Puffin crossings - a blunder?

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Derek
Member
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 10:44
Location: Norwich
Contact:

Puffin crossings - a blunder?

Post by Derek »

It's big news in Norwich -and I gather in other places but not being a TV watcher I haven't seen the news reports.

Puffin crossings, the new style pedestrian crossings, are proving to be very unpopular and with good reason in my view.

Norwich is undergoing a lot of road works in the centre just now, which is seeing the old pelican crossings being replaced by these Puffin things en mass. The result is people aren't using them, or rather they're not pressing the buttons and waiting for the green man, they're just crossing the road and car dodging.

The reason is pretty obvious in my view. Puffins have a button to press with the red/green man directly above it. The lights are placed so that to see them, you look at the direction of oncoming traffic, there aren't any lights on the other side of the road for you to watch. This seemed like a good idea, but it's not, it's really daft.

First, we're used to the idea of traffic lights. We're used to sitting at them and waiting for them to turn green. Drivers and all road users are used to this idea, as are pedestrians of course.

Second, when you cross the road, you look both ways. You don't stand there gorking at the traffic on your side of the road, generally traffic flows in both directions and you watch both flows.

So are Puffins a big flop? I give it six months before they're withdrawn. I think they're an accident waiting to happen, and it won't take long.

Derek
Free the A11
User avatar
Martin
Member
Posts: 376
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 23:30
Location: Da Royal Geto of Sutton Coldfield

Post by Martin »

The use of Puffins was one of the reasons why Birmingham's Bus Mall had such an appaling casualty rate. Expect them not to feature when it reopens in a modified form.
User avatar
M60-Tony
Member
Posts: 8673
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 08:41
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire

Post by M60-Tony »

Puffins have been around since the early/mid 1990s. Not exactly new, though thereseems to have been a spate of installations.
(Also goes to show that many pedestrians don't read the Highway Code, just like many drivers.)
Tony
Tony

"We have more and more laws, and less and less law enforcement."
User avatar
M60-Tony
Member
Posts: 8673
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 08:41
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire

Post by M60-Tony »

Mind you, I did like the name of the particular street in Norwich "Rampant Horse Street" - what goes on there? Image
Tony
Tony

"We have more and more laws, and less and less law enforcement."
User avatar
PeterA5145
Member
Posts: 25347
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 00:19
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Contact:

Post by PeterA5145 »

I still find it counter-intuitive to have to look on your own side of the road for the display as to whether to cross.
“The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.” – Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
c2R
SABRE Wiki admin
Posts: 11162
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 11:01

Post by c2R »

I don't like them because they do away with the flashing amber stage when it's time to go again.... thereby making you wait longer after the people have crossed....
They installed them in Ware high street a few years ago, thus increasing congestion and driver frustration.... not to mention all the k band radiation being scattered everywhere by them now....
Chris
Is there a road improvement project going on near you? Help us to document it on the SABRE Wiki - help is available in the Digest forum.
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Get involved! - see our guide to scanning and stitching maps
User avatar
si404
Member
Posts: 10885
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 13:25
Location: Amersham

Post by si404 »

there are lots of puffins about here. normally i listen for the beeps, or look at the signal heads for road traffic. Actually i tend to look at the traffic/road lights on pelicans too.

If i can cross I'll cross, and if the cars have a red light then i'll cross. Of course i'll look both ways etc even if on a ped xing.

I quite like Puffins as they try to minimise wait time for both peds and cars, through the use of sensors.

Yesterday some mates and I wondered how many people, walking backward and forward across the road would it take to have the cars constantly on red?

Simon
"“Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations" Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
Dadge
Member
Posts: 1024
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 17:13
Location: Birmingham, England
Contact:

Post by Dadge »

(Also goes to show that many pedestrians don't read the Highway Code, just like many drivers.)
I think that's a daft comment. Almost every driver has read the Highway Code - in order to pass the driving test. To expect drivers to know when a new edition has come out and to buy it is totally unrealistic. Meanwhile there's absolutely no call for pedestrians to read it. Anything new that effects drivers or pedestrians needs to be widely publicised, preferably with a nationally-deliveredleaflet. The Puffin programme has been woefully mismanaged, and there's no way that that can be blamed on the general public.
Adrian
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35758
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Post by Bryn666 »

Given there's an entire chapter for pedestrians in the Highway Code, I feel there is call for them to read.
And, I can't name any driver I know (other than on SABRE) who has read the HC AFTER passing their driving test... :-(
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
M60-Tony
Member
Posts: 8673
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 08:41
Location: Cheadle Hulme, Cheshire

Post by M60-Tony »

<To expect drivers to know when a new edition has come out and to buy it is totally unrealistic.>
Why? They have a responsibility to know and to keep up to date on the rules of the road. Just because the governament tries to make life difficult by not annoucing clearly enough a new edition, or making the changes very obvious, does not remove the obligations on road users.
<And, I can't name any driver I know (other than on SABRE) who has read the HC AFTER passing their driving test... >
I can, and I suspect all those I know in that category are either members/Observers/Coaches ofthe Institute of Advanced Motorists or RoSPA Advanced Drivers Association, or their trainees.
Tony
Tony

"We have more and more laws, and less and less law enforcement."
User avatar
PeterA5145
Member
Posts: 25347
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 00:19
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Contact:

Post by PeterA5145 »

<< .. And, I can't name any driver I know (other than on SABRE) who has read the HC AFTER passing their driving test>>

There are several contributors to uk.transport on Usenet who enjoy quoting the HC to score points off others Image

Peter
“The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.” – Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
mittfh
Member
Posts: 3228
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:34
Location: Kenilworth / Warwick

Post by mittfh »

Personally, when I first encounted a Puffin, I didn't need to scream and sprint down to the local WHSmith to buy a copy of the Highway Code to learn how to use them.

