilt offline with a new cutting and DMRB NSL standards, the northern section receiving a total surface replacement and the online parts having a shared path added to give a cycle link to the A48. They've also *finally* altered the A48 junction to include a separate left-turn filter to the A4226 from the A48 Westbound, something that was unbelievably left out when the junction was signalised, apparently designed by an apprentice or incompetent buffoon ~15 years ago.

The layby was indeed part of the original B4266 Five Mile Lane before it was upgraded to all-purpose with a new bridge over the River Waycock. There's also a stub at the northern end near the junction with the A48, where the lane squeezed through some farmhouses. You can see the remains of the white line and cats' eyes down the middle of the layby. Each side of the old lane must have been <1.5m wide, so one wonders what the purpose of the white line was other than to cause accidents. Said layby was also a prime spot for night-time rendezvous until they deliberately shaved off every bit of overgrowth between the old old road and the old road.
Haha I guess it did have that look about it. Looks a substantial upgrade - part GSJ I think too?
DB617
Member
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 00:51
Location: Bristol

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by DB617 »

Hdeng16 wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 12:37 Haha I guess it did have that look about it. Looks a substantial upgrade - part GSJ I think too?
Believe it or not, no - it's just a DMRB huge radius curve. The Northbound old road will meet the new road at a ghost island T junction at the end of that curve, with the Southbound road giving way to the Northbound about 10m before the T. The points where the old road bends off the new alignment will then recieve traffic filters, leaving them open only to NMU. The curve is OTT but was kinda cool to drive when traffic was switched onto it briefly last week.
User avatar
Pendlemac
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:58
Location: Pendle, Lancashire

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Pendlemac »

DB617 wrote: Sun Jul 21, 2019 22:58 You can see the remains of the white line and cats' eyes down the middle of the layby. Each side of the old lane must have been <1.5m wide, so one wonders what the purpose of the white line was other than to cause accidents.
Did you mean <2.5m there as the road looks a lot wider than 3m.

Also the lines probably went in when cars were narrower.

For example, a relatives Hillman Hunter ( classed then as a large family car ) was 20cm ( 8 inch ) narrower than my current 308 ( classed as a small family car ).
DB617
Member
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Dec 25, 2017 00:51
Location: Bristol

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by DB617 »

My mistake. Measurement by eye skills lacking. Basically it seems way too narrow to fit two modern cars. That being said on second look this morning, it looks like the hedgerow has been allowed to reclaim about 1m of width so it was probably previously the same width as the road is further north.
User avatar
IAN
Member
Posts: 1504
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 19:07

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by IAN »

When a landslip occurred on the A5 in Snowdonia a few years ago, blocking the road, the diversion used the old alignment, which had basically become a farmer's track!

Ian (M5 Driver)
AKA M5 Driver
Nwallace
Member
Posts: 4242
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 22:42
Location: Dundee

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by Nwallace »

IAN wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 16:22 When a landslip occurred on the A5 in Snowdonia a few years ago, blocking the road, the diversion used the old alignment, which had basically become a farmer's track!

Ian (M5 Driver)
That's also essentially what the Rest and Be Thankful diversion is whne it isn't the ferries.
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9733
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by WHBM »

IAN wrote: Mon Jul 22, 2019 16:22 When a landslip occurred on the A5 in Snowdonia a few years ago, blocking the road, the diversion used the old alignment, which had basically become a farmer's track!
We discussed this one again recently. The old alignment had actually been sold off to the farmer and gated, but was rented back.
NICK 647063
Member
Posts: 1724
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 17:48
Location: Leeds

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by NICK 647063 »

This was done on the A59 between York and the A1(M) a year or two back. I don't think it was a contraflow through the layby though, I think westbound was through the layby and eastbound remained on the main carriageway (using one lane or the other).
Yes it was as you say westbound through the lay-by and eastbound over the new bridge, although for a few days both directions were sent through the lay-by when a full closure of the newer bridge was required, it was controlled by traffic lights and single lane running at the narrowest part of the lay-by over the old bridge.
darkcape
Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 14:54

Re: Road closure diversion through a lay-by

Post by darkcape »

In 2013 as part of the Fosse Park roundabout improvement the south service road was diverted on to the old road which was basically an ox-bow from 1980 when the shopping park was built and first set of lights installed. The bulk of the old road was intact with a gate for maintenance access to a local park, but the other end had been dug up and bunded with a electricity overhead line pole installed very close to the carriageway, so this stretch had to operate single file under temporary lights similar to the layby set up.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Post Reply