Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Moderator: Site Management Team
Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Hi there,
I think I may have posted about this a few years ago but never got any definitive answers, so I'm posting again as I've now discovered two public footpaths - one of them is even signed - that cross the A12 Brentwood Bypass.
First is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6372647 ... 312!8i6656
Second is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6432454 ... 312!8i6656
As you can see, there are clearly provisions made for someone to cross the road, as they have allowed space in the central reservation and with a barrier alongside the road.
The first footpath is publicly signed alongside the road, but the second isn't, even from the A1023 where it begins, and isn't shown on OS maps apart from this one https://footpathmap.co.uk/map/?zoom=16& ... 5722766904
I saw someone actually cross the first one the other day. Has anyone else had experience of crossing such busy, and usually dangerous roads? Surely they should have been decomissioned, as I presume these footpaths predate the bypass that was built in '66?
I think I may have posted about this a few years ago but never got any definitive answers, so I'm posting again as I've now discovered two public footpaths - one of them is even signed - that cross the A12 Brentwood Bypass.
First is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6372647 ... 312!8i6656
Second is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6432454 ... 312!8i6656
As you can see, there are clearly provisions made for someone to cross the road, as they have allowed space in the central reservation and with a barrier alongside the road.
The first footpath is publicly signed alongside the road, but the second isn't, even from the A1023 where it begins, and isn't shown on OS maps apart from this one https://footpathmap.co.uk/map/?zoom=16& ... 5722766904
I saw someone actually cross the first one the other day. Has anyone else had experience of crossing such busy, and usually dangerous roads? Surely they should have been decomissioned, as I presume these footpaths predate the bypass that was built in '66?
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
I'm sure there will be somebody on here who knows a lot more than me about this, but I don't think that is how it tends to work. A footpath tends to be evidence of a public right of way and you can't just extinguish those. Of course there are alternatives such as diversions, footbridges and underpasses that are certainly preferable from a safety point of view.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Definitely, I am surprised at why there are no better provisions made like a footbridge, especially given another public footpath that crosses the same road a couple of miles further down is given onetrickstat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:34I'm sure there will be somebody on here who knows a lot more than me about this, but I don't think that is how it tends to work. A footpath tends to be evidence of a public right of way and you can't just extinguish those. Of course there are alternatives such as diversions, footbridges and underpasses that are certainly preferable from a safety point of view.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1725
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 17:48
- Location: Leeds
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
The worst one I know is on the A1 near Wentbridge, it crosses on a bend in the A1 and that section is one of the busiest dual Carriageways in the uk....
Others that come to mind are the A64 between York and Tadcaster, the central barrier was renewed a few years ago and more formal crossing points were put in the central reservation, plenty of pedestrians crossing warnings but this section has seen many fatals involving pedestrians crossing over the years.
Others that come to mind are the A64 between York and Tadcaster, the central barrier was renewed a few years ago and more formal crossing points were put in the central reservation, plenty of pedestrians crossing warnings but this section has seen many fatals involving pedestrians crossing over the years.
- Steven
- SABRE Maps Coordinator
- Posts: 19252
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
- Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Steven
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Probably the scariest of all there's a footpath about 3 miles from where I live that used to cross all 4 lines of the East Coast Main Line. About 20 years ago, my parents did a walk that included it. Thankfully they have now put in a footbridge.
I've just checked and the footpath is actually the Icknield Way which is several hundred years older than the ECML.
I've just checked and the footpath is actually the Icknield Way which is several hundred years older than the ECML.
Last edited by trickstat on Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:08, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
There are no pedestrian warning crossing signs either. I'm considering speaking to the local council as I believe they are in charge of maintaining the footpaths. County council I think, though it might be the responsibility of HE given it crosses a trunk road
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Congratulations!
You have discovered the highway industry's dirty (not so) little secret. We couldn't give a damn about pedestrians, cyclists or equestrians. 'If it ain't got an engine it don't count' is our motto, despite some winging about the 'cycle lobby', etc..
I give you the A303. Not the dualled bit, but still...down some steps, across essentially three lanes of trunk road traffic and up some steps. Very inclusive.
ETA - The A303 'the dualled bit'. Again, steps, gap in barrier, steps.
ETA - The scheme boundary for the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester scheme begins about 150 to 200m downstream, so while there may have been scope to do something about this if it were in the red line boundary (e.g. make a bid for designated funds) nothing will be done about this.
You have discovered the highway industry's dirty (not so) little secret. We couldn't give a damn about pedestrians, cyclists or equestrians. 'If it ain't got an engine it don't count' is our motto, despite some winging about the 'cycle lobby', etc..
I give you the A303. Not the dualled bit, but still...down some steps, across essentially three lanes of trunk road traffic and up some steps. Very inclusive.
ETA - The A303 'the dualled bit'. Again, steps, gap in barrier, steps.
