Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Discussion about street lighting, road signs, traffic signals - and all other street furniture - goes here.

Moderator: Site Management Team

qwertyK
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 19:16

Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by qwertyK »

This has got to be the road sign closest to London, well within Greater London, which signposts "London" rather than "Central" or "C." London

https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4914823 ... ?entry=ttu

There's quite a few others in Greater London usually on the outskirts that say London

Meanwhile parts of Surrey within the M25 have "Central London" on their signs rather than just London, as do signs in the Watford area.
User avatar
Steven
SABRE Maps Coordinator
Posts: 19257
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 20:39
Location: Wolverhampton, Staffordshire
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Steven »

IIRC, the distinction should be whether the signage is inside or outside the M25.
Steven
Motorway Historian

Founder Member, SABRE ex-Presidents' Corner

Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!

User avatar
Brenley Corner
Member
Posts: 3860
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 19:28
Location: nr. Canterbury, Kent

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Brenley Corner »

But should any sign say "London"? - joking!!! :-P :lol:
Brenley Corner: congesting traffic since 1963; discussing roads since 2002
User avatar
Nathan_A_RF
Member
Posts: 731
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:53
Location: East Sussex/Southampton
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Nathan_A_RF »

List of primary route destinations in England says in the Greater London section:
(NB. Primary destinations in Greater London, other than Heathrow Airport, are usually only signed within the boundary of the M25)
I suppose there's no real rule about "London" and "Central London" as this note states "usually". I'd want only "London" to appear outside of the Greater London boundary and "Central London" to appear inside.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35939
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Bryn666 »

Nathan_A_RF wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2023 12:43 List of primary route destinations in England says in the Greater London section:
(NB. Primary destinations in Greater London, other than Heathrow Airport, are usually only signed within the boundary of the M25)
I suppose there's no real rule about "London" and "Central London" as this note states "usually". I'd want only "London" to appear outside of the Greater London boundary and "Central London" to appear inside.
Oh don't stir that one up again, we have a poster here who is adamant "London" should never appear on signs and only "(M25)" should be signposted outside of the M25 due to how they've interpreted that LTN 1/94 guidance. This is clearly crackers but what do I know, questioning the trunk road agencies which never get anything wrong ever...

Quite simply in a sensible country, it would be "London" as a general control point, with other radial destinations reached via the M25 arriving the closer you get. Cross the M25 and it's then the relevant part of Greater London - be that London (S), London (E), London (N), London (W), and of course Central London, or some dreary Zone 5/6 suburb that is only known because you can dump your car there and catch the tube.
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
qwertyK
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 19:16

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by qwertyK »

Bryn666 wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2023 14:54
Nathan_A_RF wrote: Fri Jun 23, 2023 12:43 List of primary route destinations in England says in the Greater London section:
(NB. Primary destinations in Greater London, other than Heathrow Airport, are usually only signed within the boundary of the M25)
I suppose there's no real rule about "London" and "Central London" as this note states "usually". I'd want only "London" to appear outside of the Greater London boundary and "Central London" to appear inside.
Oh don't stir that one up again, we have a poster here who is adamant "London" should never appear on signs and only "(M25)" should be signposted outside of the M25 due to how they've interpreted that LTN 1/94 guidance. This is clearly crackers but what do I know, questioning the trunk road agencies which never get anything wrong ever...

Quite simply in a sensible country, it would be "London" as a general control point, with other radial destinations reached via the M25 arriving the closer you get. Cross the M25 and it's then the relevant part of Greater London - be that London (S), London (E), London (N), London (W), and of course Central London, or some dreary Zone 5/6 suburb that is only known because you can dump your car there and catch the tube.
But then there's places within the M25 that are not in London, eg, a large part of Epping forest district in Essex. Here it's just London on the signposts not central.

And interestingly on the A14 about seventy miles away from London it makes the distinction between east London and central when advising motorists whether to take the M11 or the A1.
User avatar
Chris Bertram
Member
Posts: 15778
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2001 12:30
Location: Birmingham, England

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Chris Bertram »

Watford is also within M25 and would take umbrage if you suggested that it was part of London.

