It's a fair point. I just personally don't see any benefit whatsoever of the upgrade, even if it came in relatively 'cheap' because it's mainly just changing sign colours. I'll take the reports every time in this case!
M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
- Chris Bertram
- Member
- Posts: 15987
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
- Location: Birmingham, England
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
I think that's a little unfair to Shrewsbury. It is, after all, the local county town and a centre of gravity in the way that is implied by that. But more importantly, from a roads point of view, it's a major point of navigation, being where the A5 (Telford's Holyhead Road at this point), A49 and A458 intersect, plus A53, A488 and A528 arrive from various angles. As a result it has warranted not just one, but two by-passes in its recent history, which should tell us something, and not just how unsuited the town centre is to modern through traffic (though that is indisputable). Compared to that, Telford is a mere crossroadsSteven wrote: ↑Thu Sep 19, 2019 07:19* Shrewsbury actually isn't particularly large or important - it only looks so on a map because everywhere else in Shropshire (other than Telford) is tiny. It is on the Major Towns and Cities dataset - but only just, and then only due to its workday population, not due to its resident population.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Improving journey time on this section would lead to quite a significant diversion of traffic from the M6 should there be a continuous HQDC from Wolverhampton to Chester, traffic for North Wales and Merseyside. It's currently not quite good enough for that. Doing two second Dee and then Ceiriog Viaducts at Chirk would be a substantial cost. You have to wonder how those sorts of structures were somehow affordable not too long ago (and indeed once upon a time for both the parallel railway and canal viaducts as well), but nowadays the pricing has become stratospheric.
Birmingham to Chester I found by experimentation that M54-A41 is currently better than A5-A483. M6 could be quicker or slower dependent on conditions.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
The M54 - M6 link application was received by the Planning Inspectorate at the end of January. It should make a decision on whether to accept the application by the end of the week.
So, should be starting examination very soon.
So, should be starting examination very soon.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
I still believe the scheme upgrades the wrong junction. M54 J1 never queues apart from being on the tail end of the queue on the A460 caused by the lights at Featherstone. It's really J11 that needs the freeflow. And because the existing A460 from Featherstone will still tie in to J11 it means there can be no freeflow left turn from the new road to the M6 north.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
Big and complex.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Granted, but have you seen the state of the A460 at present, with its 10mph crawl??
The presence of speed cameras is as pointless as it is offensive - they can’t catch anyone during the day!!
It’s not a perfect scheme by a long way, but it will make things a lot better than they are now.
The presence of speed cameras is as pointless as it is offensive - they can’t catch anyone during the day!!
It’s not a perfect scheme by a long way, but it will make things a lot better than they are now.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
The latest general arrangement drawing, with lane allocations etc:
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Plans.pdf
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Plans.pdf
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
A couple of the rejected alternatives for J1 were quite interesting:
The second one is a bit weird. There were also options for a hamburger or elongated roundabout (both rightly rejected).
Here's what the full freeflow option at J11 and M6T J8 would have looked like:
Once the decision was made to remove the link to the M6T it seems that no freeflow options were considered for J11.
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... er%203.pdf
The second one is a bit weird. There were also options for a hamburger or elongated roundabout (both rightly rejected).
Here's what the full freeflow option at J11 and M6T J8 would have looked like:
Once the decision was made to remove the link to the M6T it seems that no freeflow options were considered for J11.
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... er%203.pdf
- Steven
- SABRE Maps Coordinator
- Posts: 19710
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
- Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
The tailbacks onto the mainline of the M54 for the eastbound exit would disagree with you.Truvelo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 25, 2020 23:21 I still believe the scheme upgrades the wrong junction. M54 J1 never queues apart from being on the tail end of the queue on the A460 caused by the lights at Featherstone. It's really J11 that needs the freeflow. And because the existing A460 from Featherstone will still tie in to J11 it means there can be no freeflow left turn from the new road to the M6 north.
They are to be fair, mostly caused by the lights at Featherstone, but to dismiss it as "never queues" is very, very wrong; especially as there is sufficient traffic northbound A460 -> A460 at that junction to cause problems with accessing the circulatory carriageway from M54 if the traffic light queue disappeared. Of course, the alternative option would be to signalise the roundabout at this point...
Steven
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
A better J11 design would have been this which allows traffic from M6 south to A460 north to avoid one set of lights and permits a future left turn filter lane from the new road to M6 north. The report mentions this design would also reduce ratrunning through Featherstone by severing the existing A460. But really, the last option in Jackal's last post minus the M6T links would have been the perfect solution.
Time will tell if this becomes another M40 J10.
Time will tell if this becomes another M40 J10.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
Big and complex.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Now they're planning to make it a cycle path instead (joking...)
https://www.expressandstar.com/news/tra ... road-plan/
https://www.expressandstar.com/news/tra ... road-plan/
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Absolutely this, and either am better access from the M6 to the North from J15 (Although that has its own problems right now) or properly sorting out M6 J11 or 10A to facilitate it. Slapping Blue signs on the A5 doesn’t solve the A5’s problems. Motorways are not a magic economical bullet by themselves.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
"The Examining Authority issued a Recommendation Report to the Secretary of State on 21 July 2021. The Secretary of State has three months in which to issue a decision. The decision letter and Recommendation Report will be published on this project page once a decision has been made."
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... link-road/
A slightly revised general arrangement was published in March:
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Plans.pdf
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... link-road/
A slightly revised general arrangement was published in March:
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Plans.pdf
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
J11 is an absolute bin fire, I see. Just doing the same as J10, bigger roundabout with wider, not shorter, queues. FFS.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Surely when you're designing a junction between a motorway and expressway, and the minimum width of your roundabout is four lanes, you have to at least consider freeflow. There's no evidence it was even looked at once the M6T connection was dropped.
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
You'd think - there's no way that roundabout can operate at a safe level, especially not with near 90 degree turns and so many potential conflict points.
They just can't design junctions. It's obvious.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- Steven
- SABRE Maps Coordinator
- Posts: 19710
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
- Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Does the fact that the red line surrounds A460 between M6 and M6 Toll (and short stretches of A460 and A4601 the other side of the T8 roundabout) mean that that section will be trunked? It's currently not.
Steven
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Not necessarily, it just shows the extents of the DCO I think. It should be trunked though given it has a strategic function.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
BlueSky - https://bsky.app/profile/showmeasignbryn.bsky.social
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- Steven
- SABRE Maps Coordinator
- Posts: 19710
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
- Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
- Contact:
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
And I see they've also finally decided to make the link an all-purpose road. That's not ideal to say the least. By leaving the A460 connected in place as per the diagrams there could have been excellent provision for NMUs along the old road, and making the link a Special Road would have protected from development.
With its location I give it five years before the first ten sheds appear along it.
With its location I give it five years before the first ten sheds appear along it.
Steven
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Motorway Historian
Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
- RichardA35
- Elected Committee Member
- Posts: 5990
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
- Location: Dorset
Re: M54 Extension and M6 Toll/M42 Jct Improvements announced
Proposed Trunk Roads listed in Schedule 3 part 2 of the draft DCO with limits cross referenced back to the plans
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Order.pdf
https://infrastructure.planninginspecto ... 0Order.pdf