Star.pngStar.pngStar.pngStar.pngStar grey.png

Smart Motorway

From Roader's Digest: The SABRE Wiki
(Redirected from Managed Motorways)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Smart Motorway
M1, southbound - Geograph - 4730118.jpg
The Dynamic Hard Shoulder scheme on the M1
Cameraicon.png Pictures related to Smart Motorway
View gallery (33)
Quick Links
Ramp Metering • Motorway
Related Terms
Active Traffic Management • Managed Motorway


Smart Motorways (formerly known as Active Traffic Management (ATM) and Managed Motorways) are sections of motorway that use additional technology to improve traffic flow, sometimes alongside the use of the hard shoulder as a traffic lane to improve capacity.

Smart motorways are equipped with variable speed limits and, depending on the needs of each individual scheme, may also include hard shoulder running (the use of the hard shoulder as an additional lane) and ramp metering. Hard shoulder running can take two forms: Dynamic Hard Shoulder (DHS) or All Lane Running (ALR). Where additional capacity is required on the mainline through junctions, changes to junctions may take place to accommodate this (known as Through Junction Running or TJR). Motorways that use variable speed limits but that retain a full-time hard shoulder are referred to as Controlled Motorways (CM).

Electronic lane control signals and Variable Message Signs (VMS) play a major role on smart motorways, and smart motorways include the most advanced equipment on UK motorways. Emergency areas are provided to provide a place of relative safety when the hard shoulder is not available - these are akin to laybys, but may only be used in an emergency.

Key operational principles

The objective of smart motorways is to increase motorway capacity, and optimize the use of this capacity, without requiring lengthy and expensive carriageway widening. Technology-driven approaches are used to help manage traffic flow, and keep travelers updated with real-time traffic information.

Smart motorways are always equipped with variable mandatory speed limits, which are displayed in a red circle and are enforced by variable HADECS3 cameras. Traffic levels are continuously monitored, through loops in the road on older schemes, and through radar on newer schemes. Pan-tilt-zoom CCTV cameras are available too, allowing operators in the National Highways Regional Control Centres to monitor any part of the motorway.

Congestion management and queue protection

When traffic levels build up, variable speed limits are brought in automatically by the advanced queue protection systems. This can also be done manually by operators in the Regional Control Centres. Sometimes this by itself may be enough to prevent the onset of congestion, and can be supplemented by ramp metering where this is available. On dynamic hard shoulder schemes, the hard shoulder will remain closed in the first instance, though operators in the Regional Control Centre in charge of the scheme may prepare to open it if further congestion is predicted. Overhead VMS may encourage drivers to avoid changing lane:

Congestion stay in lane

If congestion is still building up, on DHS schemes, operators at the Regional Control Centre in charge of the scheme will be advised that extra capacity is needed. They will then prepare to activate the hard shoulder as a traffic lane. Before doing so, a careful sweep is made to ensure the lane is clear of broken-down vehicles or other obstructions, this is done using cameras that are placed at increased frequency along the hard shoulder. If the hard shoulder is clear, the red X above it will change to a speed limit to indicate that it is open to all traffic. Overhead MS4 VMS will display a verbal message to supplement this:

Use hard shoulder

If the cause of congestion is identified to be traffic backing up from the next junction, the hard shoulder can be designated as an extended slip road (as opposed to a general running lane), and overhead MS4 VMS will instruct traffic planning to exit to move into the hard shoulder. Where the junction concerned is an interchange between motorways, the MS4 VMS may show the number of the motorway instead of the junction number.

Use hard shoulder for [J11] only (at junctions with the local road network)

Use hard shoulder for [M5] only (at interchanges between motorways)

(note that the numbers in brackets would vary based on the specific location)

If an obstruction is detected, the sequence is aborted, the hard shoulder remains closed, and National Highways will deal with the obstruction (for example, providing assistance to a broken down vehicle).

On controlled and ALR motorways, the hard shoulder opening sequence does not apply, as the fourth lane is available at all times. The objective is that the fourth lane will minimize the formation of queues. Variable speed limits and the message "Congestion stay in lane" are then used if any further traffic management is necessary.

If queues continue to build up, variable speed limits are lowered from 60 mph to 50 and then to 40 (the lowest speed that can be set automatically) in conjunction with VMS showing "Queue ahead" and "Queue caution" text and symbols, to protect the back of a queue and minimize waves of stop-start traffic.

Incident management

During an incident, the smart motorway system can be used to show informational and warning messages, and set speed restrictions, lane closures, and, in extreme cases, closures of the entire motorway.

