Needlessly long road numbers
Moderator: Site Management Team
- Patrick Harper
- Member
- Posts: 3213
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 14:41
- Location: Wiltshire
Needlessly long road numbers
In the same area though, there's been the loss of the A41 between Warwick and Solihull, which makes no sense to me. It's still a main, albeit not primary route. The A425 inexplicably dog legs around Europa Way, while it could run along the A4189 to Redditch.
Then there's the A1081 and A5183, 80s creations that don't need much introduction. Again, the Dunstable section makes sense because of the bypass, but the rest could be just A5 without contradicting the network in any way. Same with the A1081 from London Colney north, and A6 would be a more important sounding designation for an airport link to boot.
There's probably more but, I don't want to spoil all of them. I hope everyone has had a comfy Christmas.
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
This turned out to be very confusing !
Read Wolfie Coopers book the Great North Road Then and Now for chapter and verse.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Great-North-Ro ... 1870067797
Well before road numbers were even thought of the Great North Road went through York ! Indeed in 1960 the route taken by buses from Newcastle to London went through Gateshead, Chester-Le-Street, Stockton-On-Tees, Middlesbrough, Thirsk and York before taking the A64 to the A1. Of course the A19 still ploughed through most towns along the way, I recall seeing the bypasses being built in the 60's and 70's.
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/46716/4 ... 6716-h.htm
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
They're not actually '80s creations'; both are older than that. The road atlas I grew up with was a 1977 AA Book of the Road, which showed both in 'downgraded' form, causing me to spend much of my childhood wondering what had happened to the A5 in that part of the world, and why the A6 appeared to begin in such a random place.Patrick Harper wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 16:17Then there's the A1081 and A5183, 80s creations that don't need much introduction. Again, the Dunstable section makes sense because of the bypass, but the rest could be just A5 without contradicting the network in any way. Same with the A1081 from London Colney north, and A6 would be a more important sounding designation for an airport link to boot.
It didn't bother me as much as the complete absence of an A42, though - I didn't discover where that had originally been until I was fully grown up! Speaking of which, the A4074 would be another for your list...
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
- RichardA626
- Member
- Posts: 7849
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 22:19
- Location: Stockport
- Contact:
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
None of the A1081 between the M1 and Luton Airport is on the route of the A6.Patrick Harper wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 16:17 Then there's the A1081 and A5183, 80s creations that don't need much introduction. Again, the Dunstable section makes sense because of the bypass, but the rest could be just A5 without contradicting the network in any way. Same with the A1081 from London Colney north, and A6 would be a more important sounding designation for an airport link to boot.
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
A7066, A7071, A8082 and B9119 were all B roads with the same numbers, and the A9000 is the former A90. The former A7002 also falls into the first group, while the A8010 was the B801 and the A8014 was the B814, but at the time the A8xx numbers hadn't all been used / some were already defunct (A842/3).
The A9011/2/3 were issued in Aberdeen when there are several A9xx numbers that have never been used, and more that are long term defunct.
The remainder of the early A80xx numbers that were issued were possibly needed in the first instance, although it is dubious if the first two used (A8001/2) actually needed to be A roads / could have been spurs. Most of the newer ones could have re-used defunct numbers (A8003/6/10/11), while the A8004 is a bit of a nonsense. This really just leaves the A8015 & former A8005, and for many years the A898 number appears to have been vacant - the first known use is for the Erskine Bridge in 1970, with other numbers probably already defunct, although both could have just been B roads.
My mission is to travel every road and visit every town, village and hamlet in the British Isles.
I don't like thinking about how badly I am doing.
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
As I recall Harpenden to Kidney Wood was the A6 until it was truncated in the 1980's and renumbered A1081.
See
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... A6/history
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... itle=A1081
From the SABRE Wiki: A6/history :
Page under construction'
At classification, the A6 was made Britain's second longest road and therefore England's longest. Its start was at Barnet at London and then moved to Bignell's Corner with the opening of the Barnet Bypass. In 1986, the M25 opened and the road was shortened by 17 miles. That made the A38 and A30 roads longer and relegated the A6 down to fourth place.