South of the Thames, M25 is usually some distance from the Greater London boundary as well.
“The quality of any advice anybody has to offer has to be judged against the quality of life they actually lead.” - Douglas Adams.

Did you know there's more to SABRE than just the Forums?
Add your roads knowledge to the SABRE Wiki today!
Have you browsed SABRE Maps recently? Try getting involved!
User avatar
MotorwayGuy
Member
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 15:37
Location: S.E. London

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by MotorwayGuy »

"Central London / C. London" is signed on the A2 from Dartford Heath (which is the first junction within the M25) and continues until it disappears at the Bricklayers Arms.

There is of course also the capitalised LONDON M2 sign at Brenley Corner.
qwertyK
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 19:16

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by qwertyK »

MotorwayGuy wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 09:01 "Central London / C. London" is signed on the A2 from Dartford Heath (which is the first junction within the M25) and continues until it disappears at the Bricklayers Arms.

There is of course also the capitalised LONDON M2 sign at Brenley Corner.
Wonder if the latter is owing to some obscurity over whether "LONDON" would be a regional destination akin to "SOUTH WALES" or "THE NORTH".
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16991
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Chris5156 »

qwertyK wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 14:11Wonder if the latter is owing to some obscurity over whether "LONDON" would be a regional destination akin to "SOUTH WALES" or "THE NORTH".
At the time the sign was made, I think "LONDON" was a regional destination. The list of regional destinations was then amended to remove it. It was only a regional destination for a relatively short time, and it was a long time ago, so there are very few signs left that use it - this is probably the most prominent one.
qwertyK
Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 19:16

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by qwertyK »

Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 15:44
qwertyK wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 14:11Wonder if the latter is owing to some obscurity over whether "LONDON" would be a regional destination akin to "SOUTH WALES" or "THE NORTH".
At the time the sign was made, I think "LONDON" was a regional destination. The list of regional destinations was then amended to remove it. It was only a regional destination for a relatively short time, and it was a long time ago, so there are very few signs left that use it - this is probably the most prominent one.
When was it a regional destination?
User avatar
Chris5156
Deputy Treasurer
Posts: 16991
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2001 21:50
Location: Hampshire
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Chris5156 »

qwertyK wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 17:43
Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 15:44
qwertyK wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 14:11Wonder if the latter is owing to some obscurity over whether "LONDON" would be a regional destination akin to "SOUTH WALES" or "THE NORTH".
At the time the sign was made, I think "LONDON" was a regional destination. The list of regional destinations was then amended to remove it. It was only a regional destination for a relatively short time, and it was a long time ago, so there are very few signs left that use it - this is probably the most prominent one.
When was it a regional destination?
Hard to say - I can't find a citation for regional destinations before LTN1/94, which as its name suggests dates from 1994. It would have been well before that I think. Bryn may know.
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35939
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Bryn666 »

Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 19:07
qwertyK wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 17:43
Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 15:44
At the time the sign was made, I think "LONDON" was a regional destination. The list of regional destinations was then amended to remove it. It was only a regional destination for a relatively short time, and it was a long time ago, so there are very few signs left that use it - this is probably the most prominent one.
When was it a regional destination?
Hard to say - I can't find a citation for regional destinations before LTN1/94, which as its name suggests dates from 1994. It would have been well before that I think. Bryn may know.
There used to be "LONDON" signs around the Midlands, and at Almondsbury. These signs were original to the M5 and M4 opening, so the "LONDON" regional destination existed before "The NORTH" etc, which started to appear after 1975 but not in any consistent form. Interestingly, the 75 and 81 regs have "The SOUTH EAST" on the example gantry sign, which as far as I know has never been used (but would've been a better alternative to The SOUTH).
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
User avatar
Gareth Thomas
Member
Posts: 1725
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 13:43
Location: Temple Ewell, Kent
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Gareth Thomas »

MotorwayGuy wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 09:01 "Central London / C. London" is signed on the A2 from Dartford Heath (which is the first junction within the M25) and continues until it disappears at the Bricklayers Arms.
The Kent/Greater London border is just after this junction, so I suppose it makes sense to consistently sign the route as "Central London" as a lot of traffic will have joined the A2 at the Darenth Interchange. Such as traffic here on the M20 approaching Junction 1, although this offers a distinction between "Central London" and "London (SE).

