The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.
There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).
Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.
Bryn666 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 09:50
The scary thing is several of the signs that had M6 plated over pending the change are nearly life expired, so there's actually now a brilliant time to do it looming - but they won't because it's all politics.
It's funny how people claim that the general public don't care about road numbers and yet the A74(M)/M74 can't be renamed M6 because of the public backlash.
There's something peculiarly British about the thought of 'future-proofed' M6 plated signs reaching end-of-life and needing to be replaced with new signs featuring the 'temporary' A74(M) number.
SBRoxMan wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 09:45
Firstly, I'm aware that the reason why the A74(M) number exists in the first place, as it was meant to be a temporary number that would become the M6 once it was completed.
Sunil_of_Yoxley wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 20:42
Highways England have given us, what with their recent works at Catthorpe, Brampton to Swavesey, and Girton, a near-uninterrupted expressway from Glasgow to Catthorpe to East London.
Fair point...
And with a small amount of faffing, through to Dover and the Chunnel...
jackal wrote:People already call it the M74. Really no reason not to change it.
"And if you want to know the stupidest thing about the SNP they are spending £Xmillion of YOUR money to change road signs from A74(M) to M74. Nobody knows why!"
thomas417 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:23
While I'd much prefer M6 all the way to Glasgow I understand politically that's a non starter at the moment.
Getting rid of the A74(M) would make a lot of sense however when signs become life expired. M6 in England and M74 in Scotland is something I could live with.
jackal wrote:People already call it the M74. Really no reason not to change it.
"And if you want to know the stupidest thing about the SNP they are spending £Xmillion of YOUR money to change road signs from A74(M) to M74. Nobody knows why!"
Unfortunately this is what utter melts in the press would report, despite the fact the youngest signs on the A74(M) are now 20 years old and reaching the end of their service life.
Bryn Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already. She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
thomas417 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:23
While I'd much prefer M6 all the way to Glasgow I understand politically that's a non starter at the moment.
Getting rid of the A74(M) would make a lot of sense however when signs become life expired. M6 in England and M74 in Scotland is something I could live with.
That or drop the 4 and have M7!
That would break Scotland's tradition of only naming motorways after the A road they replace. Only way we'd get an M7 if if they felt the need to build a Carlisle-Edinburgh motorway
thomas417 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:23
While I'd much prefer M6 all the way to Glasgow I understand politically that's a non starter at the moment.
Getting rid of the A74(M) would make a lot of sense however when signs become life expired. M6 in England and M74 in Scotland is something I could live with.
That or drop the 4 and have M7!
That would break Scotland's tradition of only naming motorways after the A road they replace. Only way we'd get an M7 if if they felt the need to build a Carlisle-Edinburgh motorway
I find the entire string of decisions start to finish on the A74(M)/M74 to be baffling. It was already standard for Scottish motorways to take the number of the superseded A-road. The excuse of the construction being piecemeal doesn't wash with me as an M4 corridor person, because the M4 was in incomplete chunks with a fairly random order of ground breaking and completion for years when it extended into Wales, particularly the Cardiff bypass and the far western reaches - a short section of which was very briefly the original A48(M) but was renamed. The world didn't end when drivers left the M4 and had to take the A470/A48 to rejoin. It confused nobody that there was a gap in the M4 - drivers are not that clueless. It's just a big, big botch and nobody can convince me otherwise.
DB617 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 14:02
The excuse of the construction being piecemeal doesn't wash with me as an M4 corridor person, because the M4 was in incomplete chunks with a fairly random order of ground breaking and completion for years when it extended into Wales, particularly the Cardiff bypass and the far western reaches - a short section of which was very briefly the original A48(M) but was renamed. It's just a big, big botch and nobody can convince me otherwise.
Other than the A4(M) Maidenhead Bypass, the A48(M) Morriston Bypass and the A4 Chiswick Flyover!
(plus the A48(M) Port Talbot Bypass, which is the section mentioned)
Steven
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
DB617 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 14:02
The excuse of the construction being piecemeal doesn't wash with me as an M4 corridor person, because the M4 was in incomplete chunks with a fairly random order of ground breaking and completion for years when it extended into Wales, particularly the Cardiff bypass and the far western reaches - a short section of which was very briefly the original A48(M) but was renamed. It's just a big, big botch and nobody can convince me otherwise.
Other than the A4(M) Maidenhead Bypass, the A48(M) Morriston Bypass and the A4 Chiswick Flyover!