On ALR motorways, a lane is often kept closed far in advance of an incident in order to allow a clear path for emergency vehicles to access the site of the incident as quickly as possible, because there is no hard shoulder available to use for this purpose. DHS motorways usually keep the hard shoulder closed for incident access whenever an incident is reported.

If an incident requires the closure of a lane, the lane control sequence used is usually as follows:[1]

The "lane divert" symbol showing on an MS4 VMS on the southbound M1 at J42
  1. Approaching the closure, AMI lane control signals and/or MS4 VMS first slow traffic to 60 mph and warn road users of the upcoming closure.
  2. One or two gantries / VMS later, the lane(s) that are about to be closed show a "lane divert" signal, while a speed limit of 50 mph or lower applies to the open lanes.
    • Where AMI lane control signals are provided, the signals above the lanes being diverted show a white arrow pointing downwards to the left or right, which indicates the lane into which traffic must merge. The signals above open lanes show a speed limit of 50 mph or lower.
    • Where MS4 VMS are used on their own, a "lane control diagram" is shown, whereby open lanes are depicted as arrows pointing straight upwards, and lanes being diverted are depicted as arrows pointing upwards and to the left or right, towards the arrow depicting the open lane into which traffic must merge.
  3. Another one or two gantries / VMS later, the lane(s) that are closed finally show a "red X" signal, while a speed limit of 40 mph or lower applies to the open lanes. This "red X" symbol is actively enforced by HADECS3 cameras.
    • Where AMI lane control signals are provided, the signals above the closed lanes show a "red X" with red lights flashing from side to side to attract attention. The signals above open lanes show a speed limit of 40 mph or lower.
    • Where MS4 VMS are used on their own, a "lane control diagram" is shown, whereby open lanes are depicted as arrows pointing straight upwards, and closed lanes are depicted with a "red X". Red lights flash either side of the entire lane control diagram to attract attention.
  4. At the end of the closure, all lanes are reopened. Sometimes the limit is raised to national speed limit immediately, other times the increase in speed is carried out in stages as slow traffic dissipates.
    • Where AMI lane control signals are provided, a speed limit (or the "national speed limit" symbol) is shown over all lanes, to signify that all lanes have reopened.
    • Where MS4 VMS are used on their own, the "lane control diagram" disappears, and a speed limit (or the "national speed limit" symbol) is shown which applies to all lanes.

Where the entire carriageway of a motorway must be closed, this is normally done at a junction to prevent traffic from being trapped on the motorway. However, some incidents are so serious that this cannot be done and the road must be closed immediately for safety reasons.

  • Where the road is closed at a junction and traffic must leave the motorway at that junction, "red X" symbols are used far in advance of the junction, to close the outer lanes sequentially and thus gradually funnel traffic into the left-hand lane. At the junction diverge, the signals and/or VMS over the closed main carriageway show a red X over all lanes, with the words "STOP - Road closed".
  • Where an incident forces a carriageway to be suddenly closed between junctions, "red X" symbols are shown over all lanes, with the words "STOP - Road closed" and traffic will need to wait until authorities arrive to give further instructions. In these cases, the incident is often so serious that it renders all lanes impossible or extremely unsafe to pass (such as major pile-ups, large vehicle fires, and large spills of oil, chemicals, or other hazardous substances).

These lane closure sequences are not new to smart motorways - they have been standard protocol on all motorway stretches equipped with lane control signals (whether AMI or MS1) since MS1 lane control signals were first used in the 1970s. Originally, the "red X" symbol did not exist, and closed lanes were shown only with red flashing lights on the signal above that lane - the "red X" was added at some point in the 1980s to reinforce the message. Also, an inverted national speed limit symbol (box with diagonal line) was used to show the end of a speed limit or lane closure - this was changed to the word "End" in the 1980s, and this is still used today on conventional motorways.[2]

There is a very wide range of legends that can be used on VMS to deal with various incidents, and these are set out by the National Highways Policy on the use of Variable Signs and Signals.[3] However, many of these are rarely used.

Comparison to conventional motorways

Feature Smart motorways Conventional motorways
Number of lanes Normally four lanes, but sometimes three, and occasionally more than four (e.g. M25 and M4 near Heathrow Airport).

May also be supplemented by a dynamic hard shoulder.

Two, three, or four lanes - rarely more than four.

Most motorways that have been recently upgraded with four or more lanes have been equipped with smart technology.

Hard shoulder This depends on the type of smart motorway.
  • Controlled Motorway: permanent hard shoulder for emergency use only. May be discontinuous under bridges or over underpasses.
  • Dynamic Hard Shoulder: hard shoulder defaults to emergency use only, but can be opened as a traffic lane as and when extra capacity is required.
  • All Lane Running: mostly no hard shoulder. However, hard shoulders may still be provided on slip roads, through junctions which have not been equipped with through-junction running, or in other specific circumstances (e.g. where there was previously a discontinuous fourth climbing lane).
Permanent hard shoulder for emergency use only. May be discontinuous under bridges or over underpasses.
Emergency areas Where the hard shoulder is being temporarily used as, or has been permanently converted to a running lane, emergency areas are provided as a place of relative safety.