ETA - The scheme boundary for the A303 Sparkford to Ilchester scheme begins about 150 to 200m downstream, so while there may have been scope to do something about this if it were in the red line boundary (e.g. make a bid for designated funds) nothing will be done about this.
Last edited by Debaser on Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:29, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
I think the responsibility for the footpath itself would lie with Essex County Council but I suspect the signage would be HE.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Structures cost money! Decent NMU infrastructure could be up to 1% or so of scheme costs (depending on the size of the scheme, obviously). Can't go spending all that on people who don't pay road tax (sic).qwertyK wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:36Definitely, I am surprised at why there are no better provisions made like a footbridge, especially given another public footpath that crosses the same road a couple of miles further down is given onetrickstat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:34I'm sure there will be somebody on here who knows a lot more than me about this, but I don't think that is how it tends to work. A footpath tends to be evidence of a public right of way and you can't just extinguish those. Of course there are alternatives such as diversions, footbridges and underpasses that are certainly preferable from a safety point of view.
[In real life NMU infrastructure has been found to have very high benefit/cost ratios, significantly higher than 90-odd% of road schemes, so designers really ought to be putting proper infra in in spades. Such is still the bias against active travel - despite, as I said, what many outside the industry believe.]
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Even someone quite sprightly might have to wait 15-30 minutes to find a safe gap there at the wrong time of day.Debaser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:09 Congratulations!
You have discovered the highway industry's dirty (not so) little secret. We couldn't give a damn about pedestrians, cyclists or equestrians. 'If it ain't got an engine it don't count' is our motto, despite some winging about the 'cycle lobby', etc..
I give you the A303. Not the dualled bit, but still...down some steps, across essentially three lanes of trunk road traffic and up some steps. Very inclusive.
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5720
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
I'll raise your A303 to the A13 at Basildon. Try picking your way across 65,000 vpd in 4 lanestrickstat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:19Even someone quite sprightly might have to wait 15-30 minutes to find a safe gap there at the wrong time of day.Debaser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:09 Congratulations!
You have discovered the highway industry's dirty (not so) little secret. We couldn't give a damn about pedestrians, cyclists or equestrians. 'If it ain't got an engine it don't count' is our motto, despite some winging about the 'cycle lobby', etc..
I give you the A303. Not the dualled bit, but still...down some steps, across essentially three lanes of trunk road traffic and up some steps. Very inclusive.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
I never saw anyone attempt to cross any of the signposted crossings towards the eastern end of the A14, but I would applaud the bravery of anyone that tried.
Make poetry history.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
- Alderpoint
- Member
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2015 14:25
- Location: Leamington Spa
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Quite a few of these across the A46 Warwick Bypass. Never used them myself though.
Let it snow.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Trying to find some example on the A23. Fortunately, most of the A23 has received dualing, widening or realigning (or all three) at some point since 1990, as a result at-grade PROW crossings are rare, and seem to all be diverted to a purpose built footbridge, or bridge designed for farm traffic/access.
This is this singular one I can find though
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.95021 ... 312!8i6656
Although, it looks like only trees are crossing the road. But last time I checked they couldn't cross roads.
There are a few PROW that just seem to terminate onto the dual carriageway, with no provision to cross, where they previously crossed (or OS shows them as crossing)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.97802 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.91472 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.96357 ... 312!8i6656
The A24 on the other hand, which is mostly almost entirely pre-1990s build seems to have near 0 dedicated crossings for pedestrians. But Couldn't seem to find half of the apparent crossings. However some do exist such as this one https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.00710 ... 312!8i6656
This is this singular one I can find though
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.95021 ... 312!8i6656
Although, it looks like only trees are crossing the road. But last time I checked they couldn't cross roads.
There are a few PROW that just seem to terminate onto the dual carriageway, with no provision to cross, where they previously crossed (or OS shows them as crossing)
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.97802 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.91472 ... 312!8i6656
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.96357 ... 312!8i6656
The A24 on the other hand, which is mostly almost entirely pre-1990s build seems to have near 0 dedicated crossings for pedestrians. But Couldn't seem to find half of the apparent crossings. However some do exist such as this one https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.00710 ... 312!8i6656
- multiraider2
- Member
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 17:42
- Location: London, SE
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Not only can I say I have experience of crossing such busy roads, I can say I have experience of using the very footpath to cross the A12 as used in your first example. I'm from Pilgrims Hatch originally and the footpath starts at the edge of that settlement. I crossed there with two friends, probably about 1979. We didn't do it for a lark or a dare, we were using the footpath to get somewhere and I remember waiting until it was very clear. We did cross at more than walking pace though. Traffic levels have increased since 1979 and I'm not sure I'd fancy it today. You do get platooning though and an elephant race further up the road could easily create a sizeable gap on one side at a time.qwertyK wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:26 Hi there,
I think I may have posted about this a few years ago but never got any definitive answers, so I'm posting again as I've now discovered two public footpaths - one of them is even signed - that cross the A12 Brentwood Bypass.
