I suspect it's another case of trying to deal with a left pointing green arrow from giving some misleading expectation of an exclusive movement or priority when the opposing right turn also has a full green - I can't think why else you'd use this arrangement. I think I've seen it elsewhere, but the only one I can remember off the top of my head was this one (now gone) in Plymouth, that weirdly didn't actually have a conflict on full green anyway because the opposing right turn is separately signalled.
I suspect it'll do a back-to-back right turn, looking at the markings. It looks to be a bit different to the Brighton examples in terms of layout because they're trying to use the same road space for ahead + left and right turning movements, whereas in this case it's just that the staging has the right turns running on their own.vlad wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 21:22What does "Right turn goes first" mean?Nathan_A_RF wrote: ↑Tue May 02, 2023 19:16 Been reminded of this today
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.25501 ... 384!8i8192
One I spotted closer to home the other day that's technically not a bodge but a bit scary none the less, is this one. I know we've discussed two lane (and three lane) gap accepting right turns, but this is a left turn. Despite the opposing right turn getting a 'free' turn (though it doesn't have an arrow), this left turn still goes to green in the same stage. There's an incredibly short distance between the studs and the give way line as well which I think makes matters worse (IMV, anyway!).