These were formerly known as emergency refuge areas. National Highways emphasizes that unlike lay-bys, these are for emergency use only.

They contain emergency roadside telephones, and drivers are required to use the telephone to alert National Highways of their presence and obtain safety advice before attempting to rejoin the carriageway.

Not needed due to the presence of a full-time hard shoulder, but very rarely, a few do exist.
Variable speed limits Always mandatory, and shown within a red circle on variable message signs.

Enforced using HADECS3 cameras mounted to the side of the gantries (previously HADECS2 cameras, a design based on the Gatso, mounted behind each AMI lane control signal).

Advisory speeds only - shown without a red circle (but sometimes with amber flashing lights) on variable message signs.

The national speed limit remains the legally enforced limit at all times.

Variable signs and signals This depends on the type of smart motorway.
  • Controlled motorway: gantries, each with AMI lane control signals and either a 2x12 EMS or MS4 message sign
  • Dynamic hard shoulder: gantries, each with AMI lane control signals and an MS4 message sign
  • All lane running: a single gantry with AMI lane control signals and an MS4 message sign is provided after each junction and periodically on long stretches between junctions. Apart from this, MS4 message signs are mounted individually in the verge, but these are capable of showing speed limits and lane control simultaneously, unlike their counterparts on conventional motorways.
This will often depend on how busy the stretch in question is - however there are some anomalies of motorways that have been over- or underspecified.
  • Quiet stretches of rural motorway may only have MS1 signals in the central reservation every two miles.
  • Rural stretches of more major motorways often have MS3 or MS4 signs mounted individually in the verge every mile, capable of providing advisory speed limits or lane closures alongside a message and, on MS4 signs, a warning legend.
  • On stretches with four or more lanes, when approaching major interchanges, in and around major cities, or which are otherwise very busy, lane control signals are fitted - see below.
Lane control Comprehensive lane control provided - either through AMI (Advanced Motorway Indicator) lane control signals, or using lane control diagrams on verge-mounted MS4 signs.

Lane diversions and closures always accompanied with mandatory reduced speed limit - to help ensure vehicles move through safely.

Lane closures using Red X legends - both on lane control gantries and verge mounted signs. These are mandatory, and enforced automatically by HADECS3 cameras.

Where variable mandatory speed limits and lane control restrictions no longer apply, this is shown using the national speed limit symbol.

Comprehensive lane control is not often provided.

Gantries with MS1 lane control signals (and in a few rare cases, AMIs) are usually only installed on stretches with four or more lanes, when approaching major interchanges, in and around major cities, or which are otherwise very busy.

Where lane control is provided, lane diversion and closure symbols are accompanied with advisory speed limits, but neither lane diversions nor

Lane closures using Red X legends are only provided in areas equipped with MS1 lane control. The Red X is mandatory, but unlike smart motorways, automatic enforcement cameras are not normally installed.

Where lane control gantries are not installed, "wicket" legends are used to warn of closed lanes on variable signs and signals. These do not have the same effectiveness as the Red X as they are only advisory, and cannot be accompanied by reduced speed limits.

Where advisory maximum speeds and/or lane control restrictions no longer apply, this is shown using the word "End".

History and development

Variable Speed Limits and Ramp Metering have been trialed as individual solutions before - the former first appearing on the M25's south-western quadrant in 1995 - but smart motorways generally involve the concurrent use of multiple traffic management measures, tailored to the needs of individual schemes. Motorways that use variable speed limits but that retain a permanent hard shoulder are nowadays known as Controlled Motorways (CM).

M42 Active Traffic Management pilot

The first smart motorway scheme was launched in 2006, on the M42 between junctions 3A and 7. The scheme, branded Active Traffic Management (ATM) at the time, involved Variable Speed Limits, Ramp Metering, and a Dynamic Hard Shoulder. Additional strategies, such as variable HOV/HGV lanes, peak-time overtaking bans, variable road markings, and more, were considered too, but were never implemented.[4] As the pilot scheme, the M42 was given bespoke new signage, indicating the start of active traffic management, and warning of variable speed limits ahead. This signage remains on the M42 today, though it cannot be seen elsewhere; all future schemes were equipped with simpler signage of a different design.

