London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

The study of British and Irish roads - their construction, numbering, history, mapping, past and future official roads proposals and general roads musings.

There is a separate forum for Street Furniture (traffic lights, street lights, road signs etc).

Registered users get access to other forums including discussions about other forms of transport, driving, fantasy roads and wishlists, and roads quizzes.

Moderator: Site Management Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Steven
SABRE Maps Coordinator
Posts: 19257
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Steven »

Chris Bertram wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 21:35
fras wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 21:19
Bryn666 wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 14:13 There was a more bonafide circular route once in Blackburn - the 5A and 5C. Not sure if that still runs.
And, of course, the two circular routes in Birmingham, the No 8 and the No 11. I've travelled on part of the 11 in the 70s, but never the 8. The 11 is 27 miles round. There were also a few "belt line" routes, but the numbers escape me, it's too long ago !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Midl ... s_route_11
No 8 is the Inner Circle. I don't think I've ever had cause to use it even in part. It takes a route that is generally slightly outside the A4540 Ring Road. The 11, the Outer Circle, is mostly on A4040, the former Outer Ring Road, but departs from it in some places. Going way back there was also Route 101, the Centrebus that did a circuit of the city centre. It was operated by a small vehicle rather than a full size double decker. Road changes mean that its former route is no longer available in any case.
Wolverhampton has the 25, which historically was labelled as "Circular", but actually it's a more of a spiral. It starts in the city centre, heads SSW to Goldthorn Park, then east to Bilston, north east to Willenhall, north to Wednesfield and the NW to end at Pendeford on the northern edge of the urban area. It's actually pretty sensible, linking the larger suburban centres together, but absolutely not a service you would ever catch end-to-end unless you really wanted to do it. And there's no circular service around the western side at all.

Similarly to the Birmingham example, once upon a time there was also a Centrebus (500) that did a circuit of the city centre, and again was smaller vehicles. I'd assume that Coventry once had one too, given I think they were a Centro/WMPTE thing.
Steven
Motorway Historian

Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner

Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!

Scratchwood
Member
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2008 21:44
Location: London

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Scratchwood »

fras wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:06
Micro The Maniac wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:48
Chris Bertram wrote: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:36 This is probably for similar reasons to the Circle Line in London no longer running as a circle, there being issues with timetable recovery after delays when there is no opportunity to stop and turn round.
The additional problem with the Circle Line was that the trains had to cross the flat junction at/near Edgeware Road - this was causing problems with the timing of the Hammersmith & City Line. Unfurling the loop removed the conflicts. I guess grade-separating tube lines is a tad more difficult than on the surface?
There are a few GSJs on the deep level "tube" lines, such as Camden Town, but not many. The sub-surface lines don't have any GSJs as far as I know. It would be very expensive to convert existing flat junctions on these lines as the loading gauge is the same as normal railways, (or almost).
There are GSJs on the District Line around Earl's Court, where there a number of complicated junctions. I can't think of anywhere else on the sub-surface lines within Central London.
User avatar
Truvelo
Member
Posts: 17501
Joined: Wed May 29, 2002 21:10
Location: Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Truvelo »

Steven wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:47 Similarly to the Birmingham example, once upon a time there was also a Centrebus (500) that did a circuit of the city centre, and again was smaller vehicles. I'd assume that Coventry once had one too, given I think they were a Centro/WMPTE thing.
I recall the Wolverhampton one was free to use although it's been over 30 years since I last used it.
How would you like your grade separations, Sir?
Big and complex.
Herned
Member
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 09:15

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Herned »

Micro The Maniac wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:48 The additional problem with the Circle Line was that the trains had to cross the flat junction at/near Edgeware Road - this was causing problems with the timing of the Hammersmith & City Line. Unfurling the loop removed the conflicts.
They still do, the junction is west of Edgware Road
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16986
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Chris5156 »

Chris Bertram wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:33
fras wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:06
Micro The Maniac wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:48

