Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

WHBM
Member
Posts: 9724
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by WHBM »

As a companion to the "Oldest proposed bypass that's never been built"

viewtopic.php?f=1&t=41734

a separate discussion one step on, Oldest Future Proofing, or schemes started but not finished.

I'll open with one which, as described before, I once had some peripheral professional involvement with, the Glasgow "West Street ski jumps", built about 1970, now 52 years old

https://www.google.com/maps/@55.8520043 ... 384!8i8192
User avatar
JohnnyMo
Member
Posts: 6982
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 13:56
Location: Letchworth, Herts, England

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by JohnnyMo »

I raise you with this GSJ from the mid 50's -- A602 South Stevenage
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie" - Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Johnny Mo
Herned
Member
Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 09:15

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Herned »

JohnnyMo wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:22 I raise you with this GSJ from the mid 50's -- A602 South Stevenage
Isn't that a change of plan, rather than future proofing? I was told once that it was to do with having events in the park opposite the football stadium. No idea if that is true
jnty
Member
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by jnty »

Not sure of the history of it but this one on the A27 at Crossbush is quite striking.
User avatar
JohnnyMo
Member
Posts: 6982
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2003 13:56
Location: Letchworth, Herts, England

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by JohnnyMo »

Herned wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:43
JohnnyMo wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 11:22 I raise you with this GSJ from the mid 50's -- A602 South Stevenage
Isn't that a change of plan, rather than future proofing? I was told once that it was to do with having events in the park opposite the football stadium. No idea if that is true
The original plan was for a grid road from here via what is now Fairlands Park to Martins Way.

Also this "dual carriageway" was meant to be Monkswood Way. Which is why Elder Way starts here. What was planned would be something like this
“The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie" - Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn
Johnny Mo
User avatar
skiddaw05
Member
Posts: 2041
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 21:33
Location: Norwich

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by skiddaw05 »

This and this, both from the 70s
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2476
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by the cheesecake man »

Quite a few new town roads have space to be dualled. See Warrington on roads.org.uk for some examples.
jnty
Member
Posts: 1769
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by jnty »

May I be permitted a speculative contender on the Edinburgh Trams 'network'?

https://goo.gl/maps/WSbemcpKCdZToumFA

This aerial photo from during construction is the only one I can find, but this set of points is now part of the running tram line and has been since it opened in 2014. The divergent line remains a stub, intended to facilitate the completion of Phase 1b north along the Roseburn Path. I think even at the time the points were installed Phase 1b had already been "postponed" and it is not part of the current extension works which only aim to complete Phase 1a. Sensibly the points were still installed as per the original design as future-proofing with the assumption that Phase 1b would be completed one day.

Indeed, the plan does still seem to be continued expansion of the network over the coming decades, which would surely include the completion of Phase 1b. However, as the name suggests, Roseburn Path is a useful link in the city's active travel network which is increasingly popular with cyclists and walkers, forming part of the NCN1 and providing a useful traffic-free link over the Dean Valley. While its previous life as a railway means that it provides an excellent alignment for trams, the frequency of overbridges means that the replacement path provided alongside would often be extremely constricted. While this wasn't a concern for the original planners, who probably paid a bit less attention to active travel provision than they perhaps should have, compromising an active travel route as part of a public transport scheme now seems very counterproductive.

Therefore, the council has raised a new possibility - Option B2, which would keep Phase 1b on-road for its first section, routed via the A90 Queensferry Road over the Dean Bridge. This would mean it diverged from the existing line at a different place - probably a tight bend at the west end of Princes Street. This would also have the advantage of providing tram stops at 'road level' rather than at the foot of an embankment. It's still a speculative plan, so there's still every chance the original route could still be chosen - general traffic restrictions on the A90 might be required which would be very controversial for such a key route, and detailed design would be costly and might uncover further snags. The council has also indicated that bridge reconstructions could mitigate the issues with the otherwise spacious original alignment.