It's a good job the A6 hasn't been renumbered further north than Luton, as the A6 number has gone down in UK
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
- ForestChav
- SABRE Developer
- Posts: 11126
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 00:00
- Location: Nottingham (Bronx of the Midlands)
- Contact:
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
That may be the case but I think trickstat was referring to the section which intersects that from the M1 to the airport. The present section of A1081 which was previously the A6 terminates on the dual carriageway, the western end of which was previously a motorway spur, before heading in to the airport and meeting the A505. I would have thought that the A6 would have carried straight on here and then either have been renumbered A1081 entirely into the middle of Luton or ending at the motorway spur when the M1 was built, which was presumably about the time the A5 and A6 became A5183 and A1081. The airport extension probably came much later.KeithW wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 09:15As I recall Harpenden to Kidney Wood was the A6 until it was truncated in the 1980's and renumbered A1081.
See
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... A6/history
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... itle=A1081
Never argue with an idiot. They will bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
From the SABRE Wiki: A6/history :
Page under construction'
At classification, the A6 was made Britain's second longest road and therefore England's longest. Its start was at Barnet at London and then moved to Bignell's Corner with the opening of the Barnet Bypass. In 1986, the M25 opened and the road was shortened by 17 miles. That made the A38 and A30 roads longer and relegated the A6 down to fourth place.
It's a good job the A6 hasn't been renumbered further north than Luton, as the A6 number has gone down in UK
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
A few points / clarifications :ForestChav wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 12:57That may be the case but I think trickstat was referring to the section which intersects that from the M1 to the airport. The present section of A1081 which was previously the A6 terminates on the dual carriageway, the western end of which was previously a motorway spur, before heading in to the airport and meeting the A505. I would have thought that the A6 would have carried straight on here and then either have been renumbered A1081 entirely into the middle of Luton or ending at the motorway spur when the M1 was built, which was presumably about the time the A5 and A6 became A5183 and A1081. The airport extension probably came much later.KeithW wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 09:15As I recall Harpenden to Kidney Wood was the A6 until it was truncated in the 1980's and renumbered A1081.
See
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... A6/history
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/ind ... itle=A1081
i) The renumberings of the A5 and A6 to A5183 and A1081 respectively occurred long after the opening of the M1 in the area, roughly 20 years later.
ii) I suspect the old A6 from (what was) J10A towards Luton town centre was declassified precisely to discourage traffic, with the powers that be preferring town centre traffic to use J11 / Hatters Way or A1081 / Gipsy Lane.
iii) Yes, Airport Way (A1081) was constructed roughly at the time of the A5183 / A1081 renumberings, initially mostly single carriageway. It has had numerous improvements since eg. the flyover at former J10A, full dualling right up to the airport, other junction improvements, and the bypass of the Vauxhall Way / Kimpton Road roundabout.
My view is that the Barnet to Luton, and the M1 J10 to Luton Airport sections of A1081 are fundamentally different in purpose, standard and compass orientation and should have different numbers.
From the SABRE Wiki: A6/history :
Page under construction'
At classification, the A6 was made Britain's second longest road and therefore England's longest. Its start was at Barnet at London and then moved to Bignell's Corner with the opening of the Barnet Bypass. In 1986, the M25 opened and the road was shortened by 17 miles. That made the A38 and A30 roads longer and relegated the A6 down to fourth place.
It's a good job the A6 hasn't been renumbered further north than Luton, as the A6 number has gone down in UK
- Vierwielen
- Member
- Posts: 5715
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 21:21
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
- Was92now625
- Member
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 00:29
- Location: near A625
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
I remember once (probably in the 90s), describing the route (from going north/eastbound on M56 to north/west-bound on M63 - now M60) and having to point out "don't be thrown by the 4-digit number".RichardA626 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 22:31 When I started using it on a regular basis I was surprised the Princess Parkway had A5103 for a number.
- Vierwielen
- Member
- Posts: 5715
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 21:21
- Location: Hampshire
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
This sort of thing van be overcome by having local area urban route markers. The numbers on such route markers would be unique within any one metropolitan area only (eg Greater Manchester).Was92now625 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 19:30I remember once (probably in the 90s), describing the route (from going north/eastbound on M56 to north/west-bound on M63 - now M60) and having to point out "don't be thrown by the 4-digit number".RichardA626 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 22:31 When I started using it on a regular basis I was surprised the Princess Parkway had A5103 for a number.
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
Well of course that is pretty much happens with C roads, the problem is of course that in England at least we keep changing the boundaries of metropolitan areas. The house in which I live has been in turn in the following areas in my lifetime.Vierwielen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 22:11 This sort of thing van be overcome by having local area urban route markers. The numbers on such route markers would be unique within any one metropolitan area only (eg Greater Manchester).
