M6 J10 Improvements

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
SouthWest Philip
Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2002 19:35
Location: Evesham, Worcestershire

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by SouthWest Philip »

Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:22 I’ve just driven through junction 10.

Sit down and brace yourselves…

M6 has 4 lanes open in both directions and no temporary speed limits.

Don’t know about the roundabout, but the M6 seems to finally be done !!! :o
Still, four lanes all-lane running through the junction but with dynanic hard shoulder running either side. So that remains ridiculous!
User avatar
Truvelo
Member
Posts: 17501
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 21:10
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Truvelo »

I noticed four lanes through the junction was restored a few days ago. I'm not sure why this is necessary given there's a decent amount of traffic leaving and joining at this junction. It's J9 that needs four lanes. Five lanes merging into three at J8 is still a huge bottleneck. I suspect the shorter slip roads and reduced sight lines at J9 because it's on a curve is the namby pamby reason for not doing so.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
User avatar
Big L
Deputy Site Manager
Posts: 7596
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 20:36
Location: B5012

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Big L »

HE release saying “all done”.
Make poetry history.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
fras
Member
Posts: 3603
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 18:34

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by fras »

Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:46 HE release saying “all done”.
Nothing is going to work until a motorway round the west side of the West Midlands is built. Of course the alternative could be to toll the M6 and M5 in the West Midlands. After all, we now have low-emission zones, so would this be any different ?
brummie_rob
Member
Posts: 1538
Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 00:16

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by brummie_rob »

Google Maps showed some terrible queues all day at the junction, probably first day teething issues possibly with light phasing.
User avatar
Big L
Deputy Site Manager
Posts: 7596
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 20:36
Location: B5012

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Big L »

brummie_rob wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 22:07 Google Maps showed some terrible queues all day at the junction, probably first day teething issues possibly with light phasing.
The local rag report two accidents on the M6 this afternoon in Walsall involving 5 vehicles. Could have affected J10.
Make poetry history.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Help with maps using the new online calibrator.
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki.
Micro The Maniac
Member
Posts: 1185
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2015 13:14
Location: Blackwater Valley A331/A325/B3272

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Micro The Maniac »

SouthWest Philip wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:29 Still, four lanes all-lane running through the junction but with dynanic hard shoulder running either side. So that remains ridiculous!
Yebbut... trying to remember the last time I went through there and "[50] Congestion Use Hard Shoulder" was not lit
Peter Freeman
Member
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 07:52
Location: Exits 9 & 10, M1 East, Melbourne, Australia

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Peter Freeman »

Bryn666 wrote: Fri Jan 05, 2024 11:59 The refusal to entertain SPUI and DDIs here is simply a symptom of "we know best" nationalism in highways design. The fact no-one else is copying our interchange design whereas Europe is now trialling DDIs and the like (see Belgium of all places) suggests we are much happier being a stubborn island doing the same thing over and over whilst everyone else evolves. It's a disease that leaks through our bureaucracy at all levels.
We have a similar situation on the island where I live.

Long long ago, we had (land) bridges that connected us to foreign places, and we shared stuff, especially Marsupial mammals. But then it rained a lot and we got cut off. Much later, in the rest of the world, by the time the Dynosaurs disappeared and had made more space, Placentals had pretty well replaced Marsupials. However, my island stuck with the good old, tried-and-tested Marsupials. We were used to them, we knew how to catch them, and they tasted OK.

Some enterprising black people brought a few dogs over about 20K years ago, but other Aboriginals, who'd been here longer, poo-poo-ed the idea and so the Dingoes (as they called them) didn't really catch on much.

There were still hundreds of millions of Kangaroos hopping around when, much later again, some white do-gooders introduced Rabbits, placental rodents, etc. Damn nuisances! So we still mostly do Kangaroos, despite smart-arse foreigners telling us we're way behind. What do they know? Anyway, it'd be scary having lions and tigers roaming around the Outback.
Phil
Member
Posts: 2273
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2002 18:03
Location: Burgess Hill,W Sussex, UK

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Phil »

fras wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 21:34
Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:46 HE release saying “all done”.
Nothing is going to work until a motorway round the west side of the West Midlands is built.
Hell would have to freeze over and pigs grow wings before that can ever come to pass in these more enlightened times.
fras wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 21:34
Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:46 HE release saying “all done”.
. Of course the alternative could be to toll the M6 and M5 in the West Midlands. After all, we now have low-emission zones, so would this be any different ?
Although Tolling the entire M6 & M5 through the urban areas has merit there has to be serious concern over whether the M6 Toll / M42 could take displaced traffic, plus with it being a lot longer in miles considerable quantities of traffic would simply pay the toll.

