A9 dualling
Moderator: Site Management Team
Re: A9 dualling
It's interesting to note that they seem to have finally realised that it would be better to upgrade the busier southern sections first - except for an early upgrade for Tomatin to Moy (I don't understand why this section is next on the construction list)
AKA M5 Driver
-
- Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 01:24
Re: A9 dualling
Presumably there was a desire to provide a decent length of continuous dual carriageway at each end? Notably Luncarty to Pass of Birnam and Tomatin to Moy both remove a pair of dual to single carriageway transitions each.
Pass of Birnam to (and including) Tay Crossing was along with Tomatin to Moy supposed to be one of the early intervention schemes, locals has other ideas!
Also works already carried out on the railway between Tomatin and Moy to provide a new under bridge that will take one of the left in / left out junctions that form the Moy South junction and allow for double tracking for a dynamic passing loop.
The A9 bridge over the railway at Moy will be replaced to allow double tracking and electrification clearance.
The first phase at Kincraig was chosen as such as it was already well advanced as alternating WS2+1 scheme. Though the removal of the Northbound WS2+1 south of the wildlife park underpass was insane when the objective was increasing safe non conflicting overtaking opportunities - it was resurfaced so could have been a standard 2+1 to avoid the WS2+1 in proximity to dual carriageway.
Often forgotten about is the Crubenmore northern extension, it along with Kincraig to Dalraddy have already made a big difference to what was a long often tedious slog from the Slochd to Drumochter!
I note that some of the links and page content has chanced since my afternoon post, so must have caught the tweet as stuff was being published!
- DaStreetsweep
- Member
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 00:23
- Location: East Dunbartonshire
Re: A9 dualling
Have Made Orders still to be published for 4 sections, or is it down to 3?
Dual the A9, dual and bypass the A77, and bypass Crocketford and Springholm on the A75.
Re: A9 dualling
24 hour clock. Date TBC.
The implication on Radio Scotland's Drive this evening, to my ear, was they want to start inward so that the easier sections can be done at the same time, the central harder section is done on its own.
Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
Re: A9 dualling
I agree with your surprise but suspect that, along with being relatively easy, and to provide a continuous D2 at either end as has been said, infill schemes remove two D2-to-S2 transitions which seem, understandably, to be somewhere accidents often happen. I don't know if any of the other schemes provide infill in the same way. Doing the south first is sensible as the section where it doubles as a Perth commuter road is presumably the busiest bit. Is there a similar effect in the north? I could believe traffic levels tick up a bit compared to the middle, but it's not as populated beyond the existing D2 so I'm not sure.
Re: A9 dualling
The A9 from Inverness to Aviemore has high usage - comparable to around Pitlochry I believe - Tomatin to Moy links two dualled sections making around 18miles of continuous dualled.
Happy to see any single section done but recognising Perthsire is busy so is the road from Inverness the Capital of the Highlands and not just seasonal tourism. How busy the road is from Inverness south shouldn't be underestimated.
Re: A9 dualling
There are four in total. Three of which (Killiecrankie to Glen Garry, Crubenmore to Kincraig and Dalraddy to Slochd) have had a ministerial decision confirming that the Orders should be made The fourth (Pass or Birnam to Tay Crossing) has just had its preferred route announced and so is some way off from the publication of Made Orders.DaStreetsweep wrote: ↑Wed Dec 20, 2023 21:00 Have Made Orders still to be published for 4 sections, or is it down to 3?
-
- Member
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 23:14
Re: A9 dualling
Frankly , given this governments rack record.
If it is. Completed by 2035 the final section will be opened by a fly past of the Red Oinkers, hog display team.
If it is. Completed by 2035 the final section will be opened by a fly past of the Red Oinkers, hog display team.
Re: A9 dualling
I have an idea for the Dunkeld roundabout. If the residents insist that this stupid option goes forward, signalise it with the A9 north and south at the same time getting a 5 minute run, followed by 6 seconds for right turners and then a further 6 seconds for joining traffic. The cycle times will **** everyone in Dunkeld off and they'll fight for a GSJ.