North Riding of Yorkshire
Cleveland County
County Borough of Teesside
Middlesbrough Borough Council
Then there are the contiguous roads that cross boundaries. The A1085 Trunk road which has never actually been trunk is partly in Redcar and Cleveland and the other part is in Middlesbrough.
Then we have the long established settlement of Nunthorpe which in the last round of changes was divided between Middlesbrough and Redcar and Cleveland despite having been recorded in the Domesday book in 1086. The boundary is the railway line here , which given that the area hosted the first railway in 1825 is rather fitting.
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.5278004 ... &entry=ttu
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
France does have some unnecessary four-digit N-and D-numbers (such as the former N6 over Mont Cenis), although I agree that there are far fewer than in Britain.Vierwielen wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 17:01 One of the reasons for the very long road numbers is that road numbers are not repeated anywhere in the UK, unlike in France where "D" roads numbers are unique within the relevant departement only and likewise "C" road numbers are unique only within the local commune. The downside to the French system of course is that a road number changes when you drive from one departement to another, though it appears that in many instances, departements have been workign with each other to retain the same number wither side of the boundary.
The situation here is not helped by the refusal to issue Bx and Bxx numbers (with the exception of the B77, of course!). Northern Ireland does have them, with the result that there are relatively few Bxxx and (AFAIK) no Bxxxx numbers there.
I don't really buy the argument that renumberings like A4074 and B4100 necessarily discourage people from using former Axx roads. Anybody who looks at a map and sees a motorway - or nowadays just follows a satnav - will avoid the old road by default.
And if there really is a fear that B41 might be mistaken for being a better road than the M40, what's the point in having A-, B- or M- prefixes, let alone signage in different colours?
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
The A5103 of course was originally just a local road that happened to have the M56 plug into it later. I've argued in the past that the A56 should've been rerouted down Princess Road (the old A56 west of Bowdon being renumbered as it serves no point) with the A556 being extended through to central Manchester. The A56 could then reappear at the west end of the M56 and take over that end of the A494 down to the A55 and voila, a single number for the approach to North Wales.Was92now625 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 19:30I remember once (probably in the 90s), describing the route (from going north/eastbound on M56 to north/west-bound on M63 - now M60) and having to point out "don't be thrown by the 4-digit number".RichardA626 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 22:31 When I started using it on a regular basis I was surprised the Princess Parkway had A5103 for a number.
Terminally cynical, unimpressed, and nearly Middle Age already.
She said life was like a motorway; dull, grey, and long.
Blog - https://showmeasign.online/
X - https://twitter.com/ShowMeASignBryn
YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/@BrynBuck
- RichardA626
- Member
- Posts: 7849
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 22:19
- Location: Stockport
- Contact:
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
Yes that would be a better use for the number, it's possible to see on Princess Road where it was widened to be a dual carriageway by pulling down a row of houses.Bryn666 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 28, 2023 11:04The A5103 of course was originally just a local road that happened to have the M56 plug into it later. I've argued in the past that the A56 should've been rerouted down Princess Road (the old A56 west of Bowdon being renumbered as it serves no point) with the A556 being extended through to central Manchester. The A56 could then reappear at the west end of the M56 and take over that end of the A494 down to the A55 and voila, a single number for the approach to North Wales.Was92now625 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 19:30I remember once (probably in the 90s), describing the route (from going north/eastbound on M56 to north/west-bound on M63 - now M60) and having to point out "don't be thrown by the 4-digit number".RichardA626 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 22:31 When I started using it on a regular basis I was surprised the Princess Parkway had A5103 for a number.
Re: Needlessly long road numbers
The A9119 came into being recently as a renumbering of the B9119. I’m sure a different number could have been picked, of course.rileyrob wrote: ↑Wed Dec 27, 2023 09:08 There is no need for any 4 digit A roads in Zones 7-9. A large number of those that exist now are the result of lazy renumbering, particularly in zones 7 & 9
A7066, A7071, A8082 and B9119 were all B roads with the same numbers, and the A9000 is the former A90.
The Cross Tay Link Road is to be numbered A9294, linking the A9 and the A94, but again, something shorter could surely have been picked!
http://www.owenrudge.net/
From the SABRE Wiki: A9119 :
The highest numbered A road in the UK, the A9119 is one of the main routes radiating out of Aberdeen.
The road begins on the B986 at the Woolmanhill Roundabout in front of the former Royal Infirmary the city centre. It heads south initially on Woolmanhill and then curves round to run west along Skene Street, the initial spell of grand facades quickly giving way to parkland and tower blocks. Skene Street becomes Carden Place, lined with elegant villas set back in gardens and