A35 Sinkhole

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Herned
Member
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 09:15

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Herned »

SteveA30 wrote: Wed May 12, 2021 16:03 Despite these well placed signs, one or two managed to turn on to the e/bnd A35, at both ends of the old road, caravans and even lorries..... :roll: :laugh: Shurely shome mishtake.....
I'm not surprised. I cycled along a road that is closed for works the other day, signed clearly and regularly from several miles back. There was a constant stream of cars driving up to the blockage and turning round
SteveA30
Member
Posts: 6031
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 12:52
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by SteveA30 »

It is just a case of automated systems running the show, instead of people. It was switched from Unplanned to Planned and so the standard system kicked in. Div routes miles away from the site. The obvious route which was used when categorised as Unplanned is ditched. HE traffic had the A35 yesterday morning. Since it became Planned, it isn't mentioned. This inflexibility affects so many companies and organisations nowadays. Automation may be useful for the owners but for the user -the public- it is remote from reality.
Maps today are not showing any traffic into Puddletown from the A354 but, the short bit of A35 to Troy Town is still closed. Will have to take a look. Is A354 traffic really being sent back east along the A35 to Bere Regis? I wonder if Sat Navs can work around this and find the logical route. Taking the old A35 from the B3390 Affpuddle neatly avoids all the nonsense, taking you out at the Stinsford end, which is my route... :shhh:
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9724
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by WHBM »

RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 09:32 Speed limit is a minor worry. If there are no hardened crossovers (which there aren't) how are they going to magically appear?
Um ... what's this I can see ? Seem to remember it from the construction.

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7504248 ... 312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7505366 ... 384!8i8192
Micro The Maniac
Member
Posts: 1176
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 13:14
Location: Gone

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Micro The Maniac »

RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 09:32 Speed limit is a minor worry. If there are no hardened crossovers (which there aren't) how are they going to magically appear? TBH your first sentence is probably correct🙂
It is, surely, not beyond the wit of man, or indeed HE, to create a temporary crossover that will last a few days/weeks/months while they fill in a hole?

Any risk assessment would, surely, show that sending vehicles along unsuitable roads (the fact that the villages were bypassed) is a greater evil?
User avatar
RichardA35
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 5710
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by RichardA35 »

WHBM wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 10:00
RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 09:32 Speed limit is a minor worry. If there are no hardened crossovers (which there aren't) how are they going to magically appear?
Um ... what's this I can see ? Seem to remember it from the construction.

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7504248 ... 312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@50.7505366 ... 384!8i8192
I know where they are - I built them - the response was in reply to the instant 100yard contraflow
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9724
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by WHBM »

RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 11:00I know where they are - I built them - the response was in reply to the instant 100yard contraflow
Sure :) . About 1990 ?

And I think you would only need one, the other end can just run out at the end of the dual. About a mile of cone dividers.

It's just where THIS happened to me, Christmas 2004, in my old Jag

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38300&p=946993&hili ... nt#p946993
User avatar
RichardA35
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 5710
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by RichardA35 »

WHBM wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 12:11
RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 11:00I know where they are - I built them - the response was in reply to the instant 100yard contraflow
Sure :) . About 1990 ?

And I think you would only need one, the other end can just run out at the end of the dual. About a mile of cone dividers.

It's just where THIS happened to me, Christmas 2004, in my old Jag

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=38300&p=946993&hili ... nt#p946993
That crossover is on the Puddletown bypass section c. 1997-1998 (Balfour Beatty, Tilbury Douglas) whereas the sinkhole is on the Yellowham Hill Improvements c. 1991 AMEC (promoted as the first DfT D & B contract) 🙂
Richardf
Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:19
Location: Dorchester
Contact:

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Richardf »

This may not be a straightforward or simple repair. The whole area by quirk of geology is very prone to sinkholes (or swallet holes as they are known locally) and there are many throughout the nearby woodlands, some are huge. These of course are out of the way and not a problem but now its occurred on the road it suddenly becomes one (for obvious reasons).