I find them fairly self-explanatory - you hit the button, and the red/green men stand directly above it. In many cases the red/green men box is stategically placed so you can see it from both sides of the road, so you can use them either way.
User avatar
PeterA5145
Member
Posts: 25347
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 00:19
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Contact:

Post by PeterA5145 »

<< ..I find them fairly self-explanatory - you hit the button, and the red/green men stand directly above it. In many cases the red/green men box is stategically placed so you can see it from both sides of the road, so you can use them either way.>>

Surely the proof of the pudding is in the eating - if, in practice, a lot of pedestrians find them confusing, then they are badly designed, even if intelligent, road-savvy people have no problem with them.

Peter
“The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.” – Robert A. Heinlein
User avatar
mittfh
Member
Posts: 3228
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:34
Location: Kenilworth / Warwick

Post by mittfh »

From my experience, a lot of pedestrians (particularly male teens) seem to have an irrational phobia of assisted crossings of all kinds...
I've used a few myself and (so far) have never encounted a 'confused' user - although the crossings with auxillary buttons attached to a separate post could be more confusing than average:

<pre>
. ___
. oI I
. oI I
. oI_I
. I
. I I
. I] [I
. I I
. I I
. I__________I
. Aux Traffic
. Post Light Post
</pre>
cb a1
Member
Posts: 5361
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 07:30

Post by cb a1 »

I can think of at leasttwo crossings in Edinburgh that are PUFFIN / PELICAN hybrids. There is no flashing amber as there are sensors to detect the pedestrians but the pedestrian heads are on the opposite side of the road.
Maybe the LA here noticed the same problem as Norwich and hybridised them?
Education makes the wise slightly wiser, but it makes the fool vastly more dangerous. N. Taleb
We tend to demand impossible standards of proof from our opponents but accept any old rubbish to support our beliefs.
The human paradox that is common sense
The Backfire Effect
boing_uk
Account deactivated at user request
Posts: 5366
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 16:01

Post by boing_uk »

Puffin crossings should be the normal installation nowadays for pedestrian crossing points across England and Wales.

The Pelican crossing standard is due to be withdrawn by the DfT fairly soon and in any case until then, you should have a damned good excuse to not install nearside pedestrian facilities at any signal installation.

The fact that you are having to look at traffic before you set off, means you can see if a vehicle is unlikely to stop. Generally it prevents users from blindly stepping out into traffic just because the green man is showing.

And you shouod not be able to see the RM/GM display of the other side of the crossing. If this is the case then the signals have been installed contrary to TAL 01/02. Badly designed. Badly installed. Badly commissioned.

As for ancilliary poles, sometimes they are necessary, such as on splitter islands, where traffic is approaching from the left - there has to be a pushbutton on the right-hand side of every crossing point, to facilitate for visually impaired users.

Ban the bleeper! God save the Queen.
cb a1
Member
Posts: 5361
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 07:30

Post by cb a1 »

Book of Sorrows<<And you shouod not be able to see the RM/GM display of the other side of the crossing. If this is the case then the signals have been installed contrary to TAL 01/02. Badly designed. Badly installed. Badly commissioned.>>

Just to clarify the situation at one crossing. It was originally installed as a PUFFIN with the RM/GM on the pole on the side of the pole by you.

After a while, this was changed to have PELICAN style RM / GM at the top of the pole opposite!

I.e. it was originally installed correctly and due to some reason was changed partly back. It doesn't have flashing amber / flashing green man as it using sensors to detect if people are on / waiting to cross.
Education makes the wise slightly wiser, but it makes the fool vastly more dangerous. N. Taleb
We tend to demand impossible standards of proof from our opponents but accept any old rubbish to support our beliefs.
The human paradox that is common sense
The Backfire Effect
User avatar
M4Mark
Member
Posts: 1097
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 22:17
Location: Reading

Post by M4Mark »

"The Pelican crossing standard is due to be withdrawn by the DfT fairly soon and in any case until then, you should have a damned good excuse to not install nearside pedestrian facilities at any signal installation"

Do you have this in writing from the DFTor know if it is available anywhere because I am currently designing a few Pelicans at the request of a large county council, I won't say where, andI have not seen anything official saying that they are not to be installed.
User avatar
mittfh
Member
Posts: 3228
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 12:34
Location: Kenilworth / Warwick

Post by mittfh »

I can't find anything on Google or DfT to suggest Pelicans have been withdrawn - indeed, Worcestershire County Council are planning to install a couple on my estate!

A few documents relevant to this discussion turned up though:
Four
boing_uk
Account deactivated at user request
Posts: 5366
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 16:01

Post by boing_uk »

There was talk... thats as far as I know. Its one of those things you read from time to time and when the pertinent question arises, you cant remember when or where it was, but that it just is.

LTN 1/95, 2/95 and TAL 01/01 all give design recommendations. As for anything else, all I know is, that the DfT and the GO's *prefer* PUFFIN crossings to PELICAN crossings.
Post Reply