However, if the new option B2 is followed - or, of course, if the council changes tack and abandons 1b completely - this Roseburn Stub could easily stick around for decades as a reminder of the the old abandoned plans.
User avatar
IAN
Member
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2001 19:07

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by IAN »

This was built some time ago 40'/50's? The plan was to link Quinton Road and Quinton Road West across the Woodgate valley with the completed road being D2. The link never happened and here we can see where the underused D2 reduces to S2 with space for D2 to continue.

https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4477329 ... 384!8i8192 and https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4485684 ... 384!8i8192
Last edited by IAN on Wed Feb 16, 2022 13:28, edited 1 time in total.
AKA M5 Driver
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15765
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Chris Bertram »

the cheesecake man wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:40 Quite a few new town roads have space to be dualled. See Warrington on roads.org.uk for some examples.
They don't have to be new town roads. There are loads of not-very-new roads around Birmingham where there is a service road where a second carriageway was intended to be added later, some of these quite close to me on A4040, which of course was once designated the Outer Ring Road.

If you want something newer, the ski-jumps that should have carried the Middle Ring Road (A4540) over Dartmouth Circus, the junction with A38/A38(M)/A5127 are still in place, unused.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15765
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Chris Bertram »

IAN wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 13:23 This was built some time ago 40'/50's? The plan was to link Quinton Road and Quinton Road West across the Woodgate valley with the completed road being D2. The link never happened and here we can see where the underused D2 reduces to S2 with space for D2 to continue.

https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4477329 ... 384!8i8192
See what's in the way? Harborne Golf Club. Golf clubs are very skilled and successful at defending their territory against road schemes. They have powerful and influential members who can pull the right strings.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
Truvelo
Member
Posts: 17493
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 21:10
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Truvelo »

Chris Bertram wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 13:29
IAN wrote: Wed Feb 16, 2022 13:23 This was built some time ago 40'/50's? The plan was to link Quinton Road and Quinton Road West across the Woodgate valley with the completed road being D2. The link never happened and here we can see where the underused D2 reduces to S2 with space for D2 to continue.

https://www.google.com/maps/@52.4477329 ... 384!8i8192
See what's in the way? Harborne Golf Club. Golf clubs are very skilled and successful at defending their territory against road schemes. They have powerful and influential members who can pull the right strings.
It was the policy in the city from 1917 that all the major roads were built with a 110' right of way to allow for future dualling. Many of these were never carried out.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
User avatar
Patrick Harper
Member
Posts: 3210
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 14:41
Location: Wiltshire

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Patrick Harper »

If the question specifically relates to 'capacity' then the M23's D4M capability north of the M25 is probably the most striking example.
B1040
Member
Posts: 2294
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2007 15:51
Location: fenland

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by B1040 »

In the '70s there were rumours that some of the roads in Harlow had green verges to allow for dualling.
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.7663315 ... 384!8i8192

On the other hand, the architects of Harlow liked the idea of "green wedges" dividing up the town. I haven't been back much in the last 40 years to see how things have changed. (mixture of my job taking me away, family moving and the friends I did have in school mostly leaving town).
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35861
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Oldest "future-proofing" that never got used

Post by Bryn666 »

This bridge (1971) was intended for a future Bolton Outer Ring Road: https://goo.gl/maps/c3MywKVwUfPPtVz58 and likewise St Peters Way itself is designed with a wide central reservation for future widening to D3 but is very unlikely to be used - the intention was to extend the route northwards out of Bolton towards Blackburn.

https://goo.gl/maps/RnQvUhn4bfBK6ny26 1970 bridge intended for the Whalley Bypass to be D2.

https://goo.gl/maps/Vrx2UPgoCT2e9fdD7 1969 stump for Prospect Hill Interchange (https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... nterchange)

None of these will ever happen now.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck

From the SABRE Wiki: Prospect Hill Interchange :


Prospect Hill Interchange is a twice-proposed junction on the M6 near Preston.

When the Preston Bypass opened, a junction at Prospect Hill with an east-west route was mentioned in the opening brochure. Plans show a simple roundabout interchange at the site, with motorway links in either direction.

|

In 1969, the North East Lancs Development Plan

... Read More