Its perfectly possible this is just the tip of the iceberg and there is now a serious structural issue with the road. The possibility of which was either not considered or ignored when the road was built along the chosen route.

On an historical note, the old route has probably never experienced this problem since its route could well (by chance) avoid the problem geology.
My latest Road Photos https://flic.kr/s/aHsktQHcMB
User avatar
Conekicker
Member
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
Location: South Yorks

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Conekicker »

RichardA35 wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 09:32
Micro The Maniac wrote: Thu May 13, 2021 09:24 Maybe I'm being stupid, but...

The A35 here is a dual carriageway, yes?

So why on earth can't they just put in a 100 yard (or so) contraflow past the scene, with a temporary speed limit if necessary?

I appreciate that the reality would need three weeks advance preparations to install the two miles of SPECS monitored lower limit first...
Speed limit is a minor worry. If there are no hardened crossovers (which there aren't) how are they going to magically appear? TBH your first sentence is probably correct🙂
Crossovers - not installed as part of the original design. However, if crossovers were built after opening, to enable future maintenance schemes, they will most likely still be present as it's pointlessly expensive to dig them out. The only slight problem might be that even if there are two in the area, they're going to be several kilometres apart and could skip junctions that contraflowed traffic might want to use.

On the other hand, if there were two in roughly the right spot, then it would take no more than a single night to get a contraflow installed if you're geared up to do it. Which might be another slight problem.

On the motorway network, HE went through a programme a few years back of installing these things in strategic locations:
https://www.asset-vrs.co.uk/permanent/sologuard/
Whether any were installed on the A roads I can't recall but it's a good idea if you want some network resilience.

In the days when contraflows were our "go to" solution for major maintenance schemes, as a designer I often found there were old crossovers in roughly the right locations for the section we wanted to work on. Sometimes they needed extending by up to 50 metres, less often totally new ones were needed. Occasionally there could be a kilometre or more of extra TM if the crossover was a bit far from the works area - but that extra bit of contraflow length was far quicker and cheaper to provide than building a new crossover. If we were working along a motorway, knowing that the next 3-4km would be worked on next year, we'd make a point of building a crossover as part of the scheme to enable next years work to go ahead that bit easier. Ideally crossovers should exist in pairs at roughly 4km intervals, 150m or so long with a gap of around 250m between each one.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
SteveA30
Member
Posts: 6031
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 12:52
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by SteveA30 »

Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now. Looks like they think this is a long term job, the Spring Bank Holiday rush starts a week on Friday. :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-57140863
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9724
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by WHBM »

SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now.
Really ... has it taken HE this long to read the thread here ? :)
User avatar
RichardA35
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 5710
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by RichardA35 »

WHBM wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:34
SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now.
Really ... has it taken HE this long to read the thread here ? :)
Not really - affected parishes have their own specialist who contacted HE, Dorset Council, the local councillor and MP last week to exert pressure with suggested solutions. :wink:
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9724
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by WHBM »

RichardA35 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 11:06 Not really - affected parishes have their own specialist who contacted HE, Dorset Council, the local councillor and MP last week to exert pressure with suggested solutions.
Aha ! You are Richard Drax and I claim my £5.
User avatar
Conekicker
Member
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
Location: South Yorks

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Conekicker »

SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now. Looks like they think this is a long term job, the Spring Bank Holiday rush starts a week on Friday. :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-57140863
A contraflow on a dual 2? I trust they'll be using 750mm high cylinders to form the buffer zone, otherwise the first low loader to go through will wipe the lot out.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35861
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Bryn666 »

Conekicker wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 12:48
SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now. Looks like they think this is a long term job, the Spring Bank Holiday rush starts a week on Friday. :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-57140863
A contraflow on a dual 2? I trust they'll be using 750mm high cylinders to form the buffer zone, otherwise the first low loader to go through will wipe the lot out.
Cylinders in a contraflow? I thought the hyper risk-averse clipboards had stopped that practice? Last time I saw one was about 2005, it's always been steel down the middle since... let's not forget the glossy PDF propaganda where HE praised itself to the skies for inventing contraflows for smart motorway works, ignoring the fact contraflows have existed in various forms since at least 1960.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
A9NWIL
Member
Posts: 3319
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 02:36