The additional problem with the Circle Line was that the trains had to cross the flat junction at/near Edgeware Road - this was causing problems with the timing of the Hammersmith & City Line. Unfurling the loop removed the conflicts. I guess grade-separating tube lines is a tad more difficult than on the surface?
There are a few GSJs on the deep level "tube" lines, such as Camden Town, but not many. The sub-surface lines don't have any GSJs as far as I know. It would be very expensive to convert existing flat junctions on these lines as the loading gauge is the same as normal railways, (or almost).
The Metropolitan has a diveunder junction where the Uxbridge branch diverges from the Amersham/Chesham branch.
There's another on the District at Chiswick Park.
User avatar
RichardA35
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 5720
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Location: Dorset

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by RichardA35 »

First reports from the expanded ULEZ are that the anticipated changes in behaviour have occurred and there is an increased compliance rate to 95% in the outer boroughs apart from vans.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-67266241
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by the cheesecake man »

Herned wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 22:58
Micro The Maniac wrote: Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:48 The additional problem with the Circle Line was that the trains had to cross the flat junction at/near Edgeware Road - this was causing problems with the timing of the Hammersmith & City Line. Unfurling the loop removed the conflicts.
They still do, the junction is west of Edgware Road
And then there's another one nearby at Baker Street where the Metropolitan Line joins.

The issue was the lack of terminus. The Circle Line had a few minutes slack inserted at Aldgate, the only platforms exclusively used by it, but a proper terminus at Hammersmith is much better, plus the option to turn round early. The disadvantage of course is that Paddington-Hammersmith has too many trains while there are no direct services where there should be eg Baker Street-Bayswater.
User avatar
Was92now625
Member
Posts: 848
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 00:29
Location: near A625

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Was92now625 »

Steven wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:47
Wolverhampton has the 25, which historically was labelled as "Circular", but actually it's a more of a spiral. It starts in the city centre, heads SSW to Goldthorn Park, then east to Bilston, north east to Willenhall, north to Wednesfield and the NW to end at Pendeford on the northern edge of the urban area. It's actually pretty sensible, linking the larger suburban centres together, but absolutely not a service you would ever catch end-to-end unless you really wanted to do it. And there's no circular service around the western side at all.

Similarly to the Birmingham example, once upon a time there was also a Centrebus (500) that did a circuit of the city centre, and again was smaller vehicles. I'd assume that Coventry once had one too, given I think they were a Centro/WMPTE thing.
Dundee in the 1970s had a "circular" i.e. 7 in one direction and 8 in the other. The route would start in the "centre" (which in Dundee is about as far south as you can get), go to the east, then fairly far north in the city and partly into the west before returning to the centre. Was useful to connect my area with the area my grandparents lived in and then onto the area near Balgay Hill.

The spiral not actually named as such but 13 started in the centre, went a short way east a bit north and ended up at the new (at the time) Ninewells Hospital in the west. 14 returned along the same route.

They have probably changed beyond recognition since then !
User avatar
Ritchie333
SABRE Developer
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 20:40
Location: Ashford, Kent
Contact:

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by Ritchie333 »

I set up a ULEZ account last week so when I take the van into Outer London gigs I can just be billed at the end of the month.

Interestingly, the charges don't appear to run midnight to midnight. I was charged when I passed the Greater London boundary on the A20 Sidcup Bypass last Saturday afternoon, but not for driving the same way back at about 1am the following morning. Is this a mistake, or are TfL being a bit more sensible and just starting the 24 hour clock at the first point the cameras pinpoint you?
--
SABRE Maps - all the best maps in one place....
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: London Congestion Charge Possible Expansion

Post by the cheesecake man »

Ritchie333 wrote: Wed Nov 15, 2023 12:57 I set up a ULEZ account last week so when I take the van into Outer London gigs I can just be billed at the end of the month.

Interestingly, the charges don't appear to run midnight to midnight. I was charged when I passed the Greater London boundary on the A20 Sidcup Bypass last Saturday afternoon, but not for driving the same way back at about 1am the following morning. Is this a mistake, or are TfL being a bit more sensible and just starting the 24 hour clock at the first point the cameras pinpoint you?
Or are TfL being consistent with their approach on public transport, where they start a day at 4.30am?
Post Reply