(plus the A48(M) Port Talbot Bypass, which is the section mentioned)
Hmm, yes, to be fair it was not entirely consistent at the time, so perhaps my Cardiff example is most appropriate. The break in the motorway was not judged to justify a different number, as the plans were clearly in place for a complete M4 through the area, even if there were some technicalities to be resolved with the line, consultations and engineering. Nobody felt the need to call the M4 west of J32 the A48(M) and leave it like that forever, which is pretty much the equivalent of what happened in Scotland.
DB617 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 14:02
The excuse of the construction being piecemeal doesn't wash with me as an M4 corridor person, because the M4 was in incomplete chunks with a fairly random order of ground breaking and completion for years when it extended into Wales, particularly the Cardiff bypass and the far western reaches - a short section of which was very briefly the original A48(M) but was renamed.
Indeed - the M3 was built in two distinct sections (and even the northern chunk were multi-phase), separated for several years by the Winchester gap...
I find it odd as quite a regular user of this excellent motorway. When the M74 by passed the Lesmahagow by pass and the A74 as far as Abington, it kept the M74 number, but the later upgrades became A74(M). Logically this should have been M74 all the way to Gretna, but the road has been lumbered with the A74(M) number ever since.
Sunil_of_Yoxley wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 20:42
Highways England have given us, what with their recent works at Catthorpe, Brampton to Swavesey, and Girton, a near-uninterrupted expressway from Glasgow to Catthorpe to East London.
Fair point...
And with a small amount of faffing, through to Dover and the Chunnel...
Glenn A wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 17:58
I find it odd as quite a regular user of this excellent motorway. When the M74 by passed the Lesmahagow by pass and the A74 as far as Abington, it kept the M74 number, but the later upgrades became A74(M). Logically this should have been M74 all the way to Gretna, but the road has been lumbered with the A74(M) number ever since.
Lesmahagow was as you say bypassed, and the section south to Abington took a completely different route to the old A74, whereas south of Abington was more of an online upgrade wasn't it. Someone said a while back to me that was part of the reason, south of Abington it was an improved A74 under motorway regulations, hence A74(M) changing to M74.
Does the long hatched out third lane going Northbound towards the junction that accesses Cairnlodge Services and the A70 having any bearing on what then might have been future plans - like a lane drop to an upgraded route to Edinburgh as M7, M74 north from here and M6 to that point?
roadtester wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:22
Obviously there's a big argument to be had about whether the whole lot should be M6, but I'd have thought changing it from A74(M) to M74 would be completely uncontroversial. Most people who aren't road geeks probably don't even realise it's not M74 all the way to the border anyway.
Actually the A74(M) extends into England! This roadsign is about 500 metres from the border.
Ha ha! I knew that but the whole subject is so riddled with anomalies and inconsistencies, you can't mention every proviso, quirk, exception or whatever every time!
IMO, the road numbers exist for the benefit of the road authorities, if they were for the benefit of motorists, multiplexes would be properly signposted as would E-routes.
haggishunter wrote: ↑Fri Aug 06, 2021 21:58
Lesmahagow was as you say bypassed, and the section south to Abington took a completely different route to the old A74, whereas south of Abington was more of an online upgrade wasn't it. Someone said a while back to me that was part of the reason, south of Abington it was an improved A74 under motorway regulations, hence A74(M) changing to M74.
J12-13 is more offline than other sections but I don't think that's relevant to the numbering. I think it's just a question of timing - by the time the decision to introduce the number A74(M) was taken in 1991, J12-13 was probably about to open, so it kept the older number M74.
I suspect that disagreements within the then Scottish Office may have contributed to the messed up situation.
Does the long hatched out third lane going Northbound towards the junction that accesses Cairnlodge Services and the A70 having any bearing on what then might have been future plans - like a lane drop to an upgraded route to Edinburgh as M7, M74 north from here and M6 to that point?
The reason for the change from D2M to D3M is all about timing. The decision to make the whole route a motorway happened in 1987, and sections designed before that are D2M (except approaching Glasgow north of J6). Sections designed after 1987 are all D3M.
For about a year after opening, the northbound lane drop at J12 took place by dropping the left lane into the exit slip road. The mile-long hatching took place as a change to that. I wonder if maybe some sleepy HGV driver wend down the slip road by mistake and across the A70!
Edit: there was at one stage a plan for a new/upgraded route from J12 towards Edinburgh (actually to M8 J4 at Whitburn) - see M6-M8 Fastlink - but probably not relevant either to the lane drop at J12 or the M74/A74(M) number change.
The M74 and A74(M) are motorways in southern Scotland, the latter being a southward continuation of the former. Considered together, they run from Glasgow to a point just south of the English border near Gretna, where they meet the M6. They form the only substantially-D3M long-distance rural motorway in Scotland. (The A74(M) is D3M throughout; the M74 is a mixture of D2M and D3M, with some sections near Glasgow widened to D4M in 2017.)