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by A9NWIL »

Bryn666 wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 10:58
Conekicker wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 12:48
SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now. Looks like they think this is a long term job, the Spring Bank Holiday rush starts a week on Friday. :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-57140863
A contraflow on a dual 2? I trust they'll be using 750mm high cylinders to form the buffer zone, otherwise the first low loader to go through will wipe the lot out.
Cylinders in a contraflow? I thought the hyper risk-averse clipboards had stopped that practice? Last time I saw one was about 2005, it's always been steel down the middle since... let's not forget the glossy PDF propaganda where HE praised itself to the skies for inventing contraflows for smart motorway works, ignoring the fact contraflows have existed in various forms since at least 1960.
On a D2 wouldnt there be issues with a solid steel barrier in a contraflow if there is a wide load? Surely it would be something less solid but they just reduce the speed further to say 40mph?
Formerly known as 'lortjw'
User avatar
Conekicker
Member
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
Location: South Yorks

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Conekicker »

Bryn666 wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 10:58
Conekicker wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 12:48
SteveA30 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:25 Latest news today, a contraflow is being considered now. Looks like they think this is a long term job, the Spring Bank Holiday rush starts a week on Friday. :D

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-57140863
A contraflow on a dual 2? I trust they'll be using 750mm high cylinders to form the buffer zone, otherwise the first low loader to go through will wipe the lot out.
Cylinders in a contraflow? I thought the hyper risk-averse clipboards had stopped that practice? Last time I saw one was about 2005, it's always been steel down the middle since... let's not forget the glossy PDF propaganda where HE praised itself to the skies for inventing contraflows for smart motorway works, ignoring the fact contraflows have existed in various forms since at least 1960.
Well you could put a metal barrier down the middle of a 1+1 contraflow, providing you were ready with the requisite recovery vehicles to hoick out the first wide load that got stuck trying to squeeze through, or the congestion every time there was a breakdown or collision.

That's not to say some dumpling might specify a metal barrier for such a road but you'd like to think a grown-up would have words before any was actually placed.

Can't honestly recall the last time I did a contraflow, must be well over 10 years ago now.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35861
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by Bryn666 »

Yeah, you've got more faith than I have. I feel like Gordon Ramsay asking for lamb sauce most days.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
SteveA30
Member
Posts: 6031
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 12:52
Location: Dorset

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by SteveA30 »

An oversize load on the old road, with an escort van just gone past. No need for any infrastructure, GSJ's at both ends. Opposing traffic is literally once every 5-10 minutes and most of that was me. One of the quietest bits of old road anywhere. When will they see sense?
Attachments
Old A35.jpg
Roads and holidays in the west, before motorways.
http://trektothewest.shutterfly.com
http://holidayroads.webs.com/
User avatar
solocle
Member
Posts: 812
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 18:27

Re: A35 Sinkhole

Post by solocle »

Conekicker wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 13:57
Bryn666 wrote: Tue May 18, 2021 10:58
Conekicker wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 12:48 A contraflow on a dual 2? I trust they'll be using 750mm high cylinders to form the buffer zone, otherwise the first low loader to go through will wipe the lot out.
Cylinders in a contraflow? I thought the hyper risk-averse clipboards had stopped that practice? Last time I saw one was about 2005, it's always been steel down the middle since... let's not forget the glossy PDF propaganda where HE praised itself to the skies for inventing contraflows for smart motorway works, ignoring the fact contraflows have existed in various forms since at least 1960.
Well you could put a metal barrier down the middle of a 1+1 contraflow, providing you were ready with the requisite recovery vehicles to hoick out the first wide load that got stuck trying to squeeze through, or the congestion every time there was a breakdown or collision.

That's not to say some dumpling might specify a metal barrier for such a road but you'd like to think a grown-up would have words before any was actually placed.

Can't honestly recall the last time I did a contraflow, must be well over 10 years ago now.
I mean, isn't the simplest solution to run it as a standard S2 through the contraflow?
Post Reply