Emergency areas were situated next to the signal gantries, which were 500-800 meters apart, and the motorway was equipped with continuous street lighting,

Further rollout of Dynamic Hard Shoulder schemes

The M42 pilot scheme showed mainly positive results, and so plans to introduce similar technology to much of the English motorway network, now under the name Managed Motorways, were announced by the Department for Transport in early 2009, and shortly afterwards a scheme was introduced on the M6, also near Birmingham.

Over the next few years, until around 2012, most new smart motorways took a similar form. The M42 and M6 schemes were extended, and sections of the M1, M4, and M5 received variable speed limits and dynamic hard shoulders. However, these new schemes were slightly watered down to reduce costs. The number of emergency areas was reduced, with the spacing between them increased. The design of through-junction running was changed, with a permanent fourth lane between junction slip roads.

Meanwhile, some other motorways, that were already in the process of being fully widened to D4M standard, opened as controlled motorways with variable speed limits (retaining a full-time hard shoulder), and many full widening schemes that were still in the design stage were considered for conversion to managed motorways instead.

Introduction of All Lane Running schemes

In 2011-2012, design options were being worked up to provide extra capacity to the M25 between junctions 5 (M26) and 7 (M23), and between junctions 23 (A1(M)) and 27 (M11). Though standard procedure at the time was to install dynamic hard shoulders, it was recognized that on this stretch, the extra capacity was in such high demand that hard shoulder running would likely have been necessary for most or all of the day. As a result, a new configuration was created, known as All Lane Running (ALR), where the hard shoulder is permanently converted into a running lane, to avoid the need for excessive use of electronic signalling. ALR schemes still include variable speed limits and lane control, but there is no continuous hard shoulder at all, and the entire carriageway is open to live traffic.

Street lighting has been largely removed. Some schemes retain lighting around junctions and/or service areas (such as M1 J23a-25, where lighting has been retained on much of the southern section), while others have removed all lighting completely (such as M1 J28-J35A, where even the interchange with the M18 at J32 has no lighting at all, neither on the approach, nor on the slip roads themselves).

Public consultations were carried out, including exercises whereby drivers used a simulator to judge how they reacted to various situations that would arise on ALR motorways. Consultations were also carried out examining various legends and symbols that could be shown on VMS to advise of some of these situations.

Since 2013, ALR has been the preferred option for increasing motorway capacity, as it is much more economically viable than full widening of motorways to D4M standard. The widening of M25 J27-J30 cost about £16.2 million per mile in 2002 figures (equivalent to about £27.8 million per mile in February 2023). In contrast, the M42 J3A-J7 dynamic hard shoulder scheme cost about £9 million per mile in 2008 figures (equivalent to about £13.6 million per mile in February 2023).[5] The new design standards include using MS4 VMS mounted at the verge more frequently than overhead gantries, however signals over each lane will be provided at on-slips and periodically on a long stretch of All Lane Running motorway. The distance between the emergency areas was also extended to up to 2.5 km.[6][7]

Emergence of safety concerns

Rule 275 of the Highway Code defines a "place of relative safety" as anywhere a stranded vehicle can stop that is away from the live carriageway. Traditionally, this was always the continuous hard shoulder, but examples on smart motorways include emergency areas, exits from the motorway, service areas, and sometimes hard shoulders (Controlled Motorways retain a continuous hard shoulder, dynamic hard shoulders can be used as a place to stop when closed to traffic, and All Lane Running motorways sometimes retain hard shoulders on slip roads, through tunnels, or where there was a climbing lane before the conversion to ALR).[8]

In 2016, Parliament's Transport Committee concluded that "the All Lane Running design has been chosen on the basis of cost savings, and it is not acceptable for the Department to proceed with a less-safe design", recommending that the rollout of ALR be halted immediately, and that all future schemes be designed to the same specification as the M42 Active Traffic Management pilot, with a Dynamic Hard Shoulder and emergency areas every 500-800 meters.[5]

Landmark ALR incidents

In May 2018, 8-year-old Dev Naran and his grandfather stopped in the dynamic hard shoulder of the M6 in Birmingham while returning from a visit to Dev's critically ill brother in hospital. The hard shoulder was open to traffic, and the car was hit, killing Dev instantly. Since then, Dev's mother Meera has been an active campaigner for road safety and has called for essential reforms on smart motorways.

In June 2019, on a section of the M1 near Meadowhall, which had been converted to ALR, a collision occurred when a HGV hit Jason Mercer and Alexandru Murgeanu, who had stopped in lane 1 following a minor collision to exchange details. Both were killed, and Jason Mercer's widow Claire has since been actively campaigning to stop and reverse the rollout of smart motorways, including raising money for legal action.

Ms Naran and Ms Mercer have successfully attracted widespread public attention about the potentially serious safety concerns of motorways with no permanent hard shoulder. BBC's Panorama released an episode in January 2020 investigating the matter.