(Whilst checking exactly where the border was, I found this, which was quite interesting. :-))
Chris5156 wrote: Sat Jun 24, 2023 15:44 At the time the sign was made, I think "LONDON" was a regional destination. The list of regional destinations was then amended to remove it. It was only a regional destination for a relatively short time, and it was a long time ago, so there are very few signs left that use it - this is probably the most prominent one.
There are signs like this on the M4 just before the M5 that say "LONDON, Bristol M32 M4".
My journey with testicular cancer!
https://garethishalfnuts.wordpress.com/

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads..."
-Dr Emmett Brown
User avatar
Vierwielen
Member
Posts: 5715
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 21:21
Location: Hampshire

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Vierwielen »

At the south-eastern end of the M6 Toll you have a choice of "London (M1)" or "London (M40)"
User avatar
KeithW
Member
Posts: 19301
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 13:25
Location: Marton-In-Cleveland North Yorks

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by KeithW »

On the A1 approaching the A14 junction heading south you see this on the left exit

London (E), Stansted (M11)
Felixstowe, Cambridge
A14

Straight ahead has this
London (C & W)
A1

On the M20 it says London.
User avatar
the cheesecake man
Member
Posts: 2482
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2019 13:21
Location: Sheffield

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by the cheesecake man »

KeithW wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 19:02 On the A1 approaching the A14 junction heading south you see this on the left exit

London (E), Stansted (M11)
Felixstowe, Cambridge
A14

Straight ahead has this
London (C & W)
A1
Exactly what I was about to post. Putting just "London" on either route would be confusing. And before the recent A14 upgrade this choice was offered at Alconbury, even further away from London.
User avatar
Vierwielen
Member
Posts: 5715
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 21:21
Location: Hampshire

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Vierwielen »

AS one approaches the A446 turnoff (which leads to the M42) on the M6 (NE of Birmingham, the M6 is signposted "London (N & E)", but the A446 (which leads to London (W & S)) makes no mention of London.
User avatar
RichardA35
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 5722
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2002 18:58
Location: Dorset

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by RichardA35 »

Vierwielen wrote: Mon Jul 10, 2023 21:47 AS one approaches the A446 turnoff (which leads to the M42) on the M6 (NE of Birmingham, the M6 is signposted "London (N & E)", but the A446 (which leads to London (W & S)) makes no mention of London.
It's quite a difficult route to get onto the M42 from the A446 after turning off the M6 at Junction 4 heading south (unless you use a tardis to get back to the 1970's).
At that point a driver has passed J4A where London is signed appropriately S & W on the M42 and N & E on the M6 (M1).
User avatar
Bryn666
Elected Committee Member
Posts: 35939
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2002 20:54
Contact:

Re: Variations between "London" and "Central London" on signs

Post by Bryn666 »

RichardA35 wrote: Tue Jul 11, 2023 09:01
Vierwielen wrote: Mon Jul 10, 2023 21:47 AS one approaches the A446 turnoff (which leads to the M42) on the M6 (NE of Birmingham, the M6 is signposted "London (N & E)", but the A446 (which leads to London (W & S)) makes no mention of London.
It's quite a difficult route to get onto the M42 from the A446 after turning off the M6 at Junction 4 heading south (unless you use a tardis to get back to the 1970's).
At that point a driver has passed J4A where London is signed appropriately S & W on the M42 and N & E on the M6 (M1).
You'd find RCS on the A45 listing London which you'd intersect and know to join before the M42, but the A45 itself is only signed to Coventry at that point. If you've missed the M42 exit and want to go to London you're best just using the M1 and trying harder next time :lol:
Bryn
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.

Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
Post Reply