Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
Moderator: Site Management Team
Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
Zebra and signalised pedestrian crossings are meant to have a "controlled zone" marked by zig zags. Before there were zig zags, the zone was marked by metal studs across the road instead.
I thought all the studs were gone, but no - there's a crossing on the A324 Amstel Way in Woking that still has them! Not a zig or a zag in sight.
I could just about understand it if this was a legacy Pelican crossing with ancient signal equipment, where nothing had been updated since the 70s. But it's a modern crossing with parallel cycle track and elephant footprint markings, so it's evidently seen some work in the recent past. I've no idea why it hasn't been marked out with zig zags in the normal way.
Are there more examples out there still?
I thought all the studs were gone, but no - there's a crossing on the A324 Amstel Way in Woking that still has them! Not a zig or a zag in sight.
I could just about understand it if this was a legacy Pelican crossing with ancient signal equipment, where nothing had been updated since the 70s. But it's a modern crossing with parallel cycle track and elephant footprint markings, so it's evidently seen some work in the recent past. I've no idea why it hasn't been marked out with zig zags in the normal way.
Are there more examples out there still?
Chris
Roads.org.uk
Roads.org.uk
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15777
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
In this case, there is the additional feature of RAG lights for the cycle route crossing the road, so it's not purely a ped/cycle crossing point. Maybe that's the difference?Chris5156 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 20:05 Zebra and signalised pedestrian crossings are meant to have a "controlled zone" marked by zig zags. Before there were zig zags, the zone was marked by metal studs across the road instead.
I thought all the studs were gone, but no - there's a crossing on the A324 Amstel Way in Woking that still has them! Not a zig or a zag in sight.
I could just about understand it if this was a legacy Pelican crossing with ancient signal equipment, where nothing had been updated since the 70s. But it's a modern crossing with parallel cycle track and elephant footprint markings, so it's evidently seen some work in the recent past. I've no idea why it hasn't been marked out with zig zags in the normal way.
Are there more examples out there still?
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
This toucan in Preston was the same https://goo.gl/maps/xn2cNpVmkGTb9vVj7 (the lining has now completely worn off and LCC haven't done anything about it).
I think early toucans - as the Amstel Way one looks like given the appearance of the cycle tracks either side - were exempt from the Pelican crossing regulations because they were different. It's legacy stuff, and should be fixed really.
I think early toucans - as the Amstel Way one looks like given the appearance of the cycle tracks either side - were exempt from the Pelican crossing regulations because they were different. It's legacy stuff, and should be fixed really.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
If I recall correctly, zigizags were not presecribed for use on Toucan Crossings when they were first introduced, and therefore couldn't be used. I think it was the 2002 edition of TSRGD that changed that. I vaguely remember applying for authorisation of zig-zags on a toucan crossing, probably in the late 90s. I think by that stage the Department were authorising them automatically as they knew the change to the regulations was coming.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:00 This toucan in Preston was the same https://goo.gl/maps/xn2cNpVmkGTb9vVj7 (the lining has now completely worn off and LCC haven't done anything about it).
I think early toucans - as the Amstel Way one looks like given the appearance of the cycle tracks either side - were exempt from the Pelican crossing regulations because they were different. It's legacy stuff, and should be fixed really.
Simon
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Please contact me if you want to know more
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Please contact me if you want to know more
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
That sounds right to me - the first toucans in Blackburn didn't appear until after 2002 anyway so I'd never really seen one before that.M4Simon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:50If I recall correctly, zigizags were not presecribed for use on Toucan Crossings when they were first introduced, and therefore couldn't be used. I think it was the 2002 edition of TSRGD that changed that. I vaguely remember applying for authorisation of zig-zags on a toucan crossing, probably in the late 90s. I think by that stage the Department were authorising them automatically as they knew the change to the regulations was coming.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:00 This toucan in Preston was the same https://goo.gl/maps/xn2cNpVmkGTb9vVj7 (the lining has now completely worn off and LCC haven't done anything about it).
I think early toucans - as the Amstel Way one looks like given the appearance of the cycle tracks either side - were exempt from the Pelican crossing regulations because they were different. It's legacy stuff, and should be fixed really.
Simon
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- traffic-light-man
- Member
- Posts: 4735
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
- Location: Liverpool, UK
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
This little set of thermoplastic ones and this full set of metal ones spring to mind, though both their respective crossings have officially long since been removed, so they don't count.
There's also this set of thermoplastic ones which has reappeared since the HFS was worn away, though of course the zig zags have long since replaced them so they don't really count either, but I thought were worthy of a mention! The opposite approach still has a few, too.