Smart motorway evidence stocktake and action plan

In October 2019, a review on the safety of smart motorways was ordered by then-Transport Secretary Grant Shapps[9][10]. The "evidence stocktake", as it was branded, was intended to gather data on the safety of smart motorways, and in turn suggest an action plan to improve this in the future. The findings and action plan were published in March 2020. Although fatality rates were measured to be lower on DHS and ALR motorways than those with full-time hard shoulders, serious injury rates were measured to be higher.

Actions proposed as part of the Action Plan include:

  • abolishing the Dynamic Hard Shoulder variant of smart motorways, citing the potential for driver confusion over whether the hard shoulder was available for traffic or not, with the long-term aim of converting these to ALR
  • ensuring stopped vehicle detection (SVD) is installed on all ALR motorways by the end of 2023 - this was completed ahead of schedule, by September 2022
  • increasing response times by National Highways traffic officers following a report of a breakdown
  • changing design standards such that "places of relative safety" on all new ALR motorways are a maximum of 1 mile apart, with an ideal average spacing of 0.75 miles.
  • constructing ten new emergency areas on the two M25 schemes (J5-7 and J23-27) and evaluating whether these reduce the number of breakdowns in live lanes
  • based on data from this trial, considering whether a national programme of retrofitting additional emergency areas on existing ALR motorways would be beneficial, where doing so would bring these motorways up to the new design standard of providing "places of relative safety" no more than a mile apart
  • conducting further investigation into four specific stretches of DHS/ALR motorway on the M6 and M1 where clusters of incidents have been reported (M6 J5-6, M1 J10-13, M1 J30-35, M1 J39-42)
  • making emergency areas more visible. This has already been done using orange surfacing, but will now include additional diagrammatic signage, with spacing close enough such that drivers will almost always be in view of a sign showing the distance to the next emergency area.
  • investing a further £5 million on public information campaigns regarding smart motorways
  • automatically displaying "report of obstruction" messages where SVD has identified a stopped vehicle
  • considering how places of relative safety can be highlighted on GPS navigation services
  • making it easier to call for help in an emergency, including promoting the "eCall" feature built into vehicles
  • automatic enforcement of "red X" signals using cameras (this is now in place)

Parliamentary review on smart motorway safety and subsequent suspension of ALR rollout

In January 2022, the Parliamentary Transport Committee, who were conducting their own investigation into the rollout and safety of smart motorways, published their final report.[11]

This included several recommendations to the Department for Transport and National Highways to urgently improve the safety of smart motorways:

  • to ensure that the introduction of changes to the design and operation of the Strategic Road Network are subject to a formal health and safety assessment by the Office of Rail and Road (ORR)
  • to retrofit emergency areas to existing ALR motorways to bring these up to the new design standard, whereby "places of relative safety" are a maximum of 1 mile apart, with a spacing of 0.75 miles where physically possible
  • to commission the ORR to conduct an independent evaluation of the effectiveness and operation of SVD technology, including maintenance and monitoring
  • to insert the "emergency corridor" manoeuvre into the Highway Code to help emergency services and traffic patrol officers to access incidents when traffic is congested.
    • This manoeuvre is used widely in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, where it is a legal requirement and is referred to there as the Rettungsgasse (rescue lane) in German. ASFiNAG, the agency who manage Austria's autobahns, use the slogan "Deine Lebensrettungsgasse" ("Your lifesaving rescue lane").[12]
    • In these countries, which drive on the right, the manoeuvre involves vehicles in the leftmost lane (closest to the central reservation) pulling as far as possible to the left when forming a queue, and vehicles in all other lanes pulling as far as possible to the right.
    • Where vehicles obstruct the emergency corridor and block the access of an emergency vehicle to an incident, the emergency vehicles being obstructed have issued on-the-spot fines to drivers obstructing their path.
    • Where a hard shoulder exists, rules vary as to whether it should be used. In Austria, drivers in the rightmost lane are expected to pull into the hard shoulder (as there may already be stationary vehicles here which would hinder incident access) but Germany's rules require the hard shoulder to be kept free, unless there is not enough physical space to form an emergency corridor without using it.
    • In the context of UK motorways, where traffic drives on the left, the manoeuvre is likely to be reversed, with traffic in the rightmost lane pulling as far as possible to the right and all other lanes pulling to the left. It remains to be determined whether the manoeuvre will be encouraged on motorways with a hard shoulder, and if so, whether the hard shoulder should be used by queueing traffic or not. National Highways is working with the AA to determine how the manoeuvre can be implemented in the UK.
  • to task the ORR with evaluating how successful the 2020 action plan has been in:
    • a) reducing incidences of live lane breakdowns on all-lane running motorways;
    • b) reducing the time for which people who breakdown or stop in a live lane are at risk; and
    • c) educating drivers on what to do if they break down in a live lane
  • to pause the rollout of ALR motorways until:
    • five years of safety and economic data is available for the remaining 112 miles of ALR motorway introduced before 2020. This effectively ensures no ALR motorways will enter construction until 2025 at the earliest;
    • all the measures proposed in the 2020 action plan have been implemented and independently evaluated on all existing ALR motorways; and
    • alternative options for enhancing capacity on the Strategic Road Network have been considered
  • to pause plans to convert DHS motorways to ALR until the next Road Investment Strategy and instead trial alternative ways in which to operate the dynamic hard shoulder to reduce confusion
  • to revisit the case for controlled motorways and consider how the business case for controlled motorways compares with that for all-lane running motorways

