Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by traffic-light-man »

I'm not particularly wanting to start a list of junctions where signals could be removed here, I'm just interested to see how it's working out where that has happened.

I came across an old local news article centred around how much better the traffic was flowing with the traffic signals switched off at a particular roundabout in Bournemouth. The signals-on-roundabouts discussion aside, I noticed amongst the comments at the bottom was Martin Cassini, who I believe is the chap that's been on TV before flying the flag for no-priority arrangements.

Anyway, as a result, it prompted me to take a GSV visit to the Cabstand junction in Portishead, which I believe was one of the ones Martin was involved with (or at least promoted). It was interesting to see that there's been several tweaks made over the years, including the addition of mini-roundabouts, an island, installation of zebra crossings, moving one of those zebra crossings and the installation of a set of signals for a pedestrian crossing. What was overwhelming, to me, was that despite being hailed a success, the lack of priority has been quickly addressed by asserting some form of priority control, albeit in a different way.

Off the top of my head, I can think of two locations immediately where signals were removed fairly recently, but both had the 'mitigating' measures put in place at the same time as the signals were removed. One's this crossroads in Padiham, Lancs, and the other is a dual T-junction in Chorley, Lancs, and I don't believe either have needed any changes since they were converted.

This got me thinking, how has it panned out elsewhere where signals were removed and has there been a need to make any substantial changes after the signals were first switched off?
Simon
User avatar
jervi
Member
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 16:29
Location: West Sussex

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by jervi »

People are already calling for removal of these signals and go back to a mini roundabout only mere days after the traffic lights were switched on.
https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2022- ... diabolical

Whenever I've travelled through the new lights so far, there has been minimal traffic, however I expect due to unusual Christmas traffic flows traffic has been worse than otherwise.
Plus when the lights were designed, both directions of Station Road had green lights at the same time with the right turn being uncontrolled (no filter light or RAG for the right turn). However due to too many idiots on the road, people were trying to make the right turn without giving way, so now the two directions are on different phases, which is causing additional congestion with longer cycle times.

I personally like the traffic signals, along with the other improvements in the area. It is so much better for cycling and walking now, and even more once it is complete.

https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@50.95439 ... 384!8i8192 previous junction layout.
AndyB
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 11164
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
Location: Belfast N Ireland
Contact:

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by AndyB »

If Martin Cassini's proposition that if motorists saw that a junction was unmarked they would slow down and take care were reasonable, the world would be a far better place, but he also thinks that motorists would choose a safe speed to drive it in the absence of signs.

Touchingly insane. People with visual impairments can't deal with shared space because differentiation between road and footway is essential to their safety. Any supposition that removal of priority junctions, traffic lights and speed limits would cause drivers to take responsibility for anything other than their own convenience...
WHBM
Member
Posts: 9736
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 18:01
Location: London

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by WHBM »

It's surprising how many apparently minor junctions, generally cross-roads, in Central London used to have signals long ago but have now been removed. Like this one, Pont Street/Cadogan Place, in Kensington :

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4973269 ... 384!8i8192
jnty
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by jnty »

AndyB wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 11:04 If Martin Cassini's proposition that if motorists saw that a junction was unmarked they would slow down and take care were reasonable, the world would be a far better place, but he also thinks that motorists would choose a safe speed to drive it in the absence of signs.

Touchingly insane. People with visual impairments can't deal with shared space because differentiation between road and footway is essential to their safety. Any supposition that removal of priority junctions, traffic lights and speed limits would cause drivers to take responsibility for anything other than their own convenience...
The signals at Waterloo Place in Edinburgh (at the end of the A1) fail fairly regularly, and people often comment on how much more 'smoothly' the traffic flows in their absence. Of course, they are ignoring the throngs of pedestrians (many of them foreign tourists) waiting for a gap to cross or being tooted at when they attempt to assert themselves.
AndyB
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 11164
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 21:58
Location: Belfast N Ireland
Contact:

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by AndyB »

Yeah, it’s not that simple. Traffic lights being out means that you know you have to negotiate. Absence of traffic lights and give way lines…
User avatar
L.J.D
Member
Posts: 441
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 06:34
Location: W.Yorkshire

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by L.J.D »

It worked out here with really good success and positive feedback from locals I've not heard anyone say anything bad about it at all. What's interesting is that they future proofed it here with NAL sockets for another crossing to be added on that arm but to this day its never happened the other arms all have signalised pedestrian crossings on though so it wasn't 100% removal of signals.

Here's a view before with its forest of signals it had before. It was a nightmare some long wait right turn phases to perform a simple manoeuvre.
WhiteBlueRed
Member
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 03:58
Location: Krasnoyarsk, Russia

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by WhiteBlueRed »

If a junction works better without traffic lights, it means the traffic lights weren't needed in the first place. There needs to be stricter criteria for the installation of traffic signals.
User avatar
Debaser
Member
Posts: 2237
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 16:57

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by Debaser »

WhiteBlueRed wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 03:57 If a junction works better without traffic lights, it means the traffic lights weren't needed in the first place. There needs to be stricter criteria for the installation of traffic signals.
Hmmm...not like traffic flows change over time...also traffic signals are generally the junction of last resort (in the UK), simple priority junctions or roundabouts having insufficient capacity.