The presence of the cycle signals there would've meant that this was not legally a crossing and therefore it shouldn't have zig zags. What's interesting is that the studs are 24mish from each stop line - does anyone know the original typical distance from the stop line for the studs? Measuring in 30mish from each set of studs lands a crossing point right between the existing pedestrian and cycle crossings, so it seems conceivable to me that there was a Pelican there prior to the existing parallel and the studs date from that.Chris Bertram wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 07:40 In this case, there is the additional feature of RAG lights for the cycle route crossing the road, so it's not purely a ped/cycle crossing point. Maybe that's the difference?
That one at Moor Park was installed in the late 90s, so the lack of zig zags aligns with what Simon mentions in his post. It was upgraded to a nearside Toucan last year, but I'm not sure if it's had zig zags applied or not - I'd hope so though, especially given the condition of the road markings in that 2020 view!Bryn666 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 10:00 This toucan in Preston was the same https://goo.gl/maps/xn2cNpVmkGTb9vVj7 (the lining has now completely worn off and LCC haven't done anything about it).
I think early toucans - as the Amstel Way one looks like given the appearance of the cycle tracks either side - were exempt from the Pelican crossing regulations because they were different. It's legacy stuff, and should be fixed really.
Simon
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
Thank you all - the news about zig zags at Toucan crossings is new to me!
![Bow :bow:](./images/smilies/bow.gif)
Brilliant detective work and exactly what I come to SABRE fortraffic-light-man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:02The presence of the cycle signals there would've meant that this was not legally a crossing and therefore it shouldn't have zig zags. What's interesting is that the studs are 24mish from each stop line - does anyone know the original typical distance from the stop line for the studs? Measuring in 30mish from each set of studs lands a crossing point right between the existing pedestrian and cycle crossings, so it seems conceivable to me that there was a Pelican there prior to the existing parallel and the studs date from that.Chris Bertram wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 07:40 In this case, there is the additional feature of RAG lights for the cycle route crossing the road, so it's not purely a ped/cycle crossing point. Maybe that's the difference?
![Bow :bow:](./images/smilies/bow.gif)
Chris
Roads.org.uk
Roads.org.uk
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
I think the distance varied according to the speed limit. Somewhere at the back of mind I seem to recall 15 yards if the speed limit was 30mph or less and 25 yards if the speed limit was 40mph or higher. I used to collect I-Spy books as a child, so I may have read it in one of those. In those days the only restriction was on parking between the studs and the crossing, on the approach side only. Overtaking, although the Highway Code advised against it, was not legally prohibited.traffic-light-man wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 12:02 What's interesting is that the studs are 24mish from each stop line - does anyone know the original typical distance from the stop line for the studs? Measuring in 30mish from each set of studs lands a crossing point right between the existing pedestrian and cycle crossings, so it seems conceivable to me that there was a Pelican there prior to the existing parallel and the studs date from that.
-
- Member
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 19:45
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
They are still very common in Northern Ireland. This crossing was resurfaced a couple of years ago and the studs were replaced as part of that process:
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.579693, ... 384!8i8192
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.579693, ... 384!8i8192
-
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
- Location: Belfast N Ireland
- Contact:
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
Jonathan, it’s not the studs forming the crossing itself. Before zig zags were added to light-controlled pedestrian crossings, the controlled zone was marked by two lines of studs on the approach lanes a few inches apart. The studs were closer to the crossing than the start of the zig zags.
-
- Member
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 19:45
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
Ah, apologies, I misunderstood - I don't think I've ever seen that before but I guess maybe that is why it was changed, given they don't seem to be that visible.AndyB wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 13:26 Jonathan, it’s not the studs forming the crossing itself. Before zig zags were added to light-controlled pedestrian crossings, the controlled zone was marked by two lines of studs on the approach lanes a few inches apart. The studs were closer to the crossing than the start of the zig zags.
Re: Crossing controlled zone marked by metal studs
I just found the following on page 31 of the 1965 edition of the Highway Code.
"YOU MUST NOT
Stop your vehicle on the approach side of a pedestrian crossing beyond the double line of studs in the road (which are usually 15 yards from the crossing) except to give precedence to a pedestrian on the crossing, or in circumstances beyond your control, or when necessary to avoid an accident."
There's a scan here http://www.45worlds.com/book/title/nc920491uk
Probably one of the most famous photos of a pedestrian crossing, on the Beatles Abbey Road album cover, shows a BMC J4 van parked just before the row of studs. The last couple of studs are visible behind Ringo's head. The Volkswagen, on the opposite side of the road is quite legally parked.
"YOU MUST NOT
Stop your vehicle on the approach side of a pedestrian crossing beyond the double line of studs in the road (which are usually 15 yards from the crossing) except to give precedence to a pedestrian on the crossing, or in circumstances beyond your control, or when necessary to avoid an accident."
There's a scan here http://www.45worlds.com/book/title/nc920491uk
Probably one of the most famous photos of a pedestrian crossing, on the Beatles Abbey Road album cover, shows a BMC J4 van parked just before the row of studs. The last couple of studs are visible behind Ringo's head. The Volkswagen, on the opposite side of the road is quite legally parked.