The decision to suspend the rollout of ALR until at least 2025 was considered a landmark decision by safety campaigners. Ms Naran and Ms Mercer both welcomed the decision, but Ms Mercer reiterated her wish for ALR to be permanently abolished, and for a permanent hard shoulder to be reinstated where it has been removed. Some ALR schemes were already under construction at the time the report was published (such as the M4 J3-J12); the construction of these schemes was allowed to continue to completion.

Future

The future of Smart Motorways looks bleak, at least in their current form. In the 2022 Conservative leadership contest between Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss, Sunak committed to halting the rollout of smart motorways[13]. Following Ms Truss's brief stint in office and Rishi Sunak's takeover thereafter, there is some speculation within the industry that he will follow through with this commitment, and thus that the rollout of ALR in its current form will not resume, even after 2025. The RAC called for hard shoulders to be reinstated, either by reintroducing DHS or by reducing capacity back to 3 lanes.[14]

List of schemes

Current Smart Motorways

Key: DHS: Dynamic Hard Shoulders, ALR: All Lane Running, VSL: Variable Speed Limits, MTR: Ramp Metering, TJR: Through Junction Running

Image Road Junctions Elements Installed Notes
M1 widening J9 - Coppermine - 18695.jpg Chopsticks icon.png M1 6A - 10 VSL Equipment already installed in 2008 widening.
M1, southbound - Geograph - 4730118.jpg Chopsticks icon.png M1 10 - 13 DHS, VSL December 2012 ALR between Toddington services and J12. Conversion to ALR indefinitely postponed.
Chopsticks icon.png M1 16 - 19 ALR, VSL February 2018
Chopsticks icon.png M1 23a - 24 VSL February 2019 In conjunction with J24 - J25 ALR scheme - this section is a Controlled Motorway and retains the permanent hard shoulder
Chopsticks icon.png M1 24 - 25 ALR, VSL February 2019 In conjunction with J23a - J24 Controlled Motorway scheme - this section is ALR.
Chopsticks icon.png M1 25 - 28 VSL May 2010 This section was not originally planned to open as a Controlled Motorway following widening - the reduced speed limit during widening works was observed to have an unexpected benefit to traffic flow, which prompted the introduction of VSL to retain this capability when needed.
Chopsticks icon.png M1 28 - 31 ALR, VSL March 2016
Chopsticks icon.png M1 31 - 32 VSL March 2016 Approaching the interchange with the M18, there were already four lanes - this short stretch retained the hard shoulder as a Controlled Motorway.
Chopsticks icon.png M1 32 - 35A ALR, VSL J34 - 35A opened to traffic in December 2016, J32 - J34 opened in Spring 2017.
Lane drop through J34 complex.
The Tinsley viaduct is located between the off- and on-slips of Junction 34 - four lanes reduce to three on the viaduct, with a hard shoulder retained.
Chopsticks icon.png M1 39 - 42 ALR, VSL December 2015
Chopsticks icon.png M3 2 - 4A ALR, VSL July 2017
Chopsticks icon.png M4 19 - 20 DHS, VSL Spring 2014 In conjunction with M5 J15 - 17
Chopsticks icon.png M5 4A - 6 ALR, VSL June 2017
Chopsticks icon.png M5 15 - 17 DHS, VSL Spring 2014 In conjunction with M4 J19 - 20
Chopsticks icon.png M6 2 - 4 ALR, VSL March 2020
Chopsticks icon.png M6 4 - 5 DHS, VSL, MTR, TJR (J4A west only) November 2009
Chopsticks icon.png M6 5 - 8 DHS, VSL, TJR Spring 2013 Strengthening of the hard shoulder took place between September 2009 and March 2010.