First is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6372647 ... 312!8i6656
Second is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6432454 ... 312!8i6656
As you can see, there are clearly provisions made for someone to cross the road, as they have allowed space in the central reservation and with a barrier alongside the road.
The first footpath is publicly signed alongside the road, but the second isn't, even from the A1023 where it begins, and isn't shown on OS maps apart from this one https://footpathmap.co.uk/map/?zoom=16& ... 5722766904
I saw someone actually cross the first one the other day. Has anyone else had experience of crossing such busy, and usually dangerous roads? Surely they should have been decomissioned, as I presume these footpaths predate the bypass that was built in '66?
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
This is where Wainwright's Coast to Coast crosses the A19: https://goo.gl/maps/rTdR4AsebgKj4KKg6
Sometimes crossing dual-carriageways can be easier than busy single-carriageways, because at least all traffic is coming from the same direction, which means it can be easier to find safe gaps, for a given level of busyness, although you do then have to do it twice, which can negate that!
- the cheesecake man
- Member
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
- Location: Sheffield
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
As noted Wentbridge is a horrendous idea.
Sheffield Parkway also has one.
I've never seen anyone trying to use either. There's plenty more around if you start looking.
Sheffield Parkway also has one.
I've never seen anyone trying to use either. There's plenty more around if you start looking.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Do statutory wildlife requirements count against such investment? What I mean is the wildlife mitigation (bat bridges etc.) having statutory requriements behind it mean that "has" to have money spent on it, while NMU provision is a "best effort" (i.e. "not much effort")?Debaser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 14:17Structures cost money! Decent NMU infrastructure could be up to 1% or so of scheme costs (depending on the size of the scheme, obviously). Can't go spending all that on people who don't pay road tax (sic).qwertyK wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:36Definitely, I am surprised at why there are no better provisions made like a footbridge, especially given another public footpath that crosses the same road a couple of miles further down is given onetrickstat wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:34
I'm sure there will be somebody on here who knows a lot more than me about this, but I don't think that is how it tends to work. A footpath tends to be evidence of a public right of way and you can't just extinguish those. Of course there are alternatives such as diversions, footbridges and underpasses that are certainly preferable from a safety point of view.
[In real life NMU infrastructure has been found to have very high benefit/cost ratios, significantly higher than 90-odd% of road schemes, so designers really ought to be putting proper infra in in spades. Such is still the bias against active travel - despite, as I said, what many outside the industry believe.]
Built for comfort, not speed.
Re: Public footpaths that cross dual carriageways
Haha, I have wanted to cross it. As said, I was coming from the Shenfield side from Hall Wood at around seven the other morning, a runner somehow managed to cross it. I was going to cross but I hesistated and didn't want to risk it. The only viable way of getting from one side of the A12 to the other on foot from Shenfield to Pilgrims Hatch today is really just using the Hall Lane bridge, though even that isn't particuarly ideal, given most of the road up to there is unpaved, and although they have put a 30 limit for much of that road, most of it is still NSL somehow and even then cars go faster than that.multiraider2 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 16:01Not only can I say I have experience of crossing such busy roads, I can say I have experience of using the very footpath to cross the A12 as used in your first example. I'm from Pilgrims Hatch originally and the footpath starts at the edge of that settlement. I crossed there with two friends, probably about 1979. We didn't do it for a lark or a dare, we were using the footpath to get somewhere and I remember waiting until it was very clear. We did cross at more than walking pace though. Traffic levels have increased since 1979 and I'm not sure I'd fancy it today. You do get platooning though and an elephant race further up the road could easily create a sizeable gap on one side at a time.qwertyK wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 13:26 Hi there,
I think I may have posted about this a few years ago but never got any definitive answers, so I'm posting again as I've now discovered two public footpaths - one of them is even signed - that cross the A12 Brentwood Bypass.
First is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6372647 ... 312!8i6656
Second is here - https://www.google.com/maps/@51.6432454 ... 312!8i6656
As you can see, there are clearly provisions made for someone to cross the road, as they have allowed space in the central reservation and with a barrier alongside the road.
The first footpath is publicly signed alongside the road, but the second isn't, even from the A1023 where it begins, and isn't shown on OS maps apart from this one https://footpathmap.co.uk/map/?zoom=16& ... 5722766904
I saw someone actually cross the first one the other day. Has anyone else had experience of crossing such busy, and usually dangerous roads? Surely they should have been decomissioned, as I presume these footpaths predate the bypass that was built in '66?
Were the provisions in place then for the road to be crossed, eg, in the central reservation?
Any idea about that second footpath? I thought it was a mistake up until today. Sure enough, on the Chelmsford Rd (A1023 side) there is a clearing to go through some brief woodland between there and the A12 to cross, and there is a gap in the central reservation. I think on the other side it takes you out to around Chainbridge Farm. That one isn't labelled at all though, and probably for good reason.
I thought the A12 back in 79' on the Brentwood section had a much wider central reservation with vegetation in it like the section at the western end near Brook street?