-
- Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 01:24
Re: A9 dualling
Just scrap the scheme. Keep the current A9 as the Northbound carriageway then use the road through Birnam and Dunkeld as the Southbound! Not sure if the traffic or one way main road would be more annoying for them!Burns wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 19:40 I have an idea for the Dunkeld roundabout. If the residents insist that this stupid option goes forward, signalise it with the A9 north and south at the same time getting a 5 minute run, followed by 6 seconds for right turners and then a further 6 seconds for joining traffic. The cycle times will **** everyone in Dunkeld off and they'll fight for a GSJ.
Re: A9 dualling
It's incredible how quickly the "road safety" and "local communities" masks slip when the promise of a continuous 80mph blast is faintly threatened, isn't it?
-
- Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 01:24
Re: A9 dualling
What really is going on at Dunkeld is the Scottish Conservatives orchestrating political games, causing delays and cost escalations, while having Tory friendly press attack Scot Gov for slow progress. Also why should the rest be built to a lower standard so that most of the budget could be spent on a 1.5km tunnel past their village. There needs to be much less opportunity for small local communities to screw the rest of the population as keeps happening with major national infrastructure projects across the UK.
There is currently no interruption to the mainline of the A9 between the Longman Roundabout in Inverness (and plans to bridge it are going through the statutory processes) and Inveralmond in Perth.
It’s just a nonsense to dual the single carriageway sections to provide a modern grade separated safer route, then slap a random roundabout in the middle along with a new at grade junction nearby for a tourist attraction. Given its very nature most users will be one time or occasional visitors that are unfamiliar with the junction.
Not sure quite what your snide comment is aimed at because guess what one of the principle aims of the A9 dualling and Highland Mainline improvements are to speed up travel, both reducing journey times and improving journey time reliability to / from Highland Scotland.
-
- Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 22:40
Re: A9 dualling
Southbound A9 traffic through Dunkeld (and slightly less so Birnam) would annoy everyone, not just the locals. Scope for congestion and delays would be massive.haggishunter wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 23:28Just scrap the scheme. Keep the current A9 as the Northbound carriageway then use the road through Birnam and Dunkeld as the Southbound! Not sure if the traffic or one way main road would be more annoying for them!Burns wrote: ↑Fri Dec 22, 2023 19:40 I have an idea for the Dunkeld roundabout. If the residents insist that this stupid option goes forward, signalise it with the A9 north and south at the same time getting a 5 minute run, followed by 6 seconds for right turners and then a further 6 seconds for joining traffic. The cycle times will **** everyone in Dunkeld off and they'll fight for a GSJ.
-
- Member
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2023 22:40
Re: A9 dualling
Having looked at the latest update (20 Dec) of TS's A9 dualling website, I see that common sense has prevailed to the extent that the cut and cover tunnel has been scrapped, as has a 50mph speed limit, an appropriate junction has been decided on for Birnam, and direct access from the village to the railway station maintained.haggishunter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 10:45What really is going on at Dunkeld is the Scottish Conservatives orchestrating political games, causing delays and cost escalations, while having Tory friendly press attack Scot Gov for slow progress. Also why should the rest be built to a lower standard so that most of the budget could be spent on a 1.5km tunnel past their village. There needs to be much less opportunity for small local communities to screw the rest of the population as keeps happening with major national infrastructure projects across the UK.
There is currently no interruption to the mainline of the A9 between the Longman Roundabout in Inverness (and plans to bridge it are going through the statutory processes) and Inveralmond in Perth.
It’s just a nonsense to dual the single carriageway sections to provide a modern grade separated safer route, then slap a random roundabout in the middle along with a new at grade junction nearby for a tourist attraction. Given its very nature most users will be one time or occasional visitors that are unfamiliar with the junction.
Not sure quite what your snide comment is aimed at because guess what one of the principle aims of the A9 dualling and Highland Mainline improvements are to speed up travel, both reducing journey times and improving journey time reliability to / from Highland Scotland.
I'm not a fan of roundabouts on main NSL roads (A96 has far too many), especially dual carriageways, but I think that given the constraints of the location, a roundabout for the A822/A926/local access junction makes sense. One roundabout between Inverness and Perth I can live with. Four between Inverurie and the Aberdeen Airport turn (or six if you count both ends) is ridiculous.
-
- Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 01:24
Re: A9 dualling
Just one roundabout it’s a special case. Ok so there’s now one roundabout, a second wouldn’t hurt that much would it? The roundabout needs stamped out, this is a precedent that should not be allowed to be set imo.