M6 ATM- Geograph - 1680317.jpg Chopsticks icon.png M6 8 - 10A DHS, VSL, MTR
Chopsticks icon.png M6 10A - 11A VSL February 2016
Chopsticks icon.png M6 11A - 13 ALR, VSL February 2016
Chopsticks icon.png M6 16 - 19 ALR, VSL March 2019 Partially replaced earlier M6 J13 - J19 scheme, withdrawn in 2014.
Chopsticks icon.png M20 3 - 5 ALR, VSL May 2020 VSL already existed between J4 and J5 - this was retained as part of the new scheme.
Chopsticks icon.png M20 5 - 7 VSL
Chopsticks icon.png M23 8 - 10 ALR, VSL Summer 2020
Chopsticks icon.png M23 Spur 9 - 9A ALR (Westbound only) Winter 2019 The westbound carriageway towards the airport was widened to 3 lanes with no hard shoulder, with a fixed 50 mph speed limit.
The eastbound carriageway towards the M23 was retained as 2 lanes with a hard shoulder, with the national speed limit in place.
Chopsticks icon.png M25 2 - 3 VSL
Chopsticks icon.png M25 5 - 7 ALR, VSL Spring 2014 One of the two pilot schemes for ALR.
Chopsticks icon.png M25 7 - 10 VSL
Chopsticks icon.png M25 10 - 16 VSL Spring 1995 This was the original pilot of VSL on the M25.
Chopsticks icon.png M25 16 - 23 VSL
Chopsticks icon.png M25 23 - 27 ALR, VSL J23 - J25 opened April 2014, J25 - J27 opened November 2014 One of the two pilot schemes for ALR.
Chopsticks icon.png M25 27 - 30 VSL
M42 Motorway North or West at Junction 3a - Geograph - 1283022.jpg Chopsticks icon.png M40 16 - (M42) 3A VSL (Westbound only) 2009
Chopsticks icon.png M42 3 - 3A VSL (Eastbound only) 2009
M42 TJR VMS.JPG Chopsticks icon.png M42 3A - 7 DHS, VSL, MTR, TJR (J5 south only) September 2006 The original pilot installation, publicly branded as "Active Traffic Management"
Chopsticks icon.png M42 7 - 9 VSL 2009
Chopsticks icon.png M60 8 - 18 ALR, VSL J8 - J10 opened March 2018, J10 - J18 opened August 2018. Part of the North West Smart Motorways scheme. Parts of the motorway were not converted to ALR and the hard shoulder was retained as a Controlled Motorway
Chopsticks icon.png M62 10 - 12 ALR, VSL January 2021
Chopsticks icon.png M62 18 - 20 ALR, VSL March 2018 Part of the North West Smart Motorways scheme
Chopsticks icon.png M62 25 - 26 ALR, VSL September 2013
Chopsticks icon.png M62 26 - 30 DHS, VSL September 2013
Chopsticks icon.png M1 13 - 16 ALR, VSL June 2018 Early 2022
Chopsticks icon.png M4 3 - 12 ALR, VSL, TJR March 2017 December 2022 M4 J3 - J12 is currently believed to be the longest single ALR scheme in the UK, over 30 miles long!
M27 smart motorway construction.jpg Chopsticks icon.png M27 4 - 11 ALR, VSL January 2019 June 2022 Was cut short from its planned length of J3-J12, for reasons that were never entirely clear. National Highways

Future planned deployment

(Note these schemes have all been paused until at least 2025, and are unlikely to proceed in their current form thereafter.)

Image Road Junctions Elements Expected Start Expected Completion Notes Link
A1(M) 6 - 8 ALR
M1 10 - 13 ALR TBC TBC Conversion of current DHS motorway to ALR
M3 9 - 14 ALR, VSL January 2020
M6 4 - 5 ALR TBC TBC Conversion of current DHS motorway to ALR
M6 6 - 8 ALR TBC TBC Conversion of current DHS motorway to ALR
M6 8 - 10a ALR TBC TBC Conversion of current DHS motorway to ALR
M6 15 - 15 ALR, VSL Work began March 2018 Strengthening of the hard shoulder took place Between September 2009 and March 2010
Partially replaced earlier M6 J13-J19 scheme, withdrawn in 2014
M6 21a - 26 ALR, VSL March 2021 Was due to start Early 2019

