My candidate for today's white-line error

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
mikehindsonevans
Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge

My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by mikehindsonevans »

I spotted this last night, after Eastleigh Borough Council had spent a fortnight of overnight work, resurfacing Leigh Road around the M3 J13 overpass and half-way into Eastleigh.

I am standing, facing West towards the M3, in the middle of the West-bound carriageway past the site of the old council offices ( ahead on the left behind the hoardings) and Fire/Police HQ (on the right):

And it was all going so well until the white-line gang rocked up:
DSC_9389R.JPG
(Hint, if you exit the side-road on the LEFT, they want you to either turn LEFT (thus away from the camera) or proceed straight ahead then turn RIGHT onto the eastbound carriageway which is a further 40yds to the right of the camera).

Now, what got lost in translation??
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35889
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Bryn666 »

That needs raising with them ASAP as that is potentially *dangerous*.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
mikehindsonevans
Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by mikehindsonevans »

Bryn666 wrote: Thu Oct 25, 2018 12:26 That needs raising with them ASAP as that is potentially *dangerous*.
Done - Eastleigh BC call centre giggled nervously, then she said "it's Hampshire"...
"The engineers are now aware" ; no doubt once they stop laughing.
Anyway, it brightened my morning.
Mike
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
Al__S
Member
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:56

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Al__S »

Anywhere that you have a district and county council (Eastleigh Borough is a Non Metropolitan District Council), it is always the County that are the Highways authority.
mikehindsonevans
Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by mikehindsonevans »

Al__S wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 07:48 Anywhere that you have a district and county council (Eastleigh Borough is a Non Metropolitan District Council), it is always the County that are the Highways authority.
And the borough have chased the County with the result that, within two days, all is fine!:
DSC_9511r.JPG
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
SouthWest Philip
Member
Posts: 3482
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 19:35
Location: Evesham, Worcestershire

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by SouthWest Philip »

mikehindsonevans wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 21:49 And the borough have chased the County with the result that, within two days, all is fine!:

DSC_9511r.JPG
Oh, I don't know. The spacing between "No" and "Entry" looks all wrong to me!
mikehindsonevans
Member
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 11:44
Location: Cheshire, but working week time in Cambridge

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by mikehindsonevans »

SouthWest Philip wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 21:53
mikehindsonevans wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 21:49 And the borough have chased the County with the result that, within two days, all is fine!:

DSC_9511r.JPG
Oh, I don't know. The spacing between "No" and "Entry" looks all wrong to me!
Philip, I also thought that and therefore I take your point, but on balance I'll take the "good enough and basically correct and (most importantly) pointing/facing the right way now" approach.
Last edited by mikehindsonevans on Sun Oct 28, 2018 11:01, edited 2 times in total.
Mike Hindson-Evans.
Never argue with a conspiracy theorist.
They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
User avatar
Patrick Harper
Member
Posts: 3211
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 14:41
Location: Wiltshire

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Patrick Harper »

This sliproad has been remarked with two lanes at the yielding point. Not quite sure who approved it as the roundabout remains a single lane, but it seems to be a feeble attempt to create stacking space that would otherwise overflow onto the A41 mainline.

The proper way to solve this would be to create a lane drop on the mainline, with the left-hand lane being dedicated for this junction.
Last edited by Patrick Harper on Sun Oct 28, 2018 18:12, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Conekicker
Member
Posts: 3763
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 22:32
Location: South Yorks

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Conekicker »

Skye wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:14 This sliproad has been remarked with two lanes at the yielding point. Not quite sure who approved it as the roundabout remains a single lane, but it seems to be an attempt to create stacking space that would otherwise overflow onto the A41 mainline.

The proper way to solve this would be to create a lane drop on the mainline, with the left-hand lane being dedicated for this junction.
There's something similar at M18 J3

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4893323 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Three lanes on the approach and two-ish on the roundabout. I wouldn't fancy being in the centre lane on the approach. Well done Doncaster.
Patience is not a virtue - it's a concept invented by the dozy beggars who are unable to think quickly enough.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35889
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Bryn666 »

Conekicker wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:30
Skye wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:14 This sliproad has been remarked with two lanes at the yielding point. Not quite sure who approved it as the roundabout remains a single lane, but it seems to be an attempt to create stacking space that would otherwise overflow onto the A41 mainline.

The proper way to solve this would be to create a lane drop on the mainline, with the left-hand lane being dedicated for this junction.
There's something similar at M18 J3

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4893323 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Three lanes on the approach and two-ish on the roundabout. I wouldn't fancy being in the centre lane on the approach. Well done Doncaster.
Arcady said we needed 3 lanes on approach, so we provided 3 lanes on approach.......
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Big L
Deputy Site Manager
Posts: 7570
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 20:36
Location: B5012

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by Big L »

Bryn666 wrote: Mon Oct 29, 2018 11:49
Conekicker wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:30
Skye wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:14 This sliproad has been remarked with two lanes at the yielding point. Not quite sure who approved it as the roundabout remains a single lane, but it seems to be an attempt to create stacking space that would otherwise overflow onto the A41 mainline.

The proper way to solve this would be to create a lane drop on the mainline, with the left-hand lane being dedicated for this junction.
There's something similar at M18 J3

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4893323 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Three lanes on the approach and two-ish on the roundabout. I wouldn't fancy being in the centre lane on the approach. Well done Doncaster.
Arcady said we needed 3 lanes on approach, so we provided 3 lanes on approach.......
3 lane approach, one for left, one straight, one right - so only two carrying on around after the first exit.
Make poetry history.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
User avatar
nickoli
Member
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 06:56
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: My candidate for today's white-line error

Post by nickoli »

Conekicker wrote: Sat Oct 27, 2018 22:30 There's something similar at M18 J3

https://www.google.com/maps/@53.4893323 ... a=!3m1!1e3

Three lanes on the approach and two-ish on the roundabout. I wouldn't fancy being in the centre lane on the approach. Well done Doncaster.
There's a similar mess here, at Longton A50/Trentham Road - I've no idea whether the middle lane on approach comes from the left or right, and I've no idea where it goes on the roundabout, which has no markings at all, but is treated as having two lanes. To add to the confusion, it's got four entrances and four exits, but five or six roads, with one-way roads/slip roads and odd angles making it difficult to keep track of which exit is which and where you should be signalling.
What's this for?
Post Reply