Re: A9 dualling
It's a constrained site and a difficult, dangerous junction which regularly queues back on both sides. The A9 at that point is really not that busy in national terms - the roundabout on the A3 at Liss handles twice the traffic and the roundabout-heavy A92 just down the road handles even more than that. There are no plans for permanent roundabouts anywhere else on the A9haggishunter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:00 Just one roundabout it’s a special case. Ok so there’s now one roundabout, a second wouldn’t hurt that much would it? The roundabout needs stamped out, this is a precedent that should not be allowed to be set imo.
Fundamentally, it's not unreasonable to ask for safe and quick motor vehicle access to the wider road network without accepting that you must be surrounded in concrete to prevent twenty seconds of delay to passers-by.
-
- Member
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 01:24
Re: A9 dualling
Well if certain well off local Tory donors and the Scottish Conservatives hadn't been playing games for the past 10 years -both villages would already have safe and quick access to a dualled section of the A9 via a grade separated junction - the scheme was designed and was supposed to have followed on from Kincraig to Dalraddy along with Pass of Birnam to Luncarty which has been completed.jnty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:58It's a constrained site and a difficult, dangerous junction which regularly queues back on both sides.haggishunter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:00 Just one roundabout it’s a special case. Ok so there’s now one roundabout, a second wouldn’t hurt that much would it? The roundabout needs stamped out, this is a precedent that should not be allowed to be set imo.
....[snip]...
Fundamentally, it's not unreasonable to ask for safe and quick motor vehicle access to the wider road network without accepting that you must be surrounded in concrete to prevent twenty seconds of delay to passers-by.
Re: A9 dualling
Can you substantiate those allegations? It would be odd if an SNP-led project pandered so heavily to apparently obvious party political wrangling and found so much community support? The point is presumably that the GSJs you believe should have been built immediately affected local amenity excessively.haggishunter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 00:07Well if certain well off local Tory donors and the Scottish Conservatives hadn't been playing games for the past 10 years -both villages would already have safe and quick access to a dualled section of the A9 via a grade separated junction - the scheme was designed and was supposed to have followed on from Kincraig to Dalraddy along with Pass of Birnam to Luncarty which has been completed.jnty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:58It's a constrained site and a difficult, dangerous junction which regularly queues back on both sides.haggishunter wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:00 Just one roundabout it’s a special case. Ok so there’s now one roundabout, a second wouldn’t hurt that much would it? The roundabout needs stamped out, this is a precedent that should not be allowed to be set imo.
....[snip]...
Fundamentally, it's not unreasonable to ask for safe and quick motor vehicle access to the wider road network without accepting that you must be surrounded in concrete to prevent twenty seconds of delay to passers-by.
The main problem has been the blanket commitment to dualling. Had the junction been the subject of a targeted improvement not long after this all started, a lot of heartache could have been avoided.
Re: A9 dualling
Most of the dodgy A9 junctions could've easily been S2 GSJs as the rest of the world copes with but once again our exceptionalism means you either build a stupid roundabout or a giant quasi free flowing monster with no scope for something sensible in-between.jnty wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 00:49Can you substantiate those allegations? It would be odd if an SNP-led project pandered so heavily to apparently obvious party political wrangling and found so much community support? The point is presumably that the GSJs you believe should have been built immediately affected local amenity excessively.haggishunter wrote: ↑Sun Dec 24, 2023 00:07Well if certain well off local Tory donors and the Scottish Conservatives hadn't been playing games for the past 10 years -both villages would already have safe and quick access to a dualled section of the A9 via a grade separated junction - the scheme was designed and was supposed to have followed on from Kincraig to Dalraddy along with Pass of Birnam to Luncarty which has been completed.jnty wrote: ↑Sat Dec 23, 2023 18:58
It's a constrained site and a difficult, dangerous junction which regularly queues back on both sides.
....[snip]...
Fundamentally, it's not unreasonable to ask for safe and quick motor vehicle access to the wider road network without accepting that you must be surrounded in concrete to prevent twenty seconds of delay to passers-by.
The main problem has been the blanket commitment to dualling. Had the junction been the subject of a targeted improvement not long after this all started, a lot of heartache could have been avoided.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Re: A9 dualling
Grade separated S2 would not have been politically acceptable in the slightest.
Sent from my IV2201 using Tapatalk
Sent from my IV2201 using Tapatalk