Yes, this intersection is the first place where unbracketed references to the A1 appear. On the remainder between Angel and St Martin's Le Grand directional signs are pretty rare anyway, but none of them features the A1 road number. In the City of London, road numbers are hardly being signposted and generally road numbers are rather scarce in most other boroughs within the innermost London ring road. It's not unlike Paris, Madrid and some other capitals.ellandback wrote: ↑Tue May 15, 2018 09:08Is this also the earliest point along the route of the A1 where "A1" actually appears on a sign?c2R wrote: ↑Mon May 14, 2018 10:29
There's one at The Angel, Islington on the A1
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.5308726 ... 312!8i6656
This is probably something that others can comment upon in a much more detailed way, but in many respects the Great North Road only came into being a few hundred years ago. It would rather have been conceived as a route running from London to Yorkshire via the market towns that had come into being rather than have created the markets themselves - seescynthius726 wrote: ↑Sat May 19, 2018 18:51I’ve always found this strange. You would have thought that such a historically important road would have had plenty of major settlements popping up round about it.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=34418. The GNR must have boosted some towns at the expense of others not along the route, but in the end bigger cities in the U.K. only came into being on the basis of further factors. Ability to build a port or an industry, for one, which are areas where the regions along the A1 clearly lost out against the Midlands, Lancashire and Yorkshire.
This probably explains, rather than questions, why towns along the Southern parts of the A1 aren't any bigger. Post-WW2 New Towns aside, none couldn't really make it over "historic market town" size. Often enough to justify primary destination status, but nothing really that could describe the GNR really well for longer distance traffic.