References

  1. Highways, National (2021-11-12). "Red X - National Highways". nationalhighways.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  2. "motorway signals.LONG. 1983." youtube.com. www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5FWOPU_psg. Retrieved 2023-04-12
  3. National Highways (22 July 2020). "Policy for using variable signs and signals (VSS)" (PDF). gov.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  4. Rees, T (April 2002). "Assessment Strategy for the Active Traffic Management Pilot" (PDF). Standards for Highways. Retrieved March 9, 2021.
  5. Jump up to: a b "House of Commons - All lane running - Transport Committee". UK Parliament. 15 June 2016. Archived from the original on 26 October 2016. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
  6. "What is a smart motorway? Your questions answered | The AA". www.theaa.com. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  7. "Inflation calculator". www.bankofengland.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-04-12.
  8. "The Highway Code - Breakdowns and incidents (275 to 287) - Guidance - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  9. "Smart motorways to be reviewed over driver safety fears". BBC News. 2019-10-24. Retrieved 2021-03-07.
  10. "Smart motorway safety evidence stocktake and action plan" (PDF). gov.uk. 12 March 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
  11. House of Commons Transport Committee (12 January 2022). "Rollout and safety of smart motorways: Government Response to the Committee's Third Report" (PDF). Committees - UK Parliament. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 December 2022. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  12. "Rettungsgasse". www.asfinag.at (in German). Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  13. Martin, Daniel; Turner, Camilla (2022-08-19). "No more smart motorways, vows Rishi Sunak". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 2023-04-13.
  14. "Is this the end for smart motorways in the UK? | RAC Drive". www.rac.co.uk. Retrieved 2023-04-13.




Smart Motorway
Related Pictures
View gallery (33)
- Coppermine - 4196.JPG- Coppermine - 3966.JPG- Coppermine - 3960.JPGM62 ATM Gantry.jpgM62 all-lane running west.jpg
Road Basics
Physical layoutSingle track • Single carriageway • Dual carriageway • High Quality Dual Carriageway • Road Widths • Urban Streets • Abandoned Road
Legal typesAll-purpose Road • Special Road • Motorway • Trunk road • Principal road • Classified Numbered road • Classified Unnumbered Road • Unclassified road • Primary Route • Non Primary Route • Right of Way • Unadopted road
Road numbers1922 Road Lists • Classification • Defunct road • Euroroutes • MoT Maps • National Cycle Network • Numbering principles • Numbering anomalies • Disputed Numbers • Recycled number • Unallocated numbers • Fictional Road Numbers • Junction numbers • Essential Traffic Routes • Street Names
Road FeaturesArterial Road • Automatic Bollard • Balancing Pond • Belisha Beacon • Bott's Dots • Bypass • Cannon • Cats' Eyes • Cattle Grid • CD Lanes • Central Reservation • Chopsticks • Crash Barrier • Cuttings and Embankments • Cycle Lane • Emergency Phone • Escape lane • Expressway • Fingerpost • Flare • Ford • Gore • Green Bridge • Green Wave • Hairpin bend • Hard shoulder • Island • Junction • Layby • Level Crossing • Local Access Road • Managed Motorways • Milestone • Multi Lane Drop • Multiplex • No-Car Lane • Nose • Oxbow Road • Parapet • Petrol station • Play Street • Raised Pavement Markers • Ramp Metering • Retaining Wall • Road Studs • Roadside Art • Roadside Quarry • Roadworks • Secret motorway • Service Area • Signage • Smart Motorway • Snow pole • Speed Limit • Spur • Street Lighting • Surface Dressing • Temporary terminus • Throughpass • Tidal Flow • Tiger tail • Toll booth • Traffic cone • Traffic Signals • Tunnel • Vehicle Recovery • Walking and Cycling Friendly Road • Weaving • Wig-Wag Signals • Winter Maintenance • Zip merge
Traffic CalmingBuild-Outs • Chicane • Dragon's Teeth • Home Zone • Low Traffic Neighbourhood • Pinch Point • Quiet Lane • Rumble strips • Safety Cameras • Sleeping Policeman • Speed bump
Public Transport FeaturesBus Lane • Bus stop • Guided Busway • Park and Ride • Tramway • Trolleybus System
Other termsAnderson report • Guildford Rules • Highway Authority • Highway Code • Model Traffic Area • Motorway alphabet • Pre-Worboys • Primary Destinations • Roads by 10 • Transport alphabet • Worboys report
AcronymsAADT • ADS • ANPR • ATM • DfT • GSJ • HA • HATO • HE • HETO • HQDC • LAR • LILO • LTN • MOVA • NCN • NMU • NRA • PBU • POPE • PTS • PFI • RCS • SABRE • SCOOT • SSD • SON • SOX • SRN • TEN-T • TERN • TfL • TII • TOTSO • TRO • TSM • TSRGD • UTC • VAS • VMS • VSL


  1. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  2. Template:Citation
  3. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  4. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  5. 5.0 5.1 {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  6. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  7. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  8. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  9. Template:Cite news
  10. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  11. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  12. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}
  13. Template:Cite news
  14. {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}

SABRE - The Society for All British and Irish Road Enthusiasts
Discuss - Digest - Discover - Help