M60 J10-12 proposed changes

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
darkcape
Member
Posts: 2098
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 14:54

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by darkcape »

The initial alert we received on site was that only one cable had failed, however obviously it is way more serious. Hopefully with the HSE involved there will be a thorough investigation, this could've easily resulted in many deaths.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
Pendlemac
Member
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 12:58
Location: Pendle, Lancashire

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Pendlemac »

Norfolktolancashire wrote:
Something about the supporting cables snapping, not giving me much confidence to cross when completed!

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... t-11340525
Given how wrong the MEN are calling it a 'suspension' bridge you have nothing to worry about.

When in use by traffic the bridge deck is supported by the main structure and there is no load on the cables.

As the Ship Canal is in use the bridge deck had to be suspended during the construction phase as the equipment for raising and lowering it has not yet been commissioned.

It will be interesting to see if the extended period under a higher than normal load has caused problems with the cables. ( Normally 10 - 20 min, bridge deck only compared with several weeks with containers and other equipment on it )

Can anyone remember how they did the Centenary Bridge further up the canal, as that would have had the same need to stay open during construction.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35883
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Bryn666 »

I don't actually know but the two structures are broadly identical.

There were several containers stacked towards one end and as you say I wonder if a dead load calculation was done incorrectly.

It sounds like it was a sudden and catsastrophic failure rather than a gradual failure but if no one was on it at the time that can only be good fortune.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Gav
Member
Posts: 1971
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 17:44

Lucky Escape

Post by Gav »

Looks like they had a really lucky escape.....

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... s-11338294

Wonder if this will set it back considerably ?
User avatar
KeithW
Member
Posts: 19269
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 13:25
Location: Marton-In-Cleveland North Yorks

Re: Lucky Escape

Post by KeithW »

Bound to cause some delay I would have thought, if nothing else there will be a need to review the design and construction techniques to find out how and why the collapse happened. The HSE will need to be reassured that everything has been assessed and a hold on further work will probably be issued until the investigation is complete.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: Lucky Escape

Post by wrinkly »

Under discussion (well not much actually) here.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

Video of the collapse caught on a dashcam:

https://www.facebook.com/ian.longden1/v ... 423870911/
brummie_rob
Member
Posts: 1538
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 00:16

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by brummie_rob »

wrinkly wrote:Video of the collapse caught on a dashcam:

https://www.facebook.com/ian.longden1/v ... 423870911/
That could have been so much worse if people were caught up in it...shocking!
User avatar
Big L
Deputy Site Manager
Posts: 7570
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 20:36
Location: B5012

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Big L »

The Facebook link seems dead, but it's on YouTube.


Link
Make poetry history.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
User avatar
Haydn1971
Member
Posts: 12426
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2005 14:16
Location: Sheffield
Contact:

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Haydn1971 »

Stunning video, I can't see the deck being reused and some major repairs will be needed to the towers... Huge claim
Regards, Haydn

:: Visit My roads in Sheffield mini site
:: View my photostream on Flickr
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35883
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Bryn666 »

Yes, the whole thing looks to be a write-off...
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

I was in the area yesterday so I took a look at the state of the collapsed bridge.

The deck had somehow been moved horizontally northwards between the north pair of towers to clear the canal.

I hadn't seen any reference to the move on here, or on the Greater Manchester Transport subforum of Skyscrapercity, but I've now looked on the Port Salford thread, which is on a part of Skyscrapercity I don't regularly read. There's some relevant discussion and pictures on this page.

A ship, the Arklow Vale, has been trapped at Salford, and the website marinetraffic.com is still showing it there, so perhaps the canal is not yet fully clear.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

More pictures have since been added to the page linked above.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

The ship that was upstream of the bridge site is still there. The canal is evidently still being treated as blocked. It's reported on Skyscrapercity that a forklift fell into the canal and is lost in the silt at the bottom. Divers have tried to find it but have so far failed.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

The Ship Canal is now unblocked at the lift bridge site. The trapped Arklow Vale is gone.
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

The towers of the lift bridge have reportedly been stripped of equipment in preparation for demolition.
Jeni
Banned
Posts: 7313
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 22:28

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Jeni »

Wow, didn't realise that they were leveling it and starting again. I'm guessing there was no hope of a repair.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35883
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by Bryn666 »

I wouldn't want to be the project manager, that's for sure.

Career ending?
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

wrinkly wrote:The towers of the lift bridge have reportedly been stripped of equipment in preparation for demolition.
This information came from people posting on Skyscrapercity. On the other hand, user "isambard" has posted this cutting there:

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost. ... count=1149
User avatar
wrinkly
Member
Posts: 9017
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:17
Location: Leeds

Re: M60 J10-12 proposed changes

Post by wrinkly »

All four towers still at full height. I've no idea what if anything is going on. Maybe they can't be touched until all investigations are complete.
Post Reply