A slimed down plan only including M6 between the M5 & M42 however and abolishing tolls on the M6Toll would still reduce vehicle flows through junction 10 as that traffic would mostly be heading to / from the M5 rather than a combination of M5 & M6 traffic
Peter Freeman
Member
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 07:52
Location: Exits 9 & 10, M1 East, Melbourne, Australia

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Peter Freeman »

Phil wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 13:06 Although Tolling the entire M6 & M5 through the urban areas has merit there has to be serious concern over whether the M6 Toll / M42 could take displaced traffic, plus with it being a lot longer in miles considerable quantities of traffic would simply pay the toll.

A slimed down plan only including (tolls on the) M6 between the M5 & M42 however and abolishing tolls on the M6Toll would still reduce vehicle flows through junction 10 as that traffic would mostly be heading to / from the M5 rather than a combination of M5 & M6 traffic
In either of those scenarios, HE would have to endure the embarrassment of having the toll-payers justifiably asking " Why have you gone to all this tolling palaver in order to reduce traffic at J10, instead of simply modifying J10 properly so that it can handle the traffic ? ".
KILLER KNIGHT
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 14:59

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by KILLER KNIGHT »

SouthWest Philip wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:29
Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:22 I’ve just driven through junction 10.

Sit down and brace yourselves…

M6 has 4 lanes open in both directions and no temporary speed limits.

Don’t know about the roundabout, but the M6 seems to finally be done !!! :o
Still, four lanes all-lane running through the junction but with dynanic hard shoulder running either side. So that remains ridiculous!
Learn to be grateful and not complain about an issue that doesn’t even exist.
KILLER KNIGHT
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 14:59

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by KILLER KNIGHT »

fras wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 21:34
Big L wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:46 HE release saying “all done”.
Nothing is going to work until a motorway round the west side of the West Midlands is built. Of course the alternative could be to toll the M6 and M5 in the West Midlands. After all, we now have low-emission zones, so would this be any different ?
The Western Strategic Route? Yeah that would be a dream come true! Even Midlands Connect have cancelled it!
KILLER KNIGHT
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 14:59

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by KILLER KNIGHT »

Micro The Maniac wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 08:11
SouthWest Philip wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:29 Still, four lanes all-lane running through the junction but with dynanic hard shoulder running either side. So that remains ridiculous!
Yebbut... trying to remember the last time I went through there and "[50] Congestion Use Hard Shoulder" was not lit
It’s ridiculous! The dynamic hard shoulder should be running at NSL and no less!
KILLER KNIGHT
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2022 14:59

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by KILLER KNIGHT »

Ruperts Trooper wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2024 11:29
KILLER KNIGHT wrote: Thu Feb 08, 2024 11:10
KeithW wrote: Wed Dec 20, 2023 19:58

The first section of the M42 was a simple link road from the M6 to Birmingham Airport and the NEC. It opened in the mid 70's when money was really tight after the 1970's depression and it was 1985 before it went any farther. Even so you got the A42 because they ran out of money before reaching the M1 !

Let me remind you of the interest rate in 1986, it was pushing 8% and that was low by the standards of the time.
This is why usury must be banned.
It used to be at least capped - back in the '70s the Money Lenders Act limited interest rates to 48% per annum and was used by loan companies for unsecured loans - subsequently that limit has been abolished so now there is no top limit and can rise to over 1000%.

The general public can't seem to get it's head around interest rates - for decades banks charged differential overdraft rates depending on whether it was approved in advance or not, typically 20% for approved and 40% for non-approved, but when the differential was banned a couple of years ago the banks simply doubled the approved rate to be the same as the non-approved - no-one seems to have batted an eyelid!
But still not anywhere near as what Afghanistan has accomplished recently.
Bomag
Member
Posts: 956
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 23:26

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Bomag »

KILLER KNIGHT wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 18:52
Micro The Maniac wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 08:11
SouthWest Philip wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 20:29 Still, four lanes all-lane running through the junction but with dynanic hard shoulder running either side. So that remains ridiculous!
Yebbut... trying to remember the last time I went through there and "[50] Congestion Use Hard Shoulder" was not lit
It’s ridiculous! The dynamic hard shoulder should be running at NSL and no less!
A bit of deja-view here. The combination of lane widths and markings (post 2011 amendment regs) mean that the highest safe speed for HSR, which can be sufficiently relied on, is 60 mph (based on the average eyesight of 65 year old). While the lower speed limit has some benefit at mitigating road user risk over ALR its the combination of traffic flow and enforcement which makes HSR better for most high risk sub-groups than ALR.
Bendo
Member
Posts: 2266
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 02:52
Location: Liverpool

Re: M6 J10 Improvements

Post by Bendo »

It was nice to traverse the M6 the other day and not have wonder whether the 60 limit was enforced at all.

Suppose the other us point of it being finished is we now no longer have the occasional situation where the gantries would show 50 only to have the fixed 60 sign override that until the next VMS. Really shows the confidence HE have in using the VMS to sign the limit full time.
Post Reply