And 'works' is a vague definition. 'Works' for whom? The pedestrians who may make up the vast majority of users in an urban environment, or motor vehicles which take up the most space per user?
jnty
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by jnty »

Debaser wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 14:07
WhiteBlueRed wrote: Thu Jan 05, 2023 03:57 If a junction works better without traffic lights, it means the traffic lights weren't needed in the first place. There needs to be stricter criteria for the installation of traffic signals.
Hmmm...not like traffic flows change over time...also traffic signals are generally the junction of last resort (in the UK), simple priority junctions or roundabouts having insufficient capacity.

And 'works' is a vague definition. 'Works' for whom? The pedestrians who may make up the vast majority of users in an urban environment, or motor vehicles which take up the most space per user?
The roundabout referenced above touches upon two of these points - it looks to have been completed remodelled into a roundabout when traffic lights were 'removed'. Also, the traffic lights weren't fully removed but were moved on to the approach of the junction, which presumably allows control of flows to prevent the usual failure modes of roundabouts caused by dominant flows. It also seems fairly pedestrian unfriendly, with some movements going from requiring 2 crossing activations to requiring 5 or more with a massive detour (or, as presumably normally happens, a mad dash over the road in a gap.)
wallmeerkat
Member
Posts: 1334
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 16:49
Location: County Down

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by wallmeerkat »

Cloughfern Corner - https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... ern_Corner around 1990 went from a traffic light crossroads to a busy roundabout with zebra crossings https://www.google.com/maps/@54.6732889 ... a=!3m1!1e3

A busy urban junction between several housing estates and the hospital to the south-east, as well as a route to rural Co Antrim - Ballyclare etc, or as a second road running parallel to the coast to get to Carrickfergus.

From the SABRE Wiki: Cloughfern Corner :

Cloughfern Corner in Newtonabbey was an offset crossroads between the Station Road - which led to Whiteabbey station - and the Old Irish Highway - an ancient road which ran from Carrickfergus to Antrim via Carnmoney.

When Newtownabbey was built up post-war, the housing estates of Fernagh, Rathfern and Rathcoole were built nearby.

The Old Irish Highway was bypassed by a road on a cutting with a 40mph speed limit - the O'Neill Road. Station Road was widened and bypassed at the

... Read More
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16987
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by Chris5156 »

WHBM wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:07 It's surprising how many apparently minor junctions, generally cross-roads, in Central London used to have signals long ago but have now been removed. Like this one, Pont Street/Cadogan Place, in Kensington :

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4973269 ... 384!8i8192
That was the site of the very first installation of Mellor signal heads.
User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by traffic-light-man »

Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:05
WHBM wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:07 It's surprising how many apparently minor junctions, generally cross-roads, in Central London used to have signals long ago but have now been removed. Like this one, Pont Street/Cadogan Place, in Kensington :

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4973269 ... 384!8i8192
That was the site of the very first installation of Mellor signal heads.
Had we (collective Sabristi effort 'we'!) not worked out a while back that those were only there for the photo op using the prototype equipment, and that the site never actually had signals installed?
Simon
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16987
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by Chris5156 »

traffic-light-man wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2023 16:13
Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jan 07, 2023 10:05
WHBM wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:07 It's surprising how many apparently minor junctions, generally cross-roads, in Central London used to have signals long ago but have now been removed. Like this one, Pont Street/Cadogan Place, in Kensington :

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4973269 ... 384!8i8192
That was the site of the very first installation of Mellor signal heads.
Had we (collective Sabristi effort 'we'!) not worked out a while back that those were only there for the photo op using the prototype equipment, and that the site never actually had signals installed?
Gaaah, yes, now you say that, I think you're right. Here's a post from Gareth saying as much. I have, as usual, only remembered half a story :roll:
pjr10th
Member
Posts: 194
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2020 23:35

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by pjr10th »

The two I know of best are Poyton and Douglas, both of which were replaced with quasi-roundabouts. The Douglas one seems to be working well from what I've seen / heard. Does anyone know about Poynton's longer term operation?
User avatar
traffic-light-man
Member
Posts: 4736
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 18:45
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by traffic-light-man »

Poynton is still going as far as I'm aware, though last time I was in the area it was essentially being used as a mini roundabout. The paving in the centre was all filled in with tarmac as well which helped make it look a bit more like a roundabout.

The other one that I'd completely forgotten about in my original post is the one on the A554 in Birkenhead near the Irish ferry terminal, with the spiral markings. That one has essentially also become a mini roundabout for many users, from what I can tell.
Simon
jabbaboy
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 09:25
Location: Newcastle

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by jabbaboy »

This roundabout - https://www.google.com/maps/@55.1670366 ... 312!8i6656 in Morpeth had light installed in the early 2012 and were removed in 2013 after a massive campaign called 'Lights Out' since it made traffic much worse

Article about it here - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-24384235

Ironic 10 years later the 'temporary' mini roundabout is still there.
Fenlander
Member
Posts: 7808
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 21:54
Location: south Lincolnshire

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by Fenlander »

These lights have been removed before they've even been installed as the junction now won't be changed from a roundabout to a set of traffic lights.
jnty
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 00:12

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by jnty »

Fenlander wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2023 13:24 These lights have been removed before they've even been installed as the junction now won't be changed from a roundabout to a set of traffic lights.
Holding a referendum on a new crossroads seems utterly bizarre. How on earth are people expected to make an informed decision?
AlexBr967
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 21:08

Re: Removal of Traffic Signals - How has it worked out?

Post by AlexBr967 »

2011: roundabout
2012: Traffic lights
2016: roundabout is back

As you can guess the traffic lights actually made the traffic worse
Post Reply